What's new

Che Guevara!!! And China

Can you introduce briefly on socialist movement over there in your country?

okay, give me some time.

Real socialists are internationalist, NOT nationalist

And looking at the photos you've posted, I'm afraid these Chinese kids are more of the "hipster" type rather than true political socialists. Che Guevara for them, like for many kids around the world, are just a fad, not a real political symbol.

A common trait we seem to discover is that their anti-capitalist/western stance is more influenced by their pro-China nationalism, rather than a true leftist internationalism.

those were my points too.

personally have never met any real PRC Chinese socialists/leftists in my life. In university campus, the Chinese foreign students who join those socialist/leftist club/group usually turn out to be right wing nationalist rather than a true leftist.

where do you live??

Even in PDF, I'm not sure if I've met a real PRC chinese socialist/leftist here

there was one... ailurus or something like that... at least, he mentioned that he had studied socialism and found it interesting.
 
.
those were my points too.



where do you live??



there was one... ailurus or something like that... at least, he mentioned that he had studied socialism and found it interesting.

Uh OK. I think the right-left dichotomy is reversed in China compared to how it is to the rest of the world.

I will go back to Viet Nam in the near future. And let me tell you, what I said also applied to Vietnamese people. Real leftist/socialists Vietnamese are quite rare. The "communist youth" Vietnamese are also more like right wing nationalist.

Those recent surveys that say the Chinese amd Vietnamese population are more capitalist than any western nations is true, imo.

I even think Ho Chi Minh is not a true communist/leftist/internationalist. Him travelling around the world engaging with various international communist movement is just a means to help his country back home. Even his indo-chinese communist org was motivated by his pro-Vietnam nationalism.

The REAL Vietnamese socialist/leftist and the person I respect the most is Tạ Thu Thâu.

I'm afraid in the near future, the REAL Vietnamese communist/socialist/leftist people will get harrassed/imprisoned by the authorities. Sounds ironic but thats how I see its going to be, especially if Viet Nam is heading towards the same direction as it is now: liberalising the market/being capitalist/MNC friendly/maintaining the current authoritarian form of government.

Things are not looking bright for REAL Vietnamese communist/socialist/leftists.

I'm not sure about China, would you say China will be heading towards the same path? That REAL Chinese socialists will too be harrassed/pacified?
 
.
I will go back to Viet Nam in the near future.

and you avoided telling me where you are presently. :D

Uh OK. I think the right-left dichotomy is reversed in China compared to how it is to the rest of the world.

Those recent surveys that say the Chinese amd Vietnamese population are more capitalist than any western nations is true, imo.

one american pdf member ( peter c, i think ) had said that usa's system ( at least some of it ) is more socialist than china and russia... i can't say about russia because it is more involved in international affairs than china.

me and that american member were talking about housing and welfare system... and one chinese member recently surprised me by calling housing a commodity ( rather than as a free right )... also, some chinese members earlier have boasted about china having housing that are among the costliest in the world and some chinese cities being the costliest... a strange celebration for a nation governed by a communist movement !!!

I even think Ho Chi Minh is not a true communist/leftist/internationalist. Him travelling around the world engaging with various international communist movement is just a means to help his country back home. Even his indo-chinese communist org was motivated by his pro-Vietnam nationalism.

The REAL Vietnamese socialist/leftist and the person I respect the most is Tạ Thu Thâu.

thanks for that info... i find read about the person you mentioned.

And let me tell you, what I said also applied to Vietnamese people. Real leftist/socialists Vietnamese are quite rare. The "communist youth" Vietnamese are also more like right wing nationalist.

I'm afraid in the near future, the REAL Vietnamese communist/socialist/leftist people will get harrassed/imprisoned by the authorities. Sounds ironic but thats how I see its going to be, especially if Viet Nam is heading towards the same direction as it is now: liberalising the market/being capitalist/MNC friendly/maintaining the current authoritarian form of government.

Things are not looking bright for REAL Vietnamese communist/socialist/leftists.

vietnam government has effectively put vietnam into a anti-china nato alliance, along with other regional players like singapore, india and australia... this is not so much a battle of ideologies as much a nationalist battle... you hinted to this.

so there is a chance to what you said may happen to vietnamese leftists, because it seems that, just like in china, the single-party governance is more for national unity rather than being in a east/south bloc.

by the way, does vietnam government have links with north korea??

I'm not sure about China, would you say China will be heading towards the same path? That REAL Chinese socialists will too be harrassed/pacified?

maybe... because we don't hear of hardline communist members of cpc or the pla giving hardcore statement against western capitalism/imperialism... maybe that is the chinese way or maybe we are not allowed to hear them.

china government was neutral on the libya and syria wars, compared to russia.

hopefully, the chinese socialists will strive to louden their voice.
 
.
Uh OK. I think the right-left dichotomy is reversed in China compared to how it is to the rest of the world.

I will go back to Viet Nam in the near future. And let me tell you, what I said also applied to Vietnamese people. Real leftist/socialists Vietnamese are quite rare. The "communist youth" Vietnamese are also more like right wing nationalist.

Those recent surveys that say the Chinese amd Vietnamese population are more capitalist than any western nations is true, imo.

I even think Ho Chi Minh is not a true communist/leftist/internationalist. Him travelling around the world engaging with various international communist movement is just a means to help his country back home. Even his indo-chinese communist org was motivated by his pro-Vietnam nationalism.

The REAL Vietnamese socialist/leftist and the person I respect the most is Tạ Thu Thâu.

I'm afraid in the near future, the REAL Vietnamese communist/socialist/leftist people will get harrassed/imprisoned by the authorities. Sounds ironic but thats how I see its going to be, especially if Viet Nam is heading towards the same direction as it is now: liberalising the market/being capitalist/MNC friendly/maintaining the current authoritarian form of government.

Things are not looking bright for REAL Vietnamese communist/socialist/leftists.

I'm not sure about China, would you say China will be heading towards the same path? That REAL Chinese socialists will too be harrassed/pacified?

Well written post!

Indeed it's interesting to observe these phenomenon in supposedly communist countries like China and Vietnam, where in practice except the form of government there is hardly anything socialist any more.

I suppose the neo-socialists, if I may describe them that way, are "angry" at income gap, and social divide. That's why a majority of them are young, and being the have-not's, since in an ideal socialist utopia everybody have equal wealth. In their perspective, NK and Cuba (that might be why Che is so popular) retain much more fundamentals of socialism, people are more "equal" (they ignore the fact of equally poor), than China & Vietnam.

Comparing with China, I think Vietnam is moving faster in liberalism. While to some degree I see China is swinging back left or at least slowing its pace of liberalism especially since Xi took office.
 
.
I remember a survey where the Vietnamese and Chinese answered very different to an important question. how important is
is it to tax the rich and distribute their wealth to the poor? Vietnamese disagreed heavily while Chinese mostly agreed.
 
.
I remember a survey where the Vietnamese and Chinese answered very different to an important question. how important is
is it to tax the rich and distribute their wealth to the poor? Vietnamese disagreed heavily while Chinese mostly agreed.

Was there such a survey? Anyway I wouldn't be surprised cos apparently some leftist ideology is gaining popularity in recent years. There is a stronger voice supporting tax function to play more instrumental role in wealth re-distribution of society. Well though I am not pro-socialist but the currently high Gini Index does need some rectification. Devils are in the details, let's see how it goes!
 
.
one american pdf member ( peter c, i think ) had said that usa's system ( at least some of it ) is more socialist than china and russia... i can't say about russia because it is more involved in international affairs than china.

me and that american member were talking about housing and welfare system... and one chinese member recently surprised me by calling housing a commodity ( rather than as a free right )... also, some chinese members earlier have boasted about china having housing that are among the costliest in the world and some chinese cities being the costliest... a strange celebration for a nation governed by a communist movement !!!

Most western countries are for sure more socialist than Viet Nam amd China, especially the nordics and the commonwealth countries (Canada, Australia, NZ). I think it comes down to the social ethos of those countries as well, right down to the individuals and not just the government that has “socialist” characteristics. From my personal experience, western people are alot more communitarian, kind and good hearted than VN and the east asian countries. Even just small things like a stranger holding a door for you, its common in western countries but rare in VN, hell, people will push you out of the way to get to the door first lol. Western people has a lot more empathy for strangers than Asian in general.

People say Asians are communitarian and Westerners are individualistic, but that is BS imo. Asians are not communitarian, they are “clannish”, meaning they only look after their family and friends. They will treat strangers in a dog-eat-dog world mentality, not communitarian at all. That’s why I’m not surprised that surveys show Viets and Chinese loves capitalism more than westerners. And I’m not surprised that most western countries have more socialist characteristic than VN or China.

Oh, did you know that in VN, workers can’t create their own union? The “unions”, by law, must be under the control of the govt. It ain’t a real workers union if the workers can not be in control. Here’s the funny bit, the US is now trying to pressure the VN govt to allow workers to run their own independent union. So a capitalist country telling a “communist” country how to run unions properly.


vietnam government has effectively put vietnam into a anti-china nato alliance, along with other regional players like singapore, india and australia... this is not so much a battle of ideologies as much a nationalist battle... you hinted to this.

I blame this on the PRC government. They pretty much pushed/scared the neighbourhood into the western camp.

so there is a chance to what you said may happen to vietnamese leftists, because it seems that, just like in china, the single-party governance is more for national unity rather than being in a east/south bloc.

by the way, does vietnam government have links with north korea??

Yes, I dont regard the the Viet government as a real communist government anymore. I think I am the only real Vietnamese socialist in this forum.

Viet Nam still has diplomatic ties with NK. There are NK resturants in Viet Nam, run by real NK people. I am not a fan of the NK regime.

maybe... because we don't hear of hardline communist members of cpc or the pla giving hardcore statement against western capitalism/imperialism..

hopefully, the chinese socialists will strive to louden their voice.

Ive never heard of any real Chinese socialists. All I see are nationalists. Even Bo Xilai was once hailed as a true Chinese conservative socialist/maoist. But we all now know what his true color is. So dont hold your breath.

Well written post!

Indeed it's interesting to observe these phenomenon in supposedly communist countries like China and Vietnam, where in practice except the form of government there is hardly anything socialist any more.

As I mentioned in my previous post, I think it depends on the social ethos, the individuals and not the govt. VN is not a communitarian society, it is a “clan” based society where your clan are your family, friends and business connections. Within your “clan”, it is “communitarian” I guess. But outside your clan, it is pretty much a dog-eat-dog world. This is not a kind of society where socialist/communist values can flourish. It is a perfect society for capitalism.

Would you say this is true for the Chinese society as well?

I suppose the neo-socialists, if I may describe them that way, are "angry" at income gap, and social divide. That's why a majority of them are young, and being the have-not's, since in an ideal socialist utopia everybody have equal wealth. In their perspective, NK and Cuba (that might be why Che is so popular) retain much more fundamentals of socialism, people are more "equal" (they ignore the fact of equally poor), than China & Vietnam.

Interesting. Thanks for explaining. So just like what I thought, they are not really real socialists, but just using some socialist/communist rhetorics to “get even”.

Comparing with China, I think Vietnam is moving faster in liberalism. While to some degree I see China is swinging back left or at least slowing its pace of liberalism especially since Xi took office.

I think sooner or later, they will both end up in the capitalist/liberal path. Cos if thats how society behave, then they will have no choice but to adapt in the long run, imo.
 
.
From my personal experience, western people are alot more communitarian, kind and good hearted than VN and the east asian countries. Even just small things like a stranger holding a door for you, its common in western countries but rare in VN, hell, people will push you out of the way to get to the door first lol. Western people has a lot more empathy for strangers than Asian in general.

People say Asians are communitarian and Westerners are individualistic, but that is BS imo. Asians are not communitarian, they are “clannish”, meaning they only look after their family and friends. They will treat strangers in a dog-eat-dog world mentality, not communitarian at all. That’s why I’m not surprised that surveys show Viets and Chinese loves capitalism more than westerners. And I’m not surprised that most western countries have more socialist characteristic than VN or China.

.

I dont think it is right friend, at least I have had a conversation with A New Zealand man who has lived quite long in England and also has some work currently in Australia. He stayed in Jakarta for some time as his company in Australia bring him here to Jakarta for working.

According to him, western people is really individualistic, they dont talk to strangers, and he is surprised when he comes to Jakarta, seeing how people who doesnt know each other on the street can have a small talk together. He even want to have Indonesian girl as he think western girl only care about money ( it doesnt mean he can't have western girl as he has descent job and his face is in the same level with many good looking American actor).
 
.
From my personal experience, western people are alot more communitarian, kind and good hearted than VN and the east asian countries. Even just small things like a stranger holding a door for you, its common in western countries but rare in VN, hell, people will push you out of the way to get to the door first lol. Western people has a lot more empathy for strangers than Asian in general.

People say Asians are communitarian and Westerners are individualistic, but that is BS imo. Asians are not communitarian, they are “clannish”, meaning they only look after their family and friends. They will treat strangers in a dog-eat-dog world mentality, not communitarian at all.

i agree.

i see dog-eat-dog in india everyday, either outside or what i read in the newspaper or on internet... utter disregard for miseries of others and wanting to advance one's own petty life by hook or crook... and much of the middle-class jobniks ( "professionals" ) are more callous and lacks empathy than other classes... you can visit the india-related threads ( or even in pakistan-related threads ) and see for yourself the callous posts of many indian members.

there is a famous analogy in india about indians generally... that they are crabs in a bottle who fight to get to the top by climbing on others' heads.

last year, india was declared by "world health organization" as "suicide capital of the world"... this could have been easily avoided if india had a scientific and empathetic political system.

Oh, did you know that in VN, workers can’t create their own union? The “unions”, by law, must be under the control of the govt. It ain’t a real workers union if the workers can not be in control. Here’s the funny bit, the US is now trying to pressure the VN govt to allow workers to run their own independent union. So a capitalist country telling a “communist” country how to run unions properly.

yes, funny that.. having a union is international right.

a similar thing is the case in india... the software/services industry that took off big around 1995 somehow obtained a understanding with successive governments that there need not be unions... therefore these companies were long able to remove people without notice and without repercussions... in recent years, a particular big company called infosys even had suicides happening because of the atmosphere there... also, the western economic downturn since 2007 has had a big impact on the employees of the indian software/services companies which has removed people in the countless numbers without

but it is the fault of these "highly educated" employees who did not agitate to have a union but lived only for their monthly salary and their fake occassional office gatherings or outings which united no one... these employees didn't care if the person next to them was facing injustice from the company management... and now that the entire industry is in trouble and people are being removed suddenly left, right and centre. these employees don't have a union to agitate for their rights.

i myself tried to establish a union in the media-industry company i was in until middle of 2014... i was there for less than a year but decided to take leadership because there was none... however i left the company soon after for other reasons... and after me, no one else there has taken leadership where i left off... i am saddened by the selfish nature of the neo-rich middle-classes.

I think I am the only real Vietnamese socialist in this forum.

glad to meet you.

I dont think it is right friend, at least I have had a conversation with A New Zealand man who has lived quite long in England and also has some work currently in Australia. He stayed in Jakarta for some time as his company in Australia bring him here to Jakarta for working.

According to him, western people is really individualistic, they dont talk to strangers, and he is surprised when he comes to Jakarta, seeing how people who doesnt know each other on the street can have a small talk together. He even want to have Indonesian girl as he think western girl only care about money ( it doesnt mean he can't have western girl as he has descent job and his face is in the same level with many good looking American actor).

i will ask you this... in late 2011 started the "occupy movements" in the anglo nations, seeking to change the current capitalist economic/political systems there ( interest-based banking, stock exchanges, paid education system, false democracy etc ) into more humane ones... they may not be hardcore socialists but they went out in thousands and camped out for days, keeping aside their college courses and jobs... they did this so that society as a whole can benefit... a communitarian thinking, as yorozuya described.

in how many south asian and east asian cities did this happen??
 
.
i will ask you this... in late 2011 started the "occupy movements" in the anglo nations, seeking to change the current capitalist economic/political systems there ( interest-based banking, stock exchanges, paid education system, false democracy etc ) into more humane ones... they may not be hardcore socialists but they went out in thousands and camped out for days, keeping aside their college courses and jobs... they did this so that society as a whole can benefit... a communitarian thinking, as yorozuya described.

in how many south asian and east asian cities did this happen??

Indonesia has already had state health insurance system which is much much better than Obama Care, there is also health insurance for the poor. We have paid our teacher a lot of money from government pocket. Free education system for state owned school (we have many), even though in the implementation we still see many students still pay some money to the school, but it is much less than before.

There is still problem in housing though, but the government at least will help middle class people seeking housing by interfering the banking system to fund them (low interest rate). (Actually our banking system is comprised from several huge state owned bank (Mandiri/BNI/Niaga) and many foreign ownership (BCA/CIMB/ etc) so it will not be too difficult to do so). But I dont know the implementation yet, but housing industry is booming here.
 
.
I dont think it is right friend, at least I have had a conversation with A New Zealand man who has lived quite long in England and also has some work currently in Australia. He stayed in Jakarta for some time as his company in Australia bring him here to Jakarta for working.

According to him, western people is really individualistic, they dont talk to strangers, and he is surprised when he comes to Jakarta, seeing how people who doesnt know each other on the street can have a small talk together. He even want to have Indonesian girl as he think western girl only care about money ( it doesnt mean he can't have western girl as he has descent job and his face is in the same level with many good looking American actor).

Bro, what you've mentioned are only superficial character traits, like whether someone is extroverted and start conversations easily or introverted and less open. But these kind of character traits does NOT indicate whether an individual or people group are communitarian or not. The talkative and open guy could very well be a guy that would stab you in the back if a situation calls for it and the introverted "unfriendly" guy could be those that often donate their money to charity anonymously.

A communitarian mentality must involves the willingness to sacrifice something from your life, whether it be money or time, in order to make someone else's life a bit better. Those conversations you've talked aboutabout is more of a cultural habit and something that south east Asians are good at. It is shallow and superficial and not indicative of whether someone is communitarian or not.

I've lived long enough in both Asia and the West and to know how each population are like, in general. The people in the West don't just engage in shallow conversations and cheap talk like in Viet Nam. If they are concerned about you, then they will really try to help. And let's look at it this way, what kind of people often involved in aid work or NGO? They are mostly westerners. I barely see any Asians from rich countries like Japan/SK/TW/SGP engaged in such aid or volunteer work. Aid org and NGO can sometime be questionable but on the individual level, these people really want to help people. This reflects their communitarian mentality.

Remember I had a discussion with some Indonesian members about Indonesian victims in the slavery fishing industry? The people/activists that revealed the issue and fought for those victims are mostly westerners. In fact, I still haven't read of any Asian/Indonesian group that have raised this issue. One Indonesian member here even got mad at me for mentioning the issue because it was embarrassing for her country or something, while completely ignoring the fact that her countrymen are suffering. This reflects her lack of empathy and communitarian heart. But I admit I don't know much about Indonesia that's why I've only used Viet Nam as an example of being less communitarian than the West.

And this is why in the West, the gap between the rich and poor are smaller, their workers has more rights, the vulnerable members of society like the disabled and poor has more support, etc. People say it is because the West is rich and can support such system but it is not true. The main reason is because they are more communitarian, treat other strangers more kindly than people do in say, Vietnam. If the west really wanted, they could resort back to the colonial Era where the strong dominates the weak (this is more like the south east Asian way), but they don't. Well they still kind of do, but not on the level of the Asians.
 
.
Bro, what you've mentioned are only superficial character traits, like whether someone is extroverted and start conversations easily or introverted and less open. But these kind of character traits does NOT indicate whether an individual or people group are communitarian or not. The talkative and open guy could very well be a guy that would stab you in the back if a situation calls for it and the introverted "unfriendly" guy could be those that often donate their money to charity anonymously.

A communitarian mentality must involves the willingness to sacrifice something from your life, whether it be money or time, in order to make someone else's life a bit better. Those conversations you've talked aboutabout is more of a cultural habit and something that south east Asians are good at. It is shallow and superficial and not indicative of whether someone is communitarian or not.

I've lived long enough in both Asia and the West and to know how each population are like, in general. The people in the West don't just engage in shallow conversations and cheap talk like in Viet Nam. If they are concerned about you, then they will really try to help. And let's look at it this way, what kind of people often involved in aid work or NGO? They are mostly westerners. I barely see any Asians from rich countries like Japan/SK/TW/SGP engaged in such aid or volunteer work. Aid org and NGO can sometime be questionable but on the individual level, these people really want to help people. This reflects their communitarian mentality.

Remember I had a discussion with some Indonesian members about Indonesian victims in the slavery fishing industry? The people/activists that revealed the issue and fought for those victims are mostly westerners. In fact, I still haven't read of any Asian/Indonesian group that have raised this issue. One Indonesian member here even got mad at me for mentioning the issue because it was embarrassing for her country or something, while completely ignoring the fact that her countrymen are suffering. This reflects her lack of empathy and communitarian heart. But I admit I don't know much about Indonesia that's why I've only used Viet Nam as an example of being less communitarian than the West.

And this is why in the West, the gap between the rich and poor are smaller, their workers has more rights, the vulnerable members of society like the disabled and poor has more support, etc. People say it is because the West is rich and can support such system but it is not true. The main reason is because they are more communitarian, treat other strangers more kindly than people do in say, Vietnam. If the west really wanted, they could resort back to the colonial Era where the strong dominates the weak (this is more like the south east Asian way), but they don't. Well they still kind of do, but not on the level of the Asians.

this and your last few posts should be made into a thread... fantastic posts.

One Indonesian member here even got mad at me for mentioning the issue because it was embarrassing for her country or something, while completely ignoring the fact that her countrymen are suffering. This reflects her lack of empathy and communitarian heart.

who, madokafc ??
 
.
i agree.

i see dog-eat-dog in india everyday, either outside or what i read in the newspaper or on internet... utter disregard for miseries of others and wanting to advance one's own petty life by hook or crook... and much of the middle-class jobniks ( "professionals" ) are more callous and lacks empathy than other classes... you can visit the india-related threads ( or even in pakistan-related threads ) and see for yourself the callous posts of many indian members.

there is a famous analogy in india about indians generally... that they are crabs in a bottle who fight to get to the top by climbing on others' heads.

last year, india was declared by "world health organization" as "suicide capital of the world"... this could have been easily avoided if india had a scientific and empathetic political system.

It's just like in Viet Nam, a dog eat dog world. Everyone wants to be on top of everyone. They may be friendly towards their friends and neighbours on the superficial level, but towards strangers they totally cold. That's why there are child beggars/workers on the street in Viet Nam and everyone think it's normal. In the West, if there are child beggars/workers on the street, someone (even politicians) will make a big deal about it.

Also there used to be threads in this section with video clips showing Chinese kids and old people getting in an accidents and people just walk on by without helping. Some Chinese members here even tried to justify it by saying people don't want to help because they don't want to get blamed for the accident, etc. These are all utterly lame excuses. It just show that there are a lack of empathy and the absent of the communitarian mentality in these people.


yes, funny that.. having a union is international right.

a similar thing is the case in india... the software/services industry that took off big around 1995 somehow obtained a understanding with successive governments that there need not be unions... therefore these companies were long able to remove people without notice and without repercussions... in recent years, a particular big company called infosys even had suicides happening because of the atmosphere there... also, the western economic downturn since 2007 has had a big impact on the employees of the indian software/services companies which has removed people in the countless numbers without

but it is the fault of these "highly educated" employees who did not agitate to have a union but lived only for their monthly salary and their fake occassional office gatherings or outings which united no one... these employees didn't care if the person next to them was facing injustice from the company management... and now that the entire industry is in trouble and people are being removed suddenly left, right and centre. these employees don't have a union to agitate for their rights.

i myself tried to establish a union in the media-industry company i was in until middle of 2014... i was there for less than a year but decided to take leadership because there was none... however i left the company soon after for other reasons... and after me, no one else there has taken leadership where i left off... i am saddened by the selfish nature of the neo-rich middle-classes.


glad to meet you.

Speaking of union, my theory why Europe managed to create an EU is because they are, on average, more communitarian than most other people. No doubt the EU is not perfect, some may say flawed, but the fact that they have managed to create the present EU is in itself an achievement that Asians will not be able to achieve. Like what I said, I think it is because the West are more communitarian than Asians in general.

If fact, most Asian country still have some kind of friction with one another and an Asia Union don't seem plausible for the foreseeable future. People blame this on politics and history but I blame this on the individualism and ego of the Asian people, in general. I always tell people, it is a myth that Asians are communitarian while the West are individualistics. The truth is the other way around.

Glad to meet you you too.
 
.
Bro, what you've mentioned are only superficial character traits, like whether someone is extroverted and start conversations easily or introverted and less open. But these kind of character traits does NOT indicate whether an individual or people group are communitarian or not. The talkative and open guy could very well be a guy that would stab you in the back if a situation calls for it and the introverted "unfriendly" guy could be those that often donate their money to charity anonymously.

A communitarian mentality must involves the willingness to sacrifice something from your life, whether it be money or time, in order to make someone else's life a bit better. Those conversations you've talked aboutabout is more of a cultural habit and something that south east Asians are good at. It is shallow and superficial and not indicative of whether someone is communitarian or not.

I've lived long enough in both Asia and the West and to know how each population are like, in general. The people in the West don't just engage in shallow conversations and cheap talk like in Viet Nam. If they are concerned about you, then they will really try to help. And let's look at it this way, what kind of people often involved in aid work or NGO? They are mostly westerners. I barely see any Asians from rich countries like Japan/SK/TW/SGP engaged in such aid or volunteer work. Aid org and NGO can sometime be questionable but on the individual level, these people really want to help people. This reflects their communitarian mentality.

Remember I had a discussion with some Indonesian members about Indonesian victims in the slavery fishing industry? The people/activists that revealed the issue and fought for those victims are mostly westerners. In fact, I still haven't read of any Asian/Indonesian group that have raised this issue. One Indonesian member here even got mad at me for mentioning the issue because it was embarrassing for her country or something, while completely ignoring the fact that her countrymen are suffering. This reflects her lack of empathy and communitarian heart. But I admit I don't know much about Indonesia that's why I've only used Viet Nam as an example of being less communitarian than the West.

And this is why in the West, the gap between the rich and poor are smaller, their workers has more rights, the vulnerable members of society like the disabled and poor has more support, etc. People say it is because the West is rich and can support such system but it is not true. The main reason is because they are more communitarian, treat other strangers more kindly than people do in say, Vietnam. If the west really wanted, they could resort back to the colonial Era where the strong dominates the weak (this is more like the south east Asian way), but they don't. Well they still kind of do, but not on the level of the Asians.

Thanks for this long explanation, really appreciated this.

Actually what I have said is what I heard from a Westerner who has experience living in several advanced countries and also has experience living in Indonesia for some time. I never live in western countries before though, so I will not comment on your opinion, despite that I still need to thank you for sharing your life experience with me here.
 
.
who, madokafc ??

Bro I don't want to say who. Don't wanna face her wrath (and reports). Lol

Thanks for this long explanation, really appreciated this.

Actually what I have said is what I heard from a Westerner who has experience living in several advanced countries and also has experience living in Indonesia for some time. I never live in western countries before though, so I will not comment on your opinion, despite that I still need to thank you for sharing your life experience with me here.

Australia in just right next to Indonesia, you can swim there bro. I just remembered the executions of those Aussie drug moles and a lot of aussies (even their politicians) tried to save those convicts. This too is evidence of that western communitarian mentality I was talking about.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom