China Economy Forum

[shuttler]

Huawei LTE, Now and for the future

telecoms

Huawei has deployed nearly 50% of all commercial LTE networks worldwide and the future of mobile broadband is “No-Edge Networks,” according to an interview the company gave to Telecoms during the 2012 LTE World Summit in Barcelona.

Ying Weimin, Huawei President for GSM&UMTS<E networks, cited a GSA report released in May 2012 (“Evolution to LTE”) that states of the 72 commercial LTE networks that have been launched globally, Huawei deployed 34 of them—more than any other vendor.

Since the advent of LTE, Huawei has set a number of industry milestones:

• In 2009, Huawei and TeliaSonera launched the world’s first commercial LTE network in Norway.
• In 2010, Huawei and Vodafone launched the world’s first commercial 800MHz network in Germany, demonstrating the excellent performance of LTE to narrow the digital divide.
• In 2011, Huawei and SoftBank built the world’s largest LTE TDD commercial network in Japan.
• In 2012, Huawei worked with Bell and TELUS to build the mobile broadband network with unparallel user experience.

As mobile broadband develops, operators will focus more and more on user experience. To ensure seamless user experience, Huawei announced the concept of “No-Edge Networks.” The core idea behind “No-Edge Networks” is the utilization of various LTE, LTE-Advanced and future innovative technologies (e.g. CoMP, Adaptive ICIC, AR, IRC, Turbo Equalizer) to realize ultra broadband, zero waiting, and ubiquitous connectivity. This brings users the benefits of speed, quality, simplicity, freedom and sharing.

At the 2012LTE World Summit, Huawei won an award for “Most Significant Development for Commercial LTE Networks by a Vendor,” demonstrating industry recognition of Huawei’s leading status in the LTE industry as well as its continued contributions to the development of LTE commercialization.

In 2012, LTE is set to develop at unprecedented rate. Huawei is dedicated to partnering with industry peers to promote LTE. By helping operators build efficient, sustainable and profitable mobile broadband networks, the company aims to open up highly potential markets for operators and bring users excellent service experience.

And click on the Huawei LTE Now and for the future video here:


[video]http://www.huawei.com/en/solutions/broader-smarter/hw-141165.htm[/video]

 

[eachus]

Huawei sees 2012 Revenue Growth of 15 - 20%
Cisco Systems has a Revenue Growth of 6.64%. ... July 25, 2012


mobile communication industry, there was a War Age(like 7 States Period) in 1st generate. Japan was leading in technology it ended up the USA united the mobile in 2nd generation. Chinese paid for high prices of the stand lectures. for example, in CD and DVD player age, one DVD player sold in US for $50, the license fee charge $25 each. Chinese manufacture profit down to $0.05 ~ $0.25 on each DVD player. and finally Chinese makers quit completely. Chinese government leaned and then started investing R&D on standards. There was a saying, once you develop a industry technology standard, you dont need to do anything collect 70% of the profit. you work hard to product the product, you sell technology to Chinese companies, you make 25% profit, Chinese work harder to produce the products, Chinese make the rest 5%.

Do you get that,
People who sell standard, get 70% of the profit.
Companies sell technology, get 25% of the profit,
Companies who produce the products, make 5% profit.


From the 3G mobile, Chinese used all means to develop its own 3G mobile standard,
at the same time, US used all its tricks to stop Chinese developing 3G standard,
one of the international mobile conference was in US, the US blocked the
Chinese engineers who were participation the conference by not giving them visa to enter US.
3G battle was difficult, Chinese finally occupied a tiny hill in the industry.


What about the 4G mobile?
Mobile WiMAX is US developed standard, Chinese from 3G use TD-**** standards.
TD( Time Division, can use the frequency most efficiently, frequencies are very expensive resource in mobile communication).


4G - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
TD-LTE for China Market

Just when Long-Term Evolution (LTE) and WiMax vigorously promoting in the global telecommunications industry, the former (LTE) is also the most powerful 4G mobile communication leading technology, is a meteoric rise, and quickly occupied the Chinese market. Qualcomm and the Yota's TD-LTE is not yet mature, but many domestic and international wireless carriers one after another turn to TD-LTE. IBM data show that 67% of the operators are considering LTE, because this is the main source of their future market. The above news also confirmed this statement of IBM. While only 8% of the operators to consider the use of WiMAX. WiMax can provide the fastest network transmission to its customers on the market, but still not the rival of LTE. TD-LTE is not the first 4G wireless mobile broadband network data standard, it is China's 4G standard that amendmented and published by China's largest telecom operators - China Mobile. After a series of field trials, is expected into the commercial phase in the next two years . Ulf Ewaldsson, Ericsson's vice president said: "the Chinese Ministry of Industry and China Mobile in the fourth quarter of this year will hold a large-scale field test, by then, Ericsson will help the hand." But view from the current development trend, whether this standard advocated by China Mobile will be widely recognized by the international market, is still debatable.



Huawei is a proud of China.

 

[eachus]

China economy set for soft landing, needs more reform: IMF

"Policies should continue to be geared toward achieving this year's growth targets. In the event of a worsening of the external outlook, China has ample room to respond forcefully, using fiscal policy as the main line of defense and with emphasis on measures that support China's medium-term reform objectives," the IMF report said.

The IMF lowered its medium-term forecast for the current account surplus to between 4 percent and 4.5 percent of GDP.

Last year's report said the yuan was "substantially undervalued" against the dollar by between 3 percent and 23 percent, depending on the methodology used.

China economy set for soft landing, needs more reform: IMF - Chicago Tribune

============

what IMF said is close to what I think, China can cut benchmark lending rates, print more RMB to market, and use some of its $3 trillion reserve to promote GDP growth if need. But IMF sees "soft landing" is safe signal, does not need those immediately. IMF believes China has plenty of methods to manage the growth.

RMB "substantially undervalued" is a safe guard to use any of those method freely without much worry.
IMF still remind China to appreciate the RMB, do not let it devalue in coming months.

 

[sweetgrape]

Chinese largest power mid-speed diesel engines off the assembly line
Chinese largest power mid-speed diesel engines off the assembly line | China's Great Science and Technology

July 4, Chinese ZGPT Diesel successfully produce MAN18V32/40 diesel generators and generator sets, and winning the $ 350 million in the largest single power plant project.

It is reported that ZGPT Diesel&#8217;s MAN18V32/40 diesel generator is maximum power in the current domestic mid-speed diesel engines. The diesel generator will be used to a heavy oil power plant expansion project in Oman, the power range up to 9000 kW.

MAN18V32/40 is the German MANB & W typical product for marine engineering and land power plant, representing the advanced technical level of the diesel engine industry in the world. China&#8217;s first MAN18V32/40 diesel generators and generator sets, breaks the cycle of the construction of large-scale heavy oil power plant has had to rely on imports of foreign principal generator set equipment to fill the domestic blank field.


China&#8217;s first advanced 10 kV high-voltage live working robot
China&#8217;s first advanced 10 kV high-voltage live working robot | China's Great Science and Technology

2012-07-25 &#8212; Recently, high-voltage live working robot independently developed by the Shandong LNINT. This prodcut has passed through the identification and reached the international advanced level.

The project has completed the design of master-slave operation manipulator, robot dedicated lift system design and machining, tool design and processing, insulation protection system design and processing and realizes charged and shelter enclosures and other operations task.

At the same time, integrating the operational requirements, preparation of operating procedures and charged Practice (with live working robot adaptation).

The High-voltage live working robot can satisfy the requirements of high voltage live line work process, and adapt to the operating characteristics of the High-voltage environment. Instead of manually operating, the robot can complete the high-voltage live connection/disconnection, dropped cutout replacement with high working frequency. It also shortens the time of the live working at height, improve live operating efficiency, reduce the labor intensity to ensure maximum operating safety of the personnel.

 

[doidoi2]

Chinese technology is getting better faster than I expected. It's about the only country that has such a comprehensive list of advances in whole slew of technologies in many different fields.

China, however, needs to liberalize more. The command economy results in misallocation of resources. Aside from a few places where "national champions" make sense such as aerospace and energy, most of the state companies can be released back into private hands.

If China does not do this, it will eventually suffer the fate of Japan. Japan's biggest mistake is to refuse to let the market weed out the weakest link. China also has inane controls like the state film bureau that stifle innovation and prevent the realization of Chinese soft power.

In short, fire bureaucrats, make them into private companies forced to compete on the market.

Only then will China continue to grow. Otherwise, it's doomed to be Japan 2.0.

 

[Martian2]

Chinese technology is getting better faster than I expected. It's about the only country that has such a comprehensive list of advances in whole slew of technologies in many different fields.

China, however, needs to liberalize more. The command economy results in misallocation of resources. Aside from a few places where "national champions" make sense such as aerospace and energy, most of the state companies can be released back into private hands.

If China does not do this, it will eventually suffer the fate of Japan. Japan's biggest mistake is to refuse to let the market weed out the weakest link. China also has inane controls like the state film bureau that stifle innovation and prevent the realization of Chinese soft power.

In short, fire bureaucrats, make them into private companies forced to compete on the market.

Only then will China continue to grow. Otherwise, it's doomed to be Japan 2.0.

Only the strongest state companies should be privatized. Weaker state companies should be supported until they possess world-class technology and a large market share to sustain their business.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

Only the strongest state companies should be privatized. Weaker state companies should be supported until they possess world-class technology and a large market share to sustain their business.

CPC controls the military and the strongest state companies, it is not going to happen.

They can allow the investment from the private sector to their state companies, but they are not going to hand over the stake.

Privatizing the national corporations will turn China into the second USSR, and these public wealths will later get stolen by the oligarchy.

See how the Russian oligarchy came from, they were mostly the offsprings of the CCCP leaders, after the privatization these bastards have stolen the public wealths from the Soviet people.

China will NEVER become a capitalist state, but it will remain a socialist state with the Chinese characteristics.

Do you think why they keep mentioning about the Maoism before the 18th national congress? Because they are going to shift toward left.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

Chinese technology is getting better faster than I expected. It's about the only country that has such a comprehensive list of advances in whole slew of technologies in many different fields.

China, however, needs to liberalize more. The command economy results in misallocation of resources. Aside from a few places where "national champions" make sense such as aerospace and energy, most of the state companies can be released back into private hands.

If China does not do this, it will eventually suffer the fate of Japan. Japan's biggest mistake is to refuse to let the market weed out the weakest link. China also has inane controls like the state film bureau that stifle innovation and prevent the realization of Chinese soft power.

In short, fire bureaucrats, make them into private companies forced to compete on the market.

Only then will China continue to grow. Otherwise, it's doomed to be Japan 2.0.

Wrong, Japan got stagnated by US by signing the Plaza Accord, since they are an occupied country with no choice, so they got milked by US.

On the other hand, China is not an occupied country, so US cannot blackmail China.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Wrong, Japan got stagnated by US by signing the Plaza Accord, since they are an occupied country with no choice, so they got milked by US.

On the other hand, China is not an occupied country, so US cannot blackmail China.

Very true.

Privatizing the national corporations will turn China into the second USSR, and these public wealths will later get stolen by the oligarchy.

Depends how it is implemented. It is best to have a good balance.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

Depends how it is implemented. It is best to have a good balance.

China is willing to support the small/medium corporations, but those giant national corporations still need to remain as state-owned.

Can you imagine if Shenzhou 9 being launched by a private corporation? The private corporation will definitely care about the profit first instead the safety of those taikonauts.

 

[Obambam]

When you hear the west making noises about us, then you know we're is heading on the right track.

 

[doidoi2]

Wrong, Japan got stagnated by US by signing the Plaza Accord, since they are an occupied country with no choice, so they got milked by US.

On the other hand, China is not an occupied country, so US cannot blackmail China.

Plaza accord was not as bad for Japan as you think. The biggest immediate effect of the accords was to raise the yen from 200+ to about 120+ yen.

This was actually beneficial for Japan, because one of the supposed "bad" effects of currency appreciation was that you lose your export business. Yet, the years after the Yen appreciation saw that the Japanese trade surplus CONTINUED. At the same time, Japan was able to buy its imports with a higher-valued yen. Not to mention that the Japanese workers got paid more for the same amount of work in currency terms.

Look it up yourself.

Why did Japan's trade surplus remain? because there were few alternatives to the Japanese supply of electronics and machinery.

ditto with the Reminbi appreciation from 2005-2008. All it did was help China increase its share, and increase its nominal GDP.

What does that tell us? It tells us that currency appreciation is fine as long as you're the only game in town. Your export business will not suffer. IF anything, the export business will be forced to become more competitive, and the low margin industries will be wiped out.

And Right now, China's the only game in town.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

Plaza accord was not as bad for Japan as you think. The biggest immediate effect of the accords was to raise the yen from 200+ to about 120+ yen.

This was actually beneficial for Japan, because one of the supposed "bad" effects of currency appreciation was that you lose your export business. Yet, the years after the Yen appreciation saw that the Japanese trade surplus CONTINUED. At the same time, Japan was able to buy its imports with a higher-valued yen. Not to mention that the Japanese workers got paid more for the same amount of work in currency terms.

Look it up yourself.

Why did Japan's trade surplus remain? because there were few alternatives to the Japanese supply of electronics and machinery.

ditto with the Reminbi appreciation from 2005-2008. All it did was help China increase its share, and increase its nominal GDP.

What does that tell us? It tells us that currency appreciation is fine as long as you're the only game in town. Your export business will not suffer. IF anything, the export business will be forced to become more competitive, and the low margin industries will be wiped out.

And Right now, China's the only game in town.

Their currency has been appreciated too much in a short burst, thus it hurts their economy and their export.

China's currency will also keep appreciating in the current trend, but it will remain the appreciation in a slow pace in order to not hurt the export as our manufacturing products will keep leveled up as well.

 

[eachus]

China, however, needs to liberalize more. The command economy results in misallocation of resources. Aside from a few places where "national champions" make sense such as aerospace and energy, most of the state companies can be released back into private hands.

If China does not do this, it will eventually suffer the fate of Japan. Japan's biggest mistake is to refuse to let the market weed out the weakest link. China also has inane controls like the state film bureau that stifle innovation and prevent the realization of Chinese soft power.

In short, fire bureaucrats, make them into private companies forced to compete on the market.

Only then will China continue to grow. Otherwise, it's doomed to be Japan 2.0.

I can not agree with you anymore. that logic is laughable. you think in the same way Russian did in the 1990s. sell all state enterprises to private will jump start the industry efficient and become develop country overnight. Guess what, they crash. GM was a private company, bankrupted. number of large US banks were all private companies, they were already bankrupted without bailout. Do you know how bailout works, at the time AIG was dropped to $2 billion in market cap, the Federal use $200 billion to buy 35% of its shares, then own 35% of the company sell it out for less later. GM was the same story, spend tens billion to buy 20% of GM company worth almost nothing. That was giving the money away. Give the money to who? ----- the banks!

GM borrowed 100 billions of money from the banks, if GM bankrupts, then banks will lose all. If the Federal give the money to GM, then banks are going to share the money. AIG was too big to fall, if it fall, the banks are big loser. if the Fed give tons of cash to AIG, then AIG safe, the banks will not lose. why Fed give the money to AIG, to the banks? since the banks owns the Fed. anyway, you dont understand the economics, or you dont want to.


what about the Chinese economic? "The command economy results in misallocation of resources. " is completely BS. go search in internet, which one said China is command economy? you have no clue what command economy is. China is planned market economic. it is planned, not messy, it is market oriental, it is compatible and efficient. can you find another single country out there more efficient than China?

 

[terranMarine]

I don't think privatization is a good idea. I've seen a state owned railway company turned into a private one and their service not only dropped but also robbing travelers by increasing the fee all the time. China's state banks also performed better than the western private ones so privatization isn't always a good idea.