#BreakingNews DRDO to abandon Kaveri project.

[Derolo]

Shut up.

It would have been best if you had in the start.

 

[gslv mk3]

It would have been best if you had in the start.

You have no proofs,no links-now go troll elsewhere .

 

[Derolo]

You have no proofs,no links-now go troll elsewhere .

proof given. links not needed. buy a brain and install it.

 

[gslv mk3]

proof given. links not needed.

Again,do you have statistics ? if not shut up.

 

[Abingdonboy]

Could it be that now the engine is so near to maturation that BJP wants to take credit for the success, so a new name with the same core, and the whole credit goes to the minister who sanctioned it. Just saying

Lol, nice idea. Reminds me of "Big Bath" provisioning that used to go on when new CEOs took over companies.

But I think the CAG would have something to say about this, and by that I mean they would rip the GoI to shreds.

 

[Daedalus]

Lol, nice idea. Reminds me of "Big Bath" provisioning that used to go on when new CEOs took over companies.

But I think the CAG would have something to say about this, and by that I mean they would rip the GoI to shreds.

True. Was just indulging in a little bit of conspiracy theory.
But seriously I don't trust politicians, they can go to any heights. This was reported last year.

The Kaveri’s last big activity was in 2011, when it took a flight test in Russia fitted on the Il-76 transport plane. Although 90 per cent of the flight envelop was covered, at least five problems showed up, according to scientists.
Next year, the GTRE plans to show the engine’s performance first on an Il-76 plane and then as the second engine fitted on a twin-engined fighter like MiG-29. It would be tuned to certification standards.

New tailwinds for Kaveri engine - The Hindu

 

[Su-11]

Only during vietnam war by US's own admission?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post–World_War_II_air-to-air_combat_losses

89 losses not 2146.

What are you smoking?

If you are done acting like a braying jackass open the link. Around 1500 losses post ww2. HAL has reached that figure. Tooling the hunter, su-7 apart from the countless mig crashes.

Read your own quote you piece of monkey $hit! You claimed just losses, never air to air losses.
And, even if we take AIR TO AIR LOSSES, there were never 1500 crashes in the IAF, let alone the planes assembled by HAL in service with the IAF which crashed. And even then, crashes can be human error, bird strikes, and IAF faulty service.
Think before sprout out sensationalist junk from your keyboard, because you will eventually get caught in your own $hit trying to defend which cannot be defended.

 

[Screambowl]

apne roothey paraye roothey Kaveri roothey naa.. khwab tootey , waadey tootey, Kaveri tootey naa .. oooooooo ... roothey toh Khuda bhi roothy, Kaveri sath chhutey naaa. Oh Allah waariyaa , Kaveri jaariyaa... oh tutey kaveriiya ... Allah wariyaan ... oh Kaveri ,,,,, miladey oye

Udatey Tejaso mein... Khaki wali vardio mein ... jhoomeey IAF or DRDO yaaar ... wapis toh ajaveeey... engine fitt ho javee yaaar.. oooooo Allah Wariyaan ... tutey Kaveriyaaa ... oooooooo

 

[Derolo]

Read your own quote you piece of monkey $hit! You claimed just losses, never air to air losses.
And, even if we take AIR TO AIR LOSSES, there were never 1500 crashes in the IAF, let alone the planes assembled by HAL in service with the IAF which crashed. And even then, crashes can be human error, bird strikes, and IAF faulty service.
Think before sprout out sensationalist junk from your keyboard, because you will eventually get caught in your own $hit trying to defend which cannot be defended.

I see you have switched to sniffing from smoking.

Air-to-Air losses around 1500. Includes transports and choppers shot down.

Add all HAL license made transports and helis and own helis.

Number of Chetaks, Cheetahs, Dhruvs crashed along with number of Mig 21,23,27 plus Hawker hunters, Su-7's, Ajeet's, Marut's,Su 30mki's etc the number far exceeds 1500.

Time to scrap HAL put the criminals on trial for murder and enhance BRD for license production and tooling.

Now read and understand before you quote me again

 

[he-man]

I said this last year and people said i was a false flag chinese.
This engine was

1)Badly planned as a vce when we cannot even make a conventional one
2)Under funded
3)Had inferior materials so not durable and overweight.

But it did work and if we can carry forward the knowledge we gained and pumped billions we will have something good in a decade

 

[Stephen Cohen]

@he-man

I believe we will see some new developments as a part of Rafale offsets and TOT deal

 

[he-man]

@he-man

I believe we will see some new developments as a part of Rafale offsets and TOT deal

0

The tot is for manufacturing only.
Offsets will just create some facilities but scientists have to come from our side.
Untill u pay good salary u will never get good results

 

[he-man]

I see you have switched to sniffing from smoking.

Air-to-Air losses around 1500. Includes transports and choppers shot down.

Are all HAL license made transports and below and own below as well.

Number of Chetaks, Cheetahs, Dhruvs crashed along with number of Mig 21,23,27 plus Hawker hunters, Su-7's, Ajeet's, Marut's,Su 30mki's etc the number far exceeds 1500.

Time to scrap HAL put the criminals on trial for murder and enhance BRD for license production and tooling.

Now read and understand before you quote me again

Most logical would be slow deregulation and privatisation of HAL in next 5-10 years

 

[Derolo]

Most logical would be slow deregulation and privatisation of HAL in next 5-10 years

Alongside transfer of tooling and certain assembly lines to IAF BRD ( Base Repair Depot ).

For ACM Browne gave BRD's a big boost when he said IAF would license manufacture the Pilatus trainer in the BRD.

 

[he-man]

Alongside transfer of tooling and certain assembly lines to IAF BRD ( Base Repair Depot ).

For ACM Browne gave BRD's a big boost when he said IAF would license manufacture the Pilatus trainer in the BRD.

I have been saying this for a year now.
Hal is a pathological tumour that needs to be resected.