What's new

British woman jailed in Tehran for insulting Islam and Iranian government on Facebook fears executio

somnath

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Mar 31, 2014
Messages
269
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
India
A British woman has been locked up in Iran for five months after posting derogatory comments about the country's government on Facebook and fears she will be executed, her husband has said. Concerns are growing for the welfare of Roya Saberi Negad Nobakht, 47, from Stockport, who has been charged with "insulting Islamic sanctities", a crime which can be punishable by death. The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) said it was "urgently" looking into her case. However, Britain currently has no embassy in Iran, making any negotiations more difficult.

Nobakht was in Iran visiting family in October last year when she was arrested by police as she arrived by plane in the south western city of Shiraz, according to an account given by her husband, Daryoush Taghipoor, to a family friend in Britain.

She was then taken back to Tehran and charged with "gathering and participation with intent to commit crime against national security" and "insulting Islamic sanctities", according to a copy of her chargesheet seen by The Independent.

Taghipoor, who is currently in Iran, claimed that his wife's arrest was over comments she had made on a Facebook group about the government being "too Islamic", and that she had only been charged after a confession was extracted from her "under duress". Facebook declined to comment.

She is believed to have been detained ahead of a trial at Evin prison in Tehran, which is notorious both for its harsh conditions and for its housing of political prisoners.

The couple have lived in the Stockport suburb of Heald Green for the past six years and have both been granted dual British-Iranian nationality. Nobakht had previously been a student at Stockport College, but a spokeswoman said today she had left four years ago.

Taghipoor told the Manchester Evening News: "It's a very bad situation. We don't know what's going on. Roya is not well at all. She has lost three stone and is frightened. She is scared that the government will kill her."

Nobakht's situation came to light after her husband approached his friend and former employer Nasser Homayoun-Fekri, who also lives in Stockport, who wrote a letter to his local MP Andrew Stunell.

"I must request, on humanitarian grounds as well as for the sake of justice, that you exert all possible pressure on the British government to do all that is feasible for the release of this innocent British citizen," he wrote. "Especially considering that the Islamic Republic, as acknowledged by the United Nations... is one of the most notorious human rights abusers at all the stages of arrest, custody and trial."

Homayoun-Fekri told The Independent he had spoken to Taghipoor on Tuesday but that his telephone line had since been cut off. "He used to work with me. He is not into politics or opposition groups, and neither is his wife," he added. "I was very surprised when he told me she had been arrested."

Stunell said he had "every reason to believe" that Taghipoor's account was true and that he had asked the FCO to seek consular access to Nobakht. However, he said this was proving difficult as the British embassy in Tehran was closed and a third party had to act as a go-between.

"I don't think anybody knows exactly and precisely what she's been arrested for," he added. "The randomness of these things is one of the areas of concern. But what she's been charged with appears to be an offence against attacking the holiness of Islam, which gives substance to [internet postings] being the reason."

Human rights groups have expressed concern about the reasons for Nobakht's arrest. Amnesty International's Iran researcher Bahareh Davis said: "If Roya Saberi Nejad Nobakht has been held solely for peacefully exercising her right to freedom of expression she must be released immediately and unconditionally.

"Regrettably, vaguely-worded and broadly-defined crimes such as 'gathering and colluding against national security' and 'insulting the Islamic sanctities', for which she appears to have been held, are often used by the Iranian authorities to curb those who peacefully express their opinions, including criticizing the government."

Faraz Sanei, Iran researcher at Human Rights Watch, said his organization had documented "many cases of political activists detained on trumped up charges" and that Iran had previously "used public information on Facebook and social media sites and other electronic outlets to charge individuals with insulting the government".

The FCO said in a statement: "We are aware of reports [about this case] and are looking into them urgently."

Despite the lack of a British embassy in Tehran, relations between the two countries appear to have thawed recently. In January, former home secretary Jack Straw headed the first UK delegation to travel to Iran in five years, accompanied by former chancellor Lord Lamont, Conservative MP Ben Wallace and Labour MP Jeremy Corbyn as guests of the Iranian Parliament.

Straw said on his return he felt there was a "lighter atmosphere" in the country, adding he believed President Hassan Rouhani was "committed to change" and would like to bring it "in from the cold". Evin jail in the northern suburbs of the Iranian capital, Tehran, was once given the moniker "Evin University" due to the number of political prisoners housed there. But the reality of the prison, which was constructed in 1972, is far less pleasant than the name suggests.

Standing at the foot of the Alborz Mountains, it is home to an estimated 15,000 inmates, including murders, thieves and rapists as well as intellectuals and dissidents. Former inmates have complained of human rights abuses such as beatings, torture and mock executions.

Hamid Ghassemi-Shall, a Canadian-Iranian businessman, was released from Evin in September last year after being convicted of "espionage" and sentenced to death. He told Amnesty International how he was blindfolded, dragged up a flight of stairs and made to sit against a wall in silence, convinced he was about to be killed.

One of the jail's most notorious cases of abuse involved Zahra Kazemi, a Canadian-Iranian photographer who was arrested in 2003 after taking pictures of her relatives outside Evin. She was later taken to hospital with severe injuries and later died. The Iranian government claimed she had suffered from a stroke while being interrogated.
 
She is not british clearly visible from here name
 
Hope its time world countries stop killing people in the name of religion. I mean, God, wouldn't mind much, even if we insult him daily. Why should we?
 
This is very stupid of Iranians to try foreigners on religious charges that are frivolous at best. It earns their country a bad name and does not serve any good purpose at all. I really cannot fathom any wisdom behind such trials. If you do not like a foreigner, the worst your country should do is to ask them to leave Iran. Such cases are serious lack of 'common sense of humanity'. I could write pages about it but alas my opinion here may never make any difference to Iranians. There is really no justification to such cases made on religious grounds.

When I think more about this case, the reason seems that due to being cut off from the rest of the world, Iranian government and many of their people have assumed a state of defiance to rest of the world. And they take many of these cases of religious persecution in the same assumed spirit of defiance to larger countries. It is just my thought when I try to find the logic behind why they do such acts. It would be far better for Iranians to just let go of these victims back to their own countries.

I gave above comments on similar thread on a different forum. Since the matter should be of importance to all of us, I have copied my comments to PDF here.
 
Muslims says that Islam is religion of peace and if you don't with them then they will kill you.
 
This is very stupid of Iranians to try foreigners on religious charges that are frivolous at best. It earns their country a bad name and does not serve any good purpose at all. I really cannot fathom any wisdom behind such trials. If you do not like a foreigner, the worst your country should do is to ask them to leave Iran. Such cases are serious lack of 'common sense of humanity'. I could write pages about it but alas my opinion here may never make any difference to Iranians. There is really no justification to such cases made on religious grounds.

When I think more about this case, the reason seems that due to being cut off from the rest of the world, Iranian government and many of their people have assumed a state of defiance to rest of the world. And they take many of these cases of religious persecution in the same assumed spirit of defiance to larger countries. It is just my thought when I try to find the logic behind why they do such acts. It would be far better for Iranians to just let go of these victims back to their own countries.

I gave above comments on similar thread on a different forum. Since the matter should be of importance to all of us, I have copied my comments to PDF here.

As she was probably born in Iran she is not a foreigner to Iranian government. It doesn't recognize dual citizenship. What's funny is some self declared human right activists whose hearts bleed when it comes to Israel-Palestine conflict, shy away from abuses happening at their home.

Even in executions, they deliberately make victims suffer for minutes instead of finishing quickly.
 
Last edited:
A nevrotic woman manipulated by the brits to go die
 
When you hold a british passport, you are called British. WTF are you talking?
not unless she denounce Iranian citizenship , By accept being an Iranian ,You also accept that Iran law wont recognize double nationality .
 
not unless she denounce Iranian citizenship , By accept being an Iranian ,You also accept that Iran law wont recognize double nationality .
I mentioned it in 11th comment. By the way, how to denounce it?
 
LOSS OF CITIZENSHIP:
VOLUNTARY: Person seeking to voluntarily renounce Iranian citizenship must have reached the age of 25, have performed military service, have settled all affairs in the country, and acquired the permission of the Council of Ministers. Though the rules for renunciation of citizenship are stated in Iranian Law, practical experiences have shown that Council permission is difficult to obtain, thus hindering legal renunciation of Iranian citizenship.

INVOLUNTARY: Voluntary acquisition of a foreign citizenship does not lead to automatic loss of Iranian citizenship. According to Iranian law, any Iranian national who acquires foreign citizenship without due observance of legal procedures will not have a renunciation of citizenship recognized by the government of Iran. In the eyes of the government, a male (and, in some cases, his wife and children) is still considered a citizen of Iran, regardless of the individual's status in the new country of citizenship.
 
Back
Top Bottom