What's new

China-California Cooperation: News and Updates

Gov. Jerry Brown says California wants China’s help on electric vehicles
This is done. See paragraph 2 of the "Memorandum of Understanding on Research, Innovation, and Investment to Advance Cooperation on Low-Carbon Development and Clean Energy Resources" which was signed between The Government of California of USA and Ministry of Science and Technology of China:

Untitled.png


The full agreement here https://www.gov.ca.gov/news.php?id=19832
China is advanced in techs like solar, wind, li-ion battery/storage, UHV transmission, smart grid, ICT infra, carbon capture, supercritical coal-fired, carbon capture, CTX and such, while California is advanced in carbon cap and trade, software and ICT services, there are plenty of business opportunities.

Other than with Ministry of Science and Technology, California has signed similar agreements with government of Jiangsu and Sichuan respectively.
 
.
Agree, perhaps China can work in tandem with few states like California, but fundamental difference in economic structure determines that China-US relation will remain as it is, extremely hostile yet pragmatic, sizable yet transactional.

Interesting observation and suggestion. In fact, especially with respect to infrastructure -related business, which includes machinery export, transportation, EVs and RE technology, China can target friendly states within the US and develop strong ties. In this respect, California is probably the most lucrative market to explore. Instead of wasting energy on M&A deals that would be blocked by the federal government, in the US, China should concentrate on infra business with friendly states.

Great thread.
 
.
Interesting observation and suggestion. In fact, especially with respect to infrastructure -related business, which includes machinery export, transportation, EVs and RE technology, China can target friendly states within the US and develop strong ties. In this respect, California is probably the most lucrative market to explore. Instead of wasting energy on M&A deals that would be blocked by the federal government, in the US, China should concentrate on infra business with friendly states.

Great thread.
CRRC is preparing new metro cars for LA.
 
.
CRRC is preparing new metro cars for LA.

California is a complete economy by itself.

**


California Yes, United States No

How Trump matters less in a world of sub-country level governance.

By Andrés Ortega, June 15, 2017


Some years ago, the late humorist Art Buchwald (1925-2007) wondered out loud whether California would continue being part of NATO. He did so on the eve of a visit to Washington by Jerry Brown, then and now the governor of California.

After Donald Trump’s decision to pull the United States out of the Paris Climate Accord, the question can be turned on its head.

California leads the way

California has emerged as the vanguard of a series of U.S. states, cities and companies vowing to continue respecting the commitments that have been adopted in Paris in 2016. It remains in, while the U.S. leaves. That move is more than symbolic.

The Paris Agreement – together with the decision on the Sustainable Development Goals for 2030 – is the best example of what I call inductive global governance, bringing about progress from the bottom up.

California is a powerful player on the world stage. It has 39 million inhabitants (more than Canada, and slightly less than Spain) – and a GDP that makes it the fifth-largest economy in the world (not counting the United States itself).

Leading by example

Beyond just California, New York, Washington and a dozen other states – including two with Republican governors – plus cities, including the U.S.’s 10 largest (New York City, Los Angeles as well as the capital, Washington, D.C.), and some large companies, have signed up to a coalition called the United States Climate Alliance.

These states and cities alone account for 30% of the U.S. economy and more than 52 million inhabitants. In terms of carbon emissions, however, these states account for only 18% of the U.S. total, because the most polluting (headed by Texas) are with Trump.

The California-China axis

California’s dynamism goes beyond its influence within the United States. Governor Brown is the driving force behind a joint plan with Canada and Mexico to create a pact, albeit a voluntary one, honoring the Paris goals.

Of note as well, last week Brown went to see the Chinese President, Xi Jinping, who met him in Beijing and endorsed his initiative.

Xi, no doubt, remembered that he and Obama were decisive in pulling off the Paris Agreement. So it is now California and the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology that are signing an agreement to cooperate on green energy technologies.

https://www.theglobalist.com/california-yes-united-states-no/
 
.
California-looks-to-China-foreign-investors-for-infrastructure-assistance-1.jpg


Published June 23, 2017 at 8:28 PM
Updated June 23, 2017 at 8:45 PM
China’s high-speed trains carry about 800 million passengers every year – that’s more than any other country.

And the U.S. is now in talks to get on board as business and political leaders gather in San Francisco for China-U.S. infrastructure forum.

CGTN’s May Lee reports.

Infrastructure in the U.S. is ailing from roadways to rail systems. All the more reason China with its much advancement in infrastructure development is ready and willing to forge partnerships to upgrade systems across America.

That’s the purpose of the U.S.-China Infrastructure Cooperation Forum in San Francisco, a one-day gathering of Chinese and American business and political leaders from both the public and private sectors. Representatives from California, Oregon and the state of Washington aggressively pitched major infrastructure needs and the potential for partnerships with Chinese entities.

Of the 20, 000 kilometers of railway in China, 12,000 are high speed. That number is expected to double by 2020. California welcomes Chinese technology and investment. But all of this will cost a lot of money, and government alone can’t cover the estimated $3.6 trillion that will be needed by 2020 for infrastructure improvements.

Finance experts say the U.S. has to catch up in the area of public-private sector partnerships in the infrastructure space, traditionally funded by public funds.

The forum however wasn’t just about U.S. needs. China’s One Belt One Road Initiative was brought up several times as a way for American companies take part in big infrastructure projects in Asia and Europe, but only if the U.S. chooses to participate.
https://america.cgtn.com/2017/06/23...reign-investors-for-infrastructure-assistance
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom