Calls mount for probe into US bio-labs after Russian claim

[onebyone]

The US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick Photo: AP


Calls for probes into the US' mysterious bio-labs in order to better understand coronavirus origins are growing after Russia said it has every reason to believe the US is developing biological weapons in labs mainly near the China-Russia border.

Experts said that investigation of US bio-labs may offer clues to the virus origins; however, the US continues to ignore the international community's questions over its mysterious bio-labs.

Responding to a question about the origin of COVID-19, Russian Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev said recently that US-controlled biological laboratories appear mainly near Russian and Chinese borders. And there is good reason to believe the US is developing biological weapons in those labs, and that outbreaks of non-typical diseases have been reported around them.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian on Thursday urged the US to respond to concerns and make comprehensive clarifications on biological militarization activities within and outside the US, and stop blocking the establishment of a verification mechanism under the Biological Weapons Convention.

Li Wei, a research fellow at the China Institute of Contemporary International Relations, told the Global Times that a thorough investigation of US bio-labs may offer clues to the virus origin.

The US has set up bio-labs in 25 countries and regions across the Middle East, Africa, Southeast Asia and former Soviet Union, with 16 in Ukraine alone. Some of the places where the labs are based have seen large-scale outbreaks of measles and other dangerous infectious diseases, the ministry said, citing media reports.

The Fort Detrick laboratory that handles high-level disease-causing materials, such as Ebola, in Fredrick, Maryland, was shut after the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued a cease and desist order against the organization in July 2019, media reported.

USA Today reported that since 2003, hundreds of incidents involving accidental contact with deadly pathogens have occurred in US bio-labs at home and abroad.

Zeng Guang, chief epidemiologist of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, told the Global Times on Thursday that while China opened the Wuhan lab to the scientists with an open and welcoming altitude, the US continues to ignore the international community's questions over its mysterious bio-labs.

The US has always been such an arrogant country that only allows itself to use its power to wield sticks against other countries, but not a single peek to reflect on itself, Zeng said.

Only the US government has the answers to these questions and the key to the truth. However, the world clearly understands the US will not easily allow probes into its bio-labs, as it is driven by its usual double standards on international affairs, and a stubborn mindset of hegemony, said Wang Yiwei, director of the institute of international affairs at Renmin University of China.

After their field trips and in-depth visits in China, members of the mission led by the WHO unanimously agreed that the lab leak theory is extremely unlikely, but WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus mentioned a further investigation was needed as the team's probe into a potential lab leak was not sufficient.

More investigations could be done with laboratories around the world, including US bio-labs, if there is further evidence that the hypothesis needs to be reassessed, experts noted.

Any probe should not be treated as a criminal investigation, but the relevant countries should at least cooperate closely with WHO experts in a scientific, open, transparent and responsible manner, as China has done, they said.

In response to a question about an open letter written by 24 researchers from Europe, US, Australia and Japan on a new probe into COVID-19 origins, Zhao said on Thursday's press conference that some individual countries including the US are politicizing the issue, disrupting the cooperation between China and the WHO, smearing China and openly challenging the independent and scientific research by scientists. This harms global cooperation on virus origins-tracing and global efforts in fighting the epidemic.

The so-called open letter on a new probe into COVID-19 origins is merely aimed at pressuring the WHO and members of its expert team, and the COVID-19 origins-tracing work is indeed being hindered by politics, not from China, but from certain countries including the US, Zhao said.

Calls mount for probe into US bio-labs after Russian claim - Global Times

www.globaltimes.cn

 

[denel]

View attachment 732101

The US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick Photo: AP


Calls for probes into the US' mysterious bio-labs in order to better understand coronavirus origins are growing after Russia said it has every reason to believe the US is developing biological weapons in labs mainly near the China-Russia border.

Experts said that investigation of US bio-labs may offer clues to the virus origins; however, the US continues to ignore the international community's questions over its mysterious bio-labs.

Responding to a question about the origin of COVID-19, Russian Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev said recently that US-controlled biological laboratories appear mainly near Russian and Chinese borders. And there is good reason to believe the US is developing biological weapons in those labs, and that outbreaks of non-typical diseases have been reported around them.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian on Thursday urged the US to respond to concerns and make comprehensive clarifications on biological militarization activities within and outside the US, and stop blocking the establishment of a verification mechanism under the Biological Weapons Convention.

Li Wei, a research fellow at the China Institute of Contemporary International Relations, told the Global Times that a thorough investigation of US bio-labs may offer clues to the virus origin.

The US has set up bio-labs in 25 countries and regions across the Middle East, Africa, Southeast Asia and former Soviet Union, with 16 in Ukraine alone. Some of the places where the labs are based have seen large-scale outbreaks of measles and other dangerous infectious diseases, the ministry said, citing media reports.

The Fort Detrick laboratory that handles high-level disease-causing materials, such as Ebola, in Fredrick, Maryland, was shut after the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued a cease and desist order against the organization in July 2019, media reported.

USA Today reported that since 2003, hundreds of incidents involving accidental contact with deadly pathogens have occurred in US bio-labs at home and abroad.

Zeng Guang, chief epidemiologist of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, told the Global Times on Thursday that while China opened the Wuhan lab to the scientists with an open and welcoming altitude, the US continues to ignore the international community's questions over its mysterious bio-labs.

The US has always been such an arrogant country that only allows itself to use its power to wield sticks against other countries, but not a single peek to reflect on itself, Zeng said.

Only the US government has the answers to these questions and the key to the truth. However, the world clearly understands the US will not easily allow probes into its bio-labs, as it is driven by its usual double standards on international affairs, and a stubborn mindset of hegemony, said Wang Yiwei, director of the institute of international affairs at Renmin University of China.

After their field trips and in-depth visits in China, members of the mission led by the WHO unanimously agreed that the lab leak theory is extremely unlikely, but WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus mentioned a further investigation was needed as the team's probe into a potential lab leak was not sufficient.

More investigations could be done with laboratories around the world, including US bio-labs, if there is further evidence that the hypothesis needs to be reassessed, experts noted.

Any probe should not be treated as a criminal investigation, but the relevant countries should at least cooperate closely with WHO experts in a scientific, open, transparent and responsible manner, as China has done, they said.

In response to a question about an open letter written by 24 researchers from Europe, US, Australia and Japan on a new probe into COVID-19 origins, Zhao said on Thursday's press conference that some individual countries including the US are politicizing the issue, disrupting the cooperation between China and the WHO, smearing China and openly challenging the independent and scientific research by scientists. This harms global cooperation on virus origins-tracing and global efforts in fighting the epidemic.

The so-called open letter on a new probe into COVID-19 origins is merely aimed at pressuring the WHO and members of its expert team, and the COVID-19 origins-tracing work is indeed being hindered by politics, not from China, but from certain countries including the US, Zhao said.

Calls mount for probe into US bio-labs after Russian claim - Global Times

www.globaltimes.cn

Fake news.

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Fake news.

@waz @krash @Irfan Baloch

 

[denel]

@waz @krash @Irfan Baloch

Really.

How is it not fake? You are claiming else where when the issue was within. Then coming from a fellow who makes claims this to be common cold and you are immune to this... why are you so paranoid. I again ask you to volunteer yourself to SA COVID variant exposure.


Let us start again - READ... check each scientific cited paper which is in accreditted journals.

The essence of the lab escape theory is that Wuhan is the site of the Wuhan Institute of Virology
(WIV), China’s first and only Biosafety Level 4 (BSL-4) facility. (BSL-4 is the highest pathogen
security level). The WIV, which added a BSL-4 lab only in 2018, has been collecting large
numbers of coronaviruses from bat samples ever since the original SARS outbreak of 2002-2003;
including collecting more in 2016 (Hu, et al., 2017; Zhou et al., 2018).
Led by researcher Zheng-Li Shi, WIV scientists have also published experiments in which live bat
coronaviruses were introduced into human cells (Hu et al., 2017). Moreover, according to an April
14 article in the Washington Post, US Embassy staff visited the WIV in 2018 and “had grave
safety concerns” about biosecurity there. The WIV is just eight miles from the Huanan live animal
market that was initially thought to be the site of origin of the COVID-19 pandemic.
4
Wuhan is also home to a lab called the Wuhan Centers for Disease Prevention and Control
(WCDPC). It is a BSL-2 lab that is just 250 metres away from the Huanan market. Bat
coronaviruses have in the past been kept at the Wuhan WCDPC lab.
Thus the lab escape theory is that researchers from one or both of these labs may have picked up a
Sars-CoV-2-like bat coronavirus on one of their many collecting (aka ‘”virus surveillance”) trips.
Or, alternatively, a virus they were studying, passaging, engineering, or otherwise manipulating,
escaped.

In 2014, just before the US GOF research ban went into effect, Zheng-Li Shi of WIV co-authored
a paper with the lab of Ralph Baric in North Carolina that performed GOF research on bat
coronaviruses (Menachery et al., 2015).
In this particular set of experiments the researchers combined “the spike of bat coronavirus
SHC014 in a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV backbone” into a single engineered live virus. The spike
was supplied by the Shi lab. They put this bat/human/mouse virus into cultured human airway
cells and also into live mice. The researchers observed “notable pathogenesis” in the infected mice
(Menachery et al. 2015). The mouse-adapted part of this virus comes from a 2007 experiment in
which the Baric lab created a virus called rMA15 through passaging (Roberts et al., 2007). This
rMA15 was “highly virulent and lethal” to the mice. According to this paper, mice succumbed to
“overwhelming viral infection”.
In 2017, again with the intent of identifying bat viruses with ACE2 binding capabilities, the Shi
lab at WIV reported successfully infecting human (HeLa) cell lines engineered to express the
human ACE2 receptor with four different bat coronaviruses. Two of these were lab-made
recombinant (chimaeric) bat viruses. Both the wild and the recombinant viruses were briefly
passaged in monkey cells (Hu et al., 2017).
7
Together, what these papers show is that: 1) The Shi lab collected numerous bat samples with an
emphasis on collecting SARS-like coronavirus strains, 2) they cultured live viruses and conducted
passaging experiments on them, 3) members of Zheng-Li Shi’s laboratory participated in GOF
experiments carried out in North Carolina on bat coronaviruses, 4) the Shi laboratory produced
recombinant bat coronaviruses and placed these in human cells and monkey cells. All these
experiments were conducted in cells containing human or monkey ACE2 receptors.
The overarching purpose of such work was to see whether an enhanced pathogen could emerge
from the wild by creating one in the lab.

It is hard to overemphasize that the central logic of this grant was to test the pandemic potential of
SARS-related bat coronaviruses by making ones with pandemic potential, either through genetic
engineering or passaging, or both.
Apart from descriptions in their publications we do not yet know exactly which viruses the WIV
was experimenting with but it is certainly intriguing that numerous publications since Sars-CoV-2
first appeared have puzzled over the fact that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binds with
exceptionally high affinity to the human ACE2 receptor “at least ten times more tightly” than the
original SARS (Zhou et al., 2020; Wrapp et al., 2020; Wan et al., 2020; Walls et al., 2020; Letko
et al., 2020).
This affinity is all the more remarkable because of the relative lack of fit in modelling studies of
the SARS-CoV-2 spike to other species, including the postulated intermediates like snakes, civets
and pangolins (Piplani et al., 2020). In this preprint these modellers concluded “This indicates that
SARS-CoV-2 is a highly adapted human pathogen”.
Given the research and collection history of the Shi lab at WIV it is therefore entirely plausible
that a bat SARS-like cornavirus ancestor of Sars-CoV-2 was trained up on the human ACE2
receptor by passaging it in cells expressing that receptor.
[On June 4 an excellent article in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists went further. Pointing out
what we had overlooked, that the Shi lab also amplified spike proteins of collected coronaviruses,
which would make them available for GOF experimentation (Ge et al., 2016).]

Andersen, K. G., Rambaut, A., Lipkin, W. I., Holmes, E. C., & Garry, R. F. (2020). The proximal
origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nature medicine, 26(4), 450-452.
Bell, D., Roberton, S., & Hunter, P. R. (2004). Animal origins of SARS coronavirus: possible
links with the international trade in small carnivores. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 359(1447), 1107-1114.
11
Duggal, A., Pinto, R., Rubenfeld, G., & Fowler, R. A. (2016). Global variability in reported
mortality for critical illness during the 2009-10 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic: a systematic
review and meta-regression to guide reporting of outcomes during disease outbreaks. PloS one,
11(5), e0155044.
Furmanski, M. (2014). Laboratory Escapes and “Self-fulfilling prophecy” Epidemics. Report:
Center for Arms Control and Nonproliferation. PDF available online.
Ge, X. Y., Li, J. L., Yang, X. L., Chmura, A. A., Zhu, G., Epstein, J. H., ... & Zhang, Y. J. (2013).
Isolation and characterization of a bat SARS-like coronavirus that uses the ACE2 receptor.
Nature, 503(7477), 535-538.
Ge, X. Y., Wang, N., Zhang, W., Hu, B., Li, B., Zhang, Y. Z., ... & Wang, B. (2016). Coexistence
of multiple coronaviruses in several bat colonies in an abandoned mineshaft. Virologica Sinica,
31(1), 31-40.
Hu, B., Zeng, L. P., Yang, X. L., Ge, X. Y., Zhang, W., Li, B., ... & Luo, D. S. (2017). Discovery
of a rich gene pool of bat SARS-related coronaviruses provides new insights into the origin of
SARS coronavirus. PLoS pathogens, 13(11), e1006698.
Huang, C., Wang, Y., Li, X., Ren, L., Zhao, J., Hu, Y., ... & Cheng, Z. (2020). Clinical features of
patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. The lancet, 395(10223), 497-506.
Klotz, L. C., & Sylvester, E. J. (2014). The consequences of a lab escape of a potential pandemic
pathogen. Frontiers in public health, 2, 116.
Letko, M., Marzi, A., & Munster, V. (2020). Functional assessment of cell entry and receptor
usage for SARS-CoV-2 and other lineage B betacoronaviruses. Nature microbiology, 5(4), 562-
569.
Li, W., Shi, Z., Yu, M., Ren, W., Smith, C., Epstein, J. H., ... & Zhang, J. (2005). Bats are natural
reservoirs of SARS-like coronaviruses. Science, 310(5748), 676-679.
Lipsitch, M. (2018). Why Do Exceptionally Dangerous Gain-of-Function Experiments in
Influenza?. In Influenza Virus (pp. 589-608). Humana Press, New York, NY.
Lipsitch, M., & Galvani, A. P. (2014). Ethical alternatives to experiments with novel potential
pandemic pathogens. PLoS Med, 11(5), e1001646.
Menachery, V. D., Yount, B. L., Debbink, K., Agnihothram, S., Gralinski, L. E., Plante, J. A., ...
& Randell, S. H. (2015). A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for
human emergence. Nature medicine, 21(12), 1508-1513.
Nakajima, K., Desselberger, U., & Palese, P. (1978). Recent human influenza A (H1N1) viruses
are closely related genetically to strains isolated in 1950. Nature, 274(5669), 334-339.
National Research Council. (2012). Evaluation of the updated site-specific risk assessment for the
national bio-and agro-defense facility in Manhattan, Kansas. National Academies Press.
12
Piplani, S., Singh, P. K., Winkler, D. A., & Petrovsky, N. (2020). In silico comparison of spike
protein-ACE2 binding affinities across species; significance for the possible origin of the SARS-
CoV-2 virus. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.06199.
Roberts, A., Deming, D., Paddock, C. D., Cheng, A., Yount, B., Vogel, L., ... & Zaki, S. R.
(2007). A mouse-adapted SARS-coronavirus causes disease and mortality in BALB/c mice. PLoS
Pathog, 3(1), e5.
Sheahan, T., Rockx, B., Donaldson, E., Sims, A., Pickles, R., Corti, D., & Baric, R. (2008).
Mechanisms of zoonotic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus host range expansion in
human airway epithelium. Journal of virology, 82(5), 2274-2285.
Simonsen, L., Spreeuwenberg, P., Lustig, R., Taylor, R. J., Fleming, D. M., Kroneman, M., ... &
Paget, W. J. (2013). Global mortality estimates for the 2009 Influenza Pandemic from the
GLaMOR project: a modeling study. PLoS Med, 10(11), e1001558.
Walls, A. C., Park, Y. J., Tortorici, M. A., Wall, A., McGuire, A. T., & Veesler, D. (2020).
Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell, 180, 281-292.
Wan, Y., Shang, J., Graham, R., Baric, R. S., & Li, F. (2020). Receptor recognition by the novel
coronavirus from Wuhan: an analysis based on decade-long structural studies of SARS
coronavirus. Journal of virology, 94(7).
Weiss, S., Yitzhaki, S., & Shapira, S. C. (2015). Lessons to be Learned from Recent Biosafety
Incidents in the United States. The Israel Medical Association Journal: IMAJ, 17(5), 269-273.
Wertheim, J. O. (2010). The re-emergence of H1N1 influenza virus in 1977: a cautionary tale for
estimating divergence times using biologically unrealistic sampling dates. PloS one, 5(6), e11184.
Wrapp, D., Wang, N., Corbett, K. S., Goldsmith, J. A., Hsieh, C. L., Abiona, O., ... & McLellan, J.
S. (2020). Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science,
367(6483), 1260-1263.
Zhan, S. H., Deverman, B. E., & Chan, Y. A. (2020). SARS-CoV-2 is well adapted for humans.
What does this mean for re-emergence?. bioRxiv. doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.01.073262
Zimmer, S. M., & Burke, D. S. (2009). Historical perspective—emergence of influenza A (H1N1)
viruses. New England Journal of Medicine, 361(3), 279-285.
Zhou, P., Fan, H., Lan, T., Yang, X. L., Shi, W. F., Zhang, W., ... & Zheng, X. S. (2018). Fatal
swine acute diarrhoea syndrome caused by an HKU2-related coronavirus of bat origin. Nature,
556(7700), 255-258.
Zhou, P., Yang, X. L., Wang, X. G., Hu, B., Zhang, L., Zhang, W., ... & Chen, H. D. (2020). A
pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. nature, 579(7798),
270-273.

 

[redtom]

Fake news.

According to the President of the United States, the American media is fake news.

I love Trump

 

[denel]

According to the President of the United States, the American media is fake news.

I love Trump

Quote scientific journals... that is the merit of discussion not propaganda news agencies from any country.

 

[Qmjd]

Quote scientific journals... that is the merit of discussion not propaganda news agencies from any country.

Usa should open the bio labs for the whole world to see.
After arming the space with weapons what should we expect from lunitic war lord of the world.
Usa is a war criminal of the world.
Don't play Innocent.
It's usa media based articles you are showing.
Usa has no shame left when you lie in front of the world about iraq atomic weapons.
Feel shame america

 

[KAL-EL]

According to the President of the United States, the American media is fake news.

I love Trump

Trump is no longer president, And more importantly, was the ultimate king of fake news

View attachment 732101

The US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick Photo: AP


Calls for probes into the US' mysterious bio-labs in order to better understand coronavirus origins are growing after Russia said it has every reason to believe the US is developing biological weapons in labs mainly near the China-Russia border.

Experts said that investigation of US bio-labs may offer clues to the virus origins; however, the US continues to ignore the international community's questions over its mysterious bio-labs.

Responding to a question about the origin of COVID-19, Russian Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev said recently that US-controlled biological laboratories appear mainly near Russian and Chinese borders. And there is good reason to believe the US is developing biological weapons in those labs, and that outbreaks of non-typical diseases have been reported around them.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian on Thursday urged the US to respond to concerns and make comprehensive clarifications on biological militarization activities within and outside the US, and stop blocking the establishment of a verification mechanism under the Biological Weapons Convention.

Li Wei, a research fellow at the China Institute of Contemporary International Relations, told the Global Times that a thorough investigation of US bio-labs may offer clues to the virus origin.

The US has set up bio-labs in 25 countries and regions across the Middle East, Africa, Southeast Asia and former Soviet Union, with 16 in Ukraine alone. Some of the places where the labs are based have seen large-scale outbreaks of measles and other dangerous infectious diseases, the ministry said, citing media reports.

The Fort Detrick laboratory that handles high-level disease-causing materials, such as Ebola, in Fredrick, Maryland, was shut after the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued a cease and desist order against the organization in July 2019, media reported.

USA Today reported that since 2003, hundreds of incidents involving accidental contact with deadly pathogens have occurred in US bio-labs at home and abroad.

Zeng Guang, chief epidemiologist of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, told the Global Times on Thursday that while China opened the Wuhan lab to the scientists with an open and welcoming altitude, the US continues to ignore the international community's questions over its mysterious bio-labs.

The US has always been such an arrogant country that only allows itself to use its power to wield sticks against other countries, but not a single peek to reflect on itself, Zeng said.

Only the US government has the answers to these questions and the key to the truth. However, the world clearly understands the US will not easily allow probes into its bio-labs, as it is driven by its usual double standards on international affairs, and a stubborn mindset of hegemony, said Wang Yiwei, director of the institute of international affairs at Renmin University of China.

After their field trips and in-depth visits in China, members of the mission led by the WHO unanimously agreed that the lab leak theory is extremely unlikely, but WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus mentioned a further investigation was needed as the team's probe into a potential lab leak was not sufficient.

More investigations could be done with laboratories around the world, including US bio-labs, if there is further evidence that the hypothesis needs to be reassessed, experts noted.

Any probe should not be treated as a criminal investigation, but the relevant countries should at least cooperate closely with WHO experts in a scientific, open, transparent and responsible manner, as China has done, they said.

In response to a question about an open letter written by 24 researchers from Europe, US, Australia and Japan on a new probe into COVID-19 origins, Zhao said on Thursday's press conference that some individual countries including the US are politicizing the issue, disrupting the cooperation between China and the WHO, smearing China and openly challenging the independent and scientific research by scientists. This harms global cooperation on virus origins-tracing and global efforts in fighting the epidemic.

The so-called open letter on a new probe into COVID-19 origins is merely aimed at pressuring the WHO and members of its expert team, and the COVID-19 origins-tracing work is indeed being hindered by politics, not from China, but from certain countries including the US, Zhao said.

Calls mount for probe into US bio-labs after Russian claim - Global Times

www.globaltimes.cn

The keyword is “claim”

For example, I can claim that the inside of the moon is made of cheese

 

[denel]

Usa should open the bio labs for the whole world to see.
After arming the space with weapons what should we expect from lunitic war lord of the world.
Usa is a war criminal of the world.
Don't play Innocent.
It's usa media based articles you are showing.
Usa has no shame left when you lie in front of the world about iraq atomic weapons.
Feel shame america

We are speaking about this issue solely; no need to expand the scope.
Just read scientific literature and published by Wuhan scientists themselves - available online. Especially ACE2 modifications.

 

[Qmjd]

We are speaking about this issue solely; no need to expand the scope.
Just read scientific literature and published by Wuhan scientists themselves - available online. Especially ACE2 modifications.

Who should say only usa can point fonger at other nation while still doesn't want to co-operate on the subject when his role is suspected .
This issue is the world issue not usa.
Open your bio labs if usa is so sincere in finding truth about the origin of covid-19.

 

[denel]

Who should say only usa can point fonger at other nation while still doesn't want to co-operate on the subject when his role is suspected .
This issue is the world issue not usa.
Open your bio labs if usa is so sincere in finding truth about the origin of covid-19.

We are talking to the point. We are not talking about Bioweapons.

There needs to be total BAN on bioweapons. ALL CHINA, NK, US, RUSSIA needs to open all their BioWeapons program.

Let us get back to the actual issue at hand. Entire world has been damaged beyond repair with this stupidity.

 

[Qmjd]

We are talking to the point. We are not talking about Bioweapons.

There needs to be total BAN on bioweapons. ALL CHINA, NK, US, RUSSIA needs to open all their BioWeapons program.

Let us get back to the actual issue at hand. Entire world has been damaged beyond repair with this stupidity.

What if usa is behind covid-19 pandemic and it is built in bio labs.
Usa is calling it by saying it is man made in chinese labs.
It is WHO who is finding facts and it should look into bio labs be it china or usa.
Question is IS USA allow it

 

[denel]

What if usa is behind covid-19 pandemic and it is built in bio labs.
Usa is calling it by saying it is man made in chinese labs.
It is WHO who is finding facts and it should look into bio labs be it china or usa.
Question is IS USA allow it

REad the scientific papers. I gave you the literature. Please read and then respond.

 

[Qmjd]

REad the scientific papers. I gave you the literature. Please read and then respond.

It's just a theory that it is made in bio labs.no proof at all.
The Russians are saying the same but it's usa bio labs instead of china.
Question is the same who did this mess to the world.
The suspect is usual (usa).

 

[denel]

It's just a theory that it is made in bio labs.no proof at all.
The Russians are saying the same but it's usa bio labs instead of china.
Question is the same who did this mess to the world.
The suspect is usual (usa).

read the papers....