What's new

China Builds First Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile Base?

CONNAN

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
3,381
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
United States
BY ADMIN AT 6 AUGUST, 2010, 3:51 PM

BY: Army Times Publishing Company


China’s new anti-ship ballistic missile (ASBM) will be deployed at the Second Artillery Corps’ new missile base in Guangdong Province in southeastern China, if a new report issued by Washington-based Project 2049 Institute is correct.

On July 28, the state-run Xinhua News Agency reported the visit of local government officials to a new missile base in the northern Guangdong municipality of Shaoguan. The media report is the first to acknowledge the existence of the new missile base.

The new 96166 Unit will be outfitted with Dong Feng 21C medium-range ballistic missiles (MRBM) and possibly the DF-21D ASBM, said Mark Stokes and Tiffany Ma in a new report “Second Artillery Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile Brigade Facilities Under Construction in Guangdong?” posted on Project 2049′s website.

The DF-21C was introduced into active inventory in 2005 and is designed for land targets. Though the DF-21D ASBM is nearing the stage of low rate initial production, expected in 2011 or soon after, it is not likely to be deployed into active service until after lengthy testing of the prototype.

Though the province is already home to a Second Artillery short-range ballistic missile (SRBM) base in Meizhou (96169 Unit), the new base could “have unique capabilities that could complicate the strategic calculus in Asia, and the South China Sea in particular.”

The ASBM has been dubbed the aircraft “carrier killer” by observers and is part of China’s larger anti-access/area denial strategy designed to discourage the U.S. Navy from coming to the aid of Taiwan during a war. Now it appears China is using the same strategy to deter U.S. and other regional navies from operating in the South China Sea.

Though U.S. aircraft carrier groups have significant air defense capabilities, including SM-3 missiles, the threat ASBMs pose is a new one, said Stokes. No country has yet developed a reliable ASBM system and therefore there is reluctance among some analysts to dismiss the possibility China has developed the capability of locating and destroying a moving target at sea with a ballistic missile.

However, U.S. Pacific Commander Admiral Robert Willard told members of the U.S. House and Senate Armed Services Committee in March that China was nearing a test phase for an ASBM.

China has recently announced that the South China Sea is a “core interest” and now state-controlled media outlets are claiming the entire South China Sea as Chinese territory.

“Seems to me they are staying on policy by asserting their ownership of the South ‘CHINA’ Sea,” said a former U.S. intelligence officer now based in Singapore. “They aren’t going to deviate from that policy. They’ve got the patience until they own it.”

The deployment of ASBMs near the South China Sea adds a new dimension to the problem regional powers and the U.S. are facing as China begins enforcing maritime claims.

The 1,700 km range DF-21D MRBM can hit most land targets in Vietnam as well as the northern Philippines, including Subic Bay, with little difficulty.

The 1,500-2,000 km range DF-21D ASBM should be able to cover the Spratly Islands at 1,800 km. This would include roughly seventy percent of the South China Sea, if the maximum range of 2,000 km is confirmed.

Additionally, the DF-21C and D will easily handle land targets on Taiwan and naval targets beyond the island with no difficulty. The eastern coast of Taiwan is roughly 800 km from the base. China already has 1,300 DF-11/15 SRBMs aimed at Taiwan and an unknown number of cruise missiles.

During China’s 60th anniversary parade in Beijing in October 2009, the military displayed a variety of mobile missile systems, including the DF-11A and DF15B SRBM, DF-21C MRBM and DF31A intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM). The parade also displayed the DH-10 land-attack cruise missile.

The DF-31A is China’s first road mobile ICBM capable of hitting Washington. Before this missile, China relied on aging silo-based DF-5 ICBMs for use as nuclear counterstrikes on the U.S.

As mobile missile systems, they will be difficult to locate and destroy during a war with the U.S. To add more difficulties for the U.S., the Shaoguan area is near tunneling projects through the Nanling Mountains that divide Guangdong and Hunan provinces.

“A Second Artillery engineering unit known to be responsible for tunneling work under the so-called ‘Great Wall Project’ has been in Shaoguan since as early as 2008,” said the Project 2049 report.
 
.
Silo based deterrence is out dated. Much US research has gone into finding and neutralizing silos. If the DF-21 mod 4 is to go into service it will likely be deployed as road mobile from TEL's like most China's ICBM deterrence force.
 
.
An alternative might be to have SSBNs that carry conventional ship killing DF-21 rather than nuclear missiles. Can also be used for other hard targets on land.
 
.
That's an interest possibility, seeing as the DF-21 is a landbased verison the JL-1 Sub Launched BM. I'm not sure though what the different requirements are for sub launch a missile.
 
.
That's an interest possibility, seeing as the DF-21 is a landbased verison the JL-1 Sub Launched BM. I'm not sure though what the different requirements are for sub launch a missile.

Not only that, DF-21 was actually derived from JL-1. So it will be much easier to convert DF-21D back to SLBM version, but the problem is that JL-1 is actually being phased out of service and replaced by JL-2.
 
.
Do you think that sooner or later they will do the same with JL-2 after they are successful with converting JL-1 into ASBM? Seeing that the PLA likes to take things in steps
 
.
Do you think that sooner or later they will do the same with JL-2 after they are successful with converting JL-1 into ASBM? Seeing that the PLA likes to take things in steps

Of course they could, but it will take time, as JL-2 were just deployed not long ago, and there is no official confirmation of JL-1 being ASBM capable.
 
.
I thought about it and ASBM's are sort of like nukes, because anything you hit with it is going to result in 300-5000 deaths and unforeseeable international impact. This really limits deployment against other great powers, who are the only one's with ships worth shooting with this thing.
 
.
hmmm, has there been discussion on who is likely to use nukes when? i mean, we really don't know if / when nukes come into play in case of a conventional attack.
 
.
I thought about it and ASBM's are sort of like nukes, because anything you hit with it is going to result in 300-5000 deaths and unforeseeable international impact. This really limits deployment against other great powers, who are the only one's with ships worth shooting with this thing.

Except that you don't have nuclear fallouts, so in a way this could be a more dangerous weapon as countries might use it less sparingly since it is non-nuclear. Same with the global strike doctrine.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom