What's new

‘Black economy’

Reddington

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Feb 22, 2019
Messages
1,053
Reaction score
20
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
‘Black economy’


In Pakistan’s case, ‘black economy’ is the wrong term – gives an impression as if it is about drug cartels or money originating from organized crime syndicates. In Pakistan’s case, it should be ‘informal economy’. And Pakistan’s informal economy is Pakistan’s economic backbone.


Here’s why: One, Pakistan’s informal economy employs at least 73 percent of our labour force. Two, Pakistan’s formal sector is heavily dependent on goods and services produced by the informal sector.


Our government, for the record, is a hugely deficit government. The government’s so-called Public Sector Enterprises (PSEs) manage to lose Rs1,100 billion a year every year. The circular debt has hit a high of Rs1,600 billion. The leakages in the gas sector are somewhere around $2 billion a year every year. The leakages in public procurements run into trillions of rupees.


In all probability, even if the taxpayers pay Rs10 trillion a year our government would still somehow manage a budget deficit. It is not about the ‘black economy’. It is not about raising taxes. It is all about government losses.


Here’s where the PTI’s economic policy went wrong: the PTI killed transactions. Dr Nadeem ul Haque, one of the best economic thinkers in the country, says, “Kill transactions, kill economic growth. Shopping malls are empty, consumer businesses are reporting losses in double digits, people are losing jobs while new ones are not available, and new investment is not happening. This is not a downturn in the economy. It is merely the culmination of amateur hour in policymaking that donors and bureaucracy have combined to develop for decades. The thirst for taxation has driven the economy to the ground. Economic activity is now gasping for air.” The PTI killed transactions-and killed economic growth.


Dr Hafeez Shaikh will have to stop the genocidal campaign against Pakistan’s informal sector. Our new advisor to the PM will have to bring back the lost confidence. And then sign up for the IMF programme ASAP. These steps must then be followed up by reforming and restructuring public procurements, the electricity sector and the gas sector.


The IMF is bent upon jacking up the electricity and the gas tariff. Dr Hafeez Shaikh must prepare a plan to lower the burden on low income families. The IMF is bent upon jacking up the tax burden by Rs600 billion. Dr Hafeez Shaikh must prepare a plan to lower the burden of indirect taxation on low-income families.


Every country on the face of the planet has an informal sector (according to the International Labor Organization, the informal sector in the US employs up to 40 percent of the labour force.). To be certain, our informal sector is the backbone of our economy. According to most estimates, our informal sector is more than half of our GNP (gross national product).


To be sure, around 45 million Pakistani workers – and their families – depend on the informal sector for their livelihoods. Don’t kill the livelihoods of 45 million Pakistani workers – and their families. Don’t kill the informal sector. Please don’t.

The writer is a columnist based in Islamabad.
Dr Farrukh Saleem


https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/463830-black-economy
 
. .
it's painful but we need it. Our informal economy is getting bigger than the formal one. I know many shop owners who have income in lakhs per month but pay zero taxes.
 
.
Pakistan is doomed to be an African shithole.

Anyone who thinks otherwise is either a PTI slave or a hopeful idiot.
 
.
People still have to eat.

People will simply have to adapt to paying taxes whether they like it or not.
 
. . . .
Wow. So you don't count the tax on gas, electricity, food, clothing, medicines, calls etc....
Every Pakistani pays tax. How do you think the government is working.....

No, I don't because everyone pays the same prices without any discrimination.

Do you think when a poor man goes to a shop to buy a trouser, he goes to the taxable trouser section and the rich person goes to a non-taxable section?
 
.
No, I don't because everyone pays the same prices without any discrimination.

Doesn't mean that taxes are not paid. Everything from mobile phone plans, utilities, petroleum products to drugs are heavily taxed. And these things are input to value added products. Even banking transactions are taxed EQUALLY for everyone. Indirect taxation.

All this unfair and indirect taxation manages to get the Gov TRILLIONS of PKR. And yet we are in a perpetual state of deficit. That was the point.
 
. .
Putting greater income tax on the rich who are a part of the "formal" economy is one of the worst policies ever conceived. They are the 1% paying large amounts of income tax and successive govts, to ensure they get votes, keep taxing this tiny bracket more and more.

What really needs to happen is:
1.) Tax the rich that make up the informal sector; this especially includes "traders" who work mostly on cash and many of whom are billionaires and pay zero income-related tax.

2.) Conceive some kind of amnesty system which brings much of the black/informal money back into the measurable and usable formal economy; harsh taxes only force the evaders to come up with increasingly creative ways to hold on to/store their cash and/or send it abroad through havala and other dubious means. Once the money is in, and once the FIA actually has the training, tools and talent to aggressively go after the black economy, crack down on it.

Without the prerequisites mentioned above, any crackdown is bound to fail. It's roughly equivalent to randomly banning certain proxy groups without having a plan or laying the groundwork with de-radicalization, having an attractive job market for those who lay down arms, etc.
 
.
How are the poor being taxed when out of 200 million people only 1 million pay taxes?
Increasing the tax band is hard, here’s why?

Around 51 per cent of Pakistanis are female and most females don’t work in Pakistan hence are not in the tax bracket. I know a lot of women work but just to keep the numbers simple.

Now that leaves 100 million people. Out of which majority of people are living in relative poverty and some in absolute poverty. 39 per cent of people live in poverty and therefor are out of the tax bracket. That leaves 60 million.

Out of the 60 million how many earn more than 1.2 million? Not a lot, plus there are industries where you don’t have to pay tax, such as agriculture.

Note: numbers were simplified for mental maths.
 
.
Increasing the tax band is hard, here’s why?

Around 51 per cent of Pakistanis are female and most females don’t work in Pakistan hence are not in the tax bracket. I know a lot of women work but just to keep the numbers simple.

Now that leaves 100 million people. Out of which majority of people are living in relative poverty and some in absolute poverty. 39 per cent of people live in poverty and therefor are out of the tax bracket. That leaves 60 million.

Out of the 60 million how many earn more than 1.2 million? Not a lot, plus there are industries where you don’t have to pay tax, such as agriculture.

Note: numbers were simplified for mental maths.

You are correct in your analysis in number of tax payers, but the real question is the amout of non taxed money by the top 10-20% of our society.

There are billionairs in Pakistan who have not paid a cent in tax.

In developed countires, the govermnet taxes the rich and pays for education and healthcare for the poor.
In Paksitan the poor pay indirect tax so the rich can have luxury mansions and cars.
 
.
You are correct in your analysis in number of tax payers, but the real question is the amout of non taxed money by the top 10-20% of our society.

There are billionairs in Pakistan who have not paid a cent in tax.

In developed countires, the govermnet taxes the rich and pays for education and healthcare for the poor.
In Paksitan the poor pay indirect tax so the rich can have luxury mansions and cars.
They say our informal economy is as large as our formal economy. Roughly worth more than $300 billion a year.

Taxing the rich is something that they should do. The problem with that is rich people can afford smart accountants that exploit loopholes. The other problem is corruption, why would you declare black money when you know NAB will raid? Getting rid of corruption should be seen as a priority.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom