What's new

China Can Use Bangladesh’s Largest Seaports, PM Hasina Says

The Ronin

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 24, 2017
Messages
3,386
Reaction score
0
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Bangladesh
Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina told lawmakers Wednesday that China could use Bangladesh’s two largest seaports, in a move praised by analysts, weeks after Dhaka signed an agreement with Beijing’s regional rival, India, for access to the same ports.

Hasina issued the statement while announcing that Dhaka and New Delhi had signed a deal known as the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP), which would ease the flow of cargo destined to northeastern Indian states.

“We will welcome it if the southwestern states of China show interest in using the two ports,” Hasina replied when a legislator asked if Beijing would also be given access to the ports.

India’s seven northeastern states, encircled by five countries, are connected by a sliver of land that arches over Bangladesh. By providing access to the two ports, Bangladesh would be transformed into “a hub of regional trade and connectivity,” Hasina said.

“To achieve these goals, an SOP has been signed with India. So, India can use the two ports [Chittagong and Mongla] for its export-import trade,” Hasina said. “I hope, the northeastern states of India would exploit the opportunity.”

She said landlocked Bhutan and Nepal might also be given access to the ports in the “near future.”

‘A win-win for all’

China began taking steps in recent years to expand its footprint in Bangladesh’s economy and energy sectors. Beijing outpaced the United States as Bangladesh’s top investor in 2018, during which Dhaka recorded U.S. $3.6 billion in foreign direct investments, according to official figures obtained by BenarNews.

“I think, the prime minister’s declaration of welcoming China for port use is a timely decision,” Ambassador Humayun Kabir, the acting president of the Bangladesh Enterprise Institute, a local think-tank, told BenarNews. “The announcement reflects the people’s desire.”

Bangladesh and India signed a memorandum of agreement on the use of Chittagong and Mongla ports in June 2015, but the two countries signed the SOP last month.

Kabir said this marked the first time that Bangladesh had expressed interest in allowing China to use its ports.

“By offering China to use Chittagong and Mongla ports, the prime minister has passed on a message that we are not connected with only one country, India,” he said. “We want to be connected with China and other countries, too.”

Opening up the ports would not only benefit Bangladesh but also India, China, Bhutan and Nepal, the diplomat said.

“This is a win-win for all,” he said.

Since Bangladesh won its independence from Pakistan in 1971, India had been seeking access to its seven landlocked states via Bangladesh.

In 2011, Hasina and her then-Indian counterpart, Manmohan Singh, announced in a joint statement that New Delhi would use Bangladesh ports to transport goods to India’s northeastern states, but a final agreement had not been signed.

Delwar Hossain, a Dhaka University professor, said Bangladesh’s move would help the nation maintain a balance in its relations with India and China.

“Bangladesh does not want to make the port for use by any specific country. The facility is open to all interested countries,” he said.

China is one of Bangladesh’s largest trading partners, with bilateral trade reaching about U.S. $12 billion annually, with the imbalance tilted heavily in Beijing’s favor. The Bangladeshi Army has been equipped with Chinese tanks, its navy uses Chinese frigates and its air force flies Chinese fighter jets.

A Chinese-built solar power plant recently started supplying electricity to Bangladesh’s national grid, and Beijing-based China National Machinery Import and Export Corporation (CMC) also began producing 500 megawatts of electricity across the nation.

Beijing will also help Bangladesh construct its first submarine base, but Chinese subs will not use the facility, a leading member of parliamentary committees on foreign policy and defense told BenarNews in September.

The future base, which will be built in a southeastern district on the Bay of Bengal and financed by Bangladesh, will house two Chinese-made submarines purchased by Dhaka from Beijing in 2016, retired Col. Faruk Khan said, adding that Bangladesh was not taking sides in a regional rivalry between India and China.

During Hasina’s visit to Beijing in July, Bangladesh and China inked several agreements including one that relates to China’s extension of loans worth U.S. $1.7 billion for Bangladesh’s power sector, local reports said.

https://www.benarnews.org/english/news/bengali/bangladesh-china-11132019171915.html
 
.
Good move...BD is open for business with all.
 
.
Hasina is anti Pakistan but this lady have great business sense.
 
.
Good move and huge potential for Bangladesh ports. Its cheaper
 
.
Good balancing act. I like this approach. At the end of the day we can make money and yet not be tilted towards anyone.
 
.
The outlet for this news (Benarnews) is an online news service affiliated with Radio Free Asia that reports in five languages: Bengali, Thai, Bahasa Malaysia, Bahasa Indonesia and English. BenarNews is funded by an annual grant from the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG), an independent US agency.

This piece reported is rather innocuous, but good notes for any news going forward from them.
 
.
Good balancing act. I like this approach. At the end of the day we can make money and yet not be tilted towards anyone.
But, tell me how China will use BD ports. If it has to use the Burmese corridor to reach BD, it would be easier for it to use Burmese ports. I checked the map and could not find even one-meter common BD-China border.

Hasina's talk is superficial. Giving port facilities to India's landlocked NE should not be reciprocated with a similar offer to China which has little interest to detour its transportation. It is a hollow offer.
 
.
Hasina's talk is superficial. Giving port facilities to India's landlocked NE should not be reciprocated with a similar offer to China which has little interest to detour its transportation. It is a hollow offer.

Overall agree.

I would change your wording to just "tokenism". Why not offer to China? It's just you (China) can use if you so want to as well....and thus no feathers need be ruffled.

Of course China has far better logistics reaching its south west internally rather than going circular route through sea and then trying to go through N.E india and/or Burma...this route is not going to improve all that much quickly....so its just tokenism.
 
.
But, tell me how China will use BD ports. If it has to use the Burmese corridor to reach BD, it would be easier for it to use Burmese ports. I checked the map and could not find even one-meter common BD-China border.

Hasina's talk is superficial. Giving port facilities to India's landlocked NE should not be reciprocated with a similar offer to China which has little interest to detour its transportation. It is a hollow offer.

China can use this port to supply goods to Nepal...China's newfound ally. Besides having Chinese ships in Bay of Bengal (BOB) will keep India on toes and not let her take BOB region for guaranteed.
 
.
But, tell me how China will use BD ports. If it has to use the Burmese corridor to reach BD, it would be easier for it to use Burmese ports. I checked the map and could not find even one-meter common BD-China border.

Hasina's talk is superficial. Giving port facilities to India's landlocked NE should not be reciprocated with a similar offer to China which has little interest to detour its transportation. It is a hollow offer.

The way I interpret it is that, it keeps China happy and also sends a signal to India that we are not exclusive to them. That is the key objective here.

I am no expert of shipping routes and the mechanics of it. So can't really comment on exactly how China will use it. But giving them that option means there is potential for us to make some money as well, should they choose to use it.
 
. .
Overall agree.

I would change your wording to just "tokenism". Why not offer to China? It's just you (China) can use if you so want to as well....and thus no feathers need be ruffled.

Of course China has far better logistics reaching its south west internally rather than going circular route through sea and then trying to go through N.E india and/or Burma...this route is not going to improve all that much quickly....so its just tokenism.
China is very large. Its south-west is at the north of Pakistan and its mid-south is over Indian NE and Burma. To bring imported goods including fuel to these parts from Shanghai Port at the very east must be a logistic nightmare.

So, naturally China wants Gowaddar in Pakistan to cover its SW and it can cover its mid-south by linking with Sittwe Port in Arakan. So, China does not need any port in BD or in India. However, things may change if there is a tripartite treaty and BD-China connecton made through Indian NE. In any case, Bd cannot independently connect with China without going through Burma or India.

Hasina Bibi is devoid of geography, it seems. Once she was asking people to produce hydro-electricity from the STATIC water in the shallow water bodies we call Beel and Jheel. She simply thought the meaning of hydro is water and the static beels have water. So, why power cannot be produced there?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom