What's new

British Government Preparing to launch commercial spaceport by 2018

mike2000 is back

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Messages
8,513
Reaction score
19
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
UK to launch commercial spaceport by 2018

  • The Sabre rocket engine was created by British firm Reaction Engines
  • It can be fitted to planes and travel up to five times the speed of sound
  • The company wants to use the technology on a 'spaceplane' called Skylon
  • Passenger version called Lapcat A2 could hold 300 passenger for ultrafast travel
  • Tests suggest it could cut the cost of space launches by 95%
  • European Space Agency study has back the rocket plans to blast off as soon as 2020
By MARK PRIGG FOR MAILONLINE

The U.K. government is laying the groundwork for its first spaceport in anticipation of a growing space tourism demand and a growing space plane industry by 2030, according to a new timetable. Government officials also envision orbital launches from that country within the next 15 years.
C3RTn8U.jpg


According to the new timetable, unveiled at the Farnborough International Airshow last year, the U.K. is planning to build $85.5 million spaceport and anticipates a space tourism market worth $65 million each year, as well as a space plane industry worth $40 billion by 2030.
bdhTFAq.jpg


The timetable lays out a number of other specific dates: The spaceport could be operational from 2016; the first suborbital flight would occur in 2018; the first sub-orbital space plane satellite launch from the spaceport would take place in 2020; rocket engine testing for the orbital space plane would occur in 2026, and that space plane would be operational four years later.
jDdPWY5.jpg


The rocket-engine testing refers to hybrid engines, which are used by the Skylon space plane, manufactured by U.K. company Reaction Engines.



jDdPWY5.jpg

VVcwMg2.jpg


The Skylon air breathing rocket that could power a plane anywhere in the world in four hours and get to space in 15 minutes has moved a step closer to blasting off as a major project review said it was possible to operate the plane.

A feasibility study carried out earlier this year as part of the European Space Agency's 'New European Launch Service' requirements for lowering the cost of European launch services by 2016 by using a radical new type of engine, have backed the plans - paving the way for it to blast off in 2019.

The engine is called Sabre, which stands for Synergetic Air-Breathing Rocket Engine, and was built by British firm Reaction Engines.

0Phtcm5.gif

WHAT THEY FOUND
The European Space Agency report, released earlier this year found:

Skylon is potentially Europe's most cost effective space access solution, and is able to compete with existing and anticipated competition.
Systems reusable design has the potential to undercut any other launch system currently in operation.
Once operational, Skylon could be operated independently of subsidies.
Sklyon could launch payloads of upto 15 tonnes into low earth orbit.
Also offer opportunities for spacecraft return, in-orbit servicing and human passengers.


The €1M ESA-funded study identified proved that all current mission requirements for launches can be met.

It also said vehicles operated from Europe's launch site in French Guiana, together with a reusable upper stage, can meet all Europe's launch operator requirements.

Reaction Engines claims Sabre can be used to help accelerate existing aircraft up to five times the speed of sound and plans to use the technology on a unique 3,500mph 'spaceplane' called Skylon.

Now, it is believed the firm is putting the finishing touches to the plan to launch the aircraft - possibly in 2019.

It has been earmarked as a 'high priority' technology project by the UK government following the favourable technical reports from ESA's propulsion experts.

'For example, an aircraft carrying 300 passengers could go from Europe to Australia in about four hours,' said Alan Bond, chief engineer, in a video.

The aircraft will be able to fly Mach 5 - five times the speed of sound - because of the engine, named Sabre, according to Bond.

Modern-day traditional aviation engines have to carry tanks of liquid oxygen when travelling at more than 1,900mph because they can't 'breathe' oxygen.

Oxygen helps an engine to burn the fuel needed to power its propulsion.


Reaction Engine's Sabre design uses a system of pipes, filled with helium.

The air passes through these pipes and the helium helps remove any heat and the oxygen is carried to the engine.

Once in space, the engine is capable of switching into rocket mode.

This means the craft can travel in orbit for around 36 hours and used to launch satellites, for example.
Last year the UK Government has announced plans to provide £60 million for a revolutionary new rocket enginecapable of taking people to Earth's stratosphere in just 15 minutes.

David Willetts, minister for universities and science, said the investment in Sabre would provide support at a 'crucial stage' to allow a full-scale prototype to be built.

'We're investing £60 million in this and we expect them to go out and find private support as well,' Willetts told Radio Five Live.

2412ADF000000578-0-image-m-3_1418673199309.jpg

The Lapcat A2, a passenger plane using the an aircraft carrying 300 passengers could go from Europe to Australia in about four hours

2412ADD900000578-0-image-a-11_1418676812197.jpg

The A2 vehicle, which is designed to be propelled by the Scimitar engine, has exceptional range (ca. 20,000 km both subsonic and supersonic) and is therefore able to service a large number of routes whilst simultaneously avoiding supersonic overflight of populated areas and the related sonic booms that can be heard on the ground. Its good subsonic performance enables it to service conventional subsonic overland routes.

'But we're backing this because it's technology that has been tested in the lab, it's been assessed by outside experts as right in principle.

'Now it needs to be built on a full-scale prototype before it can get commercial.

'We think it's right to support it through that crucial stage.

A passenger version, called the Lapcat A2, is also unver development.

The A2 vehicle, which is designed to be propelled by the Scimitar engine, has exceptional range (ca. 20,000 km both subsonic and supersonic) and is 'able to service a large number of routes whilst simultaneously avoiding supersonic overflight of populated areas and the related sonic booms that can be heard on the ground,' the firm says.

'Its good subsonic performance enables it to service conventional subsonic overland routes.'
 
HOW DOES IT WORK?
Modern-day traditional aviation engines have to carry tanks of liquid oxygen when travelling at more than 1,900mph because they can't 'breathe' oxygen.

Oxygen helps an engine to burn the fuel needed to power its propulsion.

Reaction Engine's Sabre design uses a system of pipes, filled with helium.

The air passes through these pipes and the helium helps remove any heat and the oxygen is carried to the engine.

Once in space, the engine is capable of switching into rocket mode.

This means the craft can travel in orbit for around 36 hours and used to launch satellites, for example.


2412AE0A00000578-0-image-m-10_1418676791622.jpg



Alan Bond, founder of Reaction Engines, told International Business Times: 'Rockets are stuck in a rut. The weight problem means it costs a great deal of money to launch even the smallest satellite.

'The basic problem is that when you suck air into an engine at high speed it instantly heats up to 1,000C - which is unmanageably hot.

'The challenge was to cool it back down to 140C in just a hundredth of a second - the time it takes to pass through the engine.'

Bond continued: '[Sabre] would allow us to launch satellites far more cheaply, to build space stations or to create orbiting solar arrays that would beam power to earth. We could even construct spaceships for missions to other planets.'


Skylon is likely to be viewed a competitor to Sir Richard Branson's Virgin Galactic business, in which people can experience six minutes of weightlessness during a sub-orbital spaceflights.

Sir Branson and his Virgin Galactic company offer trips into space, that include six minutes of weightlessness, for around £121,000.

Skylon is expected to offer similar flights for cheaper, but has not announced any prices.

Figures from the company believe the Skylon space place could cut the cost of space launches by around 95 per cent.


Sabre rocket engine could be the future of space exploration.


The Sabre engine has taken part in 100 successful test runs and its design was recently validated by the European Space Agency to validate the design.

Modern-day traditional aviation engines have to carry tanks of liquid oxygen when travelling at more than 1,900mph because they can't 'breathe' oxygen.

Oxygen helps an engine to burn the fuel needed to power its propulsion.

Reaction Engine's Sabre design uses a system of pipes, filled with helium. The air passes through these pipes and the helium helps remove any heat.

Once in space, the engine is capable of switching into rocket mode.


2412AE3200000578-0-image-a-14_1418677045833.jpg



The Sabre engine has taken part in 100 successful test runs and its design was recently validated by the European Space Agency to validate the design. Modern-day traditional aviation engines have to carry tanks of liquid oxygen when travelling at more than 1,900mph because they can't 'breathe' oxygen. Oxygen helps an engine to burn the fuel needed to power its propulsion. Reaction Engine's Sabre design uses a system of pipes, filled with helium. The air passes through these pipes and the helium helps remove any heat. Once in space, the engine is capable of switching into rocket mode.

This means the craft can travel in orbit for around 36 hours and be used to launch satellites, for example.

Alan Bond, founder of Reaction Engines, told International Business Times: 'Rockets are stuck in a rut. The weight problem means it costs a great deal of money to launch even the smallest satellite.

'The basic problem is that when you suck air into an engine at high speed it instantly heats up to 1,000C - which is unmanageably hot.

'The challenge was to cool it back down to 140C in just a hundredth of a second - the time it takes to pass through the engine.'

Bond continued: 'It would allow us to launch satellites far more cheaply, to build space stations or to create orbiting solar arrays that would beam power to earth.

'We could even construct spaceships for missions to other planets.'


Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
HOW DOES IT WORK?
Modern-day traditional aviation engines have to carry tanks of liquid oxygen when travelling at more than 1,900mph because they can't 'breathe' oxygen.

Oxygen helps an engine to burn the fuel needed to power its propulsion.

Reaction Engine's Sabre design uses a system of pipes, filled with helium.

The air passes through these pipes and the helium helps remove any heat and the oxygen is carried to the engine.

Once in space, the engine is capable of switching into rocket mode.

This means the craft can travel in orbit for around 36 hours and used to launch satellites, for example.


2412AE0A00000578-0-image-m-10_1418676791622.jpg



Alan Bond, founder of Reaction Engines, told International Business Times: 'Rockets are stuck in a rut. The weight problem means it costs a great deal of money to launch even the smallest satellite.

'The basic problem is that when you suck air into an engine at high speed it instantly heats up to 1,000C - which is unmanageably hot.

'The challenge was to cool it back down to 140C in just a hundredth of a second - the time it takes to pass through the engine.'

Bond continued: '[Sabre] would allow us to launch satellites far more cheaply, to build space stations or to create orbiting solar arrays that would beam power to earth. We could even construct spaceships for missions to other planets.'


Skylon is likely to be viewed a competitor to Sir Richard Branson's Virgin Galactic business, in which people can experience six minutes of weightlessness during a sub-orbital spaceflights.

Sir Branson and his Virgin Galactic company offer trips into space, that include six minutes of weightlessness, for around £121,000.

Skylon is expected to offer similar flights for cheaper, but has not announced any prices.

Figures from the company believe the Skylon space place could cut the cost of space launches by around 95 per cent.


Sabre rocket engine could be the future of space exploration.


The Sabre engine has taken part in 100 successful test runs and its design was recently validated by the European Space Agency to validate the design.

Modern-day traditional aviation engines have to carry tanks of liquid oxygen when travelling at more than 1,900mph because they can't 'breathe' oxygen.

Oxygen helps an engine to burn the fuel needed to power its propulsion.

Reaction Engine's Sabre design uses a system of pipes, filled with helium. The air passes through these pipes and the helium helps remove any heat.

Once in space, the engine is capable of switching into rocket mode.


2412AE3200000578-0-image-a-14_1418677045833.jpg



The Sabre engine has taken part in 100 successful test runs and its design was recently validated by the European Space Agency to validate the design. Modern-day traditional aviation engines have to carry tanks of liquid oxygen when travelling at more than 1,900mph because they can't 'breathe' oxygen. Oxygen helps an engine to burn the fuel needed to power its propulsion. Reaction Engine's Sabre design uses a system of pipes, filled with helium. The air passes through these pipes and the helium helps remove any heat. Once in space, the engine is capable of switching into rocket mode.

This means the craft can travel in orbit for around 36 hours and be used to launch satellites, for example.

Alan Bond, founder of Reaction Engines, told International Business Times: 'Rockets are stuck in a rut. The weight problem means it costs a great deal of money to launch even the smallest satellite.

'The basic problem is that when you suck air into an engine at high speed it instantly heats up to 1,000C - which is unmanageably hot.

'The challenge was to cool it back down to 140C in just a hundredth of a second - the time it takes to pass through the engine.'

Bond continued: 'It would allow us to launch satellites far more cheaply, to build space stations or to create orbiting solar arrays that would beam power to earth.

'We could even construct spaceships for missions to other planets.'


Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Has the engine been tested ? as in, practiced or demonstrated air breathing ? Reaction Engines has been working on it for the past 2 and a half decades. The theory is great, metallurgical challenges remained for quite some time. Not just for the engine but the aircraft fuselage in general. nay news from the ground zero ?

Not talking about Lab tests, but flight tests or open air tests..
 
Has the engine been tested ? as in, practiced or demonstrated air breathing ? Reaction Engines has been working on it for the past 2 and a half decades. The theory is great, metallurgical challenges remained for quite some time. Not just for the engine but the aircraft fuselage in general. nay news from the ground zero ?

Not talking about Lab tests, but flight tests or open air tests..

The spaceport could be operational from 2016; the first suborbital flight would occur in 2018; the first sub-orbital space plane satellite launch from the spaceport would take place in 2020; rocket engine testing for the orbital space plane would occur in 2026, and that space plane would be operational four years later.

The first suborbital flight test is scheduled for 2018/19 bro. While the spaceport from where they will be launched is being built and will be completed by the end of next year.

£60 million ($90 million) has been committed to begin building the SABRE prototype. Seems project has been pushed forward (since it was first scheduled to see the completion of the prototype SABRE by 2017 and flight tests around 2020) after the British government and ESA offer more funds for the Private British company carrying out this project:)

Futuristic British Space Plane Engine Set for 2020 Test
 
Last edited:
The first suborbital flight test is scheduled for 2018/19 bro. While the spaceport from where they will be launched is being built and will be completed by the end of next year.:)

So its on its way. :) P.S. you'll need to be my Visa guarantor the day it turns into a commercial service, The British High Commission rejects visa with an enthusiasm almost unheard of (of course provided skylon prices the tickets in the "affordable" range :P)
 
So its on its way. :) P.S. you'll need to be my Visa guarantor the day it turns into a commercial service, The British High Commission rejects visa with an enthusiasm almost unheard of (of course provided skylon prices the tickets in the "affordable" range :P)

I thought getting a British Visa was easy as far as you have a guarantor?:o: I can be your guarantor when this project takes off don't worry.:D

Anyway to be honest, i think the spaceport building completion will take longer, probably 2017 or 18 at most. Since the site in Scotland Newquay Cornwall Airport where the space port will be built was just awarded recently. So i don't think they can build it in one year. lol

Anyway, even if it takes 1 or even 2 years longer its still ok, as far as i see this project take off by 2020s, that will be fabulous. It will also provide the U.K with another global rapid nuclear first strike capability(since there is always military applications for such projects).:P lol
SABRE engine concept passes US Air Force feasibilty test
 
interesting, could be very useful in orbital space.
 
I thought getting a British Visa was easy as far as you have a guarantor?:o: I can be your guarantor when this project takes off don't worry.:D

Anyway to be honest, i think the spaceport building completion will take longer, probably 2017 or 18 at most. Since the site in Scotland Newquay Cornwall Airport where the space port will be built was just awarded recently. So i don't think they can build it in one year. lol

Anyway, even if it takes 1 or even 2 years longer its still ok, as far as i see this project take off by 2020s, that will be fabulous. It will also provide the U.K with another global rapid nuclear first strike capability(since there is always military applications for such projects).:P lol
SABRE engine concept passes US Air Force feasibilty test

Me too.:kiss3:
 
I thought getting a British Visa was easy as far as you have a guarantor?:o: I can be your guarantor when this project takes off don't worry.:D

Anyway to be honest, i think the spaceport building completion will take longer, probably 2017 or 18 at most. Since the site in Scotland Newquay Cornwall Airport where the space port will be built was just awarded recently. So i don't think they can build it in one year. lol

Anyway, even if it takes 1 or even 2 years longer its still ok, as far as i see this project take off by 2020s, that will be fabulous. It will also provide the U.K with another global rapid nuclear first strike capability(since there is always military applications for such projects).:P lol
SABRE engine concept passes US Air Force feasibilty test

Misssiles are way faster and convenient, why need a new mechanism :P ? trust me no one wants to be near a nuke going off. :D

But I must appreciate the tenacity of some, this engine has been in development from concept since 1950s. that's just wow.
 
Hats off. :tup:

Thanks bro. However to be honest, our government has not been proactive enough when it comes to supporting our sace industry. They hardly invest anything in our space industry, its mostly private companies that have been doing all the hard work. If only our space industry had receive even half the support/finance U.S/Russia and even China give to their space industry then we will be Farrrrr ahead today.

Just to give you an example of what i mean by that; our private space companies basically control the world's small satellite market/industry even without receiving any government support.:disagree: They have been crucial in building and providing services for operation of small/micro satellites all over the world. It's also because of them that our space industry is worth over $17 billion employing over 37,000 people, thus consisting about 8-9% of the world's space industry and that is set to grow to about 15% in the coming decades to over $50bn business by 2030 for the U.K . That's amazing considering the fact that they received basically little to no government support.:hitwall:

Misssiles are way faster and convenient, why need a new mechanism :P ? trust me no one wants to be near a nuke going off. :D

But I must appreciate the tenacity of some, this engine has been in development from concept since 1950s. that's just wow.

This new mechanism is far more revolutionary than any missile program/systems we have today. It's faster, more effective and more efficient/convenient to launch than missiles, and also easier/less costly to maintain/launch at quick notice. We have to give it couple of years though for it to mature, probably not until early 2020s, about a decade from now or so.

Yes indeed Mark Thomas persisted on his idea/dream, which is now paying off since the British government(BAE has already taken a stake in the company) and ESA are now investing in it having seen how feasible/advanced their engines/system have proved to be. His other British counterpart Richard Branson's Virgin galactic already has a head start/lead over him though. I'm sure Branson also started his virgin galactic space program in the U.S because of the support/maturity of U.S space industry received from government and angel investors, which is not the case in his own home country Britain.:disagree:
 
Thanks bro. However to be honest, our government has not been proactive enough when it comes to supporting our sace industry. They hardly invest anything in our space industry, its mostly private companies that have been doing all the hard work. If only our space industry had receive even half the support/finance U.S/Russia and even China give to their space industry then we will be Farrrrr ahead today.

Just to give you an example of what i mean by that; our private space companies basically control the world's small satellite market/industry even without receiving any government support.:disagree: They have been crucial in building and providing services for operation of small/micro satellites all over the world. It's also because of them that our space industry is worth over $17 billion employing over 37,000 people, thus consisting about 8-9% of the world's space industry and that is set to grow to about 15% in the coming decades to over $50bn business by 2030 for the U.K . That's amazing considering the fact that they received basically little to no government support.:hitwall:

But I must appreciate the tenacity of some, this engine has been in development from concept since 1950s. that's just wow.
This new mechanism is far more revolutionary than any missile program/systems we have today. It's faster, more effective and more efficient/convenient to launch than missiles, and also easier/less costly to maintain/launch at quick notice. We have to give it couple of years though for it to mature, probably not until early 2020s, about a decade from now or so.

Yes indeed Mark Thomas persisted on his idea/dream, which is now paying off since the British government(BAE has already taken a stake in the company) and ESA are now investing in it having seen how feasible/advanced their engines/system have proved to be. His other British counterpart Richard Branson's Virgin galactic already has a head start/lead over him though. I'm sure Branson also started his virgin galactic space program in the U.S because of the support/maturity of U.S space industry received from government and angel investors, which is not the case in his own home country Britain.
:disagree:
State capitalism vs free market economy, hard to challenge China's SOE's. Also I don't blame Branson for going state side for investors he would never get funding equivalent if he stay in Europe.
Got to say that bender does look funny, quirky made in UK.
 
State capitalism vs free market economy, hard to challenge China's SOE's. Also I don't blame Branson for going state side for investors he would never get funding equivalent if he stay in Europe.
Got to say that bender does look funny, quirky made in UK.

Agree, Our scientist/engineers have alot of talent, but they are sometimes hampered by our government's unwillingness to support promising private endeavors These are engineers/scientists/investors many countries will die to have working for them, but our clueless government couldn't care less, not until when these people have already struggled and done all the hard work until it starts bearing fruits, that's only when our government starts paying attention. This is a very bad system. Since it means we might be lagging behind other nations who governments help provide a head start for their private projects. Just like in the U.S and even Russia where space industry gets alot of government support. So its not a matter of state capitalism vs free market, since even the U.S government provides alot of funds to promising private initiatives which is why they are so ahead in many fields as well. We could match them if our government provided even half of the kind of support they get.

Well, at least on the positive side the government has started paying attention since 2005 when the British space industry started bringing in billions of pounds to the country/economy and employing tens of thousands of people, all these by private British companies with little to no government support. Big respect to our hard working engineers/scientists and investors. now they have issued the contract for construction of a spaceport in Scotland, It's a good start. Better late than never. :what:
Britain's booming space industry looks to Mars and beyond | Science | The Guardian
The unsung success of the UK space industry
 
I don't think there is a lot to learn opposite actually the US and even China have been nicking/borrowed UK's Intelligentsia.
SOE's won't work outside of China - with all that money coming in from exports the largest economy in the world, a private firm will never challenge in resources or capital, unless it teams up with another hence the Europe and Russian co-op.
bbc /news/science-environment-34504067

I believe there is a natural order in the world, history proves, powers wax and wane. But I think UK will be OK because they have always thought outside the box. That Sabre engine is a prime example!
 
Back
Top Bottom