Juggernaut_Flat_Plane_V8
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2017
- Messages
- 3,309
- Reaction score
- -7
- Country
- Location
I have been perfectly coherent. It is you who disregards the elephant in the room.
Your fundamental problem is that the IVC originated in Pakistan. Ours is an older nation than yours. Even the genetic tests on the Rakhigiri specimen confirm her origins in Pakistan. The major consequential bone of contention for you and other pseudo-secularists is that Hinduism's roots lie in Pakistan on the banks of the Indus, not in India on the Gangetic plains. You and I both know that this alone is the reason that Delhi MUST maintain its claim over Pakistani history. This is the true challenge for those of your ilk. Imagine the furore in temples across the land if history books taught "Hinduism's roots lie in ancient Pakistan". You people would cut your own livers out in rage, starting with the oh so adorable little "show-secularists".
Be proud of your parts of the IVC by all means, but dissociate yourselves from our parts ...if you think you can.
View attachment 725862
You guys dissociate from our parts first..stop claiming Rakhigarhi specimen...Find your own bones and do genetic testing on them .In your own map Rakhigarhi is not even covered within the IVC range..so why claim the Rakhigarhi genes in your post? Decoherence much?.....There is a way to resolve this in an intelligent manner with nuance, but Pakistani posters on PDF (I am talking of intelligent ones like @Indus Pakistan and others) have been reluctant to show that nuance on this topic....