What's new

Change head!!8 Indians pale in comparison with 163 Chinese in list of highly-cited researchers

master_13

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Nov 25, 2013
Messages
933
Reaction score
-1
Country
China
Location
China
Eight Indian scientists, including two from Chandigarh, have been honoured with their inclusion it a recently released global list of "Highly Cited Researchers." However, the Indian performance pales in comparison with China, who has a whopping 163 scientists in the list which features top researchers from 21 fields.

The list, which represents some of world's leading scientific minds, includes over 3,000 researchers whose work is among the top 1% most cited work in their respective subjects. Regarded as a measure of work impact of these scientists, the list is dominated by the United States, which has more than half the entries. India's performance is, however, at par with other BRICS partners. Brazil has five researchers in the elite group, while Russia has eight. On the other hand, 11 researchers from South Africa make it to the global list.

India also falls behind other East Asian countries like Japan with 102, South Korea with 25 and Singapore with 11 scientists. Iran has 11 entries, but it is Saudi Arabia which stuns everyone with 180 listings.

The majority of the 180 researchers associated with Saudi Arabia are not primarily working in Saudi Universities, since 150 of them mention Saudi Arabia as their secondary affiliation. Only 30 scientists of the 180 have Saudi Arabia has their primary affiliation, and the remaining 150 are scientists who primarily work in other universities, but are engaged in partnerships and collaborations with universities in Saudi Arabia. Still, Saudi Arabia is way ahead of India.

Indian performance is clearly way ahead of other SAARC countries, with only Pakistan's Tasawar Hayat being listed in mathematics and engineering. In both cases, Quaid-I-Azam University, Pakistan, is his secondary affiliation, while King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia, is his primary affiliation. Besides India and Pakistan, no researcher from universities and institutes in SAARC countries find a mention.

From India, Bharat Ratna awardee C N R Rao is among the select scientists who are quoted twice in the list, featuring in two categories of chemistry and material science. Rao, who works at the Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research (JNCASR), Bangalore, is joined by his colleague Ujjal K Gautam who is listed for material science. JNCASR is the only Institute from India which has two scientists in this elite list.

From Chandigarh, Gajendra Pal Singh Raghava of Institute of Microbial Technology (IMTECH), Sector 39, and V R Sinha from Panjab University (PU) have earned a place. While Raghava is featured in the field of computer science, Sinha is India's entry in Pharmacology and Toxicology. Raghava obtained his doctorate from PU, which adds another feather to the university's cap.

Two Indian scientists also make it in the field of engineering. This includes Vinod Kumar Gupta from Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Roorkee. Gupta's work at IIT is in collaboration with the King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Saudi Arabia. The second Indian in the field of engineering is Dinesh Mohan of Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.

Rajeev K Varshney from International Crop Research Institute for Semi Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, finds a place in the field of plant and animal sciences. ICRISAT is mentioned as the secondary affiliation, with the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT) in Mexico being the primary affiliation for Varshney's research. The other scientist in the global list includes R N Tharanathan of the Central Food Technology Research Institute, Mysore, in the category of agricultural sciences.

Panjab University and Jawaharlal Nehru University are the only two universities which feature in this list, with the other five being institutes. Both CFTRI and IMTECH are CSIR bodies, while JNCASR was established by the department of science and technology, and is a deemed university. IITs are autonomous institutes, and ICRISAT falls under the global CGIAR centres.
 
. .
Eight Indian scientists, including two from Chandigarh, have been honoured with their inclusion it a recently released global list of "Highly Cited Researchers." However, the Indian performance pales in comparison with China, who has a whopping 163 scientists in the list which features top researchers from 21 fields.

The list, which represents some of world's leading scientific minds, includes over 3,000 researchers whose work is among the top 1% most cited work in their respective subjects. Regarded as a measure of work impact of these scientists, the list is dominated by the United States, which has more than half the entries. India's performance is, however, at par with other BRICS partners. Brazil has five researchers in the elite group, while Russia has eight. On the other hand, 11 researchers from South Africa make it to the global list.

India also falls behind other East Asian countries like Japan with 102, South Korea with 25 and Singapore with 11 scientists. Iran has 11 entries, but it is Saudi Arabia which stuns everyone with 180 listings.

The majority of the 180 researchers associated with Saudi Arabia are not primarily working in Saudi Universities, since 150 of them mention Saudi Arabia as their secondary affiliation. Only 30 scientists of the 180 have Saudi Arabia has their primary affiliation, and the remaining 150 are scientists who primarily work in other universities, but are engaged in partnerships and collaborations with universities in Saudi Arabia. Still, Saudi Arabia is way ahead of India.

Indian performance is clearly way ahead of other SAARC countries, with only Pakistan's Tasawar Hayat being listed in mathematics and engineering. In both cases, Quaid-I-Azam University, Pakistan, is his secondary affiliation, while King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia, is his primary affiliation. Besides India and Pakistan, no researcher from universities and institutes in SAARC countries find a mention.

From India, Bharat Ratna awardee C N R Rao is among the select scientists who are quoted twice in the list, featuring in two categories of chemistry and material science. Rao, who works at the Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research (JNCASR), Bangalore, is joined by his colleague Ujjal K Gautam who is listed for material science. JNCASR is the only Institute from India which has two scientists in this elite list.

From Chandigarh, Gajendra Pal Singh Raghava of Institute of Microbial Technology (IMTECH), Sector 39, and V R Sinha from Panjab University (PU) have earned a place. While Raghava is featured in the field of computer science, Sinha is India's entry in Pharmacology and Toxicology. Raghava obtained his doctorate from PU, which adds another feather to the university's cap.

Two Indian scientists also make it in the field of engineering. This includes Vinod Kumar Gupta from Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Roorkee. Gupta's work at IIT is in collaboration with the King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Saudi Arabia. The second Indian in the field of engineering is Dinesh Mohan of Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.

Rajeev K Varshney from International Crop Research Institute for Semi Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, finds a place in the field of plant and animal sciences. ICRISAT is mentioned as the secondary affiliation, with the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT) in Mexico being the primary affiliation for Varshney's research. The other scientist in the global list includes R N Tharanathan of the Central Food Technology Research Institute, Mysore, in the category of agricultural sciences.

Panjab University and Jawaharlal Nehru University are the only two universities which feature in this list, with the other five being institutes. Both CFTRI and IMTECH are CSIR bodies, while JNCASR was established by the department of science and technology, and is a deemed university. IITs are autonomous institutes, and ICRISAT falls under the global CGIAR centres.

More R&D Investment is needed if we are serious about catching up to the Powerhouses of West & East

Thats true,,,,our research is minuscle compared to others.
On per capita basis its actually pretty shameful

@Bhasad Singh Mundi
@Dillinger
@gslv mk3
@sreekumar

This is the reason we are lagging behind,,,,almost NIL research

Yaar sahi mein bada bura haal hai :(:(
 
.
Now as usual indians here will just overlook this.

For god's sake even saudi arabia had 180 entries

More R&D Investment is needed if we are serious about catching up to the Powerhouses of West & East



Yaar sahi mein bada bura haal hai :(:(

We nned at least 10 years to be on par with china,,,forget about the west.
And do u think china will remain static during tht time doing nothing??
They would have gone on to next level
 
. .
Thats true,,,,our research is minuscle compared to others.
On per capita basis its actually pretty shameful

@Bhasad Singh Mundi
@Dillinger
@gslv mk3
@sreekumar

I don't care about citations as long as we produce our own Tech. Anyway, most of this is driven by collaborations and funding. China has money and funds projects in collaboration with other nations. We even don't have sufficient money to fund our own projects.

Now as usual indians here will just overlook this.

For god's sake even saudi arabia had 180 entries



We nned at least 10 years to be on par with china,,,forget about the west.
And do u think china will remain static during tht time doing nothing??
They would have gone on to next level

I tell you most of this is driven by funding and collaborations. If you have money, it will become easy. Both china and SA are extensively funding research overseas.
 
.
I don't care about citations as long as we produce our own Tech. Anyway, most of this is driven by collaborations and funding. China has money and funds projects in collaboration with other nations. We even don't have sufficient money to fund our own projects.

Thats irrelevant.
We produce almost nothing.

All the rest is just excuses
 
.
Now as usual indians here will just overlook this.

For god's sake even saudi arabia had 180 entries



We nned at least 10 years to be on par with china,,,forget about the west.
And do u think china will remain static during tht time doing nothing??
They would have gone on to next level

Honestly my only hope for this country is the new govt,abhi tak toh theek kaam karrahe hai aage dekh te hai kya karte hai
 
. .
money and quota system is the major problem....

provide money for research...
give good salaries to scientist and appropriate recognition in the community...
stop job quota system.... it prevent talented minds to fill in the system...
 
.
money and quota system is the major problem....

provide money for research...
give good salaries to scientist and appropriate recognition in the community...
stop job quota system.... it prevent talented minds to fill in the system...

Sadly it will never happen.
50 percent quota is here to stay and **** us forever..................

If u think of it,,,,,for every 2 people u see in a college or government job,,,1 did not even deserve to be there.
So much so for merit:lol:
 
.
Thats irrelevant.
We produce almost nothing.

All the rest is just excuses

ignorance becomes excuse for you? Do you even know
1) how much money china is putting to fund projects in collaboration with foreign universities
2) How many wetern academicians are hired to teach in chinese unis.


We produce lots of papers in local journals. We need to increase government funding tp support papers in overseas conferences. But Its better to promote local conferences rather than putting money in western pockets by publishing in IEEE and ACM.
 
.
ignorance becomes excuse for you? Do you even know
1) how much money china is putting to fund projects in collaboration with foreign universities
2) How many wetern academicians are hired to teach in chinese unis.


We produce lots of papers in local journals. We need to increase government funding tp support funding in overseas conferences. But Its better to promote local conferences rather than putting money in western pockets by publishing in IEEE and ACM.

Ya right genius..............i knew nothing of that:lol:
 
.
Ya right genius..............i knew nothing of that:lol:
If you know then what are you crying for? If don't have money simple. And even if we have money, its better to promote local conferences and universal participation.
 
.
Nothing revolutionary has been proposed by the new govt.
At least in education sector,,,nothing at all

Toda time doh yaar abhi toh aye hai & wasn't there a descison to Build more IIT,IIM & AIIMS
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom