China aims for naval supremacy by 2050

[White and Green with M/S]

I've told you: by installing all the crane at the same time! What make it difficult for you to understand?

You dont put crane on another crane right? or do you think so?
Then why equate it with Lego?

Nope, installing 10 cranes at the same time wont exhaust China's resource and budget .... noooo... you underestimate China so childisly if it take say 20 persons to install 1 crane, then you will need 200 persons to install 10 cranes at the same time; will China run out of manpower? lol.

ok troll , you're going to my ignore list

 

[antonius123]

ok troll , you're going to my ignore list

Using this kind of accusation and excuse after getting lost in argument actually is just a show of your real quality with a childish manner.

No problem buddy.

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Aircraft carriers are power projection machines can't be use in near the country of origin unless for maintenance, where your Navy is strongest, Does Japan or South Korea is out of reach of your destroyers and Frigates??? tell me its main mission to protect your interest in Pacific/Indian oceans???

Aircraft carrier can hit destroyer / frigate because better range. Plane combat radius 1,000 km + missile range 500 km = total strike range 1,500 km against ship. Aircraft carrier can sink destroyer / frigate outside range of destroyer / frigate.

Consider this. Russia don't have an operational aircraft carrier (it's sitting in a dry dock), let's say a Russian frigate tries to shoot at a Chinese carrier. Russian frigate missile has max range 500 km. It can only shoot if it gets within 500 km of Chinese carrier. Chinese carrier can send out a plane when it's 1500 km from the Russian frigate. Chinese plane flies 1000 km towards the Russian frigate and shoots missile which has range 500 km. Means Chinese carrier will sink Russian frigate at a distance of 1500 km, well beyond the 500 km distance the Russian frigate needs to be able to shoot at Chinese carrier.

 

[White and Green with M/S]

Aircraft carrier can hit destroyer / frigate because better range. Plane combat radius 1,000 km + missile range 500 km = total strike range 1,500 km against ship. Aircraft carrier can sink destroyer / frigate outside range of destroyer / frigate.

In comparison to destroyers ànd frigates carriers always expensive to operate ànd near the coastal uses kill its purpose POWER PROJECTIONS
ànd destroyers ànd frigates cheaper to attack enemy ship I mean near to coastal areas than carriers??

 

[Nasr]

I believe that before 2050 even arrives, the world would have already experienced a Nuclear Exchange in WW3. From a logical point of view, america wouldn't wait for China to reach that point. Particularly when Russia and China match and surpass the West in technology. That isn't some fantasized, it's actually happened. Russia has built and is now fielding Hypersonic Weapons which the West has no answer for. Same goes for China, which is rapidly growing and developing technologies which position it in a near dominant place in the Pacific.

Which would also explain why China has expanded it's naval power at such phenomenally lighting speed. No country to date, including Soviet Union, America or Nazi Germany, were ever at the industrial output, as China is.

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

I believe that before 2050 even arrives, the world would have already experienced a Nuclear Exchange in WW3. From a logical point of view, america wouldn't wait for China to reach that point. Particularly when Russia and China match and surpass the West in technology. That isn't some fantasized, it's actually happened. Russia has built and is now fielding Hypersonic Weapons which the West has no answer for. Same goes for China, which is rapidly growing and developing technologies which position it in a near dominant place in the Pacific.

Which would also explain why China has expanded it's naval power at such phenomenally lighting speed. No country to date, including Soviet Union, America or Nazi Germany, were ever at the industrial output, as China is.

America won't fight nuclear war. Washington DC would be nuked and millions would die. Nukes have prevented large scale warfare since 1946.

 

[Nasr]

America won't fight nuclear war. Washington DC would be nuked and millions would die. Nukes have prevented large scale warfare since 1946.

Go study some history my friend, for when a superpower is teetering on the brink of economic collapse, it has always chosen war. Be it Roman Empire, British Empire, Nazi German Super State or Soviet Union.

Today, america teeters on the brink of an economic collapse, as never seen before in history. Washington DC is desperately screaming for a war. Without a war to redress the balance to some semblance of normality, america's economy would begin to disintegrate, brick by brick.

Today Russia and China have challenged Western hegemony by first becoming impervious to Western economic sanctions, then equalling and then surpassing Western military technology to such an extent, that the West is now in a position where it has to think 10 times before it could possibly start up a war with either country. Syria and Taiwan are both sticking points for the West, where both Russia and China have successfully thwarted Western hegemony. The best indicator to prove this point, well no war has been triggered where the West has directly engaged both countries and won.

 

[CAPRICORN-88]

I don't know what naval supremacy encompassed.

IMO today China is basically a deadly defensive force and if USN were to challenge China in its backyard, it will still be suicidal.

 

[TNT]

One is tai hai chen, no introduction needed and the other is a paindu and think china works at same speed as his local pind council. Can someone ban both these dumb trolls.

 

[retaxis]

Unlike Beijingwalker who is a decent poster. Chinese need to stay humble and just keep working hard. America will be minority majority country soon enough and Chinese have good relations with blacks and latin americans. So we just got to keep chipping away at peace

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Go study some history my friend, for when a superpower is teetering on the brink of economic collapse, it has always chosen war. Be it Roman Empire, British Empire, Nazi German Super State or Soviet Union.

Today, america teeters on the brink of an economic collapse, as never seen before in history. Washington DC is desperately screaming for a war. Without a war to redress the balance to some semblance of normality, america's economy would begin to disintegrate, brick by brick.

Today Russia and China have challenged Western hegemony by first becoming impervious to Western economic sanctions, then equalling and then surpassing Western military technology to such an extent, that the West is now in a position where it has to think 10 times before it could possibly start up a war with either country. Syria and Taiwan are both sticking points for the West, where both Russia and China have successfully thwarted Western hegemony. The best indicator to prove this point, well no war has been triggered where the West has directly engaged both countries and won.

If America goes to nuclear war then all America will be destroyed. It's possible but unlikely. Nuke is no bow and arrow. Nuke is serious stuff. Hence no major war since 1945.

 

[Nasr]

If America goes to nuclear war then all America will be destroyed. It's possible but unlikely. Nuke is no bow and arrow. Nuke is serious stuff. Hence no major war since 1945.

Expect it to be coming soon, at the rate which the West is going. Not long to go now!!

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Expect it to be coming soon, at the rate which the West is going. Not long to go now!!

Don't hold your breath.

 

[Nasr]

Don't hold your breath.

Don't need to, those who have with which to see, are seeing all the signs coming to fore.

 

[VCheng]

Expect it to be coming soon, at the rate which the West is going. Not long to go now!!

Third Tuesday in October?