Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What a wonderful Idea ...... we should start with demolishing all the temples in India..............Let me guess....u'r a congress supporter ?
@Peshwa .... I just remembered u'r that muslim indian who praises tipu sultan right ?
.......the name Peshwa misled me for a moment.
Actually Mahinda is more of a Hindu than a Buddhist. He truly believes in them, a very religious hindu and a believer of Sai Baba..
Why are u posting ur previous comment again. Didn’t read what I said or couldn’t understand? Either way, I said, destruction of temples in a war zone is a NATURAL THING. Only an idiot who has absolutely NO idea abt war would be amazed when temples are destroyed in war zone.
Mainly because ur LTTE fire at the army hiding from inside temples. Are u that much stupid to expect well-conditioned temples inside a war zone. And not any more temples are destroyed and the gov is renovating them
The bombing incident had shocked and deeply troubled the Tamil people. The
on going conflict has seen much aerial bombardment of the Tamil homeland.
Notorious among these incidents were the Navaly church bombing in 1995,
The Nagar Kovil school bombing of 1996 and the Puthukudiyiruppu market
bombing of 1999. But the Vallipunam bombing due perhaps to the fact that
most victims were innocent schoolgirls horrified most people. Adding insult to
injury was the blatant denial by the state that the victims were schoolgirls and
the puerile attempt to describe them as child soldiers.
utter rubbish and stop fooling yourself , the president of Buddhist Lanka is a staunch Roman Catholic, the rest is all gimmicks to fool people
The fact that Im implying that the need of the hour for our country is education and infrastructure rather than a useless temple must imply that Im asking for the destruction of all temples in india, right?
Clearly a temple in Sri Lanka will solve all of our problems....why didnt we think of this before!
I dont know how i can compete with such logic...
And my affiliation to political parties should not be of concern to you..
So if Im a muslim...what about it?
@<u><a href="http://www.defence.pk/forums/member.php?u=145520" target="_blank">manlion</a></u>
Between why dont u ask Tamil brethren in TN to stop poaching SL waters and depreive SL tamil fishermen from their livelihood. It is much better than making ur self an idiot in an internet forum.
What an idiot.. So anybody who meets with his holiness has to be Catholic in your logic?? For you information madam Shiranthi Rajapaksa is indeed Catholic and the presidents cousin is a Hindu Tamil (who was attacked in TN recently by morons like you)
Sinhala logic - anyone raising Tamil Lankan issue has to be "Hindu Tamil moron" but Sinhalese "Buddhist" married to a Catholic visiting 'his holiness' 3 times after the war is just for friendly chit chat ?
Actually me being a Lankan is against it. For me the number 1 reason is, the proposed place Seetha eliya is an environmentally sensitive place. So having a temple there which would attract many devotees can harm the ecological balance. And we already have enough temples in this country.The fact that Im implying that the need of the hour for our country is education and infrastructure rather than a useless temple must imply that Im asking for the destruction of all temples in india, right?
Clearly a temple in Sri Lanka will solve all of our problems....why didnt we think of this before!
Just because he poses for a photo with the Pope doesn’t make him a Roman Catholic. (Are u that dumb? )His wife is a catholic. When he was in SL since the time he was an MP he was a strong Sai follower. Many in SL knw that as a fact. Also he is a huge devotee of Thirupathi temple in India. He visits it very often. As far as I knw he used to be a huge devotee at Thirupathi even before he became known to the world as president of SL. I remember seeing photos of him in thirupathi in local newspapers. Actually he visits this temples whenever he meets with a difficult situation in his political life to get blessings.utter rubbish and stop fooling yourself , the president of Buddhist Lanka is a staunch Roman Catholic, the rest is all gimmicks to fool people
What I meant by saying destruction of temples is natural in a war zone, I meant it can be subjected to gun fire in the middle of war fare like every other building. I didn’t say the temples are destroyed due to natural consequences. (how can people be this dumb!) So my two sentences are not contrary to each other but supportive of each claim. Please develop ur comprehension skills cos its difficult to make u understand something.How you spin your tale, this is what you claimed before
Make up your mind , so which is correct ? your first claim or the second , destruction of temples in war zone is "natural" ?
Guerilla tac tic DOESN’T mean the guerilla army does not fight urban war fare. Actually LTTE did fight conventional war fare time to time. LTTE was not a static organization. It eveolved from time to time. You can say LTTE was a complete guerilla unit in later 1987-88. But after IPKF saga LTTE evoloved and became something more than a guerilla group confined to jungles. They started controlling areas for the first time. They became a terrorist army controlling a part of SL republic and creating a de facto state inside SL. They were not a mere guerilla unit.Let me brief you, LTTE did not fight an urban war fare, it's strategy was mainly guerrilla tactic of hit and run, attacking miltary camps, bases, installations and convoys.
Lets see what a civilian is, just because one is in civilian clothes doesn’t necessarily make him a civilian. LTTE had many of its carders in civilian clothes. Also they had a strategy of dressing their dead fighters in civilian clothes to give the impression that the dead are civilians.However, the lankan army retaliated it loss by attacking civilian who are asked to take shelter in schools, hospitals , temples and churches by dropping leaflets
Many civilians of both sides had to suffer due to the war and that is why GOSL ended the war by eradicating the terrorist. Civilian deaths is sad but the reality is it is a norm in wars. There have never been a single war fought without civilian casualty. Also how much the writer tries to say this is a civilian institute it is heavily linked to the LTTE.Aerial Terror results in massacre of innocents
transcurrents » Aerial Terror results in massacre of innocents
I am currently tackling a cyber-warrior who runs away when faced with facts and come back changing the goal posts.on your pet issue " Fishing in Lankan troubled waters" , take up with the Indian PDF cyber warriors thats not my problem !!!
The fact that Im implying that the need of the hour for our country is education and infrastructure rather than a useless temple must imply that Im asking for the destruction of all temples in india, right?
Clearly a temple in Sri Lanka will solve all of our problems....why didnt we think of this before!
shameless ......its funny you did not recommend breaking down mosques in pakistani and India so that your muslim community can build schools to exit the medieval mindset.
Building temples is a pure Hindu matter and should be non of your concern.
Temple in Sri Lanka will certainly solve some of 'Hindu problems'. Its IRONIC that we Hindus have to build a sita temple in Sri Lanka but cannot build a Ram Mandir in Ayodhya, INDIA wich is birth place of Ram.
After identifying your religion your political affiliation is no surprise.
You are a muslim who worship tipu sultan, a man who demolished temples and killed Hindus purely because they where Hindus......you are what I call a terrorist in waiting.
I suggest that you retract your statement. I am a Hindu and I support Peshwa's stance. Does that make me a "terrorist in waiting" as well? If an Indian Muslim puts his point of view across and it differs from yours, that doesn't qualify you to launch personal attacks on him. Your conduct is no different from some of the bigoted, radical, Pakistani members here. You are living in a secular democracy, approved by the majority of your countryfolk. Please respect that choice