What's new

China agrees to ‘substantially reduce trade deficit’ to avoid trade war with US, White House says

Hamartia Antidote

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 17, 2013
Messages
35,188
Reaction score
30
Country
United States
Location
United States
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...-reduce-deficit-white-house-a8359816.html?amp

The US and China have agreed to begin bilateral trade talks, with Beijing committing to “substantially reduce” the trade deficit between the countries by boosting the amount of goods it purchases from America.

A joint statement sent from the White House announced they had reached “consensus on taking effective measures to substantially reduce the United States trade deficit in goods with China”.


The announcement comes amid fears that President Donald Trump’s tough talk on trade could spark a trade war between two of the world''s largest economic power houses.

The development comes just one day after the US and China appeared at odds over a claim from White House Economic Adviser Larry Kudlow, who said that China had agreed to reducing its deficit with the US by $200bn.

It is not clear exactly how much China actually plans on reducing that deficit, however, and negotiators from both countries reportedly went back and forth through the night as they crafted the exact language of the joint statement, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Mr Trump has remained optimistic that a palatable agreement will be made, and has regularly boasted that his good relationship with Chinese President Xi Jinping is an asset that will help deliver that promised reduction.


“President Xi and I will always be friends, no matter what happens with our dispute on trade,” Mr Trump tweeted last month as the talks of a potential trade war swirled.

The trade deficit has grown recently, and has proved to be a difficult issue to resolve between Washington and Beijing for years. Data from the Department of Commerce shows that the imbalance reached a record high of $375 billion in 2017.


The tough stance Mr Trump has taken on the deficit with China has led to those in some areas of the American agricultural industry to express concern that a potential trade war with China could ravage their businesses, since China is a main trading partner for American agricultural exports.

The statement released Saturday described a cut in the deficit as being mutually beneficial to both countries’ interests.

“To meet the growing consumption needs of the Chinese people and the need for high-quality economic development, China will significantly increase purchases of United States goods and services,” the statement reads. “This will help support growth and employment in the United States.”

The statement says that the US will send a team to China to negotiate the agreement, and included American agricultural and energy exports as priorities.

Those talks could be held as soon as late next week, according to the statement.

Mr Trump set off fears of a trade war by saying he was considering tariffs on up to $150bn worth of Chinese products. That proposal was met with stiff threats from Beijing, which threatened an equal response targeting American exports like soybeans, cars, and aircraft.

The statement did not mention Chinese telecommunications manufacturer ZTE, which was hit with sanctions for violating a ban on sending products to Iran and North Korea that include parts made in the United States.

The president has said on Twitter that he has instructed the US government to consider reversing those sanctions, which were imposed last month and shut down the company’s operations.
 
Last edited:
.
What purchases do you think China plans to make? China could just be signing deals for products it already wants in one big deal to please Washington.
 
.
What purchases do you think China plans to make? China could just be signing deals for products it already wants in one big deal to please Washington.

Consumer-wise...not much. The Chinese are well below the average of developed countries in terms of consumption. Remember there is no social security in China so you aren't going to get $2,500 a month for life when you retire. You have to save for your later years out of basic survival. So consumer consumption isn't suddenly going to go up overnight to lower the trade imbalance.

They could try and sell less to the US but that would cost jobs...unless they can find another market...which is unlikely.

They would have to do something which they would find to be a national security issue. Like buying oil and natural gas exclusively from the US.
 
Last edited:
. . .
Consumer-wise...not much. The Chinese are well below the average of developed countries in terms of consumption. Remember there is no social security in China so you aren't going to get $2,500 a month for life when you retire. You have to save for your later years out of basic survival. So consumer consumption isn't suddenly going to go up overnight to lower the trade imbalance.

They could try and sell less to the US but that would cost jobs...unless they can find another market...which is unlikely.

They would have to do something which they would find to be a national security issue. Like buying oil and natural gas exclusively from the US.
China spends as much as the US does in consumption... :disagree:

They don't allow the US to buy land and they have a 51% rule on companies so that isn't going to be agreed on.
Doesn’t matter. The US will block any acquisition of valuable companies in the name of national security.
 
.
They don't allow the US to buy land and they have a 51% rule on companies so that isn't going to be agreed on.

Why? There is a precedent. US is a capitalist country and the board/CEO only care about the share holders.

Should We Allow the Chinese to Buy Any US Company They Want?

http://www.industryweek.com/economy/should-we-allow-chinese-buy-any-us-company-they-want

China Is Buying Its Way Into the U.S. Economy

Chinese investors have gone on a spending spree in the U.S. Should regulators be concerned?

https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-05-17/china-is-buying-its-way-into-the-us-economy

China Is Making a Major Play for American Farms and Farmland

Companies backed by the Chinese government are making Big Ag acquisitions in the U.S.


http://www.takepart.com/article/2016/02/22/china-syngenta-smithfield


 
.
Consumer-wise...not much. The Chinese are well below the average of developed countries in terms of consumption. Remember there is no social security in China so you aren't going to get $2,500 a month for life when you retire. You have to save for your later years out of basic survival. So consumer consumption isn't suddenly going to go up overnight to lower the trade imbalance.

They could try and sell less to the US but that would cost jobs...unless they can find another market...which is unlikely.

They would have to do something which they would find to be a national security issue. Like buying oil and natural gas exclusively from the US.

So your saying Commodities? Which of the following commodities do you think the Chinese would want to buy, to build up reserves or supplement the Chinese Food Market or just to satisfy the current flareup?

1. Oil / Natural Gas / Coal
2. Precious Metals/Stones (Gold, Silver, Platinum, Copper, Diamonds, etc.) and other mined minerals/metals/elements
3. Agriculture (Soybeans, Corn, Wheat, etc.)
4. Meat and Livestock (Cattle, Pork, etc.)

Also do you think they would buy high tech industrial products? Nuclear power plants or other cutting edge electricity generation technologies, may the latest airplanes with the most modern engines?

Would they buy Shares in major companies like Apple, Google, and others?

Would China fund factories in America, like how Japanese Car makers have plants in the American South?
 
.
Consumer-wise...not much. The Chinese are well below the average of developed countries in terms of consumption. Remember there is no social security in China so you aren't going to get $2,500 a month for life when you retire. You have to save for your later years out of basic survival. So consumer consumption isn't suddenly going to go up overnight to lower the trade imbalance.

They could try and sell less to the US but that would cost jobs...unless they can find another market...which is unlikely.

They would have to do something which they would find to be a national security issue. Like buying oil and natural gas exclusively from the US.
lol china has the largest consumer market in the world what are you even on about? The percentage of the population that is of middle class is irrelevant when it has 1.4 billion people. Chinas middle class is larger than the us has people. Secondly, no they will not buy oil exclusively from the us, why mention such ideas proves you have little to no grasp on politics to be commenting here.
 
.
Consumer-wise...not much. The Chinese are well below the average of developed countries in terms of consumption. Remember there is no social security in China so you aren't going to get $2,500 a month for life when you retire. You have to save for your later years out of basic survival. So consumer consumption isn't suddenly going to go up overnight to lower the trade imbalance.

They could try and sell less to the US but that would cost jobs...unless they can find another market...which is unlikely.

They would have to do something which they would find to be a national security issue. Like buying oil and natural gas exclusively from the US.

Are you kidding me you poor boy?

China is by far the world largest single market bascially in terms of anything sold, autos/properties etc.

According to the Liu, who lead the Chinese team, he told the media: "The US need to improve their products to market-competitve standard before they ask China to buy anything more."



135127m5092gppl5sox9c4.png


And btw, Dotard love to brag the deal he make, but even your wall st journal published the detail mentioning China just make no promise on how she will increase the import.

E7CE4236B48051BDA2F5B7650F67D21D2F7079F9_size197_w620_h645.jpeg


697353B721D9EE2162088E80321FCC250CFF8F7C_size268_w620_h387.jpeg


Actually, the only thing China agree to import more form the US are natural gas and food, you know basically treat you like another third world country with no industry.
 
.
lol china has the largest consumer market in the world what are you even on about? The percentage of the population that is of middle class is irrelevant when it has 1.4 billion people. Chinas middle class is larger than the us has people. Secondly, no they will not buy oil exclusively from the us, why mention such ideas proves you have little to no grasp on politics to be commenting here.

You aren't understanding the big picture. If a nation today had 500 Trillion people and each could only spend $1 each year that would easily beat both China and the US. However the per capita is so low it would be hard to market anything to them.
 
.
You aren't understanding the big picture. If a nation today had 500 Trillion people and each could only spend $1 each year that would easily beat both China and the US. However the per capita is so low it would be hard to market anything to them.

Lol, just last year along China sold 30 million cars, 2x of your little market, despite the cars ban and lottery, and high tax (which make cars 2x more expensive than the cars sold in the poor US), as well as 10x more priced houses.

You can brag your crappy iphones and under $10,000 remote house in a nobody knowns town, but nobody cares you little wallet:lol:
 
.
You aren't understanding the big picture. If a nation today had 500 Trillion people and each could only spend $1 each year that would easily beat both China and the US. However the per capita is so low it would be hard to market anything to them.

that's why China still developing Country, The US is the Richest Country in the world, so f cking damn Rich, The US should just stick to old term and keep the current trade.
it's a win win for both Country :usflag::china:
 
.
I found the Americans in China are very funny, despite their very poor income (there is no hope to own any property in China), they always spend most of their free time in Beijing's most expensive nightlife region (not by high standard just very pricy, whenever I get into there I met alots of them, many are just poor ESL teachers etc), with such way to spend their little money, could they even afford their rent in a reasonable good appartment? I doubt so.

Their mind are very comparable to the africans I saw:e.g. happy today and worry no future, e.g. no long term plan or any plan at all, just like their president:lol:
 
.
You can brag your crappy iphones and under $10,000 remote house in a nobody knowns town, but nobody cares you little wallet:lol:

Your ignorance of the definition of the suburbs is amazing. What you don't understand is most US cities stopped expanding in the 1950's. The city of Boston is only 17km wide with only a population of 700,000. At that line you are in the suburbs. My "remote" location in the suburbs may well be closer to the center of the city than you are. Living in the suburbs does not mean you are 500km away in the deep woods. I'm sure @siegecrossbow can explain it to you. He lives in Texas and I bet the city he is near is not very big and he is not far from the center of it.

China is expanding their cities. The US is expanding the suburbs.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom