What's new

China economic corridor is no 'debt trap' for Pakistan

Khanivore

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jan 2, 2010
Messages
1,395
Reaction score
0
Country
United Kingdom
Location
Netherlands
China economic corridor is debt reliever for Pakistan

By Yasir Masood | 23 April 2019 • 4:00pm | Telegraph

Detractors have labelled it a ‘debt trap’ but in reality a $5.9bn loan payable over a long period of time is of little consequence to the Pakistani economy

The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), as part of the Belt and Road Initiative, has been making remarkable progress, yet some countries and observers are trying to belittle its enormous potential benefits by labelling it a “debt trap”.

Since the CPEC is entering its next phase of development, those opposed to it are trying to impede its progress using a two-pronged strategy: deceiving the public by misquoting the CPEC’s financial figures and achievements in the media; and raising the spectre of past militancy in Pakistan to mislead investors into believing the country is still a volatile investment destination.

Despite Pakistani government departments issuing innumerable clarifications, along with the real facts and figures about the CPEC, the international CPEC cynics are bent on calling it a “debt trap”. Let us solve this puzzle by analysing the CPEC’s financial figures shared by the Chinese embassy in Islamabad. For instance, only $5.9bn of the $18.9bn funding provided by the Chinese companies so far for infrastructure projects constitute loans with 2 per cent interest payable from 2021. The rest of the sum is meant for energy projects funded by Chinese companies and other partners.

Also, $143m has been provided as an interest-free loan for the construction of the Gwadar East Bay Expressway in the Pakistani province of Balochistan and $29m as a grant to fund welfare projects. This means loans are being used to fund less than 20 per cent of all CPEC projects, and more than 80 per cent of the projects are funded via different financial modalities according to international rules.

Since the CPEC loan of $5.9bn is hardly 6 per cent of Pakistan’s total external debt and liabilities of $99.1bn, how can it be called a “debt trap”? As part of a “hybrid war”, it is obvious that some global observers along with a few Pakistanis are calling the CPEC a “debt trap” to fulfil their ulterior motives. The loans from the International Monetary Fund, World Bank, Asian Development Bank and other international lending institutions form a major part of Pakistan’s total external debt and liabilities. Yet no one calls them a “debt trap”?

Thanks to the CPEC, China has been the largest investor in Pakistan for the past five years. The CPEC has not only attracted more Chinese investment in Pakistan but also transformed the country from an investment-dry to an investment-friendly destination. For instance, in February, Saudi Arabia signed memorandums of understanding worth $10bn to invest in the Gwadar oil refinery apart from an additional $10bn of other deals. Other countries, too, are looking forward to investing in Pakistan, especially in CPEC projects, to reap rich benefits.

CPEC energy projects have already helped Pakistan overcome its energy shortfall, and by 2021 Pakistan will no longer be an energy-deficient country – which will allow Pakistani entrepreneurs to produce more exportable goods and increase their export earnings.

The CPEC has already created about 70,000 direct jobs since 2015, and about 60,000 of those jobs have gone to local people. And by 2030, up to 800,000 people are likely to be employed in various CPEC projects.

The other major benefit of the CPEC, especially apparent in the Gwadar port, is likely to be a huge influx of foreign investments.

Pakistan’s transport network is in bad shape, causing an annual loss of about 3.5 per cent of GDP – due mainly to excessive consumption of gas and lubricants, and frequent changes of spare parts and breakdown of vehicles. According to the IMF, Pakistan’s GDP was about $304.95bn in 2017, which means it loses about $10.67bn because of its poor transport network.

The CPEC will help reduce this loss because it is expected to help improve Pakistan’s transport network. And by building the Gwadar port and road network, the CPEC will help Pakistan earn $6bn to $8bn a year from road and bridge tolls.

Pakistan is on the way to establishing three special economic zones (SEZs) by the end of June. Also, it has plans to establish an information technology SEZ in Islamabad. Such projects will promote upstream and downstream industries, as well as create more employment opportunities for the local people.

Along with the CPEC, Pakistan’s tourism industry, too, is developing at a rapid pace with the country attracting a record number of tourists. Agriculture is another sector that Chinese investors have targeted, and the innovative and modern technology they will introduce to farming will greatly benefit Pakistani farmers by increasing their yields manyfold.

Compared with the increased earnings and benefits of Pakistanis, a $5.9bn debt payable over a long period of time is of little consequence to Pakistan’s economy.

The author is working as a deputy director of media and publications at the CPEC Centre of Excellence, Islamabad.

This article was originally produced and published by China Daily. View the original article at chinadaily.com.cn
 
The only people against it are staunch enemies of Pakistan and China. *COUGH* India *Cough*

Looks like India is to gareeb to even make an economic corridor with anyone. Looks like the slums gave additional side effects to the Indian Economy.
 
The only people against it are staunch enemies of Pakistan and China. *COUGH* India *Cough*

Looks like India is to gareeb to even make an economic corridor with anyone. Looks like the slums gave additional side effects to the Indian Economy.
Absolutely. The only folks extremely butt-hurt are the Indians, but I have a feeling they'll have no choice but to participate in China's BRI. :partay:
 
The actual debt trap is the 99B USD debt we have.CPEC and it’s assorted debts are peanuts. This is all butt-hurt propaganda mainly to counter the rise of China and Pakistan.
 
What is the latest development? Are we receiving money?this project is already half implemented.there are no details.are we receiving money from China and how much? I think we have 9 percent share.
 
What is the latest development? Are we receiving money?this project is already half implemented.there are no details.are we receiving money from China and how much? I think we have 9 percent share.
There you go, parroting like a typical Indian again. :yahoo:
 
There you go, parroting like a typical Indian again. :yahoo:

@Dubious I am not indian.this person hates me just because of my neutral opinion on feb27 dogfight.he thinks I am indian and attacking me on my every single post.kindly ask him to refrain.kindly tell him that this is Pak defence forum and not Facebook where you can attack and troll anyone.this is too much.i am not indian.i followed indian people on Twitter just to get latest news,nothing else.i even talked about kashmir on indian defence forum and they ban me.lol kindly check my ip address and tell this man that I am not indian.
 
@Dubious I am not indian.this person hates me just because of my neutral opinion on feb27 dogfight.he thinks I am indian and attacking me on my every single post.kindly ask him to refrain.kindly tell him that this is Pak defence forum and not Facebook where you can attack and troll anyone.this is too much.i am not indian.i followed indian people on Twitter just to get latest news,nothing else.i even talked about kashmir on indian defence forum and they ban me.lol kindly check my ip address and tell this man that I am not indian.

I and others here have seen how you tried to question and doubt Pakistan air force, you used Indian videos laden with rubbish theories on downing F-16 - you even towed their mantra! - and you doubted PAF CAS's statement to Warnes on Su-30MKI kill. When you act like an Indian, you become like one; hence why I doubt you're a Pakistani and always see your posts in focus. @waz

And here's yet again Indian mantra in your words on PM IK in Iran on terrorism: "I think he clearly said that propagating from pakistan.it means he is in Iran to beg for mercy and not for omara.i think it's time for army to do something.imran Khan lost his mind."
 
Last edited:
I and others here have seen how you tried to question and doubt Pakistan air force, you used Indian videos laden with rubbish theories on downing F-16 - you even towed their mantra! - and you doubted PAF CAS's statement to Warnes on Su-30MKI kill. When you act like an Indian, you become like one; hence why I doubt you're a Pakistani and always see your posts in focus. @waz

And here's yet again Indian mantra in your words on PM IK in Iran on terrorism: "I think he clearly said that propagating from pakistan.it means he is in Iran to beg for mercy and not for omara.i think it's time for army to do something.imran Khan lost his mind."

dude opinions can differ.why you don't understand this logic? i think we are here because of different views and not to proof loyalty to country.i don't understand your problem.you are very emotional and patriotic.patriotism is good but there are critics as well.everything is not perfect.you are the same person who blamed me for su-35 picture because you thought it's su-30 and india uses it.i mean this type of logic is childish.you can talk to indians,to anyone around the world if you have patience.i didn't replied to specific indians on indian defence forum because they used bad words against our country but there are some good people also.finally they unban me and now i can see their stuff.it's important for you and me to have a look at their discussion.most of their intel is fake but not all.what i am trying to say is that we should also look at our enemy and be prepare for everything.imran khan statement is on media.i don't want to share video here.do you believe that we target iran? this is what our pm said.may be in another context but it hurts our reputation that's why i was critical but please stop this loyalty test.
 
dude opinions can differ.why you don't understand this logic? i think we are here because of different views and not to proof loyalty to country.i don't understand your problem.you are very emotional and patriotic.patriotism is good but there are critics as well.everything is not perfect.you are the same person who blamed me for su-35 picture because you thought it's su-30 and india uses it.i mean this type of logic is childish.you can talk to indians,to anyone around the world if you have patience.i didn't replied to specific indians on indian defence forum because they used bad words against our country but there are some good people also.finally they unban me and now i can see their stuff.it's important for you and me to have a look at their discussion.most of their intel is fake but not all.what i am trying to say is that we should also look at our enemy and be prepare for everything.imran khan statement is on media.i don't want to share video here.do you believe that we target iran? this is what our pm said.may be in another context but it hurts our reputation that's why i was critical but please stop this loyalty test.

You're not a critic you're a self hater. You twist the narrative to make Pakistan look like the aggressor/loser/generally bad. In your current post you say:

"imran khan statement is on media.i don't want to share video here.do you believe that we target iran? this is what our pm said.may be in another context but it hurts our reputation that's why i was critical but please stop this loyalty test."

Actually here's what he said:

"I know Iran has suffered from terrorism [perpetrated] by groups operating from Pakistan. …we [need to] have trust in each other that both countries will not allow any terrorist activity from their soil. We hope this will build confidence between us."

Nowhere does he say "WE target Iran". He is saying perpetrators have used Pakistan's soil not that Pakistan has supported this in any way. You are the one being emotional by twisting his words and trying to pass it off as "in another context". No, that's not another context, it's completely different. He also says that similar terrorist activity emanates from Iran ("both countries...") a part you conveniently ignore.

Before you get upset I think it was a stupid move to make such a statement but I'm not going to twist his words. Lets see how this effects the relationships in the region.


Thankfully self hating behavior is self destructive, nature does not look kindly on such behavior. You'll fizzle out yourselves. You're not the only one though there's others like you. Right @Peaceful Civilian ?
 
You're not a critic you're a self hater. You twist the narrative to make Pakistan look like the aggressor/loser/generally bad. In your current post you say:

"imran khan statement is on media.i don't want to share video here.do you believe that we target iran? this is what our pm said.may be in another context but it hurts our reputation that's why i was critical but please stop this loyalty test."

Actually here's what he said:

"I know Iran has suffered from terrorism [perpetrated] by groups operating from Pakistan. …we [need to] have trust in each other that both countries will not allow any terrorist activity from their soil. We hope this will build confidence between us."

Nowhere does he say "WE target Iran". He is saying perpetrators have used Pakistan's soil not that Pakistan has supported this in any way. You are the one being emotional by twisting his words and trying to pass it off as "in another context". No, that's not another context, it's completely different. He also says that similar terrorist activity emanates from Iran ("both countries...") a part you conveniently ignore.

Before you get upset I think it was a stupid move to make such a statement but I'm not going to twist his words. Lets see how this effects the relationships in the region.


Thankfully self hating behavior is self destructive, nature does not look kindly on such behavior. You'll fizzle out yourselves. You're not the only one though there's others like you. Right @Peaceful Civilian ?

so are you saying that we finally admitted to iran that groups operate from our country target them? and what about recent attacks from iran and omara? and kulbhushan lol.yes he said that same is true for iran.again it doesn't change anything.groups from pakistan or attack from pakistan are same.i don't mind but i think we should use aggressive approach in dealing with iran.they don't even accept kulbhushan.point is we accepted groups inside pakistan but what are they doing to stop omara like activities? nothing.why always sympathy for countries who adopted aggressive approach against pakistan? this is why i said those words which you don't like.i don't want to continue this discussion because i don't think that anybody can understand my opinion.see khanivore,targeting me everywhere on my posts.it's like you say here whatever looks good to other members.lol i think i should stay away from pak defence forum.i think i need a break hahaha. have a good day.
 
Last edited:
I Started An Entire Thread On This Topic Explaining How CPEC Cannot Be Compared With Sri Lankan and Venezuelan Debt
 
The only people against it are staunch enemies of Pakistan and China. *COUGH* India *Cough*

Looks like India is to gareeb to even make an economic corridor with anyone. Looks like the slums gave additional side effects to the Indian Economy.

India-BD-India-maybe Burma pipeline will undo CPEC. Lol :rofl:
 
so are you saying that we finally admitted to iran that groups operate from our country target them? and what about recent attacks from iran and omara? and kulbhushan lol.yes he said that same is true for iran.again it doesn't change anything.groups from pakistan or attack from pakistan are same.i don't mind but i think we should use aggressive approach in dealing with iran.they don't even accept kulbhushan.point is we accepted groups inside pakistan but what are they doing to stop omara like activities? nothing.why always sympathy for countries who adopted aggressive approach against pakistan? this is why i said those words which you don't like.i don't want to continue this discussion because i don't think that anybody can understand my opinion.see khanivore,targeting me everywhere on my posts.it's like you say here whatever looks good to other members.lol i think i should stay away from pak defence forum.i think i need a break hahaha. have a good day.
When I see you writing nonsense, trying to make Pakistan look like an aggressor and a liar, I will point you out. I hate fraudsters.

dude opinions can differ.why you don't understand this logic? i think we are here because of different views and not to proof loyalty to country.i don't understand your problem.you are very emotional and patriotic.patriotism is good but there are critics as well.everything is not perfect.you are the same person who blamed me for su-35 picture because you thought it's su-30 and india uses it.i mean this type of logic is childish.you can talk to indians,to anyone around the world if you have patience.i didn't replied to specific indians on indian defence forum because they used bad words against our country but there are some good people also.finally they unban me and now i can see their stuff.it's important for you and me to have a look at their discussion.most of their intel is fake but not all.what i am trying to say is that we should also look at our enemy and be prepare for everything.imran khan statement is on media.i don't want to share video here.do you believe that we target iran? this is what our pm said.may be in another context but it hurts our reputation that's why i was critical but please stop this loyalty test.
Opinions differ indeed but when you parrot Indian mantra and wear the Pakistan badge, that's where you stand out. By the way, it wasn't me who mentioned about your Sukhoi avatar. Go back and check.
 
Back
Top Bottom