If Mao is still alive, China might be economically slightly smaller than now, but its military would have already surpassed the US.
I still prefer Deng but Deng has his own flaw and imperfect too.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If Mao is still alive, China might be economically slightly smaller than now, but its military would have already surpassed the US.
I still prefer Deng but Deng has his own flaw and imperfect too.
Deng is a more practical person. One good personality of him is he is not that stubborn.Deng needs to be as patriotic and tough as Mao.
However, no one in this world is perfect.
Deng is a more practical person. One good personality of him is he is not that stubborn.
Still you didn't answer my question...why buy? When you claim your aerospace industry is better than Russia's....why buy a 4++ gen fighter when you have j30 and apparently capable aerospace industry...why?Prepare ur money to buy Su-35 from Russia, Indian. When IAF face PLAAF 1,000x 4gen - 5gen fighters in next 5-6 years, don't wet ur pant. Right now China just lack 300+ fighters to reach the quantity, not too long we can finish it.
Maoism vs Dengism, you will see the difference.
Mao created the project for Y-10, while Deng destroyed it.
Shanghai Y-10 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If the Y-10 wasn't scrapped by Deng and his liberal think tanks, then China would already build something similar to the Boeing 747 by now.
If Mao is still alive, China might be economically slightly smaller than now, but its military would have already surpassed the US.
Deng needs to be as patriotic and tough as Mao.
However, no one in this world is perfect.
Still you didn't answer my question...why buy? When you claim your aerospace industry is better than Russia's....why buy a 4++ gen fighter when you have j30 and apparently capable aerospace industry...why?
The country that claims that it has two fifth gen fighter programs running and ready for mass production...buys 4++ gen fighter??
Lol
It speaks volumes about the technological gap between two countries!!
Even you dislike Mao, but you have to agree when it comes to support the domestic products, no one is more patriotic than Mao.
India signs deals for PakFa and lay down the ground work for FGFA.
The low numbers supposedly procured (24), as well as the development/production of aircraft such as the J-15, J-16, J-10C, and soon J-20 and J-11D, suggest otherwise.1) Insecurity of current Chinese made aircraft is given
What makes you think that? Procuring a platform (if this deal is true) isn't always to make up for a lack in capability. In fact, the similarities between the Su-35 and J-11D/J-16 suggests that this deal isn't about capabilities at all.2) Chinese leaders themselves don't think China is in position to go for war with current capabilities. Think about it. What if Vietnam gets Su35 or what will be the reaction in China establishment when India signs deals for PakFa and lay down the ground work for FGFA. This deal as put China atleast 15 years backwards.
False. The WS-10 bears no relation to any Russian engine and has been in service aboard the J-10B/C prototypes, J-11B, J-16, and J-15 prototypes. Over 500 have been produced.3) Chinese claims of having in-house capacity to produce world class weapons is seriously scrutinized. Check below listing :
China's best engine : imported from Russia. Works for indegineous engine (Literally a Ripoff) going on for more than 30 years.
So, it just so happens that a "Russian-designed" warship in China manage to feature capabilities and subsystems far more advanced anything Russia has herself? Come on, you are better than that.China's best war ship? Designed and built in China by Russians
There is no evidence to suggest that.China's best cruise missiles. An Soviet Union Ripoff
And yet somehow these missiles frequently manage to outperform their "original" counterparts.China's missile force : Soviet and current Russians technology and with more Ripoff.
False. Kamov provided consultation during the concept stage, which is very different from the blueprinting stage that was undertaken by the Chinese. This is not to mention that the subsystems aboard the helicopters are Chinese.China's best Attack helicopters : Secretly signed deal with Russia to design and build in China. Even India is in the verge to cracking world's most powerful Light attack choppers.
Who said they could do so in the first place?Now US airforce can't claim that in just a week 2 fleet of USAF can wipe 50% Chinese Aircrafts at will.
Still you didn't answer my question...why buy? When you claim your aerospace industry is better than Russia's....why buy a 4++ gen fighter when you have j30 and apparently capable aerospace industry...why?
Still you didn't answer my question...why buy? When you claim your aerospace industry is better than Russia's....why buy a 4++ gen fighter when you have j30 and apparently capable aerospace industry...why?