What's new

China-India Geopolitics: News & Discussions

This in turn make me remember the Battle of Imjin River, where 4 Chinese Division of the 63rd Army attack the British 29th Brigade, 3rd Infantry Division and 2nd ROK division and got their arse kicked back to the 38th parallel.

The war ends in a draw, and I would not personally called Chinese 230,000 Casualty (of those at least 120,000 KIA) in the Chinese side was any type of victory, when you compare the US/UN force killed during the whole war. In fact, I have met some Chinese Korean War veteran, many of them do not consider they have won and their rank suffer many hardship, not to mention by interfere in North Korea, effectively they gave the Taiwan a ran away province for a status quo in Korea.

Attacking the North after repelling their invasion was a mistake, in fact, Truman did not want it from the beginning (The reason why SK Armed Force is in such a bad shape at the beginning of hostilities is because Truman does not want Rhee to go attack the North, thus refusing to build up the SK armed force after WW2) Truman sees the advantage of a divided Korea, MacArthur didn't, he was drunk with his own power.

Not entirely true. China entered the war also to protect its North East border from US/KMT troop. It got China peace in the North East for over 60 years.

After the war China got respect from around the world. On the other hand, US call the war "The forgotten war" or " The wrong war in the wrong place and in the wrong time". In fact no memorial were ever build until recently.


Can you give the list of battles which Chinese won against Japanese?

Battle of Changsha

Battle of Changsha was the only good news in 1942 for the allies in the pacific theater. The British had just surrender in Singapore and MacArthur lost Philippines.

Battle of Taierzhuang
The Battle of Tai'erzhuang (Chinese: ; pinyin: Tái'érzhūang Huìzhàn) was a battle of the Second Sino-Japanese War in 1938, between the armies of the Republic of China and Japan. The battle was the first major Chinese victory of the war. It humiliated the Japanese military and its reputation as an invincible force, while for the Chinese it represented a tremendous morale boost
 
Last edited:
.
Not entirely true. China entered the war also to protect its North East border from US/KTM troop. It got China peace for for over 60 years.

After the war China got respect from around the world. On the other hand, US call the war "The forgotten war" or " The wrong war in the wrong place and in the wrong time". In fact no memorial were ever build until recently.




Battle of Changsha

Battle of Changsha was the only good news in 1942 for the allies in the pacific theater. The British had just surrender in Singapore and MacArthur lost Philippines.

Battle of Taierzhuang
The Battle of Tai'erzhuang (Chinese: ; pinyin: Tái'érzhūang Huìzhàn) was a battle of the Second Sino-Japanese War in 1938, between the armies of the Republic of China and Japan. The battle was the first major Chinese victory of the war. It humiliated the Japanese military and its reputation as an invincible force, while for the Chinese it represented a tremendous morale boost
I get it
 
.
Not entirely true. China entered the war also to protect its North East border from US/KTM troop. It got China peace for for over 60 years.

After the war China got respect from around the world. On the other hand, US call the war "The forgotten war" or " The wrong war in the wrong place and in the wrong time". In fact no memorial were ever build until recently.


The impact of China in the world stage during Korean War is small, the geopolitics to see China as any sort of Enemy was and still is being foreshadowed by Soviet Union, there are many decision the US want to do to China during Korean war did not go ahead (Such as using nuclear weapon on Chinese border, massing troop to attack Chinese border in 2 fronts and helping KMT in a more active role) not because of US/UN afraid of Chinese Prowess, but because of the potential Russia influence in the outcome.

On top of that, China did not emerge in the world stage not until 1971 after China step out of "Post Mao" cultural revolution era, full 20 years after the Chinese decided to get involve in Korean War. Which quickly followed by Economic Reform in 1978 and Open to International Policy in the early 1980. During and Immediately after Korean War, the role China, PRC plays in international politics are almost none.

On the other hand, the American like to call Korean War the forgotten war is not because the American were ashamed of the Korean war, but rather the Korean War got smacked in the middle of two major US war fought, the WW2 and the Vietnam War. Memorial have been established all over the America after the war ends, and VFW chapter quickly listed and Accept Korean War vet into their Chapter after the war ends, unlike their stance on Vietnam War vet. Which were only almost universally recognised in late 1980s.

And finally, China would have peace in the next 60 years regardless of whether or not the Chinese involve in Korean War. The next 3 war in South East Asia is Malaya Insurgency, China/India border war, and Vietnam War, all at the wrong side of the border of China. China was protected by the Russian back in the beginning of 1950. And modern Historian all commonly agree had China not assist in Korean War, the chances of North Korean Collapse is certain and the Korean Peninsular would have certainly reunited under Rhee, whom is a dictator, which mean after the war is over, he would have ruled Korea like how he ruled South Korea with an Iron hand and will expulse any US/UN troop in Korea. Meaning, there will not be 40,000 US troop and base in Korea and pull US Closer to China than ever before. And finally, this is a known fact that by involve in Korean War, Chinese government is giving the KMT breathing space and most importantly, time of reprieve.

Militarily, not going to lie, there are quite a few "Wow" moment, especially to how US/UN troop view on the Chinese endurance, which also give the initial Chinese Advantage, but these "Wow" factor subsided quite quickly as the front line in Korea had settled. I cannot remember any battle that the Chinese had won magnificently after the third time Seoul had been occupied.
 
Last edited:
.
The impact of China in the world stage during Korean War is small, the geopolitics to see China as any sort of Enemy was and still is being foreshadowed by Soviet Union, there are many decision the US want to do to China during Korean war did not go ahead (Such as using nuclear weapon on Chinese border, massing troop to attack Chinese border in 2 fronts and helping KMT in a more active role) not because of US/UN afraid of Chinese Prowess, but because of the potential Russia influence in the outcome.

On top of that, China did not emerge in the world stage not until 1971 after China step out of "Post Mao" cultural revolution era, full 20 years after the Chinese decided to get involve in Korean War. Which quickly followed by Economic Reform in 1978 and Open to International Policy in the early 1980. During and Immediately after Korean War, the role China, PRC plays in international politics are almost none.

On the other hand, the American like to call Korean War the forgotten war is not because the American were ashamed of the Korean war, but rather the Korean War got smacked in the middle of two major US war fought, the WW2 and the Vietnam War. Memorial have been established all over the America after the war ends, and VFW chapter quickly listed and Accept Korean War vet into their Chapter after the war ends, unlike their stance on Vietnam War vet. Which were only almost universally recognised in late 1980s.

And finally, China would have peace in the next 60 years regardless of whether or not the Chinese involve in Korean War. The next 3 war in South East Asia is Malaya Insurgency, China/India border war, and Vietnam War, all at the wrong side of the border of China. China was protected by the Russian back in the beginning of 1950. And modern Historian all commonly agree had China not assist in Korean War, the chances of North Korean Collapse is certain and the Korean Peninsular would have certainly reunited under Rhee, whom is a dictator, which mean after the war is over, he would have ruled Korea like how he ruled South Korea with an Iron hand and will expulse any US/UN troop in Korea. Meaning, there will not be 40,000 US troop and base in Korea and pull US Closer to China than ever before. And finally, this is a known fact that by involve in Korean War, Chinese government is giving the KMT breathing space and most importantly, time of reprieve.

Militarily, not going to lie, there are quite a few "Wow" moment, especially to how US/UN troop view on the Chinese endurance, which also give the initial Chinese Advantage, but these "Wow" factor subsided quite quickly as the front line in Korea had settled. I cannot remember any battle that the Chinese had won magnificently after the third time Seoul had been occupied.
Wo ... :o: you really spend some BTU replying.
OK. You win the most patriotic immigrant award.

First the CPC inherited a devastated and bankrupt agricultural country. Yet managed to hold off a much better armed industrialized United States to a draw. Without even having air superiority nor naval superiority.
I think they did very well.

Secondly. MacArthur after winning would pass the entire Korea to a dictator that he put in place and just leave ?
And after taking N Korea why would he not be emboldened to move on to Beijing with the KMT before the CPC get a chance to consolidate their power?
 
.
Wo ... :o: you really spend some BTU replying.
OK. You win the most patriotic immigrant award.

It's not about being patriotic immigrant (I don't even know what that have to do with anything to begin with) It's about Geopolitics and Military progress. Anyone would have make the same suggestion and observation. It does not matter if the person making it is American, Australian, Chinese or Martian.

Stop being a smart arse if you want people to take your argument seriously, otherwise if you draw in some ridiculous point in your argument, you looks like a joke rather than being serious.

First the CPC inherited a devastated and bankrupt agricultural country. Yet managed to hold off a much better armed industrialized United States to a draw. Without even having air superiority nor naval superiority.
I think they did very well.

Again, that is not a military achievement, when you are have 250,000 KIA (Conservative number, higher ceiling up to 1 million Chinese died in that war) compare to US 36,000 KIA, the number of men the Chinese can be used other wise to either put in home front and re-develop after the ravaging Civil War or to recapture Taiwan if it wanted to do so Militaristically, the men died in that war deal a major blow to the Chinese development, making it no longer operationally able to do what the Chinese set out to do, which making it a strategic failure and operational failure.

In a war, when we discuss the outcome, we look at it Strategically, Operationally and Tactically.

Strategically, the goal for China is to remove the American Threat to the Chinese Northern Border, by popping up the Northern Regime, but the American Threat has not been removed, which the American is still in South Korea, which mean if and when the American decided to mobilize again, they have the material support from South Korea as well as the mean to initiate the invasion. Unless you think North Korea alone can be used to deal with this without the Help of the Chinese, that threat still remain, the different is just 450 mile further away. Which, to be honest, is not much. Also, if you look at the before and after, the Demarcation line did not change much, which is still quite rightly squared on the 38th parallel, the only difference is that, before the war begin in 1950, there were no US base and no Significant amount of US troop in South Korea, in 2017, the line is the same but there are 43,000 US troop and 20 US bases in South Korea. Some can argue that this war from 1950-1953, attracted the American to settle in South Korea, meaning? this war pull the US threat closer to the Chinese border from the nearest US troop being stationed in Japan in 1950, which is over the sea of Japan, to there are US troop just 450 Miles south of Chinese border in South Korea.

Also, the North Korea have increasing become Chinese Financial, Military, and Political burden, which is not something Chinese want to beginning.

Operationally, Chinese have a significant shortage of men which limited what China can do after the Korea War. Which mean the Chinese failed this Operationally because of this war, Chinese recovery has been basically longer and more painful.

Tactically, it is a draw, because neither China and UN can achieve their goal, US wanted to roll over North Korea, which is a mistake as I pointed out before, which is not to be, and the Chinese wanted to roll over the South, which is not to be as well, and the war stopped (NOT ENDED) almost the same as where it started.

To you, maybe the Romantic account of how Chinese Soldier died in herd bravely under the American Machine gun and air attack stopped the American invasion into the North is something of a good thing, but in military account, it meant nothing as that is not any sort of achievement, these people died while did not achieve anything in a grand scheme of thing, people died, the line is the same, the situation is the same, again, the only different is, there weren't any US troop before the war, there are now. So, in term of military goal, 250,000 Chinese died did not earn Chinese anything. Other than a state to feed and a scare of Refugee crisis over the Chinese border had the North Korea steam into trouble again.

Secondly. MacArthur after winning would pass the entire Korea to a dictator that he put in place and just leave ?
And after taking N Korea why would he not be emboldened to move on to Beijing with the KMT before the CPC get a chance to consolidate their power?

You are mistaken the assumption of Chinese Not Helping the North Korean (Which is the scenario I purposed) and Chinese help but lose the War. Don't forget had Chinese not intervene, the Chinese can use the people they use to fight in Korea for other objective.

Had the war ended in MacArthur favour without Chinese intervention, he would have return to Japan and continue to be the governor of Japan, the US position at that point in time is focus on Japan, not Korea, that is the reason why the American do not have any amount of troop in South Korea in 1950, the first fighting troop in South Korea is Task Force Smith of the 24th Infantry Division, which is 408 soldiers arrived in South Korea in July 1, 1950 from Garrison in Japan. 6 Days after the start of hostility. The US government weren't even bothered with rearming the South Korea prior to Korea war, citing the risk of the South would use the power to invade the North and drag US into a war they do not want.

Had the South Rolled over the North, the South Korean president Rhee would most likely invite the American to leave because the American Stance toward the Japanese. And there are absolutely no reason as to why the United States have to stay once the Korea peninsular is reunified. Which is again the reason why US would not help the South Korean before the hostility.

The problem is, had Chinese not intervene, the Chinese can use those force otherwise fought in Korea on recapturing Taiwan. The Taiwan Problem would be the same, the level of support the American gave to Taiwan is at maximum after the KMT government to chased back to a tiny island, what the KMT is waiting on is a Coup de grâce, the final assault that never came. Because the troop the Chinese need to retake Taiwan in the final assault has been used in Korea. Had Chinese not help the North, this is most likely the case where the Chinese will use the troop to attack Taiwan. Which I don't think American can do anything when they are fighting another war in the North.

In fact, some can actually argue had China not intervene in the North Korean war, the US have to be careful because of the millions (It is estimated 1.5 to 3 millions Chinese fought in Korea) The American may actually have to surrender Taiwan or Korea or both to consolidate their position elsewhere in South East Asia (namely in South Vietnam, Philippine and Japan). Afterall, 1.5 (low estimate) millions troop in Chinese Reserve is actually quite a scary number, and basically Chinese just dish this out on a foreign land in Korea, and with the US in their best position, which is with UN support, now imagine if Chinese uses these troop against the US in South East Asia alone? Without the help of the UN, without the help of the 600,000 strong South Korean? They could have achieve more than they did in Korean War.
 
Last edited:
.
China's economy success has been wildly accepted. But how powerful China's military is now? Unlike economy achievement, people can not be convinced by paper data. Only a real war can test it. Just out of curiosity, I bet the whole world wants to the answer. But the question is who will be the test target? Unexpectedly, it's not US, Japan or Vietnam. Here stepped out the victim: India.

As I said before, India is a dangerous country. Because Indians as a whole are not rational people. They always overestimate themselves and in return make mistakes one after another.

China is not a big talker. Maybe Indians have been used to much talking less doing. But China doesn't behave in that way. Indians should take the warns seriously and get out of China's territory.
 
.
China's economy success has been wildly accepted. But how powerful China's military is now? Unlike economy achievement, people can not be convinced by paper data. Only a real war can test it. Just out of curiosity, I bet the whole world wants to the answer. But the question is who will be the test target? Unexpectedly, it's not US, Japan or Vietnam. Here stepped out the victim: India.

As I said before, India is a dangerous country. Because Indians as a whole are not rational people. They always overestimate themselves and in return make mistakes one after another.

China is not a big talker. Maybe Indians have been used to much talking less doing. But China doesn't behave in that way. Indians should take the warns seriously and get out of China's territory.

You are welcome to test your metal.
 
.
Lets see . China should take back doklam and also cut chicken neck and create direct link with Bangladesh.
It will give china strategic depth.

:sniper::sniper:
 
.
When China warned the US not to declare war on DPRK after her first nuclear test, US obeys. After years of testing nukes and ballistic missiles, still US don't dare touch DPRK.

When China warns VN to stop drilling oil or we will immediately declare war, monkeys told the Spanish STOP DRILLING.

When China warns India to get the f00k out of China's territory, they don't take our warning serious.

So why this stark contrast in attitude? US and VN have higher IQ thus not as stupid as Hindus.
 
. . . .
When China warns VN to stop drilling oil or we will immediately declare war, monkeys told the Spanish STOP DRILLING.

When China warns India to get the f00k out of China's territory, they don't take our warning serious.

So why this stark contrast in attitude? US and VN have higher IQ thus not as stupid as Hindus.
China has told Vietnam to stop drilling but they award another contract to India apart from the one India is already drilling.china even told India not to drill but apparently no fk was given.:-).
 
.
I strongly suggest that all further threads on this issue be stopped until the first bullet is fired...in the disputed area. Until then it is simply becoming a waste of time opening a thread in the hope of finding that the Chinese have taken credible steps only to find out that some official of China or a member of this forum is issuing yet another warning. No offence to the Chinese members but I really hoped for a better show of strength from your country considering its size economically and militarily
 
.
All China has done for the moment is talk.
During the Korea War, China warned many times that US army must not to cross 38 line otherwise would interfere. US ignored the warns. We all know what happened.

In 1962, China warned India many times to prevent the "forward policy". Indians ignored China's warns.

During the Vietnam War, China Warned US land troops must not cross the 17 line. This time US did as China asked.

US know China's warns would be followed by acts if you don't treat them seriously.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom