China-India Geopolitics: News & Discussions

[Avijit]

I'm itching for a war with these Hindus. I guess China needs to hammer them down with our Communist Iron Fist to show who the f*ck is the BOSS here. Another utter defeat would humiliate them that India today is pretty much India 1962.

I say come on. Show some balls and at least make an advance. For more than a month now, China has been issuing empty threats. Pretty much the same way as North Korea. This is the ground reality. Stand-off is India's move. The next move is yours. All this bullshit here means nothing.

 

[Jackdaws]

Funny, democracy. official Chinese media saying if China had opted for democracy it would have become another India “where around 20 per cent of the world’s poorest live”.

Does that include about 100,000 Chinese citizens who live in India as refugees?

 

[karl wang]

Does that include about 100,000 Chinese citizens who live in India as refugees?

Do India treasures them? As Chinese, they deserve a life which should be 4 times better than your Indian. If India can't affort them, please send them back.

 

[T-Rex]

I say come on. Show some balls and at least make an advance. For more than a month now, China has been issuing empty threats. Pretty much the same way as North Korea. This is the ground reality. Stand-off is India's move. The next move is yours. All this bullshit here means nothing.

Be careful what you wish for, it just might come true!

 

[Jackdaws]

Do India treasures them? As Chinese, they deserve a life which should be 4 times better than your Indian. If India can't affort them, please send them back.

LOL - no one is stopping them from going back. Of course they deserve a better life and they chose a better life in India. What steps have you taken to take them back?

 

[T-Rex]

Do India treasures them?

Dalailama is the gang leader!

 

[karl wang]

LOL - no one is stopping them from going back. Of course they deserve a better life and they chose a better life in India. What steps have you taken to take them back?

Those peoples once were salve of Dalai lama, If you think living as a slave was happy, fine, You win. Don't tell me they went for India's democracy.
China makes Tibetian's captia GDP to as much as 4 times of India. Far more richer than you India. Just tell them the truth. If they still choice to live as poor as India, It's ok. Then we don't need care about them anymore.

Be careful what you wish for, it just might come true!

Nobody wants war. But some idiots may make it come true. As a poor nation, India may lost their chance to become power once for good.
Tactics is one thing, but play fires with someone power than you, it's a dangerous game.
Let's wait and see.

 

[Shabi1]

Everything summed up in two cartoons.

 

[shahbaz baig]

India says it has international backing in border dispute with China
By AFP
Published: July 20, 2017

File image of India-China trade route at Nathu-La, 55 km (34 miles) north of Gangtok, capital of India's northeastern state of Sikkim. PHOTO: Reuters

NEW DELHI: India’s stand in its border dispute with China is supported by other countries, Foreign Minister Sushma Swaraj said Thursday as she praised tiny Bhutan for standing up to China in the row.

Swaraj reaffirmed that India’s security could be jeopardised if China takes over the zone where the frontiers of India, China and Bhutan meet. The standoff started more than a month ago after Chinese troops started building a road on the remote plateau, which is disputed by China and Bhutan.

‘Chance of war’ between nuclear-armed China and India

Indian troops moved in to the flashpoint zone to halt the work.
“All the countries are understanding that India’s stand is not wrong. Justice is on our side, this is being accepted by all other countries,” the minister told the upper house of the Indian parliament. Swaraj praised Bhutan, one of the world’s smallest countries, for taking an “aggressive” stand and not bowing to its giant neighbour.

Bhutan has said construction of the road is “a direct violation” of agreements with China. Bhutan and China do not have diplomatic relations. India, which fought a war with China in 1962 over a separate part of the disputed Himalayan border, supports Bhutan’s claim. “There is a written agreement signed in 2012 which states that the issue of trijunction (the border where the three countries meet) should be decided by India, China and … Bhutan,” Swaraj said.

“All this while China has been building roads… various activities have been going on. This time they brought bulldozers and excavators and their intention is to reach the trijunction. “They want to end the status quo of this trijunction unilaterally,” she added.

‘India won’t allow IoK to be part of CPEC’

China has said Indian troops should “unconditionally” withdraw to the Indian side before talks can start on the dispute. Swaraj said China must also pull back its troops for any dialogue to happen. India and China have vied for influence in South Asia, with Beijing ploughing large sums into infrastructure projects in Nepal, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. Bhutan has remained closely allied to India.

 

[shahbaz baig]

The Answer of this Article

International backing == bhutan
Delusional Indians think that because Japan and U.S conducted the Naval exercise. it means that both are backing India's stand over Sikkim stand-off, although neither U.S nor Japan stated officially regarding this matter.

India moved troops because of the fear or as usual unwarranted concerns that china can capture India's neck (siliguri corridor).
although siliguri corridor is miles far away from the actual construction of a road. that cant be captured until there wouldn't be full conventional war. because Siliguri Corridor is being protected by difficult terrains, rivers that make sure the safety of both side naturally.

India is saying it is our move to save our sovereignty and that's why Indian chest thumping is going on all over India that India stopped a road construction and saved her sovereignty.

To stop construction of a road and call it saving your sovereignty is totally insanity.

2nd India's biggest misunderstanding about the border defense cooperation agreement 2005 between china & India.
According to Agreement.

"China and India have previously agreed that the disputes must be solved diplomatically. During the visit of the then Chinese premier Wen Jiaboa to India in 2005, Beijing and New Delhi signed a historic accord, agreeing to settle the decades-old border dispute without use of force.

and in 2013 when the then indian Prime Miniter manmohan Singh Visited China, the two states singed the Border Defense Cooperation Agreement, reaffirming that both shall "exercise maximum self-restraint,""not use force or face-offs occur along the disputed areas."​

if you consider this agreement among China-India-Bhutan.. then India Violated the Agreement by using Force against Chinese Construction employees rather then Diplomatic Cooperation, although not a single bullet was fired but by using force, India violated the Agreement with China.

India moved troops on behalf of India's unwarranted Concerns. India didn't have any intention to confront with China just because of Bhutan, it is India's own unwarranted Concerns over Silliguri Corridor.

What Indian Army is doing in that area which dont belong to India at Doklam ? not even Indian claimed Area.

@Kiss_of_the_Dragon

 

[Baby Leone]

NEW DELHI:

India’s stand in its border dispute with China is supported by other countries, Foreign Minister Sushma Swaraj said Thursday as she praised tiny Bhutan for standing up to China in the row.

Swaraj reaffirmed that India’s security could be jeopardised if China takes over the zone where the frontiers of India, China and Bhutan meet. The standoff started more than a month ago after Chinese troops started building a road on the remote plateau, which is disputed by China and Bhutan.

‘Chance of war’ between nuclear-armed China and India

Indian troops moved in to the flashpoint zone to halt the work.
“All the countries are understanding that India’s stand is not wrong. Justice is on our side, this is being accepted by all other countries,” the minister told the upper house of the Indian parliament. Swaraj praised Bhutan, one of the world’s smallest countries, for taking an “aggressive” stand and not bowing to its giant neighbour.

Bhutan has said construction of the road is “a direct violation” of agreements with China. Bhutan and China do not have diplomatic relations. India, which fought a war with China in 1962 over a separate part of the disputed Himalayan border, supports Bhutan’s claim. “There is a written agreement signed in 2012 which states that the issue of trijunction (the border where the three countries meet) should be decided by India, China and … Bhutan,” Swaraj said.

“All this while China has been building roads… various activities have been going on. This time they brought bulldozers and excavators and their intention is to reach the trijunction. “They want to end the status quo of this trijunction unilaterally,” she added.

‘India won’t allow IoK to be part of CPEC’

China has said Indian troops should ‘unconditionally’ withdraw to the Indian side before talks can start on the dispute. Swaraj said China must also pull back its troops for any dialogue to happen. India and China have vied for influence in South Asia, with Beijing ploughing large sums into infrastructure projects in Nepal, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. Bhutan has remained closely allied to India.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/1462372/india-says-international-backing-border-dispute-china/

lo kr lo baat

 

[ito]

International backing == bhutan

What about US and Japan?...given that both take China to be their enemy...they should side with India

 

[shahbaz baig]

What about US and Japan?...given that both take China to be their enemy...they should side with India

delusional Indians think that because Japan and U.S conducted the Naval exercise. it means that both are backing India's stand over Sikkim stand-off, although neither U.S nor Japan stated officially regarding this matter

 

[airmarshal]

India is trying become a cheap soldier of America by inciting wars and conflicts against Chine and supporting America in South China Sea dispute.

Under Modi, India filled with Hindu nationalism has become even more reckless. Its political leadership thinks like in IT, outsourcing its manpower, it can outsource its military strength to an imperial effort.

China and India are no match. China if it wants to escalate will teach India a lesson that it will forget what happened to it in 1962. I wish China teach India a lesson sooner than later. This will deflate Modi and his Hindutva orgasms.

 

[duhastmish]

delusional Indians think that because Japan and U.S conducted the Naval exercise. it means that both are backing India's stand over Sikkim stand-off, although neither U.S nor Japan stated officially regarding this matter

so who should we trust?
Non delusional pakistani?

get a life dude. your perception is kinked. just because china owns you. you take them as friends. there ia diffrence in owning something and supporting.

you were owned by american earlier. now china too both are shareholder.