‘Bill to ban Jamaat on way’

[somebozo]

1. Most Islamic scholars in Bangladesh are against Jamat.

2. The party are known for corruption e.g. their leaders took money earmarked for Rohingyas and put it in their own pockets according to comments I read by @asad71 bhai.

3. Most of the lower cadres are attracted to them by positive and admirable things, but they are naive to the fact that the senior leadership of Jamat are corrupt and interested in power and wealth.

I have had a chance to see the inner workings of Jamat very closely..both Tableeghi Jamat as well as Jamat e Islami.
These people could earn their names in Guiness Book for their ingenious corruption!

 

[scholseys]

I have had a chance to see the inner workings of Jamat very closely..both Tableeghi Jamat as well as Jamat e Islami.
These people could earn their names in Guiness Book for their ingenious corruption!

During BNP's term jamaat was given the task of 2 ministries, you would not find a single case of corruption from those, not one. They ran them perfectly.

 

[Kaniska]

Jute and Textiles Minister Abdul Latif Siddiqui said on Tuesday that a bill seeking a ban on the Jamaat-e-Islami and its student wing would be placed in the current parliament in line with the demand of the ongoing nationwide mass movement.
183
14
2 Siddiqui, also a Presidium Member of the ruling Awami League, said the bill was being drafted.

Deputy Leader of Parliament Syeda Sajeda Chowdhury backed his comment and said the demand for banning the party, which officially opposed the creation of Bangladesh as an independent country in 1971, was indeed of many political parties.



“But now it has become a national demand,” she said.

“We are discussing the issue, a process is on. It will take some time,” she said.

The leaders made the statement when they joined Tuesday’s three-minute silence at the Central Shaheed Minar demanding execution of Jamaat leader Abdul Quader Molla and other war criminals.

Millions of people across the country joined their hands and expressed their solidarity with the Shahbagh movement by holding a three-minute silence at 4pm on Tuesday to press for execution of all war criminals.

On Monday, the protesters from the centre stage at Shahbagh, named as Ganajagaran Manch, called upon the countrymen to stand three minutes in silence.

Sheikh Fazlul Karim Selim, also a Presidium Member of the Awami League, said a national consensus was needed to ban the party.

http://bdnews24.com/politics/2013/02/12/bill-to-ban-jamaat-on-way

I am not sure what would be the reaction of the sane posters from BD....But politically it is a unwise move....You are simply making a non significant political player of your nation to a martyr...If people are really not intrested for the political party of JI...Let them perish in the natural way rather than banning them and providing much needed breather to them...

 

[scholseys]

Protests held against Bangladesh war crimes trial - YouTube

 

[Hammer-fist]

I have had a chance to see the inner workings of Jamat very closely..both Tableeghi Jamat as well as Jamat e Islami.
These people could earn their names in Guiness Book for their ingenious corruption!

I don't believe you.

You must be an "Indian secret agent", "RAW operative", "communist" or "Awami supporter".

*sarcasm*

This is the "quality" of the discussion in this sub-forum amongst the Jamati gang here (who are actually worse and call people "malauns", "Awami thugs" etc).

 

[Agnostic_Indian]

I want to tell sane Bangladeshi members of this forum that most of the India members joined here on pdf with a favourable view towards Bangladesh..but here what awaited us is irrational India blaming and rants from jamathi supporters, so we also started replying on the same coin to them.regardless of what they say we still see Bangladesh as a friendly country who has great respect for democracy and secularism.

 

[kalu_miah]

Ban Jamat, it will be good for Bangladesh, the workers and activists will simply join BNP minus the old leaders, who are a liability and baggage for BNP.

 

[kalu_miah]

I want to tell sane Bangladeshi members of this forum that most of the India members joined here on pdf with a favourable view towards Bangladesh..but here what awaited us is irrational India blaming and rants from jamathi supporters, so we also started replying on the same coin to them.regardless of what they say we still see Bangladesh as a friendly country who has great respect for democracy and secularism.

Truth hurts.

 

[ShadowFaux]

I want to tell sane Bangladeshi members of this forum that most of the India members joined here on pdf with a favourable view towards Bangladesh..but here what awaited us is irrational India blaming and rants from jamathi supporters, so we also started replying on the same coin to them.regardless of what they say we still see Bangladesh as a friendly country who has great respect for democracy and secularism.

Don't listen to these Jamati crap. They are still pissed at India for helping Bangladesh.

 

[bdslph]

banning Jammat can be counter productive

 

[Spring Onion]

BAN? by whom? By Rawami ?

and that will be "national demand" as per rawami ?

so if its a national demand why not to let it contest elections and be eliminated by the nation not by political victimisation.

 

[Echo_419]

banning Jammat can be counter productive

Abe bhoot jamat ki..…........ Toh lag gayi
Abb unko koi nahi bachapayega

 

[Spring Onion]

I want to tell sane Bangladeshi members of this forum that most of the India members joined here on pdf with a favourable view towards Bangladesh..but here what awaited us is irrational India blaming and rants from jamathi supporters, so we also started replying on the same coin to them.regardless of what they say we still see Bangladesh as a friendly country who has great respect for democracy and secularism.

yeh just check the BSF shooting Bangladeshis threads and we all can see the Indian favour in form of calling for shooting all Bangladeshis / calling Bangladeshis as poorest and so on

 

[SamantK]

BAN? by whom? By Rawami ?

and that will be "national demand" as per rawami ?

so if its a national demand why not to let it contest elections and be eliminated by the nation not by political victimisation.

4.7% votes is good enough a number to declare them eliminated, they are able to survive even after this means they have some dubious funding, is that so @ShadowFaux @Hammer-fist ?

 

[ShadowFaux]

BAN? by whom? By Rawami ?

and that will be "national demand" as per rawami ?

so if its a national demand why not to let it contest elections and be eliminated by the nation not by political victimisation.

Jamat has 4.6/4.7% votes only. Wouldn't matter if they participate in the elections. But people of Bangladesh don't want war-criminals doing politics in Bangladesh.