What's new

Both myself & Shaukat Tareen had warned the "Neutrals" that if conspiracy succeeded our fragile economic recovery would go into a tailspin: Imran Khan

There are 2 theories making rounds here

- Did Bajwa and co. remain neutral when all this was going on?

- or Bajwa and co. abet and support the conspiracy against Pakistan sitting government?

Not that either one is a lesser crime.
 
Direct firing at "neutrals" by ex PM Imran Khan now...
:lol::lol::lol:





Some points {not only from this video, but from other videos from other journalists on this meeting}:

  • IK believes, or is told, that 90% of rank and file, even to very high levels are with him. {probably that's why he's getting bold}
  • One MNA Ramesh Kumar {who was in neutral's rest house} even showed messages on his phone from est. asking him to leave PTI.
  • IK has no control over NAB {which is OK, NAB is supposed to be independent}, but in fact est. was controlling NAB.
  • Est. told IK to not worry about accountability, and let them handle that aspect. i.e NRO was planned. Now that SS is PM they are giving themselves an NRO.
  • Est. was the one who didn't let NAB cases reach verdicts.
  • FIA was also being meddled with by est. FIA case against SS was delayed by est.
  • Dr. Rizwan (late) was receiving threats despite being in FIA and having sitting government on his back. {who could be so bold?}
  • Est. dictated court's decision.
  • Est. entered Dr. Rizwan in stop list, because SS had not even become PM yet.
  • Person(s) from est. who sent messages to various ex-PTI MNAs is the Mir Jafar IK is holding back the name of.
  • Est. will dictate when next election will be held.
  • Some 30 PML-N MNAs had made a forward block and wanted to "resign" to join PTI, unlike lotas who switch side without resigning.. But est. stopped them.
  • ex-PTI members have told sitting-PTI friends that they did what (all powerful) est. told them to do.
  • PTI resignations not approved was also due to est. because they still trying to break off more PTI MNAs.
  • est. telling US to give financial help or else IK will come back. :lol:
  • Est. played double game about Rus, to IK est. said YES, but to US est. said IK didn't take us into confidence.
  • Tosha Khans & Farah Khan campaigns were tipped off to opponents by est.
  • IK blocked numbers of DG ISI & COAS.
  • IK never expressed desire to make Faiz a COAS. {in fact according to alleged leaked info, Bajwa himself wanted to make Faiz a COAS after himself}
  • IK's relations w est./COAS were never spoiled {i.e. IK didn't expect est. to flip like that}. Only issue was they asked Buzdar to be changed. To which IK replied Sindh is worst in governance why they don't ask for a change in Sindh? Buzdar was doing better than ones in Sindh. Sindh's CM facing serious charges. etc. Sindh folks were resisting construction packages because they wanted 3 -3 cror bribery in Sindh for every project. And IK names a woman {probably Zardari's sister?} who was on top of it all.
  • Same est. who used to report to IK how corrupt these gangsters were, who now brought same criminals into government.
  • Maryam Nawaz is being given presidential level security on what basis?
  • IK never went to London on a private visit {despite having his sons there}, while sitting cabinet is meeting in London.
  • Amrikan were not used to kind of input we were giving to them. "Ours" lie down before Amrikans on a single call. IK tried to invoke "their" ghairat by telling them to deal with Amerikans differently.
  • US/EU wanted us to condemn Rus on Ukraine, and COAS had no role to make condemnation statements. It should have been a political government's decision. Indians and many other countries could not be forced then why us?
  • Putin had a 3hr meeting with IK and offered cheaper wheat & oil.
  • If current setup is given time, then they'll prepare enough grounds for rigging, so forcing an early election will mitigate the possibly of rigging.
  • IK also said few other things off the record, which are very serious and should not be disclosed. Could it be? what one journalist almost divulged that in meeting with DI ISI, US has put forth some VERY SERIOUS demands in order to rescue Pakistan from financial crisis. HINT: similar demands that Bill Clinton made to Nawaz Sharif back then.
 
Last edited:





Some points {not only from this video, but from other videos from other journalists on this meeting}:

  • IK believes, or is told, that 90% of rank and file, even to very high levels are with him. {probably that's why he's getting bold}
  • One MNA Ramesh Kumar {who was in neutral's rest house} even showed messages on his phone from est. asking him to leave PTI.
  • IK has no control over NAB {which it's supposed to be}, but in face est. was controlling NAB.
  • Est. told IK to not worry about accountability, and let them handle that aspect. i.e NRO was planned. Now that SS is PM they are giving themselves an NRO.
  • Est. was the one who didn't let NAB cases reach verdicts.
  • FIA was also being meddled with by est. FIA case against SS was delayed by est.
  • Dr. Rizwan (late) was receiving threats despite being in FIA and having sitting government on his back. {who could be so bold?}
  • Est. dictated court's decision.
  • Est. entered Dr. Rizwan in stop list, because SS had not even become PM yet.
  • Person(s) from est. who sent messages to various ex-PTI MNAs is the Mir Jafar IK is holding back the name of.
  • Est. will dictate when next election will be held.
  • Some 30 PML-N MNAs had made a forward block and wanted to "resign" to join PTI, unlike lootas who stitch side without resigning.. But est. stopped them.
  • ex-PTI members have told sitting-PTI friends that they did what (all powerful) est. told them to do.
  • PTI resignations not approved was also due to est. because they still trying to break off more PTI MNAs.
  • est. telling US to give financial help or else IK will come back. :lol:
  • Est. played double game about Rus, to IK est. said YES, but to US est. said IK didn't take us into confidence.
  • Tosha Khans & Farah Khan campaigns were tipped off to opponents by est.
  • IK blocked numbers of DG ISI & COAS.
  • IK never expressed desire to make Faiz a COAS. {in fact according to alleged leaked info, Bajwa himself wanted to make Faiz a COAS after himself}
  • IK's relations w est./COAS were never spoiled {i.e. it was unexpected}. Only issue was they asked Buzdar to be changed. To which IK replied Sindh is worst in governance why they don't ask for a change in Sindh? Buzdar was doing better than ones in Sindh. Sindh's CM facing serious charges. etc. Sindh folks were resisting construction packages because they wanted 3 -3 cror bribery in Sindh for every project. And IK names a woman {probably Zardari's sister?} who was on top of it all.
  • Same est. who used to report to IK how corrupt these gangsters were, who are now brought into government.
  • Maryam Nawaz is being given presidential security on what basis?
  • IK never went to London on a private visit {despite having his sons there}, while sitting cabinet is meeting in London.
  • Amrikan were not used to kind of input we were giving to them. "Ours" lie down before Amrikans on a single call. IK tried to invoke "their" ghairat by telling them to deal with Amerikans differently.
  • US/EU wanted us to condemn Rus on Ukraine, and COAS had no role to make condemnation statements. It should have been a political government's decision. Indians and many other countries could not be forced then why us?
  • Putin had a 3hr meeting with IK and offered cheaper wheat & oil.
  • If current setup is given time, then they'll prepare enough grounds for rigging, so forcing an early election will mitigate the possibly of rigging.
  • IK also said few other things off the record, which are very serious and should not be exposed. Could it be? what one journalist almost divulged it that in meeting with DI ISI, US has put forth some VERY SERIOUS demands in order to rescue Pakistan from financial crisis. HINT: similar demands that Bill Clinton made to Nawaz Sharif back then.


Thanks for summarizing it so nicely.
 
Imran Khan better control himself. He has earned brownie points by keeping criticisms at the army aside.

The public sentiment is largely with Imran khan. But constant criticism at the generals might backfire.


You hire a bodyguard to protect you against your enemies. If he decides to stay neutral while you're under attack, how would you describe the situation?

Neutrals are to be blamed for whatever happened.
 
Back
Top Bottom