Asoka
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2010
- Messages
- 781
- Reaction score
- -7
- Country
- Location
"@Deino sir please ban permanently @Asok for its baseless and clueless posts thank you sir"
Very funny! Haha.
I have been patiently listed all my reasons and given proof for my assertions that J-20 is using WS-15 engines.
You don't have to accept my conclusion, but there is only two other choices of engine for J-20, AL-31-F-M2 and WS-10.
Let's take a look at them.
1.) WS-10. There has been numerous comparisons between AL-31-F and J-20's engine nozzles, but there is no comparison with WS-10.
Because, one glance is enough to conclude, there is no similarity, with the J-20's engine at all. There is no need of expand the nozzle pictures and compare them, back and forth.
On this point, alone, WS-10 failed the comparison test.
And this is fatal to the WS-10 theory.
Here is WS-10 on display. Could you see any similarity between WS-10 and J-20's mysterious engine?
2.) AL-31-F does have a high similarity with the nozzle of J-20. And the picture comparisons with J-20 is done with the pictures of the AL-31-F engine. China has ordered plenty of AL-31-F for spares.
But most people claim J-20 is using the M2 version of the engine, which supposedly has a higher trust.
The problem with this theory is that there is absolutely proof or reports that this engine was completed. And it was ordered and delivered to China in the last 6 years.
And also, this AL-31-F-M2 engine's development, was announced by the Russia, on September 2012, at least 18 months, after J-20's first flight. So it is impossible to have been powering J-20, since day one, of the testing.
I have asked repeatedly for proof, and searched the Internet myself, but absolutely found nothing, to substantiated, that AL-31-F-M2 has been materialized, ordered and delivered to China.
None whatsoever. This alone should be fatal to the AL-31-F-M2 theory.
As for the ridiculous theory that China, somehow, manufactured the AL-31-F-M2, itself, with the transfer of Russian technologies.
Where is your proof? If you have no proof, how do you know?
You don't have to like my proof for WS-15, but you can not ignore these two points, I have made about the two alternative engines WS-10 and AL-31-F-M2, and just go after me, with personal attacks.
The AL-31-F-M2 supporters, could offer nozzle comparisons as proof, but there is not even "baseless and clueless" proof from the WS-10 supporters. None whatsoever. Not even the nozzle pictures comparison.
If you think it's not WS-15 that J-20 it is using, and you think it's either WS-10 or AL-31-F-M2.
Where is your proof? Show me your proof!
The same rules of evidence should be applied to everyone.
If you don't like other person's claim, you have to come with evidences for your own claim, too.
Attacking other person, is not enough to prove your theory.
So I ask, where is your evidences to support your WS-10 or AL-31-F-M2 theory?
Very funny! Haha.
I have been patiently listed all my reasons and given proof for my assertions that J-20 is using WS-15 engines.
You don't have to accept my conclusion, but there is only two other choices of engine for J-20, AL-31-F-M2 and WS-10.
Let's take a look at them.
1.) WS-10. There has been numerous comparisons between AL-31-F and J-20's engine nozzles, but there is no comparison with WS-10.
Because, one glance is enough to conclude, there is no similarity, with the J-20's engine at all. There is no need of expand the nozzle pictures and compare them, back and forth.
On this point, alone, WS-10 failed the comparison test.
And this is fatal to the WS-10 theory.
Here is WS-10 on display. Could you see any similarity between WS-10 and J-20's mysterious engine?
2.) AL-31-F does have a high similarity with the nozzle of J-20. And the picture comparisons with J-20 is done with the pictures of the AL-31-F engine. China has ordered plenty of AL-31-F for spares.
But most people claim J-20 is using the M2 version of the engine, which supposedly has a higher trust.
The problem with this theory is that there is absolutely proof or reports that this engine was completed. And it was ordered and delivered to China in the last 6 years.
And also, this AL-31-F-M2 engine's development, was announced by the Russia, on September 2012, at least 18 months, after J-20's first flight. So it is impossible to have been powering J-20, since day one, of the testing.
I have asked repeatedly for proof, and searched the Internet myself, but absolutely found nothing, to substantiated, that AL-31-F-M2 has been materialized, ordered and delivered to China.
None whatsoever. This alone should be fatal to the AL-31-F-M2 theory.
As for the ridiculous theory that China, somehow, manufactured the AL-31-F-M2, itself, with the transfer of Russian technologies.
Where is your proof? If you have no proof, how do you know?
You don't have to like my proof for WS-15, but you can not ignore these two points, I have made about the two alternative engines WS-10 and AL-31-F-M2, and just go after me, with personal attacks.
The AL-31-F-M2 supporters, could offer nozzle comparisons as proof, but there is not even "baseless and clueless" proof from the WS-10 supporters. None whatsoever. Not even the nozzle pictures comparison.
If you think it's not WS-15 that J-20 it is using, and you think it's either WS-10 or AL-31-F-M2.
Where is your proof? Show me your proof!
The same rules of evidence should be applied to everyone.
If you don't like other person's claim, you have to come with evidences for your own claim, too.
Attacking other person, is not enough to prove your theory.
So I ask, where is your evidences to support your WS-10 or AL-31-F-M2 theory?
Attachments
Last edited: