BREAKING: North Korea has Conducted a Nuclear Test

[friendly_troll96]

And sometimes govts hide such info as suited to their diplomatic endeavours. But the info slips through one way or other and sooner or later.


Bhai jo khushboo laga kar hota ha

par thi wo kon?

 

[war&peace]

par thi wo kon?

"Whatever" par jao ...

 

[The SC]

What will experts look for?
Analysts who advise governments on nuclear weapons will study the shock waves from the blast measured by monitoring stations. They will also look for clues from traces of nuclear gases that could float into the atmosphere.

Those traces may tell if this test was really a hydrogen bomb, or perhaps something less than a full-scale thermonuclear device. But it can take weeks for the gases to leak out and be detected.

They have never stated something like this before.. So it is an H-bomb..
North Korean leader:
I ordered the testing of a hydrogen bomb designed to be placed on an intercontinental ballistic missile. The test was a complete success.

 

[EpiiC]

Can you provide a link to this doctrine that mandates low yield tactical nukes to the exception of all others?

Secondly, do you understand how tactical neutron bombs are made? If you do, then you already know that tactical nukes utilize fusion to unleash neutrons, instead of using them for a secondary fission reaction, which is what a hydrogen bomb does. Why do you think Pakistan doesn't have the capability? Accepting Pakistan's tactical nukes is equivalent to accepting our thermonuclear capability.

See that false flagger troll is now shying away... He needs such a critical info about our program but the coward rat is not ready to provide his verifiable contact info. And any security clearance needs not only the person's details but also his family and extended family (i.e. blood relatives like Uncles and aunts from both sides). BTW his IP address and proxies are being analysed and he will be positively spotted.

http://thediplomat.com/2017/02/the-dangers-of-pakistans-tactical-nuclear-weapons/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-34588009
http://foreignpolicynews.org/2017/0...l-security-calculus-full-spectrum-deterrence/

Pakistan has disclosed for the first time that it has made low-yield nuclear weapons for use in the event of a sudden attack by its larger neighbour and rival, India.

The disclosure was made by Pakistan's Foreign Secretary Aizaz Chaudhry.

"The fact that Pakistan was making small tactical nuclear weapons was clear to the world from the day Pakistan started its missile programme," says Pervez Hoodbhoy, a nuclear physicist and independent security analyst based in Lahore.

"It meant that Pakistan had developed low-yield nuclear warheads to be delivered by those missiles at short ranges, in a battlefield, having localised impact, unlike big bombs designed to destroy cities."

Experts believe that the 2011 testing of the nuclear-capable Nasr missile with a 60km range was an indication that Pakistan was building an arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons for use in a theatre of war.

Hasan Askari Rizvi, a Lahore-based expert on defence and security issues, suspects Pakistan may have designed even smaller nuclear weapons, capable of being shot from a specially-designed gun.

he is the one who was claiming babur 2 is useless since it cannot target Calcutta

How can a 750km Babur missile have a range of 2000km, use your head do you know what your even saying? You need 2000km range roughly from Islamabad to target Calcutta.

They have never stated something like this before.. So it is an H-bomb..
North Korean leader:
I ordered the testing of a hydrogen bomb designed to be placed on an intercontinental ballistic missile. The test was a complete success.

They have:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...t-suspected-as-artificial-earthquake-detected

he is the one who was claiming babur 2 is useless since it cannot target Calcutta

I never claimed babur 2 is useless I said it can't target deep into India due to its low range.

 

[terranMarine]

https://www.rt.com/usa/401897-pentagon-threat-military-response/

All options are on the table

 

[KN-1]

View attachment 422873

https://www.rt.com/usa/401897-pentagon-threat-military-response/

All options are on the table

as expected

 

[war&peace]

http://thediplomat.com/2017/02/the-dangers-of-pakistans-tactical-nuclear-weapons/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-34588009
http://foreignpolicynews.org/2017/0...l-security-calculus-full-spectrum-deterrence/

Pakistan has disclosed for the first time that it has made low-yield nuclear weapons for use in the event of a sudden attack by its larger neighbour and rival, India.

The disclosure was made by Pakistan's Foreign Secretary Aizaz Chaudhry.

"The fact that Pakistan was making small tactical nuclear weapons was clear to the world from the day Pakistan started its missile programme," says Pervez Hoodbhoy, a nuclear physicist and independent security analyst based in Lahore.

"It meant that Pakistan had developed low-yield nuclear warheads to be delivered by those missiles at short ranges, in a battlefield, having localised impact, unlike big bombs designed to destroy cities."

Experts believe that the 2011 testing of the nuclear-capable Nasr missile with a 60km range was an indication that Pakistan was building an arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons for use in a theatre of war.

Hasan Askari Rizvi, a Lahore-based expert on defence and security issues, suspects Pakistan may have designed even smaller nuclear weapons, capable of being shot from a specially-designed gun.


How can a 750km Babur missile have a range of 2000km, use your head do you know what your even saying? You need 2000km range roughly from Islamabad to target Calcutta.


They have:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...t-suspected-as-artificial-earthquake-detected

Reported... you have derailed the thread with your obsessive diarrhoea about Pakistan's nuke while the thread is about NK nuke test and its implications. I also encourage other Pakistani members on this thread (i.e. @django @CriticalThought @friendly_troll96 @maximuswarrior @PAKISTANFOREVER ) to do the same. Please admins take a notice of this and act as per rules.
@waz @Oscar @WebMaster @HRK @Mugwop

 

[Mrc]

Have you ever studied economics and about Pakistani economics?? Can you export goods to China which are expensive in producing then the goods produced in China??

Did that stop us in 1998?? Are we stronger 9r weaker than that tine?? Do u even know what u are talking about???

 

[war&peace]

Did that stop us in 1998?? Are we stronger 9r weaker than that tine?? Do u even know what u are talking about???

Guys try to understand, Pakistani already possesses the capability and the concerned quarters know it very well and this ambiguity is always beneficial. We need to strengthen our economy first.

 

[EpiiC]

Reported... you have derailed the thread with your obsessive diarrhoea about Pakistan's nuke while the thread is about NK nuke test and its implications. I also encourage other Pakistani members on this thread (i.e. @django @CriticalThought @friendly_troll96 @maximuswarrior @PAKISTANFOREVER ) to do the same. Please admins take a notice of this and act as per rules.
@waz @Oscar @WebMaster

You haven't even proved me wrong.. Admins are smart enough not to pay attention to unfounded claims that have no basis in fact or truth.

 

[friendly_troll96]

Reported... you have derailed the thread with your obsessive diarrhoea about Pakistan's nuke while the thread is about NK nuke test and its implications. I also encourage other Pakistani members on this thread (i.e. @django @CriticalThought @friendly_troll96 @maximuswarrior @PAKISTANFOREVER ) to do the same. Please admins take a notice of this and act as per rules.
@waz @Oscar @WebMaster

done

 

[Mrc]

Any ways this discussion about h or not h is not relevant today.... 100 KT yield is enough for a city size target no matter how u get it .... boosted fission devices can have 100s of KT yield and how can we say NK has tested maximum yield they could produce??

 

[terranMarine]

as expected

The saddest part is, there's no option on the table. There's only one card to play and that's telling the world that there are options available.

 

[mike2000 is back]

A

Mate are americans so brain dead they are not able to understand the problem? Every one knows that NK does not have the capacity to take on US. Even a single missile fired will invite severe response from US.

The problem is for the american allies in vicinity of NK. NK more or less will attack the nearby countries who will bear the brunt of mad man. NK will certainly go for the nearby soft targets and all that US will do is keep giving updates on what is going on. Who cares if NK is a dump? its only that neighboring countries dont want to become the dump.

Agree 100%, N.Korea poses no real threat at all to the U.S ,not by a wide margin. They are no match for the U S military. Everybody knows this(even Fat Kim himself).

The real issue here is the two most developed countries in Asia i.e Japan and S.Korea who are strong U.S allies. These two countries being neighbours with Pyongyang will be the ones to suffer in case of hostilities/war, since Fat Kim will throw everything he has against these two countries. This is the main problem for the U.S(even though some say it serves U.S interests, since it's brings S.korea and Japan even closer to the U.S and justifies U.S massive Military presence in the Asia Pacific region).
S.Korea and Japan are among the most advanced developed countries on earth (they have everything to lose in this case) while Now.Korea is a poor hungry large prison camp(as such they have nothing much to lose. Lol )
Therein lies the problem.

 

[terranMarine]

A

Agree 100%, N.Korea poses no real threat at all to the U.S ,not by a wide margin. They are no match for the U S military. Everybody knows this(even Fat Kim himself).

The real issue here is the two most developed countries in Asia i.e Japan and S.Korea who are strong U.S allies. These two countries being neighbours with Pyongyang will be the ones to suffer in case of hostilities/war, since Fat Kim will throw everything he has against these two countries. This is the main problem for the U.S(even though some say it serves U.S interests, since it's brings S.korea and Japan even closer to the U.S and justifiable U.S massive Military presence in Asia Pacific region).
S.Korea and Japan are among the most advanced developed countries on earth (they have everything to lose in this case) while Now.Korea is a poor hungry large prison camp(as such they have nothing much to lose. Lol )
Therein lies the problem.

LOL we already knew that, but somehow many choose to stick their heads in the sand. American government once again issued the same old threat "IF USA IS THREATENED TO BE ATTACKED, ALL OPTION ARE AVAILABLE". You see Fat Kim never said anything about pulling the trigger striking US FIRST. US keeps using the same old rhetoric always trying to portray Fat Kim as insane. Anybody with a brain understands perfectly the difference in power between these two and there's no way DPRK is gonna launch war against US. US is trying to save face by saying IF being attacked we will take them down. Always putting the US perspective as a victim and will respond in reaction to it. Sorry but US has always been the aggressor from the start, Iraq/Libya/Afghanistan/Syria and many more in the past.

Japan and SK are definitely not jumping with joy and start making military preparations. These two are more cowardly than the stupid people who believe these dogs will join US to invade DPRK. If anything these two don't want to get involved in a war against DPRK. Japanese spokesperson always react with the same line: "we are worried and hoping for US to protect us" and the South Korean citizens too protesting US making things worse. If US is launching a war, SK and Japan would be finished. It would mean two crippled dogs are useless to US.