Chengdu J-10 Multirole Fighter Air Craft News & Discussions

[graphican]

which aircraft is this can some one translate the writings

Writing says FC-1 but and from the top-view, it looks like some derivative of it. Also look at number of hard-points which are the same as FC-1! Interesting!

 

[Bratva]

Writing says FC-1 but and from the top-view, it looks like some derivative of it. Also look at number of hard-points which are the same as FC-1! Interesting!

Idea of making FC-1 evolved up to such level describred in drawings were resulted in J-31.

 

[abdulbarijan]

India raises nuclear stakes - FT.com

I have provided official link. Now what you want more. As far as Pakistan's yield is considered this is what I found. You provide with better figure if you have.

BBC NEWS | South Asia | India nuclear test 'did not work'

By Sanjoy Majumder
BBC News, Delhi

In a file photo from 1974, a crater is shown in the Thar desert area southwest of New Delhi where India conducted an underground nuclear test. India successfully tested three devices in the same area on Monday May 11,1998. (AP Photo/HO)
India's nuclear tests shocked the world

A retired atomic scientist who was closely associated with India's 1998 nuclear tests has said they were not as successful as was claimed.

K Santhanam said one of the tests - on a hydrogen bomb - had not worked, and that India would have to carry out more tests for a credible nuclear deterrent.

His statement has been dismissed by the government and his former colleagues.

The Indian tests led to similar tests by Pakistan, raising fears of a nuclear conflict between the two countries.

Cover-up?

K Santhanam is a respected Indian atomic scientist who was project director of the 1998 nuclear tests.

He now says that one of the five tests that were carried out, in which a thermonuclear device or hydrogen bomb was detonated, did not perform as well as expected.

He also said that everyone associated with the tests immediately recognized that something had gone wrong.

If his statement is accurate it points to a massive cover-up by India and also confirms what many in the West suspected at the time - that the nuclear devices India tested were not as powerful as had been thought.

I rest my case on this point

IAF's fighters

- What do you mean by only SU 30mki, Mig 29 and Mirage is fit for service. Jaguar and Mig 27 are very potent fighter. As far as anti-aircraft means are considered each of India's fighters are loaded with EW suite of latest standard excluding Mig 21 which mostly depends on the escorting fighters avionics and that's why it is used for point defence role.

And if the same thing is considered PAF has only 18 F-16 fighter which can enter Indian territory.So don't talk childish.

There is a difference between front line aircrafts and the likes of jaguars or Mig-21's which serve as strike fighters and interceptors ---- IAF's front line aircrafts are the M2k's, Mig-29's and SU-30 MKI's

on the other hand PAF has 50 odd JF-17's 45 F-16 A/B's and 18 F-16 Block 50/52's serving as front line aircrafts -- F-7 P/PG basically serve as interceptors while Mirages basically are dedicated towards strike role.

That makes IAF 270 odd front liners versus PAF's 110 odd front line aircrafts a ratio of 1 : 2.45 amongst the lowest in history when it comes to numerical figures ----

Rule of Thumb - If India's size is bigger and it need more fighter to protect, Pakistan is almost one-fourth of India and it will get destroyed by few of India's front line fighters. And even new countable nukes on hand to get wipe out. Don't bring irrational logic.

LOL! so India's size is bigger that means more area to protect --- Dont tell me IAF is going to field all the strength near PAF's borders while leaving China alone --- as for nukes ---

This is what your scientists say about your delivery systems

India's nuclear arsenal failed by 'unreliable' missiles : India, News - India Today

The most authoritative non-governmental assessment of world nuclear forces has revealed that India's nuclear capabilities are seriously lagging behind those of its putative adversaries, Pakistan and China. The evaluation by Hans M. Kristensen and Robert S. Norris in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists called "Indian nuclear forces, 2012", reveals that for New Delhi, the principal means of weapons delivery remains fixed-wing aircraft like the Mirage-2000 and the Jaguar.

P.S YOU SHOULD LEAVE THESE TOPICS AS THEY ARE NOT RELATED TO THE THREAD ___ OTHERWISE YOU MAY GET BOTH OUR ***** BANNED!

 

[bigzgvr4]

^^ lol classic Uranium Problems Even one of them did not Exploded in Japan out of 4 three worked 2 were devestating
would you guys agree on the idea Paf should Replace MIrages with J-10, F-7 with FC-1 and Start a JV with China ON LONG Range Stealth Bomber and A SInGle Engine Stealth Fighter Based on that Pic i posted Earlier, FOCUS all their budget On that and ARMY Can Worry About Making UCAV like the Predator and warrior alpha and then Later after those 2 projects they Can Make UCAV like X-47

 

[Manticore]

Stick to topic, gents

 

[applesauce]

which aircraft is this can some one translate the writings

it says

"another FC-1 based, stealth fighter concept circulating on the internet"

 

[bigzgvr4]

it says

"another FC-1 based, stealth fighter concept circulating on the internet"

thanks bro

 

[tarrar]

When is Pakistan buying J10 B, I thought they were suppose to come last year in 2012?

 

[CrazyPaki]

When is Pakistan buying J10 B, I thought they were suppose to come last year in 2012?

wont be hearing anything until after the election from what i can tell

 

[S-A-B-E-R->]

which aircraft is this can some one translate the writings

this came in around 2007 -08 time when talks about a lo ob version of jf17 was in the talks...i dont know if this is the offical version cuz the one proposed had single tail not 2.

 

[umair86pk]

it has some resemblance with JSF

 

[hashirkhan]

The problem is purely a financial one. Adding more JFT is a necessity which is agreed by all. Adding a later block with IRST,dual ejector racks and a refueling probe with the possibility of an AESA radar and 2 additional hardpoints(even for a pod) would suffice for PAFs needs for 6-8 yrs. As mentioned before the high ups in PAF feel there is security in numbers in the case of F16s and financially with the begging bowl out it wont break the bank either.
Post 2018-20 all the money that we have(or dont) can be utilized to buy J 31 with commonality between it and JFTwith regards to engine a d even some avuonics. Overall it would prove to be a much more effective package considering the adversary will have Rafale and pakfa. This I feel is what is the thought process within the PAF currently.You can argue with it but it does sound logical.
Araz

Exactly, but i have a question, what will happen in the gap of years, when there would be PAK-FA and Rafals in the indian inventory, and we would be formulating our purchases, we would be vulnerable i think. i am a starter so dont mind if my question is not up to the mark.
Regards

 

[araz]

Exactly, but i have a question, what will happen in the gap of years, when there would be PAK-FA and Rafals in the indian inventory, and we would be formulating our purchases, we would be vulnerable i think. i am a starter so dont mind if my question is not up to the mark.
Regards

Hi.
I have partly answered your querry towards the end of my post. PAF can never win at ththe numbers game. Our only defence is to make it so costly for the enemy that a victory would be out of the consideration. Jingoism aside with an inept and corrupt government an econmy in tatters the best that we can achieve is what I have mentioned. Please also note that at this point in time no one is willing to part with any technology or equipment to us as they dont want to annoy a vendor with a much bigger buying power than us so our options also are limited.
Araz

 

[baron von richtofen]

is there a MoU signed?
haven't heard of one then why is there such a fuss?

 

[[--Leo--]]

is there a MoU signed?
haven't heard of one then why is there such a fuss?

it is signed i remember galani singed it in 2011 i think so in tour of china