jhungary
MILITARY PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 19,295
- Reaction score
- 387
- Country
- Location
You flatter me, comrade.
China, specifically ZTE, had conducted 7 separate tests as of the end of last year, setting a new record of 19Gbps (19Gbps>10Gbps if you don't know).
https://www.techrepublic.com/article/in-china-5g-trials-zte-hits-massive-19-gbps-network-speeds/
The deplorable "mouthpiece" of the evil, children killing, and brainwashing CPC, which has done nothing to the Chinese people but killing all of them, has shown tests of 5G.
From 38:00 - 41:00
Why do you find it weird for CCTV to praise other country's achievements? Why does CCTV have always to be praising China? Are you suggesting that CCTV shouldn't keep Chinese citizens informed about developments from other places in the world? Comrade, I never knew you were a staunch advocate for censorship!
Even if we just ignore all of my counterarguments, your claim that the US doesn't lead or has never been a leader in telecommunications is, at best, challenged. Look at an article by CNN, the voice of FREEDOM and DEMOCRACY and PERFECTION which you are contradicting right now.
Here's a snippet from the article:
"Qualcomm, a leader on 2G and 3G wireless network technology, has been investing heavily in 5G research."
The sentence clearly says Qualcomm, a US company, is a LEADER on 2G and 3G, which is NOT what you wrote.
"The US government has indicated before that it wants to win the 5G race, and is cognizant of the threat coming from China."
If China's 5G is as crap as you stated, then why does the US view it as a threat? Are you insinuating that the US is even worse than crap? How dare you? This is blasphemy! You can't insult your master like that.
http://money.cnn.com/2018/04/16/technology/china-united-states-5g-technology-study/index.html
But don't worry, let me give you some good news.
http://money.cnn.com/2018/04/17/technology/zte-china-us-phones-ban/index.html
US just hit ZTE, a Chinese company heavily invested in 5G, really really hard, banning it from purchasing US components.
So..you are welcome. Now you have something to jack off to.
You do know the different between Trial under laboratory condition, and actual deployment over network, right?
South Korea have done theoretical test back in November 2013 during METIS conference in Sweden, and reaching maximum bit rate of 35.3Gbps
https://www.metis2020.com/wp-content/uploads/presentations/W@kth_METIS_overview_scenarios_20131115_web.pdf
That test, along with ZTE test is under laboratory condition, a single field, single frequency test (ZTE tested 7 different scenario/field) but not with user traffic (I think the article you provided put traffic on the ZTE test as 28). Which Samsung reaches 35.3Gbps and ZTE reaches 19Gbps and in case you don't know 35.3G > 19G
However, the test that is tried in South Korea during winter Olympic is a phase one user test, which is the same way we use the mobile technology now, not under laboratory circumstance. Which mean you have actual loading with different user, and in that trial, it service on average 44,000 user a day, which basically share the bandwidth. And people like you and me can simply walk into the stadium and connect to 5G using one of the Intel tablet provided.
As I said, when is the First Chinese public field testing on 5G?
Again, you have not understand anything in 5G field, you simply jump up and down once you saw an article and started blowing trumpet without even knowing what you are talking about.
Last edited: