What's new

Brainwashing and Jehad!

. . . . . . . . .
One who doesnt know should be brave enough to question!


Which part? And what is the source of all this?
The whole conflict of religion , you will understand. Kindly read about Ibn tehmiya and then read about al Wahab, and then read about Shah walli Ullah, then read about 3rd Battle of Panipat, in the end Deoband.

Follow the sequence and you will be enlightened. :)
 
.
.
One who doesnt know should be brave enough to question!


Which part? And what is the source of all this?

Here we have an internet and interested guys can digout a lot of history related subjects.But now I dont interested in it.
All I am saying is that you cant deny one basic point of this thread .Brits strategy of exploiting religious sentiment.
Can you refute his point ? Then do it.
 
.
The whole conflict of religion , you will understand. Kindly read about Ibn tehmiya and then read about al Wahab, and then read about Shah walli Ullah, then read about 3rd Battle of Panipat, in the end Deoband.

Follow the sequence and you will be enlightened. :)
:rofl:

I have read about 2 of the stated things (Muhammad ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab - unless it is some other Wahab and Deoband) but believe me I am far from getting anything where you are heading...Either explain it...and if you cant I can easily assume you didnt get it either...Coz one who knows what he is talking about can easily make the other understand his POV otherwise that POV is not worthy ...

Here we have an internet and interested guys can digout a lot of history related subjects.But now I dont interested in it.
All I am saying is that you cant deny one basic point of this thread .Brits strategy of exploiting religious sentiment.
Can you refute his point ? Then do it.
Firstly I am not in the mood,

2ndly your fellow countrymate has thrown a blind allegation without backing it and only thing he can come up with is read this and that...Well, if I read it from some perspective I will understand from that view not his view...hence I asked for his proof which all he came up with was read ABOUT so and so...Do you expect me to read every single book/ article written? Has he that he is proclaiming his part as truth?
 
.
Here we have an internet and interested guys can digout a lot of history related subjects.But now I dont interested in it.
All I am saying is that you cant deny one basic point of this thread .Brits strategy of exploiting religious sentiment.
Can you refute his point ? Then do it.
and why only Shah Walli Ullah, were britishers aware of that he would react without thinking once, due to his extremists thoughts? They could have approached Marathas, or Sikhs too.

:rofl:

I have read about 2 of the stated things (Muhammad ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab - unless it is some other Wahab and Deoband) but believe me I am far from getting anything where you are heading...Either explain it...and if you cant I can easily assume you didnt get it either...Coz one who knows what he is talking about can easily make the other understand his POV otherwise that POV is not worthy ...

Okay then please enlighten us with his theology on Islam. I hope you are aware of it.
 
.
What be out of order does not exist in Pakistanbrainwashing I never heard
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom