What's new

BJP to construct "Sita temple" in Sri Lanka after hat-trick victory

@Peshwa .... I just remembered u'r that muslim indian who praises tipu sultan right ?

.......the name Peshwa misled me for a moment.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
What a wonderful Idea ...... we should start with demolishing all the temples in India..............Let me guess....u'r a congress supporter ?


The fact that Im implying that the need of the hour for our country is education and infrastructure rather than a useless temple must imply that Im asking for the destruction of all temples in india, right?
Clearly a temple in Sri Lanka will solve all of our problems....why didnt we think of this before!

I dont know how i can compete with such logic...

And my affiliation to political parties should not be of concern to you..

@Peshwa .... I just remembered u'r that muslim indian who praises tipu sultan right ?

.......the name Peshwa misled me for a moment.

So if Im a muslim...what about it?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Actually Mahinda is more of a Hindu than a Buddhist. He truly believes in them, a very religious hindu and a believer of Sai Baba..

utter rubbish and stop fooling yourself , the president of Buddhist Lanka is a staunch Roman Catholic, the rest is all gimmicks to fool people

th


th
 
.
Why are u posting ur previous comment again. Didn’t read what I said or couldn’t understand? Either way, I said, destruction of temples in a war zone is a NATURAL THING. Only an idiot who has absolutely NO idea abt war would be amazed when temples are destroyed in war zone.

How you spin your tale, this is what you claimed before

Mainly because ur LTTE fire at the army hiding from inside temples. Are u that much stupid to expect well-conditioned temples inside a war zone. And not any more temples are destroyed and the gov is renovating them

Make up your mind , so which is correct ? your first claim or the second , destruction of temples in war zone is "natural" ?

Let me brief you, LTTE did not fight an urban war fare, it's strategy was mainly guerrilla tactic of hit and run, attacking miltary camps, bases, installations and convoys.

However, the lankan army retaliated it loss by attacking civilian who are asked to take shelter in schools, hospitals , temples and churches by dropping leaflets

Aerial Terror results in massacre of innocents


The bombing incident had shocked and deeply troubled the Tamil people. The
on going conflict has seen much aerial bombardment of the Tamil homeland.

Notorious among these incidents were the Navaly church bombing in 1995,
The Nagar Kovil school bombing of 1996 and the Puthukudiyiruppu market
bombing of 1999. But the Vallipunam bombing due perhaps to the fact that
most victims were innocent schoolgirls horrified most people. Adding insult to
injury was the blatant denial by the state that the victims were schoolgirls and
the puerile attempt to describe them as child soldiers.

http://transcurrents.com/tamiliana/archives/187


on your pet issue " Fishing in Lankan troubled waters" , take up with the Indian PDF cyber warriors thats not my problem !!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
utter rubbish and stop fooling yourself , the president of Buddhist Lanka is a staunch Roman Catholic, the rest is all gimmicks to fool people

th


th

What an idiot.. So anybody who meets with his holiness has to be Catholic in your logic?? For you information madam Shiranthi Rajapaksa is indeed Catholic and the presidents cousin is a Hindu Tamil (who was attacked in TN recently by morons like you)

Inter religious/Inter communal marriages are very common in SL,Unlike in highly castist,racist madrasi communities like your's bob.. And yeah anybody with intelligence of atleast a ameoba would notice where your sources of information is coming from..Hilarious
 
.
The fact that Im implying that the need of the hour for our country is education and infrastructure rather than a useless temple must imply that Im asking for the destruction of all temples in india, right?
Clearly a temple in Sri Lanka will solve all of our problems....why didnt we think of this before!

I dont know how i can compete with such logic...

And my affiliation to political parties should not be of concern to you..

:lol: shameless ......its funny you did not recommend breaking down mosques in pakistani and India so that your muslim community can build schools to exit the medieval mindset.

Building temples is a pure Hindu matter and should be non of your concern.

Temple in Sri Lanka will certainly solve some of 'Hindu problems'. Its IRONIC that we Hindus have to build a sita temple in Sri Lanka but cannot build a Ram Mandir in Ayodhya, INDIA wich is birth place of Ram. :cheesy::cheesy:

After identifying your religion your political affiliation is no surprise.

So if Im a muslim...what about it?

You are a muslim who worship tipu sultan, a man who demolished temples and killed Hindus purely because they where Hindus......you are what I call a terrorist in waiting.
 
.
@<u><a href="http://www.defence.pk/forums/member.php?u=145520" target="_blank">manlion</a></u>
Between why dont u ask Tamil brethren in TN to stop poaching SL waters and depreive SL tamil fishermen from their livelihood. It is much better than making ur self an idiot in an internet forum.

while you are at your pet topic "Fishing in Lankan trouble waters ", a gentle reminder , it should be deprived SL Sinhalese fishermen (not tamil fishermen) as you try an bluff.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
What an idiot.. So anybody who meets with his holiness has to be Catholic in your logic?? For you information madam Shiranthi Rajapaksa is indeed Catholic and the presidents cousin is a Hindu Tamil (who was attacked in TN recently by morons like you)

Sinhala logic - anyone raising Tamil Lankan issue has to be "Hindu Tamil moron" but Sinhalese "Buddhist" married to a Catholic visiting 'his holiness' 3 times after the war is just for friendly chit chat ?

And how did the Hindu Tamil moron attack the President's Hindu Tamil cousin ? was it like these orange skin heads ?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Sinhala logic - anyone raising Tamil Lankan issue has to be "Hindu Tamil moron" but Sinhalese "Buddhist" married to a Catholic visiting 'his holiness' 3 times after the war is just for friendly chit chat ?

Sinhala logic will apply to a Sinhalese not me.. But your logic clearly applies to morons,Especially racist Madrasi ones.. As per your typical stupid argument sake so what if Rajapaksa is indeed a Catholic?? It does not matter to Lankans!! So why should it matter to some idiot cleaning toilets in Singapore??
 
.
The fact that Im implying that the need of the hour for our country is education and infrastructure rather than a useless temple must imply that Im asking for the destruction of all temples in india, right?
Clearly a temple in Sri Lanka will solve all of our problems....why didnt we think of this before!
Actually me being a Lankan is against it. For me the number 1 reason is, the proposed place Seetha eliya is an environmentally sensitive place. So having a temple there which would attract many devotees can harm the ecological balance. And we already have enough temples in this country.

utter rubbish and stop fooling yourself , the president of Buddhist Lanka is a staunch Roman Catholic, the rest is all gimmicks to fool people
Just because he poses for a photo with the Pope doesn&#8217;t make him a Roman Catholic. (Are u that dumb? )His wife is a catholic. When he was in SL since the time he was an MP he was a strong Sai follower. Many in SL knw that as a fact. Also he is a huge devotee of Thirupathi temple in India. He visits it very often. As far as I knw he used to be a huge devotee at Thirupathi even before he became known to the world as president of SL. I remember seeing photos of him in thirupathi in local newspapers. Actually he visits this temples whenever he meets with a difficult situation in his political life to get blessings.
Yes his presence and sponsoring Buddhism is a political gimmick and he is a strong and a devoted Hindu.
How you spin your tale, this is what you claimed before
Make up your mind , so which is correct ? your first claim or the second , destruction of temples in war zone is "natural" ?
What I meant by saying destruction of temples is natural in a war zone, I meant it can be subjected to gun fire in the middle of war fare like every other building. I didn&#8217;t say the temples are destroyed due to natural consequences. (how can people be this dumb!) So my two sentences are not contrary to each other but supportive of each claim. Please develop ur comprehension skills cos its difficult to make u understand something.
If it is STILL hard for u to understand, in a war fare where heavy artillery, gunfire, RPGS are used buildings are NOT safe. And buildings are destroyed. Temples are also buildings. So temples also meet the same destiny like the rest of the buildings. That is what I meant in my first sentence.
This case is further aggravated when one party hides inside the buildings and attack the other warring party. That is when LTTE target army from temple buildings (or hospitals, or schools or any other building) the chances of these buildings destroying is HIGH and it HAS BEEN the biggest reason for destruction of many temples. This is what I meant. Hope U can understand this at least NOW.

Let me brief you, LTTE did not fight an urban war fare, it's strategy was mainly guerrilla tactic of hit and run, attacking miltary camps, bases, installations and convoys.
Guerilla tac tic DOESN&#8217;T mean the guerilla army does not fight urban war fare. Actually LTTE did fight conventional war fare time to time. LTTE was not a static organization. It eveolved from time to time. You can say LTTE was a complete guerilla unit in later 1987-88. But after IPKF saga LTTE evoloved and became something more than a guerilla group confined to jungles. They started controlling areas for the first time. They became a terrorist army controlling a part of SL republic and creating a de facto state inside SL. They were not a mere guerilla unit.
They had a massive arms smuggling network all over world. Be it in afganistan-pakistan border, Africa LTTE had smuggling networks. KP who was arrested later in 2009 was the chief man in it. Also it owned commercial ships that was in both commercial use and arms smuggling in Asia and Africa. They had high tec weapons made abroad in their arsenal. They had shell artillery. I don&#8217;t think a mere guerilla unit has access to shell artillery. They did shelling just like SL army did. Actually the LTTE had night vision ability before SL army did. SL army first encountered RPGs when LTTE fired it at them. LTTE had superior weapons than SL army in late 80s and continuously had access to modern weapons. SL army was embarrassingly behind LTTE in firepower in late eighties and mid-nineties. LTTE was not a rag tag guerilla force. It had weapons, it had man power, it had excellent propaganda machines and it did engage in conventional war fare.

However, the lankan army retaliated it loss by attacking civilian who are asked to take shelter in schools, hospitals , temples and churches by dropping leaflets
Lets see what a civilian is, just because one is in civilian clothes doesn&#8217;t necessarily make him a civilian. LTTE had many of its carders in civilian clothes. Also they had a strategy of dressing their dead fighters in civilian clothes to give the impression that the dead are civilians.
The Lankan army acted in a manner to minimize civilian casualty often resulting high number of fatalities in their side.
If you are talking abt NO fire zones, the army declared NFZs and LTTE rejected it.
The civilians flocked to the NFZ and then LTTE along with them entered the NFZ and positioned their artillery and gunmen inside the NFZ and attacked the army from within the NFZ. Then it is the army attacked back and it is completely justifiable and does NOT violate the international laws.
Also there is no way of finding who fired at the hospital (actually only one incident is recorded.) , because shelling came from BOTH sides and civilians fleeing the warzone gave witness to that.
Don&#8217;t u think it is better to get educated on the subject before repeating terrorist propaganda? Because it makes look stupid when facts are used by the other.
Many civilians of both sides had to suffer due to the war and that is why GOSL ended the war by eradicating the terrorist. Civilian deaths is sad but the reality is it is a norm in wars. There have never been a single war fought without civilian casualty. Also how much the writer tries to say this is a civilian institute it is heavily linked to the LTTE.

on your pet issue " Fishing in Lankan troubled waters" , take up with the Indian PDF cyber warriors thats not my problem !!!
I am currently tackling a cyber-warrior who runs away when faced with facts and come back changing the goal posts.
It is an irony when one is caring (one claims himself to be an athiest) more abt the religious structures damaged in a war zone while forgetting the destruction and robbing by a neighborhood thieves of the very livelihood of a people battered by war. And it is utmost HYPOCRACY.
 
.
The fact that Im implying that the need of the hour for our country is education and infrastructure rather than a useless temple must imply that Im asking for the destruction of all temples in india, right?
Clearly a temple in Sri Lanka will solve all of our problems....why didnt we think of this before!

they will be constructing the temple on private funds .... whats the big matter in it ??
 
.
If they construct with private funds then why did they say if they come to the power
If BJP stop the mockery of temple , saints and reject RSS puppet role then BJP surpass congress in every state and good for India.
 
.
what schools give us?

Schools give us pseudo marxists who believe in all the trash the media gives and vote for congress and talk about scams/terrorist incidents and do nothing about it.
 
.
:lol: shameless ......its funny you did not recommend breaking down mosques in pakistani and India so that your muslim community can build schools to exit the medieval mindset.

Building temples is a pure Hindu matter and should be non of your concern.

Temple in Sri Lanka will certainly solve some of 'Hindu problems'. Its IRONIC that we Hindus have to build a sita temple in Sri Lanka but cannot build a Ram Mandir in Ayodhya, INDIA wich is birth place of Ram. :cheesy::cheesy:

After identifying your religion your political affiliation is no surprise.



You are a muslim who worship tipu sultan, a man who demolished temples and killed Hindus purely because they where Hindus......you are what I call a terrorist in waiting.

I suggest that you retract your statement. I am a Hindu and I support Peshwa's stance. Does that make me a "terrorist in waiting" as well? If an Indian Muslim puts his point of view across and it differs from yours, that doesn't qualify you to launch personal attacks on him. Your conduct is no different from some of the bigoted, radical, Pakistani members here. You are living in a secular democracy, approved by the majority of your countryfolk. Please respect that choice
 
.
I suggest that you retract your statement. I am a Hindu and I support Peshwa's stance. Does that make me a "terrorist in waiting" as well? If an Indian Muslim puts his point of view across and it differs from yours, that doesn't qualify you to launch personal attacks on him. Your conduct is no different from some of the bigoted, radical, Pakistani members here. You are living in a secular democracy, approved by the majority of your countryfolk. Please respect that choice

LOL ....and I suggest you stick your 'advice' up your @$$.

BTW why did you have the need to specify your were a 'Hindu' too ? you looking for brownie points ?

Are you Trying to suggest peshwa is a spokesperson for Indian muslims ? if not then you can stop twisting your panties.

I am not seeking a certificate from anyone that grants me 'permission' to launch attacks, personal or otherwise. Nor do i consider you qualified or relevant enough to issue 'certificates' for 'bigots'. You are too full of yourself.....maybe you need to grow up and smell something nasty.

I guess all pseudo secular have compulsive need to justify their self worth by issuing certificate to others :lol:

Last point is .....learn to 'respect' my choice too .....:disagree: or do sikulars 'respect' choice when they tally with their own ?
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom