Blasphemers are terrorists, says IHC judge

[Dawood Ibrahim]

This is the number one reason no "Muslim" country is developed or even half way decent

Don't use religion as a scapegoat for the sake of corruption failure etc.

 

[Awan68]

dont worry,hopefully now the islamabad high court might force the govt to get rid of the likes of him from social media
and hopefully it would reach a point in the future that they are tracked online so that they are arrested and punished under the law

Inshallah..

 

[sakha39]

No body says terrorists Ghazi. But if you are referring Mumtaz Qadri and Ghazi Ilm Din then sorry to say we consider them since they acted when state reuse to act against the blasphemers.

Qadri is a murderer cloaked as a religious demagogue. Who gave him the right to kill Salman Taseer who only raised questions on blasphemy law and how it is used to victimize. He never said "one" word about Holy prophet.

Even if Salman had said something we had blasphemy law. BTW JJ was also accused of blasphemy. Should we kill him too. Ghamdi was one. Should we kill him too .... ?

 

[sakha39]

Murdering taseer was wrong but that is what happens when the courts and govts dont uphold the rule of law, he was openly parading around calling the blasphemey law a black law or whatever, he was defending a criminal sentenced by the lahore high court, he waw doing this bullshit on behest and payroll of foriegn ngos etc, he was a known drunk corrupt asshole, u dont mess around with stuff that is sensitive in anation, taseer invited this upon himself, the govt is responsible for his murder because they didnt have balls enought to get that drunk toad to shut his mouth, they didnt have the balls to carry out the sentence of that aasia bitch due to fear of their masters in europe and amreeka...

The FIR was registered against him but Qadri murdered him even before the outcome of the decision of the court. So it was Qadri who didnot allow the state the time to prosecute Salman.

There is nothing wrong in defending a criminal that has been sentenced by the court. People do it here and abroad. BTW same court sentenced Qadri to death. Why are you not defending that per se ?

Everything progressive is not foreign my friend. People in Pak have brains too to think for themselves.

There are many people in Pak who drink. Up until 1974 PA used to serve beer and alcohol in army mess halls dear. Anything you would like to say

Read the full details even FIR of the Taseer case then open your mouth.

Dear salman said it on live TV. He called blasphemy a black law. Never said a word about Holy prophet. You update yourself.

 

[Verve]

What the judge said, according to the writer, was in regards to the no ban by PTA of such sites where blasphemous content is published and if those are Pakistanis then why no action has been taken.

Such liberal fascists are terrorists, they are the other side of the same coin as religious extremists.

 

[war&peace]

Excellent news ...yes these libturds and blasphemers are worse than terrorists...these morally and financially corrupts tend to be libturds, blasphemers and islamophobes because Islam talks against corruption so it hurts them directly...Zardari, NS both are great libturds..

 

[Awan68]

View attachment 382285
Blasphemer are terrorists but bloody terrorists are ghazi. What a helpless nation.

The ultinate defeat and rejection of ttp by the pakistani people and its army in operations named after the prophet(pbuh)'s sword and verses of quran would beg to disagree so stop ur idiotic trolling, ttp endangered islam and so do these liberals, both these groups are controlled by the same people and their goals are one and that are of bellitiling and insulting islam, ttp did it with murdering innocents and claimng it in name of islam to destroy islam and peoples faith init and these liberals do a similar job by spreading doubt about islam in immature and young minds by their stupid lies which anyone with knowledge can counter...

 

[Max]

completely agree..

 

[Jungibaaz]

What an utterly absurd statement, God help Pakistan when we have judges like this.

 

[sakha39]

i am glad you living in US so keep your personal belief seprate Disrespecting of Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) is not allowed and will never allow in this land, people who doesnt want to follow the law of Islamic Republic of Pakistan are welcome to leave.

He calling the judge impartial and questioning the comments he made on a case he is presiding. BTW disrespecting Holy Prophet and blashemy law are two different things.

As per FIR
When Qadri humbly approach Taseer and inquire why he is against the law he replied this law is no more good than his feces and in a fit of a rage he emptied his smg on his body.

Even as per American law Qadri may not be awarded death punishment since it was not a planned or first degree murder.

If I go by your logic that criticizing blasphemy law is blasphemy then there are 10 people on this forum who are liable to be murdered as per you. Sorry moderators but had to drive the logic forward.

 

[VCheng]

What an utterly absurd statement, God help Pakistan when we have judges like this.

God helps only those ........

That old adage is still true.

 

[NakedLunch]

Please see the Frankfurt School and the 'Culture of Critique' ie Radical Cultural Marxism. This Judge is right.

 

[Awan68]

The FIR was registered against him but Qadri murdered him even before the outcome of the decision of the court. So it was Qadri who didnot allow the state the time to prosecute Salman.

There is nothing wrong in defending a criminal that has been sentenced by the court. People do it here and abroad. BTW same court sentenced Qadri to death. Why are you not defending that per se ?

Everything progressive is not foreign my friend. People in Pak have brains too to think for themselves.

There are many people in Pak who drink. Up until 1974 PA used to serve beer and alcohol in army mess halls dear. Anything you would like to say



Dear salman said it on live TV. He called blasphemy a black law. Never said a word about Holy prophet. You update yourself.

I dont consider qadri bad cause he was driven by rage and murder in the heat of the movement is understood by the entire world and death penalty is not awarded in such cases, the verdict is of involuntary manslaughter, that bieng said i accept that commiting his murder was wrong on the paet of the qadri yet qadri was a simple man and taseer was a governer, didnt more responsibility rested on his shoulders to he responsible, what kind of message was he giving by openly defending a woman not accused but convictes in a blasphemey case, he accepted that she committed blasphemey yet was of a mind that she had a right to do so hence should be freed, he was a known corrupt drunk, these people sell their hide and pakistan on daily basis so dont turn him into some hero, just another politician sent to the cleaners nothing else, i do not object to the sentence of qadri cause i believe that non state actors do not reserve the right to dispense justice yet that doesnt mean that i hate qadri or something like that, if the state convicted and hanged taseer than the result would've been the same dont u agree??,

 

[EasyNow]

His eyes welled up?

Why is he getting emotional when every other authority in the land is able to discuss this subject rationally? Block the Internet, escalate the matter to minister level but why is a judge talking about sacrificing his family, his life etc? Total lack of professionalism.

In fact, it's not a lack of professionalism, it's opportunism. Flouting all protocol to boost his personal image of religiosity.

When the lawmakers, enforcers and leaders brazenly exploit Islam. One can only wonder what effect this has on wider society.

 

[Awan68]

Still falls under blaspheme law even if a Muslim man burns a bible or said something bad about it that too falls under blaspheme law.

Read the law then came to me.

Be my pupil.

As per FIR
When Qadri humbly approach Taseer and inquire why he is against the law he replied this law is no more good than his feces and in a fit of a rage he emptied his smg on his body.

Even as per American law Qadri may not be awarded death punishment since it was not a planned or first degree murder.

And qadri was not a terrorist, he didnt murder any innocent women and children, he served no foriegn intel against pakistan, he just killed a guy in rage and heat of the movement, how is that terrorism??, first learn the defination of terrorism , what qadri did is catogerized as "crimes of passion" across the entire globe, its not taken as terrorism...