nice to know you are against injustice everywhere. So lets see the common trend and who fights who.
1. In every country in this world, majority community is priviledged(simply because they are majority), unless a dictator from minority community is running the country.
2. Majority community everywhere think minority people are being given special priviledge.
3. When the same people are in minority elsewhere, they will complain against majority.
Now, the minority could be based on religion, ethnicity, language. The problem remains same.
The only people who fight against it and try to safeguard interests of minority are the people you despise. in UK its the humanists(or similar groups) who fight against majoritarianism of anglicans. In case of religion, they tend to be secular people but they dont need to be.
Only secular people question why bishops are sitting in parliament, not christians, not even muslims.
Instead of making common cause and supporting secularism, you are targetting the very people who are fighting for you. Same in India, its only seculars who will raise voice for muslims. Whether they can influence majority is different issue, but at least its a force we should support.
Now you behave like any other person who believes in majoritarianism.
Your views are effected by the liberal paradigm u grew up in. U simply didn't get my post i am afraid. UK is a liberal society not a christian society. Liberalism has many sects & colors , Cameroon's muscular liberalism being one.
Its the religion of post-christianity west with its own creed like individualism. Liberals who apparently help minorities expect those minorities to get in line with liberalism with time. And what kind of help r they doing exactly? They don't support practicing muslims in their right to freely practice their religion. Liberals in UK are silent over the recent strings of anti-muslim laws passed in parliament. Yes they will help only those minorities who fall in line with the majority culture,
thus not remaining a minority anymore eg. hindus, sikhs , qadianis, jews etc. They look for moderate "muslims" , people who have 0 connection with the muslim community. In india the "representative" of muslim that liberals champion is people like shahrukh khan who does idol worship. What have indian liberals done to prevent the slaughter of muslim in gujrat, north east and Kashmir?
Liberals believe in the superiority of their religion i.e liberalism. They believe in majoritarianism. WHy else would they call their version of human rights as "universal"? They would only tolerate those who r liberal or in line with their views not those who r illiberal. They would find ways to demonize illiberals calling them extremist, terrorist etc. Thus liberalism doesn't want a minority. Liberalism doesn't even recognize minorities.
Unlike liberals muslims don't beat around the bush. As a muslim , I consider my religion to be the only true religion and believe in its absolute superiority over all other isms. Unlike liberalism , islam guarantees protection to minorities and
recognizes them as minorities . Minorities have always been protected under successive islamic caliphates and empires (which was in existence as early as just 100 years ago) . Islam allows them to live their lives as per their beliefs & customs but wants them to accept the truth and provide an environment where they can do so by their own free will .
Minority can never rule over majority. Minorities can only rule over majority via backing of foreign powers and through the barrel of the gun which is inherently unstable and inevitable to collapse. The current muslim world ruled by seculars is a good example.
