The issue that I agreed with Munshi on was something that has been written on by authors in all of the countries like BD, SL and Pakistan. Nobody is ready to toe the Indian line and certainly don't like to be pushed around by an arrogant India (in the past it was the "big" India, now its the "big, arrogant" India). The interesting thing about this whole discussion is that this arrogance shows through the comments of the Indian contributers here...so I am not sure why you guys act so surprised when somebody from BD calls you guys arrogant or bullies.
Why is that anti-India articles from some writers from the these regions is only consider and consider the truth? Can't there be a second face to the facts presented by these writers?
as far as arrogance is consider,it is based one's perspective right? When Munshiji says Bangladesh can close economic gap within 5 years would be arrogance to me,similarly Indians saying Bangladesh cannot do **it to India is arrogance to others.
There are certain advantages that comes to India due it being a large country within the subcontinent. For people who dislike India it is arrogance when Indians point out these advantages,however that does not negate the truth for what it is. Unfortunately this will always be the case in whatever discussion has India in it.
And yeah that educated figure part..
here is the link
https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/in.html#People
It says around 60% above 15 years.. And yeah not all in US and UK are "educated" either.