Centre plans 'carnival' to mark 50 years of India-Pakistan War of 1965

[The_Sidewinder]

Good step Indeed.

 

[Kinetic]

Indian claims were exaggerated. Your generals were aiming to have a drunken night in Lahore gymkhana. If you ever visit Lahore you'll see how close it is to the border. That will put Indian Army's myth making machine in perspective.

Who is drunken Ayub or Indian generals?

As people said, if there was no surrender ceremony in 1971, Pakistan would have won the war. Just the day before surrender, people of Pakistan knew they were wining a war.

Report from BBC,

This happen when live under a military dictator like Kim -II.

 

[Dr. Sen]

We were actually waiting for cow urine to throw at our enemies and hence to commence celebrations. Hence they delay.

I like your avatar pic. Its of Modi in Arunachal Pradesh, wearing traditional Arunachal dress and head gear. Thanks man for supporting Indian rule of South Tibet! Highly appreciated gesture!

 

[Manindra]

Strange no one mention operation dwarka :p

There is a plan to build a memorial of single donkey which died in this operation.

 

[tested]

India lost 1965 war despite having a 6-1 advantage. Twisting history won't change the facts. 65 was the only fair one on one fight which India lost. It may not be a clear victory for Pakistan either, however 65 broke the myth of Indian military prowess which grossly overestimated it's blitzkrieg capacity and even more so, underestimated the will of Pakistanis to fight.

India won the 1965 war despite just getting back up after losing from China in 1962 and having a war it did not want thrust upon it.


It is a testament to the bravery of Indian forces and incompetence of Pakistani army that at the time the war ended Pakistan had lost more land to India in a war that Pakistan started to capture Kashmir.

It is a tragedy that our Government lost on the negotiating table what our forces won on the battlefield.

 

[The_Sidewinder]

India won the 1965 war despite just getting back up after losing from China in 1962 and having a war it did not want thrust upon it.


It is a testament to the bravery of Indian forces and incompetence of Pakistani army that at the time the war ended Pakistan had lost more land to India in a war that Pakistan started to capture Kashmir.

It is a tragedy that our Government lost on the negotiating table what our forces won on the battlefield.

We captured more terrain, lost less soldiers, stopped Pakistan from capturing Kashmir still we are the loosers according to Pakistanis. Talking about twisting history what about pakistani education system which is well known for distrauting history.

What is the most blatant lie taught through Pakistan textbooks? - Pakistan - DAWN.COM

What are we teaching our children? - The Express Tribune

Maybe Admin should keep your own house clean before accusing others of twisting history.

 

[tested]

The problem is that Pakistan has nothing to be proud of from their Army.

So therefore they have a need to keep inventing events and versions of history to keep up some pride.

Otherwise for an Army that starts a war to capture a vast area and - ends up losing more land than it captures, more soldiers is a matter of shame.
Losing half a country is a matter of shame.
Losing up as big an area as Siachen is a shame.

Their army has achieved nothing on the battlefield.

Yet they need to feel some pride in their army, so they manufacture their versions. This way Army gets to keep ruling Pakistan and Pakistanis feel some pride.

We captured more terrain, lost less soldiers, stopped Pakistan from capturing Kashmir still we are the loosers according to Pakistanis. Talking about twisting history what about pakistani education system which is well known for distrauting history.

What is the most blatant lie taught through Pakistan textbooks? - Pakistan - DAWN.COM

What are we teaching our children? - The Express Tribune

Maybe Admin should keep your own house clean before accusing others of twisting history.

 

[pakdefender]

The carnival should include a dummy of an Indian army general having tea at Lahore gymkhana , that should make it more real

India won the 1965 war despite just getting back up after losing from China in 1962 and having a war it did not want thrust upon it.


It is a testament to the bravery of Indian forces and incompetence of Pakistani army that at the time the war ended Pakistan had lost more land to India in a war that Pakistan started to capture Kashmir.

It is a tragedy that our Government lost on the negotiating table what our forces won on the battlefield.

India lost the war , no matter how high you get on gaumutr , it won't change the fact that India beat the retreat and failed to capture Lahore

 

[Kinetic]

The carnival should include a dummy of an Indian army general having tea at Lahore gymkhana , that should make it more real



India lost the war , no matter how high you get on gaumutr , it won't change the fact that India beat the retreat and failed to capture Lahore

Who started the war and why? Pakistan started the war to capture kashmir. India did not start the war to capture lahore, than how we lost?

 

[tested]

The carnival should include a dummy of an Indian army general having tea at Lahore gymkhana , that should make it more real



India lost the war , no matter how high you get on gaumutr , it won't change the fact that India beat the retreat and failed to capture Lahore

Actually Pakistan lost the war by any standard used to compare.

It started the war to capture land and ended up losing more land to India. Pakistan Army was beaten hollow, it had to keep retreating giving more land to India.

 

[Kinetic]

where is Barkee? can anyone show on map?

 

[Stephen Cohen]

India lost 1965 war despite having a 6-1 advantage. Twisting history won't change the facts. 65 was the only fair one on one fight which India lost. It may not be a clear victory for Pakistan either, however 65 broke the myth of Indian military prowess which grossly overestimated it's blitzkrieg capacity and even more so, underestimated the will of Pakistanis to fight.

India did not start the war

Pakistan attacked India with a CLEAR AIM ; to take Kashmir

We foiled your aims ; and at the time of ceasefire India had the UPPER HAND

India declared the ceasefire UNILATERALLY

Pakistan accepted the ceasefire ; If Pakistan was in a WINNING position
then you could have continued the war ; but you did not do so

 

[Kinetic]

barki is just outer area of lahore ring road.

 

[genmirajborgza786]

The carnival should include a dummy of an Indian army general having tea at Lahore gymkhana , that should make it more real



India lost the war , no matter how high you get on gaumutr , it won't change the fact that India beat the retreat and failed to capture Lahore

but what about Kashmir ? , did you won that sir' ? as this was the very objective of the war ,
if not then how did you win a war by starting it with an offensive operation Gibraltar & ending with a defensive one @ Lahore ? i can understand that these are some very hard but , also some very real & logical questions , nonetheless , rants don't run in the real world , Logic does , so i ask again what is the logic behind your claim ?

 

[Stephen Cohen]

@Horus

Pakistan Army celebrates September 6 as DEFENCE Day and NOT as VICTORY Day

You managed to defend Lahore but did not win the war