What's new

Chengdu J-10 Multirole Fighter Air Craft News & Discussions

Following link is an interesting read on the RCS. There is a table that shows various platforms (don't know how genuine it is) but just wondering, where would the J-10 be placed on the list. Here's the article

Radar Cross Section (RCS)
 
.
Looking sleeker than prototypes
8234789583_9e36a40372_b.jpg
J10B is really cool looking guy, even sharper than J20.
 
. . .
J10 GOT BATTERED BY THIS BELOW 42-0 IN RECENT plaaf excercises

THE J11B

new+images+pictures+of+the+Chinese+J-15+Flying+Shark+naval+fighter+jet+and+Varyag+Aircraft+Carrier++takoff+operational+carrier+landing+missile+sd-10+pl-12+pl-10+%25281%2529.jpg

Is it just me or the entire Indian body of posters is taking this claim as true ...

i mean I never saw our friends endorsing the 13:1 claims on J-11, the claims for multiple locks on Su-30 MKK's and SU-30 MKV's by basic J-10's....

Suddenly when its J-10 on the receiving end .... Even the chinese whose claims used to be "unofficial" "hyped" are now "Hard facts" :D ... no offense to you Mr. storm force
 
. .
J10 GOT BATTERED BY THIS BELOW 42-0 IN RECENT plaaf excercises

THE J11B

new+images+pictures+of+the+Chinese+J-15+Flying+Shark+naval+fighter+jet+and+Varyag+Aircraft+Carrier++takoff+operational+carrier+landing+missile+sd-10+pl-12+pl-10+%25281%2529.jpg


This poor fellow doesn't even know that highly upgraded j-11s went against 10 year old J-10As.

J-10Bs are advanced, not to mention, that Chinese are developing J-10s for a reason....and this exercise will actually help filter the shortfalls.


Duh!
 
.
Unless you match the J11B TWR raw power of EW suites & jammers which comes from twin egines THE single ENGINED J10 wil struggle to match the J11...

This is why the PLAAF wil have more twin egines J11 J15 J20 J8 then single engines J10 J7 & J31

J10 maybe advanced enough to fight off F7 and other single enngined FIGHTERS but the RUSSIAN designed flankers are a deadly opponent
 
.
j31 single engine :undecided:
Unless you match the J11B TWR raw power of EW suites & jammers which comes from twin egines THE single ENGINED J10 wil struggle to match the J11...

This is why the PLAAF wil have more twin egines J11 J15 J20 J8 then single engines J10 J7 & J31

J10 maybe advanced enough to fight off F7 and other single enngined FIGHTERS but the RUSSIAN designed flankers are a deadly opponent
 
.
J31

will be built in smaller nos

THE J20 and the J11 will form the back bone of the PLAAF
 
.
Unless you match the J11B TWR raw power of EW suites & jammers which comes from twin egines THE single ENGINED J10 wil struggle to match the J11...

This is why the PLAAF wil have more twin egines J11 J15 J20 J8 then single engines J10 J7 & J31

J10 maybe advanced enough to fight off F7 and other single enngined FIGHTERS but the RUSSIAN designed flankers are a deadly opponent
J10b is state of art platform, which has RCS less than 1 square meter. What is MKI'S RCS? 11 OR 15 square meters?
 
. .
Unless you match the J11B TWR raw power of EW suites & jammers which comes from twin egines THE single ENGINED J10 wil struggle to match the J11...

This is why the PLAAF wil have more twin egines J11 J15 J20 J8 then single engines J10 J7 & J31

J10 maybe advanced enough to fight off F7 and other single enngined FIGHTERS but the RUSSIAN designed flankers are a deadly opponent

And this should tell you that this gentleman(or boy) has no idea what is being talked about.
That the J-10B with an AESA will be better to fight off mig-15's because its single engined.
That it was an impossible feat that the F-16 brought down Mig-29's since .. oh my lord.. the Mig has two engines and the F-16 has one.
That it was impossible for the Mig-21 to bring down the F-4.. must have been multiple flukes... that it was able to beat a twin engined fighter.

That oh my word.. the F-16 ends up scoring multiple kills on F-15's which have bigger radars and more power/juice/jizz than them in Red Flag since the 80s.

That F-16's find themselves being outclassed by F-7P's(which dont even have a display in the cockpit!!) in High Mark exercises thanks to clever tactics that put the F-16's radar with its BVR weapons guessing.

That MIG-21 Bisons with MUCH less power than F-15's in their radars.. and with .. wait for it.. A SINGLE engine were able to give hell to Eagle's in Cope India..

Talking nonsense takes little effort.
Reading wikipedia even less..
Coming up with conclusions based on posts of others.. NONE.

Posting repeated arguments on the same topic over and over the forum on topics that have little relation to and have been debunked again and again and again, will have you banned now without an infraction, without a warning.

I expect you to not post, really.. NOT post. but read up on the history of aerial warfare.. on the effectiveness of radar systems in actual combat from 1960-2010..In magazines and articles OTHER than wikipedia.. before coming to post here again.
Really, Because unlike others.. who come here to troll and make some effort of it in an embarrassing way.
You actually start out quite well(like another member who is known for his similar efforts in religion Z) and end up acting like a parrot saying the same thing AGAIN and AGAIN without understanding, or comprehending the other's point and without stopping if you disagree.
Learn to be a good poster, because your persistance should make you one.

As for now.

Discussions on J-10 vs other choices is BANNED on this thread for now unless its between the TT's.

Any further posts will lead to pink paint.
 
.
Any one could upload some new pictures of J10b? I strongly agree with Oscar that Single engine or duo engine is not the determined indicator in the survival of air combat, it depends on the avionics/EWS/RCS/WEAPON/Pilot Experience/RADAR RANGE and so on.
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom