China GDP plummets to 0.4% in Q2

[F-22Raptor]

I was referring to the robberies. The US doesn’t prioritize what most people wouldn’t use. People drive and fly more, which is why those things get the investments they do.

I don’t know why the PDF Chinese are so obsessed with trains relative to the US. The vast majority of Americans don’t give a s**t about trains. It’s all about driving and flying.

 

[Beast]

In the democratic, civilized world such facts are verified and if they are untrue, when opposition comes to power the truth finally comes out. We will see how this pans out.

So u telling Indian democracy is about making lies and deceiving other with immortal standard? Is this what indian school teaches the young? That is why from minister to airforce Chief, all nothing but full of lies.

I don’t know why the PDF Chinese are so obsessed with trains relative to the US. The vast majority of Americans don’t give a s**t about trains. It’s all about driving and flying.

Lol.. the grape are always sour. We have seen plenty of video of American clamouring for high speed train.

Once our Fujian aircraft carrier EMAL surpasses US one, you will come out with same excuse that electric catapult are nothing but bull and useless.

 

[F-22Raptor]

So u telling Indian democracy is about making lies and deceiving other with immortal standard? Is this what indian school teaches the young? That is why from minister to airforce Chief, all nothing but full of lies.


Lol.. the grape are always sour. We have seen plenty of video of American clamouring for high speed train.

Once our Fujian aircraft carrier EMAL surpasses US one, you will come out with same excuse that electric catapult are nothing but bull and useless.

Americans don’t give a s**t about train travel. It’s flying or driving. You’ve never heard of the famous American road trip? Very few travel by train these days.

As for EMALS, it’s now 10,000 launches for the Ford and 0 for the Type 3.

 

[Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam]

So u telling Indian democracy is about making lies and deceiving other with immortal standard? Is this what indian school teaches the young? That is why from minister to airforce Chief, all nothing but full of lies.


Lol.. the grape are always sour. We have seen plenty of video of American clamouring for high speed train.

Once our Fujian aircraft carrier EMAL surpasses US one, you will come out with same excuse that electric catapult are nothing but bull and useless.

This is a good example of how copying someone's homework doesn't mean you understand the material. The US carriers that use EM catapults are nuclear powered, meaning there is almost an unlimited amount of electrical power available and makes sense.Nuclear-powered Ford and Nimitz-class ships have much more free storage capacity so they can store more jet fuel, weapons, and so on. While the Chinese carrier is fossil fueled so it normally would have an excess amount of steam and therefore should use steam catapults instead. The EM cats require vast amounts of electricity, meaning you'll be stressing the boilers to drive generators for electricity (losing efficiency) to use the cats. This will limit the sortie rates and cause more frequent fuel replenishment (thus limiting range or station time). This carrier is far from being operational anytime soon. The Chinese do have experience with carrier operations they have been for the past 10 years. But going from a ramp style to a catapult launch system is a very large step and one they are not familiar with.
US navy has been using catapult launch for decades and are the best in the world in carrier operations. Not just in ship board operations but also in aviation operations. China's propulsion technology is still several generations behind. There are speculations that Chinese pays the German for Maglev, in order to obtain technologies for EM propulsion, to put it in military applications.

The US has EM catapult also but rumors says that it breaks down after very short hours of use.

 

[Beast]

This is a good example of how copying someone's homework doesn't mean you understand the material. The US carriers that use EM catapults are nuclear powered, meaning there is almost an unlimited amount of electrical power available and makes sense.Nuclear-powered Ford and Nimitz-class ships have much more free storage capacity so they can store more jet fuel, weapons, and so on. While the Chinese carrier is fossil fueled so it normally would have an excess amount of steam and therefore should use steam catapults instead. The EM cats require vast amounts of electricity, meaning you'll be stressing the boilers to drive generators for electricity (losing efficiency) to use the cats. This will limit the sortie rates and cause more frequent fuel replenishment (thus limiting range or station time). This carrier is far from being operational anytime soon. The Chinese do have experience with carrier operations they have been for the past 10 years. But going from a ramp style to a catapult launch system is a very large step and one they are not familiar with.
US navy has been using catapult launch for decades and are the best in the world in carrier operations. Not just in ship board operations but also in aviation operations. China's propulsion technology is still several generations behind. There are speculations that Chinese pays the German for Maglev, in order to obtain technologies for EM propulsion, to put it in military applications.

The US has EM catapult also but rumors says that it breaks down after very short hours of use.

Another clown that write long but nothing but trash and rubbish...

China used IEP for it's Fujian aircraft carrier. If somebody telling you IEP is several generation behind the best propulsion. Clearly shows they are idiot writing trash.
China EMAL is nothing but original becos we used DCEV instead of ACEV uses by Gerald Ford and other western electric propulsion system.

How can u copy something that don't exists before? Clearly sourgrape are the reason why these idiots spew nonsense against China.

 

[Beast]

Americans don’t give a s**t about train travel. It’s flying or driving. You’ve never heard of the famous American road trip? Very few travel by train these days.

As for EMALS, it’s now 10,000 launches for the Ford and 0 for the Type 3.

Lol.. 10000 with breakdown more frequent than steam catapult. No wonder trump want to dump this trash. You can even tell me it's make 100,000 launches but pls don't avoid talking about 50,000 break down.

China EMAL already make thousands of launches and the ground tested system is the same as the one install on Fujian aircraft carrier.

 

[MH.Yang]

This is a good example of how copying someone's homework doesn't mean you understand the material. The US carriers that use EM catapults are nuclear powered, meaning there is almost an unlimited amount of electrical power available and makes sense.Nuclear-powered Ford and Nimitz-class ships have much more free storage capacity so they can store more jet fuel, weapons, and so on. While the Chinese carrier is fossil fueled so it normally would have an excess amount of steam and therefore should use steam catapults instead. The EM cats require vast amounts of electricity, meaning you'll be stressing the boilers to drive generators for electricity (losing efficiency) to use the cats. This will limit the sortie rates and cause more frequent fuel replenishment (thus limiting range or station time). This carrier is far from being operational anytime soon. The Chinese do have experience with carrier operations they have been for the past 10 years. But going from a ramp style to a catapult launch system is a very large step and one they are not familiar with.
US navy has been using catapult launch for decades and are the best in the world in carrier operations. Not just in ship board operations but also in aviation operations. China's propulsion technology is still several generations behind. There are speculations that Chinese pays the German for Maglev, in order to obtain technologies for EM propulsion, to put it in military applications.

The US has EM catapult also but rumors says that it breaks down after very short hours of use.

If you don't understand one thing, I suggest you don't join the conversation easily. EMALS in the USA is AC, while EMALS in China is DC. There are great differences between the two even from the beginning of basic theory.

Even American members of PDF dare not say "copying". An Indian who knows nothing but bullshit, it will only show Indian stupidity and ignorance.

 

[Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam]

If you don't understand one thing, I suggest you don't join the conversation easily. EMALS in the USA is AC, while EMALS in China is DC. There are great differences between the two even from the beginning of basic theory.

Even American members of PDF dare not say "copying". An Indian who knows nothing but bullshit, it will only show Indian stupidity and ignorance.

Too much hype. Now you guys jump from ramp style to catapult, will the airframes of your current fighters handle the extra stress? And the containers covering the catapult runs is either to hide them from satellites or to hide unfinished parts of this project. If these need to be shielded in port, they will never hold up to flight operations on the open sea. This is a great leap for sure, but close to the US navy I don't think so. Too many questions, still has to do sea trials and does the PLAN have enough aircraft to support it? The CCP is all about image not actual function. The PLAN has been studying the US navy for years, however copying does not produce the same results and the PLAN has a long way to go before it can even think about matching the US navy
If China really wants to compete with the US army, it's going to need more than 6 aircraft carrier battle groups compared to US's 11. And with the air force, the US does lead in terms of drones, strategic bombers and their stealth jets, the F-35, with loads of variants being successful in the UK, like the Lightning and F-35b. China's J-20 stealth jets have faced complications and delays. And even if China does increase it's naval assets, the US is also upgrading at the same time with it's new Columbia class nuclear submarines, which is their largest one yet. So, my point is China is always going to be several stages behind the US in terms of air and naval superiority

 

[shi12jun]

A group photo of the four-star U.S. general and the U.S. Secretary of Energy

 

[Beast]

Too much hype. Now you guys jump from ramp style to catapult, will the airframes of your current fighters handle the extra stress? And the containers covering the catapult runs is either to hide them from satellites or to hide unfinished parts of this project. If these need to be shielded in port, they will never hold up to flight operations on the open sea. This is a great leap for sure, but close to the US navy I don't think so. Too many questions, still has to do sea trials and does the PLAN have enough aircraft to support it? The CCP is all about image not actual function. The PLAN has been studying the US navy for years, however copying does not produce the same results and the PLAN has a long way to go before it can even think about matching the US navy
If China really wants to compete with the US army, it's going to need more than 6 aircraft carrier battle groups compared to US's 11. And with the air force, the US does lead in terms of drones, strategic bombers and their stealth jets, the F-35, with loads of variants being successful in the UK, like the Lightning and F-35b. China's J-20 stealth jets have faced complications and delays. And even if China does increase it's naval assets, the US is also upgrading at the same time with it's new Columbia class nuclear submarines, which is their largest one yet. So, my point is China is always going to be several stages behind the US in terms of air and naval superiority

So after expose of your crap for slander Fujian aircraft carrier as copy, you start change that now number of aircraft carrier is the factor and not quality?

 

[MH.Yang]

Too much hype. Now you guys jump from ramp style to catapult, will the airframes of your current fighters handle the extra stress? And the containers covering the catapult runs is either to hide them from satellites or to hide unfinished parts of this project. If these need to be shielded in port, they will never hold up to flight operations on the open sea. This is a great leap for sure, but close to the US navy I don't think so. Too many questions, still has to do sea trials and does the PLAN have enough aircraft to support it? The CCP is all about image not actual function. The PLAN has been studying the US navy for years, however copying does not produce the same results and the PLAN has a long way to go before it can even think about matching the US navy
If China really wants to compete with the US army, it's going to need more than 6 aircraft carrier battle groups compared to US's 11. And with the air force, the US does lead in terms of drones, strategic bombers and their stealth jets, the F-35, with loads of variants being successful in the UK, like the Lightning and F-35b. China's J-20 stealth jets have faced complications and delays. And even if China does increase it's naval assets, the US is also upgrading at the same time with it's new Columbia class nuclear submarines, which is their largest one yet. So, my point is China is always going to be several stages behind the US in terms of air and naval superiority

First of all, the performance of EMALS in China should be proved by time, not by the mouth of Indians.

Secondly, China's aircraft carrier 003 was built in 2018 and launched in 2022, which took only six years.

Third, China is willing to engage in a naval arms race with the United States. We need 16 aircraft carriers instead of six.

Fourth, China's shipbuilding capacity is 30 times that of the USA(per year 12 million tons:0.4 million tons)
The cost of shipbuilding in China is less than half that in the USA
055's cost is $0.9 billion.
Burke's cost $2.58 billion.
China's military expenditure is 1.5% of GDP.
USA's military expenditure is 4% of GDP.

We welcome the USA to enter into a naval arms race with us.

 

[Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam]

So after expose of your crap for slander Fujian aircraft carrier as copy, you start change that now number of aircraft carrier is the factor and not quality?

The Fujian has a conventional propulsion system not suited to prolonged operation in the high seas, because of the regular refuelling and maintenance involved. The most urgent need for Chinese navy is to carefully test the Fujian. Only the first carrier of PLAN – the Liaoning has achieved initial operational capability, or basic combat readiness

First of all, the performance of EMALS in China should be proved by time, not by the mouth of Indians.

Secondly, China's aircraft carrier 003 was built in 2018 and launched in 2022, which took only six years.

Third, China is willing to engage in a naval arms race with the United States. We need 16 aircraft carriers instead of six.

Fourth, China's shipbuilding capacity is 30 times that of the USA(per year 12 million tons:0.4 million tons)
The cost of shipbuilding in China is less than half that in the USA
055's cost is $0.9 billion.
Burke's cost $2.58 billion.
China's military expenditure is 1.5% of GDP.
USA's military expenditure is 4% of GDP.

We welcome the USA to enter into a naval arms race with us.

The most important advantage of a nuclear powered aircraft carrier is its ability to sustain high speeds and long-range military power projection at sea for up to eight month. The abundance of China’s most advanced multipurpose nuclear reactor, the ACP100 small modular reactor is only 3 per cent, compared with 60 per cent for the US Nimitz-class aircraft carriers, and 97 per cent on the Ford-class ones. In other words, the Chinese nuclear reactor would need to refuel once every two or three years, whereas the one on a Ford-class ship can operate for up to half a century

 

[Dungeness]

Once again. Try. I am sure you will eventually write a comprehensible sentence. Attaboy.

Indians saved you from the Japanese. Least you can do is talk in a way that makes sense.

Just to jog your memory - what Indians saved you from -

View attachment 862073View attachment 862074

What are you trying to accomplish by posting these photos? Japs were not nice to Indians either, they ate you!

Japanese ate Indian PoWs, used them as live targets in WWII | India News - Times of India

India News: Work parties of haggard men would be taken away from the Japanese concentration camps to the shooting range where they would be used as live targets f

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

 

[Viet]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1547763519688359936

That’s expected when people are locked in their apartment, factories closed, not even a mouse can travel freely how can the growth come from?
This on off lockdown in China can last for years. Permanent apocalypse.

 

[Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam]

What are you trying to accomplish by posting these photos? Japs were not nice to Indians either, they ate you!

Japanese ate Indian PoWs, used them as live targets in WWII | India News - Times of India

India News: Work parties of haggard men would be taken away from the Japanese concentration camps to the shooting range where they would be used as live targets f

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

On 6 November 1943, Japan handed over Andaman and Nicobar Islands to India. The islands were passed to the government of Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose, who suggested back then to rename the Andaman island as 'Shaheed' and Nicobar island as 'Swaraj' Island respectively