What's new

CFO of Chinese tech giant Huawei arrested in Vancouver, sought by U.S. for extradition

. . . . .
Meaningless move.
Unlike the US, big Companies do not influence China government, Huawei can die any second and there will be others in less then 3 months. That's the difference between communist and capitalist
 
. . .
https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/stocks/asia-markets-tumble-china-tech-hit-after-huawei-arrest
Asia: Markets tumble, China tech hit after Huawei arrest

[HONG KONG] Shares across Asia plunged on Thursday, with technology firms in Hong Kong and Shanghai battered after the arrest of a top executive at Chinese telecoms giant Huawei that has also fueled fears about the recent China-US trade deal.

As Donald Trump and Xi Jinping's tariffs ceasefire last weekend - which sparked a one-day rally - fades to a distant memory, investors are back in selling mood as they fret over a range of issues including the state of the world economy, oil prices and Brexit.

The chances of trade peace between the US and China took a blow Thursday as it emerged Huawei chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou had been held in Canada and faces extradition to the United States over alleged Iran sanctions breaches by the firm.

Meng is also the daughter of company founder Ren Zhengfei, a former Chinese People's Liberation Army engineer.

The company had been investigated by US intelligence, who deemed it a national security threat.

However, the arrest drew a swift response from China, which said it "firmly opposes and strongly protests" the move, adding it had urged Canada and the US to "immediately correct the wrongdoing".

The news sent shudders through Hong Kong and Shanghai markets, where tech firms were hammered.

Hong Kong-listed ZTE, which was subject to a US banning order earlier his year over security fears before that was reduced to a massive fine, was almost five per cent down. Market heavyweight Tencent was two percent lower and AAC Technologies was five percent off.

And in Shanghai, Wingtech Technology was four percent down, Raisecome Technology sank 2.8 per cent and Fujian Raynen Technology lost 2.6 per cent.

Taipei-listed tech firms were also hurt. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company lost 2.2 per cent and Hong Hai Precision was 2.7 per cent lower.

'SIGNIFICANT'

There were also losses for other tech firms in the region, with Sony down three percent in Tokyo and Samsung almost two percent lower. The sector was already under pressure from concerns about future growth and following a surge in recent years.

"This headline is quite significant as the US government is attempting to persuade allies to stop using Huawei equipment due to security fears," said Stephen Innes, head of Asia-Pacific trade at Oanda.

"Recall that over 100 Chinese companies traded limit down (last month) when news broke the US urged allies to blacklist Huawei?"

On broader markets Hong Kong was down more than two percent while Shanghai lost more than one percent and Tokyo shed 1.8 per cent by the break. Taipei was two percent off, while Manila and Jakarta also took a hit.

Sydney fell 0.5 per cent, Singapore gave up 1.2 per cent and Seoul was one per cent lower.

"This is what you call playing hard ball," said Michael Every, head of Asia financial markets research at Rabobank in Hong Kong.

"China is already asking for her release, as can be expected, but if the charges are serious, don't expect the US to blink."

Oil prices extended losses ahead of the weekend's meeting of Opec and non-Opec production giants, with investors unsure about how much and for how long they plan to reduce output.

The commodity has come under selling pressure, having soared Monday and Tuesday, owing to uncertainty about the reduction plans while Trump has called on OPEC to lift output to keep prices low.
 
Last edited:
. . .
I don't see xi lasting his full term.
If he retaliates then relations deteriorate and china's economy suffers.
If he does not retaliate then comes off as weak and his position is severely undermined.
USA is a bully and basically showing China who is boss.
Now all Chinese will travel in fear because they won't know under what pretense they might get picked up.
She will be released but its utter humiliation for China.

why would China retaliates, Its a Chinese company but if they have broken US Laws then they should face the consequences, Neither Xi nor Chinese govt has anything to do with this.
 
.
Behind the US Attack on Chinese Smartphones
By Manlio Dinucci

After having imposed heavy taxes on Chinese merchandise – 250 billion dollars – President Trump, at the G-20, accepted a “truce” by postponing further measures, mainly because the US economy has been struck by Chinese retaliation.


But apart from these commercial considerations, there are also some strategic reasons. Under pressure from the Pentagon and the Intelligence agencies, the USA took the decision to forbid the use of Smartphones and telecommunications infrastructures from the Chinese company Huawei, warning that they may potentially be used for espionage, and pressured their allies to do the same.

The warning concerning the danger of Chinese espionage, especially addressed to Italy, Germany and Japan, countries which house the most important US military bases, came from the same US Intelligence agencies which have been spying on the telephone communications of their allies for years, in particular in Germany and Japan. The US company Apple, at one time the undisputed leader in the sector, saw its sales doubled by Huawei (a company owned by its workers as share-holders), which moved up to the world second place behind the South Korean company Samsung. This is emblematic of a general tendency.

The United States – whose economic supremacy is based artificially on the dollar, until now the main currency for monetary reserves and world commerce – has increasingly been overtaken by China, both in capacity and production quality. The New York Times wrote that

“The West was certain that the Chinese approach was not going to work. All it had to do was wait. It’s still waiting. China is planning a vast global network of commerce, investments and infrastructures, which will remodel financial and geopolitical relations”.

This came about above all, though not entirely, along the New Silk Road that China is currently building across 70 Asian, European and African nations.

The New York Times examined 600 projects which have been implemented by China in 112 countries, including 41 oil and gas pipelines, 199 energy centrals, most of them hydro-electric, (including seven dams in Cambodia which supply half of the country’s needs in electricity), 203 bridges, roads and railways, plus several major ports in Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Malaysia and other countries.

All of this is regarded by Washington as “an aggression against our vital interests”, as declared by the Pentagon in the National Defense Strategy for the United States of America 2018
. The Pentagon defines China as a “strategic competitor which uses a predatory economy to intimidate its neighbours”, willfuly overlooking the series of wars waged until 1949 by the United States, including against China, to strip these countries of their resources.

While China is building dams, railways and bridges, useful not only for its commercial network, but also for the development of the countries concerned, in the US wars, dams, railways and bridges are the first targets to be destroyed. China is accused by the Pentagon of “intending to impose, in the short term, its hegemony in the Indo-Pacific region, and catch the United States off-guard in order to achieve future global pre-eminence”, together with Russia, accused of wanting to “crush NATO” and “sabotage the democratic process in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine”.

This is the source of the “incident” in the Kerch Strait, provoked by Kiev under the command of the Pentagon, intended to sabotage the meeting between Presidents Trump and Putin at the G-20 (which is what happened) and force Ukraine into NATO, of which it is already a de facto member.

“Long-term strategic competition with China and Russia” is considered by the Pentagon to be a “main priority”. For this purpose, “we shall modernise our nuclear forces and reinforce the trans-Atlantic Alliance of NATO”.

Behind the commercial war lurks nuclear war.

This article was originally published in Italian on Il Manifesto.

Translated by Pete Kimberley

Manlio Dinucci is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization.
 
Last edited:
.
why would China retaliates, Its a Chinese company but if they have broken US Laws then they should face the consequences, Neither Xi nor Chinese govt has anything to do with this.
If you are right then the Chinese embassy in Canada is overstepping its brief -
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...f-huawei-cfo-arrested-in-canada-idUSKBN1O5036

"
Chinese embassy demands release of Huawei CFO arrested in Canada
Adam Jourdan
SHANGHAI (Reuters) - China’s embassy in Canada criticized Canada and the United States on Thursday for wrongfully arresting a senior executive at Chinese telecoms giant Huawei [HWT.UL] and demanded her immediate release.

Meng Wanzhou, Huawei’s global chief financial officer, is facing extradition to the United States and her arrest could rekindle tensions between Washington and Beijing only days after they agreed to a ceasefire in a bitter trade war.

Meng was arrested in Canada on Dec. 1. Her arrest is related to violations of U.S. sanctions, a person familiar with the matter said. Reuters was unable to determine the precise nature of the violations."
 
.
If you are right then the Chinese embassy in Canada is overstepping its brief -
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...f-huawei-cfo-arrested-in-canada-idUSKBN1O5036

"
Chinese embassy demands release of Huawei CFO arrested in Canada
Adam Jourdan
SHANGHAI (Reuters) - China’s embassy in Canada criticized Canada and the United States on Thursday for wrongfully arresting a senior executive at Chinese telecoms giant Huawei [HWT.UL] and demanded her immediate release.

Meng Wanzhou, Huawei’s global chief financial officer, is facing extradition to the United States and her arrest could rekindle tensions between Washington and Beijing only days after they agreed to a ceasefire in a bitter trade war.

Meng was arrested in Canada on Dec. 1. Her arrest is related to violations of U.S. sanctions, a person familiar with the matter said. Reuters was unable to determine the precise nature of the violations."

what else would you expect them to do, not even defend their citizen, this is why countries have embassies to defend their citizen. You said Xi will not complete his term because of this issue as if Xi was planning to attack Canada for this.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom