What's new

China: Big spender or loan shark?

Vanguard One

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Dec 20, 2019
Messages
1,307
Reaction score
-7
Country
Ireland
Location
Ireland
1633046008012.png

Workers in Jiangsu province, seen here producing equipment for export along China's Belt and Road


China hands out at least twice as much development money as the US and other major powers, new evidence shows, with most of it coming in the form of risky high-interest loans from Chinese state banks.

The sheer amount of Chinese lending is startling. Not too long ago China received foreign aid, but now the tables have turned.

Over an 18-year period, China has granted or loaned money to 13,427 infrastructure projects worth $843bn across 165 countries, according to the AidData research lab at William & Mary, a university in the US state of Virginia.

Much of this money is linked to Chinese President Xi Jinping's ambitious Belt and Road strategy. Starting in 2013, it leverages China's expertise in infrastructure projects, and ample foreign currency, to build new global trading routes.

1633046158737.png



However, critics fear that the high-interest loans funding many Chinese projects are saddling unsuspecting populations in sky-high debt.

And that's news even to Chinese officials themselves. The AidData researchers - who have spent four years tracing all of China's global lending and spending - say that Chinese government ministries are regularly going to them for information on how Chinese money is being used overseas.

"We hear from public officials in China all the time, saying 'Look, you're in the only game in town'," explains Brad Parks, executive director of AidData. "They say: 'We can't get our hands on this data internally'."

A twisting railway running between China and the neighbouring country of Laos is often touted as a prime example of China's off-the-books lending.

1633046230089.png

The Yumo railway will link China and Laos - but experts say Laos will struggle to pay back the debt


For decades, politicians wondered about building such a connection - linking landlocked south-west China directly to South East Asia.

However, engineers warned the cost would be prohibitive: tracks would need to run through steep mountains, requiring dozens of bridges and tunnels.
Laos is one of the poorest countries in the region and couldn't afford even a fraction of the cost.

Enter China's ambitious bankers: with backing from a group of Chinese state companies and a consortium of Chinese state lenders, the $5.9bn railway is set to begin operations in December.

However, Laos had to take out a $480m loan with a Chinese bank to fund its small part of the equity. One of Laos' few sources of profit, the proceeds of its potash mines, were used to back the massive loan.

1633046272969.png

President Xi has sought to reassure others after criticism of China's global infrastructure projects


"The loan that China's Eximbank made to cover part of the equity really showcases the urgency of the Chinese state to push through the project," explains Wanjing Kelly Chen, research assistant professor at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.

Most of the line is owned by the Chinese-dominated railway group, but under the murky terms of the deal, the Laotian government is ultimately responsible for the railway's debt. The imbalanced deal has led international creditors to downgrade Laos' credit rating to "junk" status.

In September 2020, on the brink of bankruptcy, Laos sold a major asset to China, handing over part of its energy grid for $600m in order to seek debt relief from Chinese creditors. And this is all before the railway has even begun operations.



The Laos railway is far from the only risky project that Chinese state banks have funded - and yet, AidData says China remains the financier of first resort for many low and middle income countries.

"In an average year, China's international development finance commitments amount to about $85bn. And by comparison, the US is spending about $37bn in any given year to support global development activities," says Brad Parks.

China has vastly outpaced all other countries in development financing, but the way in which Beijing has reached that level is "extraordinary", AidData says.

1633046352535.png



In the past, Western countries were guilty of dragging African countries in particular into debt. China is lending differently: instead of financing projects by granting or loaning money from one state to another, almost all the money it's handing out is in the form of state banking loans.

Such loans don't show up in official accounts of government debt. That's because central government institutions aren't named in a lot of the deals struck by Chinese state banks, keeping such deals off government balance sheets and hidden by confidentiality clauses that can prevent governments from knowing exactly what has been agreed behind closed doors.

AidData tallied underreported debt amounting to $385bn.

Many Chinese state developments loans also demand unusual forms of collateral. Increasingly, Chinese loans appear to require borrowers to promise hard cash earned from selling natural resources.

A deal with Venezuela, for example, demands the Venezuelan borrower deposit the foreign currency earned by selling oil directly into a bank account controlled by China. If a debt payment is missed, the Chinese lender can immediately withdraw the cash waiting in the account.

"It really seems like kind of a bread-and-butter strategy they use to signal to their borrower that 'We're the big boss around here'," Brad Parks explains. "Their message is: 'You're going to repay us before anyone else because we're the only ones asking for this prized possession'.

"[That is] income for these very poor countries, dollars and euros, to lock those up in an offshore account that's controlled by a foreign power."

"Is China being smart?" wonders Anna Gelpern, a Georgetown law professor who was involved in an AidData study earlier this year examining Chinese development loan contracts. "I think our conclusion is that they were being muscular and sophisticated in these contracts. They're very much protecting their interests."

Countries can be difficult borrowers, Gelpern explains, and it's not practical to expect them to hand over a physical asset like a port if they're unable to pay their debts.


China might soon face some international lending competition. At a G7 meeting in June, the US and its allies announced the G7 adopts spending plan to rival China's influence, which promises to fund global infrastructure projects that are financially and environmentally sustainable.

However, the plan might simply have come along too late.

"I'm sceptical that Western initiatives will make much of a dent in the Chinese programme," says David Dollar, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and the former US Treasury representative in China.

"[Those new initiatives] will not have enough real money to address the scale of infrastructure needs in the developing world. Also, working with Western official financiers is bureaucratic and subject to long delays."

The AidData researchers found that the Belt and Road project is facing its own issues. BRI projects were more likely to be associated with corruption, labour scandals or environmental issues than other Chinese development deals.

In order to keep the BRI on track, researchers say, Beijing will have no choice but to address borrowers' concerns.

 
.
Zambia owes Chinese lenders $6.6bn - new research
A new estimate for the amount of money that Zambia owes Chinese lenders is nearly double what the Zambian government had previously admitted.
Zambia spends at least 30% of its income on interest payments, according to credit ratings firm S&P Global.
Last year, it missed an interest repayment, making it the first African country to default on a loan during the pandemic.
The country is now under a new President, Hakainde Hichilema, who told the BBC earlier this month that he had inherited an "empty" treasury.
He said the debt situation had not been "fully disclosed" by the former government.
This included what was owed to Chinese lenders.
A new paper from the China Africa Research Initiative, based at Johns Hopkins University in the US, estimates that the sum now amounts to $6.6bn (£4.8bn). A previous Zambian government figure put it at $3.4bn, the paper’s authors say.
Zambia's finance ministry said these figures were "broadly consistent" with official government reporting, Reuters news agency reports.



BBC
 
.
The bridge was one of several major projects built under Abdullah Yameen, a pro-China president elected in 2013. He wanted to kickstart the economy and borrowed hundreds of millions of dollars from China to do so.
Maldives' former President Abdulla Yameen and China's President Xi Jinping
IMAGE SOURCE,GETTY IMAGES
Image caption,Chinese President Xi Jinping (left) pictured with Maldives' former President Abdulla Yameen
At the time Chinese President Xi Jinping was embarking on his grand "Belt and Road Initiative" to build road, rail and sea links between China and the rest of Asia, and far further beyond.
Mr Yameen's tenure was also marked by allegations of human rights abuses, which he denies. Many opposition politicians, including the former president Mohamed Nasheed, were jailed.
But in September 2018, weeks after the bridge opened, Mr Yameen suffered a surprise election defeat to his rivals, the Maldivian Democratic Party, with the MDP's Ibrahim Solih becoming president.
The change of guard also enabled Mr Nasheed to return and re-enter politics.

The new government soon began looking into the nation's finances. What they found shocked them.

"The [Chinese debt] bill was $3.1bn," Mr Nasheed, now Speaker of parliament, told me. The figure included government-to-government loans, money given to state enterprises and private sector loans guaranteed by the Maldivian government.
He is worried his country walked into a debt trap.



"Can these assets produce enough revenue to pay back the debt? The business plan of none of these projects has any indication to suggest that it will be able to pay back the loan."
He argues the cost of projects was inflated and the debt on paper is far greater than the money actually received - which he says was only $1.1bn, although he hasn't released documents to back up his sums.


The Maldives GDP is around $4.9bn and if you go by Mr Nasheed's figures, then the debt is more than a half of the country's annual economic output. If government revenues fall it may struggle to repay the loan by 2022-23.
If the Maldives defaults, Mr Nasheed worries his country could face the same fate as nearby Sri Lanka - it owes billions of dollars to China after borrowing to rebuild after years of civil war.
Among the projects, the Sri Lankan government spent nearly $1.5bn on building a port in Hambantota. But within a few years the port proved to be economically unviable and Colombo defaulted on its loan commitment.

After the debt was restructured, a Chinese state-run enterprise acquired a 70% stake in the port on a 99-year lease in 2017. In addition, Sri Lanka also agreed to give 15,000 acres around the port to China to build an economic zone.


For China, the port is a valuable strategic asset overlooking one of the busiest shipping lanes in the Indian Ocean. The port is also a few hundred kilometres off the southern coast of China's rival, India.


Mr Nasheed says he's concerned about Chinese investments in several islands where resorts and hotels are being built which have both Maldivian and Chinese partners.
"It is very easy to see these Maldivian partners don't have necessary finance to be able to be a partner in such a venture, So, the Chinese partners would buy it out in no time. I can see the islands going to them very quickly," Mr Nasheed says.

Late last year Mr Yameen was sentenced to five years in prison on charges of money laundering.



BBC

The fears over debt are not restricted to the Maldives. Other countries in Asia have also been reviewing mega projects funded under China's Belt and Road Initiative.
Last year, after a change of government, Malaysia renegotiated a Chinese-funded railway project, bringing the cost down by a third to $11bn.
In 2018, Myanmar reviewed a Chinese-funded multi-billion dollar deep-sea port project and scaled it down to three-quarters of the original cost, fearing the loan would be unrepayable.

But even so, it's unchartered financial territory for the Maldives which must hope its borrowing has not mortgaged its future.

BBC
 
Last edited:
.
View attachment 781171
Workers in Jiangsu province, seen here producing equipment for export along China's Belt and Road


China hands out at least twice as much development money as the US and other major powers, new evidence shows, with most of it coming in the form of risky high-interest loans from Chinese state banks.

The sheer amount of Chinese lending is startling. Not too long ago China received foreign aid, but now the tables have turned.

Over an 18-year period, China has granted or loaned money to 13,427 infrastructure projects worth $843bn across 165 countries, according to the AidData research lab at William & Mary, a university in the US state of Virginia.

Much of this money is linked to Chinese President Xi Jinping's ambitious Belt and Road strategy. Starting in 2013, it leverages China's expertise in infrastructure projects, and ample foreign currency, to build new global trading routes.

View attachment 781172


However, critics fear that the high-interest loans funding many Chinese projects are saddling unsuspecting populations in sky-high debt.

And that's news even to Chinese officials themselves. The AidData researchers - who have spent four years tracing all of China's global lending and spending - say that Chinese government ministries are regularly going to them for information on how Chinese money is being used overseas.

"We hear from public officials in China all the time, saying 'Look, you're in the only game in town'," explains Brad Parks, executive director of AidData. "They say: 'We can't get our hands on this data internally'."

A twisting railway running between China and the neighbouring country of Laos is often touted as a prime example of China's off-the-books lending.

View attachment 781173
The Yumo railway will link China and Laos - but experts say Laos will struggle to pay back the debt


For decades, politicians wondered about building such a connection - linking landlocked south-west China directly to South East Asia.

However, engineers warned the cost would be prohibitive: tracks would need to run through steep mountains, requiring dozens of bridges and tunnels.
Laos is one of the poorest countries in the region and couldn't afford even a fraction of the cost.

Enter China's ambitious bankers: with backing from a group of Chinese state companies and a consortium of Chinese state lenders, the $5.9bn railway is set to begin operations in December.

However, Laos had to take out a $480m loan with a Chinese bank to fund its small part of the equity. One of Laos' few sources of profit, the proceeds of its potash mines, were used to back the massive loan.

View attachment 781174
President Xi has sought to reassure others after criticism of China's global infrastructure projects


"The loan that China's Eximbank made to cover part of the equity really showcases the urgency of the Chinese state to push through the project," explains Wanjing Kelly Chen, research assistant professor at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.

Most of the line is owned by the Chinese-dominated railway group, but under the murky terms of the deal, the Laotian government is ultimately responsible for the railway's debt. The imbalanced deal has led international creditors to downgrade Laos' credit rating to "junk" status.

In September 2020, on the brink of bankruptcy, Laos sold a major asset to China, handing over part of its energy grid for $600m in order to seek debt relief from Chinese creditors. And this is all before the railway has even begun operations.



The Laos railway is far from the only risky project that Chinese state banks have funded - and yet, AidData says China remains the financier of first resort for many low and middle income countries.

"In an average year, China's international development finance commitments amount to about $85bn. And by comparison, the US is spending about $37bn in any given year to support global development activities," says Brad Parks.

China has vastly outpaced all other countries in development financing, but the way in which Beijing has reached that level is "extraordinary", AidData says.

View attachment 781175


In the past, Western countries were guilty of dragging African countries in particular into debt. China is lending differently: instead of financing projects by granting or loaning money from one state to another, almost all the money it's handing out is in the form of state banking loans.

Such loans don't show up in official accounts of government debt. That's because central government institutions aren't named in a lot of the deals struck by Chinese state banks, keeping such deals off government balance sheets and hidden by confidentiality clauses that can prevent governments from knowing exactly what has been agreed behind closed doors.

AidData tallied underreported debt amounting to $385bn.

Many Chinese state developments loans also demand unusual forms of collateral. Increasingly, Chinese loans appear to require borrowers to promise hard cash earned from selling natural resources.

A deal with Venezuela, for example, demands the Venezuelan borrower deposit the foreign currency earned by selling oil directly into a bank account controlled by China. If a debt payment is missed, the Chinese lender can immediately withdraw the cash waiting in the account.

"It really seems like kind of a bread-and-butter strategy they use to signal to their borrower that 'We're the big boss around here'," Brad Parks explains. "Their message is: 'You're going to repay us before anyone else because we're the only ones asking for this prized possession'.

"[That is] income for these very poor countries, dollars and euros, to lock those up in an offshore account that's controlled by a foreign power."

"Is China being smart?" wonders Anna Gelpern, a Georgetown law professor who was involved in an AidData study earlier this year examining Chinese development loan contracts. "I think our conclusion is that they were being muscular and sophisticated in these contracts. They're very much protecting their interests."

Countries can be difficult borrowers, Gelpern explains, and it's not practical to expect them to hand over a physical asset like a port if they're unable to pay their debts.


China might soon face some international lending competition. At a G7 meeting in June, the US and its allies announced the G7 adopts spending plan to rival China's influence, which promises to fund global infrastructure projects that are financially and environmentally sustainable.

However, the plan might simply have come along too late.

"I'm sceptical that Western initiatives will make much of a dent in the Chinese programme," says David Dollar, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and the former US Treasury representative in China.

"[Those new initiatives] will not have enough real money to address the scale of infrastructure needs in the developing world. Also, working with Western official financiers is bureaucratic and subject to long delays."

The AidData researchers found that the Belt and Road project is facing its own issues. BRI projects were more likely to be associated with corruption, labour scandals or environmental issues than other Chinese development deals.

In order to keep the BRI on track, researchers say, Beijing will have no choice but to address borrowers' concerns.


If repayment of chinese loans are defaulted you have to give ownership of land and project to china , as happened in srilanka .
 
.
If repayment of chinese loans are defaulted you have to give ownership of land and project to china , as happened in srilanka .

Looks like China is trapping a lot of poor countries in debt that the Chinese know those countries cant pay.
 
.
Looks like China is trapping a lot of poor countries in debt that the Chinese know those countries cant pay.
Staying primitive or building infrastructures by loaning money for future development. Those countries are much smarter than you. They definitely choose the latter. Time won't wait. Developing your country sooner will be better.
If repayment of chinese loans are defaulted you have to give ownership of land and project to china , as happened in srilanka .
Without China's investment, Srilanka ports are just grass lands
 
.
Looks like China is trapping a lot of poor countries in debt that the Chinese know those countries cant pay.

They give loan but keep everything secret , they force govt to keep terms of loan secret . It results in ultimate exploitation of the poor country which is getting loan on very high term .
Staying primitive or building infrastructures by loaning money for future development. Those countries are much smarter than you. They definitely choose the latter. Time won't wait. Developing your country sooner will be better.

Without China's investment, Srilanka ports are just grass lands

Srilanka was a developing economy , after handing over its port to china it lost port which is gone 15000 acre land is gone . Same thing is with maldive .
 
.
Transparency needed
EditorialPublished October 1, 2021 - Updated 39 minutes ago
Facebook Count
Twitter Share

0
A REPORT by the US-based research lab AidData on the nature of Chinese financing for infrastructure schemes under the multibillion-dollar CPEC initiative should once again lead to calls for greater transparency in the projects being executed here since 2015. It should also bring up questions about the impact of CPEC borrowings on our economy and how the projects will be paid for.
The assurance of the SAPM on CPEC affairs that “everything is in the open” and “there’s no hidden debt” does not allay concerns. In fact, the PTI, when in opposition, had demanded complete transparency in CPEC investments. But now in government, it has done nothing to make public the costs or conditions of the CPEC deals with China’s government, companies and banks, keeping the matter strictly under wraps just as its predecessor had done.
Read
: CPEC and geopolitics go hand in hand

The report, which has mostly collated scattered data and information to weigh the hidden costs of CPEC, sufficiently elaborates on the potential impact of Chinese loans for the power and transport infrastructure on Pakistan’s economy. That the bulk of Chinese financing for CPEC schemes comprises expensive commercial loans isn’t the only worrisome aspect. What is more troubling is that as much as 40pc of Chinese loans have been disbursed in a way that blurs the distinction between private and public debt, ‘doing away’ with the need for its disclosure as public debt. Further, Islamabad has given an “explicit or implicit … government liability protection” to Chinese investors in the form of sovereign guarantees or guaranteed returns on equity. This means that the government will repay loans from its own sources if public and private borrowers can’t meet their financial obligations.
Then, about half of all Chinese finance has come in the form of ‘export buyer’s credit’ or the money lent by Chinese institutions to Pakistan to facilitate the purchase of equipment and goods to be bought by Chinese implementation partners. That is why almost all CPEC projects are awarded to Chinese contractors without competitive international bidding, which could have saved Pakistan millions of dollars. Lastly, we are also not aware of the amount of tax waivers and exemptions given to Chinese firms executing public or private projects.

The CPEC initiative has largely helped Pakistan fill its power and transport infrastructure gaps and may be a boon for the nation’s faltering economy going forward, but it is deplorable that people get information on Chinese investments from foreign sources rather than their own government. Indeed, considering that most of the deals analysed were inked during the PML-N’s tenure and that the PTI leadership accuses the previous rulers of having made a lot of money on these schemes, it is a wonder the government is not respecting the people’s right to know on what terms these deals were concluded and who, if any one, benefited from them at their expense.
Published in Dawn, October 1st, 2021

Dawn
 
.
Srilanka was a developing economy , after handing over its port to china it lost port which is gone 15000 acre land is gone . Same thing is with maldive .
China controlled ports are much much profitable for Srilanka than 15000 acres grass land
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom