What's new

China Leads Race to the Moon

Raphael

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 1, 2012
Messages
3,287
Reaction score
5
Country
China
Location
China
China Leads Race to the Moon | The Diplomat

In October 2014, China’s Chang’e 5-T1 lunar probe, known as Xiaofei or Little Flyer, successfully completed an orbit around the Moon. This was the first time that a trip around the Moon and back of this sort had been made since the USA and Russian trips in the 1970s. The Little flyer is a precursor to Chang’e 5 which will bring back lunar soil (regolith) containing the nuclear fuel helium-3 that can be used for baseload energy production and the next generation of nuclear weapons.

The Little Flyer mission lasted eight days and its primary objective was to conduct atmospheric re-entry tests on the Chang’e 5 capsule design which will be launched by 2017. The destination on the lunar surface for Chang’e 5, like that of the Yutu Jade Rabbit rover, is the Mare Imbrium also known as the Sea of Rains, one of the vast lunar crater seas visible from Earth and a known repository of high concentrations of helium-3. This now puts China strongly in the lead in the secret space race between states to secure helium-3, which has one of the highest known energy return on investment ratios while also being a fourth-generation nuclear weapons fuel.

In the words of former president of India Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam, “The Moon contains 10 times more energy in the form of helium-3 than all the fossil fuels on the earth.”

To put this into perspective one ton of helium-3 can produce 10,000 megawatt years of electricity. This is enough energy to power 80 percent of Tokyo’s energy needs for a whole year, or a city of 7.3 million people like Hong Kong, Hyderabad or Singapore. This much energy is comparable to 315 petajoules released in a nuclear weapon explosion.

Compare this to the largest nuclear weapon explosion on record, the 1962 test of the Russia Tsar Bomba, which released 210-240 petajoules. The bomb had a 50-58 megaton destructive capacity, equivalent to 1,350 times the combined power of the bombs that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki and ten times the combined power of all the conventional explosives used in World War II. The detonation left behind a zone of total destruction with a radius of 35 km and produced a mushroom cloud 64 km high. The explosion was so powerful that it registered 8.1 on the Richter scale, shattering windows more than 900 km away and sending seismic shockwaves around the Earth three times. It was the largest ever nuclear explosion.

One ton of helium-3 has the potential to produce 1.5 times more destructive power than the Tsar Bomba. In other words, the potential to make a nuclear weapon with a 75 megaton yield.

Fusion is often criticized as being always thirty years away, unworkable, or not possible. In fact, fusion is a very real and workable technology and has been with us since the Ivy Mike hydrogen bomb detonation in 1952. The internal dynamic of a thermonuclear explosion is fusion. Man-made fusion is an essential process of the chain reactions of all thermonuclear weapons held by states today and of course every star in the universe works from fusion.

The energy released by the Tsar Bomba was 97 percent derived from fusion so it produced very little radioactive fallout and was considered the cleanest nuclear explosion.

Thermonuclear weapons use deuterium and tritium, which just happens to be the fuel used by the ITER fusion energy production experiment in France, the harmful radiation from which is twice as damaging to human health as a standard nuclear fission reactor. Helium-3 exists on Earth principally as a by-product of tritium nuclear warhead decay from the U.S. and Russian nuclear stockpiles, totalling around 600 kg, with another 100 kg found in nature. However, vast quantities of Helium-3 exist up to six meters deep in the lunar soil.

When fused with itself, helium-3 is attractive as a nuclear fuel for energy generation because it does not emit harmful radioactive neutrons. A 1,000 MW nuclear power station using only helium-3 as a fuel would produce no radiation. Likewise, pure helium-3 fourth-generation nuclear weapons would produce minimal or no radioactive fallout thus challenging the taboo on the use of nuclear weapons and their status as unconventional weapons.

Helium-3 weapons are more likely to be tactical in nature, small enough to be used in battlefields, allowing for armies to occupy a territory soon after detonation without concern for high levels of radiation. However, governments willing to forego the energy generation value of a ton of helium-3 could build a Brahmastra-style strategic weapon with a yield larger than the Tsar Bomba.

With no radioactive fallout a helium-3 nuclear missile could be suitable for destroying asteroids. In 2013, NASA estimated there was more than 1,400 potentially hazardous asteroids threatening Earth.

Much has been written about the value of helium-3 for non-radiation producing energy production and states around the world are quietly positioning themselves to secure it from the Moon. In fact, most national space programs citing Mars as the primary objective conveniently include the Moon as a stepping stone, including NASA’s Space Launch System with its 130 tons payload capacity, which will be the biggest heavy lift rocket ever built. If one state secures helium-3 exclusively, then it will become the new global hegemon.

China is very close to a breakthrough in energy production from helium-3 and the goals of its space program inspired by the visionary Professor Ouyang Ziyuan are closely, if not directly, related to securing helium-3 as a geostrategic national priority. Several other stakeholders are also working on duel use applications of helium-3 and other fusion fuels.

It is widely considered by governments that the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty and the Non Proliferation Treaty do not ban confinement fusion research, largely because at the time of the treaty negotiations the size of the machines required for fusion research could not possibly fit inside deployable nuclear missiles. With helium-3, weapons would be much easier to build in secret as they would be invisible to radiation sensing equipment such as the neutron detectors installed in ports around the world.

Deuterium and tritium are the standard fuels used for fusion energy research around the world as well as being the standard primary fuels in thermonuclear weapons.

In October 2014, Lockheed Martin Skunkworks announced that is is working on Magnetic Confinement Fusion in compact fusion reactors for “jet engine sized” propulsion for spacecraft. In 2011, a sustained fusion reaction of pure helium-3 was achieved in the United States, in an inertial electrostatic confinement device the size of a basketball.

Governments should now consider the implications of all of this research for the creation of fourth-generation nuclear weapons, as research into fusion shares the same principles as that for fusion weapons.

Magnetic Confinement Fusion research being done at the HT-7 Tokamak facility in the city of Hefei, China, the KSTAR National Fusion Research Institute in Daejon, South Korea, and the Z Pinch Machine at Sandia National Laboratories in the United States, as well as inertial confinement fusion research with lasers, such as those at the National Ignition Facility in the USA, the Laser Mégajoule in France, or the planned ISKRA-6 at the Russian Federal Nuclear Center, all have the potential for weapons research. So do particle beam accelerators, such as those used by CERN in the EU and KEK in Japan.

When fused with deuterium, helium-3 can produce 18.4 MeV of energy, a scale of energy familiar to scientists working with particle accelerators. Helium-3 fused with deuterium offers the potential for spaceships powered by fusion propulsion to reach Mars in fewer than 100 days, Jupiter or the Sun in only 200 days, and Titan in three to four years. Helium-3 with deuterium propulsion could also enable interstellar travel, with the nearest star accessible in less than 100 years.

To extract helium-3 is a relatively simple surface mining operation that would require sifting through the lunar soil up to six meters deep and then heating it to separate out the helium-3 gas. The technology to extract, compress and return it to Earth already exists in the mining, gas and space industries and the nuclear industry has the capability to build the power stations.

China’s Chang’e 5 rover will build on the work of the Chang’e 3 Yutu rover and will be equipped with a lunar mineral spectrometer and lunar soil gas analytical instruments, in addition to a drilling rig. The rover will drill two meters deep into the lunar surface with the aim of returning two kilograms of lunar soil samples to Earth to analyze concentrations of helium-3. This will be the shot across the bow for the rest of the world.

Helium-3 is the most valuable resource on the Moon. The other known lunar resources include titanium, nickel, the platinum group of metals, aluminum, silicon, uranium, thorium, phosphorous, diamonds, water, and rare earth elements. All of these have been mapped and analyzed by China, India, Japan, and the U.S. over recent years.

The energy potential from helium-3 is significant enough for all major spacefaring nations to be racing to secure it from the lunar surface, no doubt leading to a new rush to claim territory and strip mine sections of the Moon in the style of the “Scramble for Africa.” Some have called for a legal regime for the sharing of lunar resources, which according to the 1967 Outer Space Treaty are the “common heritage of all mankind.” But this might discourage the investment needed to develop these resources. It may be more appropriate that the ancient laws of salvage and the Lockean proviso of performing work on these extraterrestrial resources apply provided that, “… there is enough, and as good, left in common for others.” Meaning that the moved resources may be fairly owned and traded, but lunar territory must remain common land.

It was not science or an endeavor to aid the common heritage of mankind that led to the initial establishment of trade routes and settlements across the world. It was the human desire for profit and prosperity. The same motivation will drive prospecting for helium-3 and the other resources on the Moon, asteroids and beyond. So, “Drill, baby, drill!”
 
. . .
An interesting article, I saw it too, but on the TheDiplomat instead (their coverage and analysis is hit-or-miss and this article was one of the worst I have seen), but thought it was too full of inaccuracies to muster the necessity to comment there.

I wonder why, whenever an article is talking about nuclear fusion, do they never mention the "Lawson Criteria"? It's a very important concept in fusion power generation. Perhaps the casual reader just doesn't have the necessary capacity or attention span to understand?

Lawson Criteria for Nuclear Fusion

Magnetic Nuclear Fusion

Conditions for Fusion

Helium-3 serves no purpose at this point, and even in the future it's still limited. Fusion hasn't even produced enough net energy to be viable as an energy provider and yet we are already talking about 2.5/3rd generation fuels? It seems a bit premature. That, and Helium-3 is hardly the only fuel that can be used for nuclear fusion, so creating a monopoly isn't going to be a thing since alternative fuels render the monopoly ineffective, Deuterium is the current standard. An interesting article, but we have decades more work before fusion becomes a reality, only in 2014 did we see a slight net output... a slight output, not the massive numbers needed to see it become a reality for energy production.

NIF_wide-363b27a25b03804d468852d491e240a7f36ad055-s800-c85.jpg


Scientists Say Their Giant Laser Has Produced Nuclear Fusion : The Two-Way : NPR

The mention of stronger nukes is interesting, but those in existence are already enough to eliminate the human presence on Earth, so are stronger ones really going to be a game-changer? Of course not!

Also, the US is still in the game. SpaceX, NASA, and other US companies as well as international partners and competitors will ensure China never truly has a lead... it will share one.
 
Last edited:
. .
An interesting article, I saw it too, but on the TheDiplomat instead (their coverage and analysis is hit-or-miss and this article was one of the worst I have seen), but thought it was too full of inaccuracies to muster the necessity to comment there.

I wonder why, whenever an article is talking about nuclear fusion, do they never mention the "Lawson Criteria"? Perhaps the casual reader just doesn't have the necessary capacity or attention span to understand?

Lawson Criteria for Nuclear Fusion

Magnetic Nuclear Fusion

Conditions for Fusion

Helium-3 serves no purpose at this point, and even in the future it's still limited. Fusion hasn't even produced enough net energy to be viable as an energy provider and yet we are already talking about 2.5/3rd generation fuels? It seems a bit premature. That, and Helium-3 is hardly the only fuel that can be used for nuclear fusion, so creating a monopoly isn't going to be a thing since alternative fuels render the monopoly ineffective, Deuterium is the current standard. An interesting article, but we have decades more work before fusion becomes a reality, only in 2014 did we see a slight net output... a slight output, not the massive numbers needed to see it become a reality for energy production.

View attachment 182185

Scientists Say Their Giant Laser Has Produced Nuclear Fusion : The Two-Way : NPR

The mention of stronger nukes is interesting, but those in existence are already enough to eliminate the human presence on Earth, so are stronger ones really going to be a game-change? Of course not!

Also, the US is still in the game. SpaceX, NASA, and other US companies as well as international partners and competitors will ensure China never truly has a lead... it will share one.
Thanks @SvenSvensonov for putting some scientific sanity back into the thread.
If I remember correctly only the Lawrence Livermore National Lab is seriously trying nuclear fusion using laser bombardment of deuterium-tritium alloy pellets. China has some very good photonics schools, but the non-linear optics problems are still considerable, and solving some of them will fetch you a Nobel. For example, we still don't have a proper medium for lasing sub-100 nm frequencies, nor do we have sustainable high harmonic generation. If somebody would have solved them, trust me, people would have known.
So when somebody talks about third generation fusion, they simply don't know what they are talking about.
 
.
the race was won in 69'
Indeed, I watched the Apollo 11 lunar landing on television at the time. I was 10 and I can remember it very clearly. The Communist Chinese are some decades too late in this race.
 
.
wow, i really hope china does land on the moon. Not that im supporting their team in the space race, i hope they find a way to either prove or disprove that america landed on the moon in the 60's.
i do believe that usa landed on the moon first at that time, but hey - it would be interesting if proved otherwise. what would it mean ? lols
 
.
wow, i really hope china does land on the moon. Not that im supporting their team in the space race, i hope they find a way to either prove or disprove that america landed on the moon in the 60's.
i do believe that usa landed on the moon first at that time, but hey - it would be interesting if proved otherwise. what would it mean ? lols

I suppose if being disappointed is your thing, more power to you, but...

Another Great Way to Prove Moon Hoax Conspiracy Theorists Wrong

Why the moon landings could have never EVER been faked

New Moon Landing Sites Photos Are So Sharp They Show Detailed Rover Tire Marks

New Simulation Offers Definitive Proof the Moon Landing Was Not Fake

Also, both the Soviet (now Russian) and Chinese space programs acknowledge the US has been there. We've been there, six times, and I welcome the Chinese going too.

I'm really saddened by the need to create this post knowing there are those on PDF who subscribe to the conspiracy theories. I have so little faith in humanity anymore. But I'm glad to see that you aren't among the morons... also welcome to the forum!!!
 
Last edited:
.
I suppose if being disappointed is your thing, more power to you, but...

Another Great Way to Prove Moon Hoax Conspiracy Theorists Wrong

Why the moon landings could have never EVER been faked

New Moon Landing Sites Photos Are So Sharp They Show Detailed Rover Tire Marks

New Simulation Offers Definitive Proof the Moon Landing Was Not Fake

Also, both the Soviet (now Russian) and Chinese space programs acknowledge the US has been there. We've been there, six times, and I welcome the Chinese going too.

I'm really saddened by the need to create this post knowing there are those on PDF who subscribe to the conspiracy theories. I have so little faith in humanity anymore. But I'm glad to see that you aren't among the morons... also welcome to the forum!!!
Hey mate, one genuine query. As we all are aware, US is way ahead of other countries when it comes to space science. But still there are things which other countries have achieved like my country has found water on moon and we also reached MARS in our first attempt. While whatever we learnt during moon mission(including premature failure of not completing full time frame & parameters), has been applied in mars mission which will live longer than what was our time frame in radioactive space. Although it is pretty miniscule when compared to US achievement but still good enough for our youth encouragement. What exactly types of missions which US has missed and will be target for newcomers like Japanese Chinese and Indian space agencies. I am not in favor of manned mission for next ten years to say the least due to sheer risk to scientists life. Thank you.
 
.
Hey mate, one genuine query. As we all are aware, US is way ahead of other countries when it comes to space science. But still there are things which other countries have achieved like my country has found water on moon and we also reached MARS in our first attempt. While whatever we learnt during moon mission(including premature failure of not completing full time frame & parameters), has been applied in mars mission which will live longer than what was our time frame in radioactive space. Although it is pretty miniscule when compared to US achievement but still good enough for our youth encouragement. What exactly types of missions which US has missed and will be target for newcomers like Japanese Chinese and Indian space agencies. I am not in favor of manned mission for next ten years to say the least due to sheer risk to scientists life. Thank you.

To date there haven't been any notable US failures on the moon, but there is still a lot to be done by an aspiring and motivated nation. For all the talk about mining resources or setting up moon bases, one key ingredient is missing: water.

NASA is studying how to mine lunar water, but any other nation could beat us to it:

NASA Is Studying How to Mine the Moon for Water

Of course there is also the problem of generating oxygen. This article pertains mostly to Mars, but the same concepts can apply to the moon as well.

Oxygen-Generating Mars Rover to Bring Colonization Closer

We still don't have a good grasp on the origins of the moon, even with Lunar samples brought back to Earth more studies need to be done on the Lunar make-up and composition.

We've hardly explored "the dark side" either. Much of our best data comes from the Russian Luna and American Apollo missions. These missions happened a long time ago. China's in on the act too, and more recently then the US or Russian missions, but there is still so much to be done.

NASA Lunar Exploration - NASA Going Back to the Moon - Popular Mechanics

We've only a limited list of what comprises the Lunar atmosphere, yep it has one, more research can be focused on this aspect of Lunar studies.

Is There an Atmosphere on the Moon? | Solar System Exploration Research Virtual Institute

Finally, the best answer is simple that we can. Humans shouldn't be confined to doing things for scientific, nationalistic or economic reasons. Sometimes we need to do things just because we can. Even if we learn little, the publicity, the pride, the thought of space may inspire the next generation of scientist and that's never a bad thing. It helps keep the spirit of space exploration alive. As a child I gained much of my interest in space exploration from watch Space Shuttle launches, even if I didn't know what they were doing, I still gained an interest in learning more about space. For a nation like China or India, who's space programs are still in their infancy compared to ours, their programs can help foster the next wave of space explorers.

There is much to be done still on the Moon for any nation willing to put the effort into getting there. From India, to Japan and China, the US, EU or Russia, space has much to offer and I hope we can cooperate rather then turn this into a competition.
 
Last edited:
.
Can anyone provide a link to Chandrayaan-1's images of the Moon? There are hundreds of them but I can't find them!
Thanks in advance! :D
 
. .
"China is very close to a breakthrough in energy production from helium-3 and the goals of its space program inspired by the visionary Professor Ouyang Ziyuan are closely, if not directly, related to securing helium-3 as a geostrategic national priority. Several other stakeholders are also working on duel use applications of helium-3 and other fusion fuels."

Very encouraging news. Prof Ouyang is a visionary leader and the father of our Lunar program

The Diplomat is unfolding a different kind of race here. Not just "landing on the Moon" which was accomplished by the Americans about half a century ago.

Similar to the fact that you've been crowned the champ of Athens Summer Olympics marathon race, but yet there is another one 4 years later in Beijing!
baby_soldier_33.gif
 
Last edited:
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom