BJP Youth Leader Gowhar Ahmed Bhat Killed By Terrorists In Kashmir

[Kdpreddy]

The Gita DOES tell Arjun to kill his loved one's for Dharma. There is NO Ambiguity about it.

There is no point debating a person who thinks Mahabharata is about Good Vs Evil mate.
That showed me how messed up we have become that most of us don't even understand our history.

 

[Gadkari]

There is no point debating a person who thinks Mahabharata is about Good Vs Evil mate.
That showed me how messed up we have become that most of us don't even understand our history.

I am not debating, I am educating. Debate is among equals. It only looks like a debate because that is the only way I can stimulate their minds to understand what they need to understand.

 

[oOo]

Of you could demonstrate some personal integrity and admit that you were wrong.

Much easier than calling names and pretending that posts don't make sense. But that is just me.

Mr X takes an oath out to satisfy his father lust for another woman.

Mr X follows the oath even if that means killing innocents for sake of it.

Mr X follows the oath even if that means supporting the evils.

Mr X do not support Dharma but Adharma by violating teachings of Gita as he was bind by his oath. He values his oath more than innocent lives and dharma.

Be like Mr X.

Keep living in a cocoon where use of your own mind is prohibited.

The Gita DOES tell Arjun to kill his loved one's for Dharma. There is NO Ambiguity about it.

Your comprehension scks. So killing is fine for Dharma, but breaking oath is not even if not breaking oath means supporting adharma?

Be like Mr X.

I am not debating, I am educating. Debate is among equals. It only looks like a debate because that is the only way I can stimulate their minds to understand what they need to understand.

Fools paradise where everyone is master in their own minds. Inhabited by most religious ones.

 

[Gadkari]

Mr X takes an oath out to satisfy his father lust for another woman.

"lust" is a christian word. Hindus do not have any such word. We call it Kama or Love/desire.

So In Hindu sub text Mr. X takes an oath to reassure that the object of his fathers love/desire will get what she wants if his father gets what he wants.

And what he gives in exchange was what was always his to give.

Mr X follows the oath even if that means killing innocents for sake of it.

There are no word called "innocent" in Hinduism/sanskrit. There is only a word for blameless i.e. Anagas. If anybody participates in a war, then they are not blameless.

This is not a terrorist attack, this is a declared way where the opponents are there to kill each other.

Mr X follows the oath even if that means supporting the evils.

There is no word called "evil" in Hinduism or sanskrit. We have Dush-Karma or "wrong deed", we have "paapa" which comes from the word "Aap" which means identity(self/ego) in sanskrit. So even a Paap is action done in self interest or in other words a "Selfish" deed.

Mr. X oath is a promise of Karma, IRRESPECTIVE of the end result. In english the saying is "Means is more important than the end".

Mr X do not support Dharma but Adharma by violating teachings of Gita as he was bind by his oath. He values his oath more than innocent lives and dharma.

Be like Mr X.

You have ZERO understanding of the teaching of Gita or even what "Dharma" means. Those are just meaningless words to you.

As my post demonstrates, you entire understanding of Hinduism is actually a feeble understanding of christianity disguised as Hinduism. The same way your "proofs" are opinions disguised as facts.

Following's one's oath IS dharma. Not the end result, but the Journey itself. Dharma IS the journey, the end always leads to god.

Keep living in a cocoon where use of your own mind is prohibited.

Now is the prefect time to take your own advice and take a good long hard look in the mirror. I invite you to step outside your cocoon and educate yourself by breaking free of years of social brainwashing.

Fools paradise where everyone is master in their own minds. Inhabited by most religious ones.

Nope. A fools paradise is based on Ignorance. Unaware or denying the existence of potential trouble. You are ignorant about your own mind, what to say about Facts that lies outside your own ego.

 

[oOo]

"lust" is a christian word. Hindus do not have any such word. We call it Kama or Love/desire.

So In Hindu sub text Mr. X takes an oath to reassure that the object of his fathers love/desire will get what she wants if his father gets what he wants.

And what he gives in exchange was what was always his to give.



There are no word called "innocent" in Hinduism/sanskrit. There is only a word for blameless i.e. Anagas. If anybody participates in a war, then they are not blameless.

This is not a terrorist attack, this is a declared way where the opponents are there to kill each other.



There is no word called "evil" in Hinduism or sanskrit. We have Dush-Karma or "wrong deed", we have "paapa" which comes from the word "Aap" which means identity(self/ego) in sanskrit. So even a Paap is action done in self interest or in other words a "Selfish" deed.

Mr. X oath is a promise of Karma, IRRESPECTIVE of the end result. In english the saying is "Means is more important than the end".



You have ZERO understanding of the teaching of Gita or even what "Dharma" means. Those are just meaningless words to you.

As my post demonstrates, you entire understanding of Hinduism is actually a feeble understanding of christianity disguised as Hinduism. The same way your "proofs" are opinions disguised as facts.

Following's one's oath IS dharma. Not the end result, but the Journey itself. Dharma IS the journey, the end always leads to god.



Now is the prefect time to take your own advice and take a good long hard look in the mirror. I invite you to step outside your cocoon and educate yourself by breaking free of years of social brainwashing.



Nope. A fools paradise is based on Ignorance. Unaware or denying the existence of potential trouble. You are ignorant about your own mind, what to say about Facts that lies outside your own ego.

Blimey.

Now the guy want me to write sanskrit words while communicating in English. You must be a pakhandi pandit fooling people for ages. Now shoo.

I am better of christian if that is what you called hinduism. I will never get my father a woman if that means killing thousands of people fighting for dharma. I will break thousand oaths if i could save even one live.

Even suicide bombers takes oath to kill kafirs out of ignorance. They follow their oath and kill people. They are like Mr X.

All actions are judged by the "bhao" they are committed. If you know you are supporting evil, no oath can take that from you that you are committing sin. His taking oath was no sin, his sticking to his oath even if that means supporting adharma certainly was.

Let me take a oath to kill all human being on earth. After killing 100, I realize I am doing Adharma of killing people, I take back my oath and repent. Am I a better person now or should I have continued with my oath to be like Mr X?

I am sitting at my home and some invaded my house. I went for a war with them. Am I still not blameless? What Gita says about on side of Dharma and Adharma? Didn't Krishna was on Dharma side? Or shall I recite "Yada Yada hi Dharmasya..."? What are you smoking? Bhaang?

 

[livingdead]

nobody should be killed for political affiliation... sad state of affairs in jk...