Hell hound
STAFF
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2014
- Messages
- 4,168
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
paf lacks in advance ground attack missiles and bombs like brimstone, CBU105 or new maverick models (we do have 70s era B models).which is seriously hampering our ground attack ability to destroy multiple armored moving targets.hence we are resorting to nasar like solutions which endanger our own population with radiation of our own missile.
my point here is instead of treating nasar as final solution to cold start treat it as a stop gap solution and in mean time search for some Close air support missile like brimestone(6 of which can be carried by single jf 17) or guided cluster bomb like GBU105 (which can destroy 20 targets at once) to do the job of stopping multiple armored targets instead of a nuclear solution.
my point here is instead of treating nasar as final solution to cold start treat it as a stop gap solution and in mean time search for some Close air support missile like brimestone(6 of which can be carried by single jf 17) or guided cluster bomb like GBU105 (which can destroy 20 targets at once) to do the job of stopping multiple armored targets instead of a nuclear solution.
Last edited:
But overall I agree. It's a far better option than using Nasrs that would result in an all out nuclear holocaust in the subcontinent that would affect not only South Asia but the entire Northern hemisphere too! 
