Well, they do have a Gandhi-Nehru Dynasty after 1947.
FYI, people relate the current Gandhis to Mahatma Gandhi, but there's no relation.
Nehru's daughter married some guy whose surname ended with Gandhi as well, so she adopted that name by marriage. So Indira Nehru became Indira Gandhi. As the only child, she inherited Nehru's legacy. If she was a man, the family would have continued to be called Nehru.
Anyway, back to topic, the CCP screwed up population control, so they need to roll back leverage led growth because future generations cannot handle the growing leverage. The CCP can't go back to suggesting they can double GDP and per capita income every decade. So now, they are whitewashing low growth with "quality" growth, which actually means nothing since even today 60-70% of the Chinese population is still earning between $2 and $10 every day.
At the individual level also, with only one son, there is too much pressure on the son to take care of far too many dependents, which means in a few years, there will be less focus on marriage and more focus on staying single and avoiding marriage because it's not affordable.
With women trying to get married before 27, their focus on career will be short-lived. And with the govt organizations insulting women by referring to above 27s as shengnu, there is going to be a spate of bad marriages with women having lesser choices due to men avoiding marriages. Marriage rates are falling and divorce rates are rising in China. This will further put a strain on new births.
And all this will happen while half of the Chinese population is still poor. So problems developed nations face will creep into a still developing nation, which is extremely bad in the long run.
Quality growth >>>
Instead of questioning what "quality" growth means, most of the Chinese here are supporting CCP's browbeating as though their propaganda is some sort of panacea. People forget that even today developed countries still aim for high growth, not the so-called "quality" growth.
Ah ha, I knew you would talk about Sanskrit, but it's only used by the upper echelons like the scholars and priest. The masses spoke different language from the nobles, and masses from different region spoke different languages. The South mainly spoke Telugu,Kannada & Tamil for example.
More importantly, I'm actually talking about a common language today. Using Sanskrit, a language spoken primarily by only a few thousand today, to make your point is simply makes the argument easier. It's like saying Europe is one nation because they used to speak Latin, also almost a dead language today like Sanskrit, and the Europeans speak a derivative of Latin today too. The Tamil language is not derived from Sanskrit by the way.
So in the past, when India was a single country with common laws, common ancestry and common language at the time, which properly defines a single country, now you want to talk about the modern times simply because India is a far more sophisticated country with far more intelligent people capable of creating entire new languages and culture compared to the Chinese. Hey, just because your society wasn't advanced enough to diversify with time, I can't help it that my society did.
Sanskrit was lingua franca for a very long time. Yes, people spoke other languages too, but the main language for everything, even education was Sanskrit.
Even our women were educated.
https://blogs.timesofindia.indiatim...n-than-the-west-at-least-in-womens-education/
In comparison, Mandarin became a standard in China much, much later, only a few hundred years ago. Later than even English.
Even better, Old Chinese is completely irrelevant today while Sanskrit can still become a mainstream language for India, maybe even the rest of the world because the language is highly advanced with an
unlimited vocabulary which tends to infinity.
Very tiny parts of India continued to have their own system, like the Tamilians, but that's pretty much the same even in China, with the South Chinese having their own system. Even if it's not as much as India's, you forget that even China has many languages.
