Bigoted hatred of Muslims at 'epidemic' level: UN chief

[lightoftruth]

We love that filth like you despise us. Heaven protect all Muslims from the day when people like you start liking us and trying to be our buddies.

I don't despise all muslims.

Thought of Non Believers being friendly with muslims must be terrifying to you, DAR AL HARB concept would be invalid....

 

[Titanium100]

Indians have to give respect where it is due 1000 years says that the hindu by right has to respect his step-father or become an adopted son again. These are the only 2 options

 

[waz]

okay wikipedia says the Thai Islamic insurgency is still ongoing. Just a lull in the fighting. Muslims still want to take and Buddhists don't want them to take. Plus, Buddhists have a VERY bad history with Islam. Wiki decline of Buddhism in the Indian subcontinent.

the chart you show does not include Canada. I only spoke of Canada (and Thailand).

"According to the surveys conducted by the Angus Reid Institute (ARI), 24% of the Canadians had a favorable opinion of Islam in 2013 which increased to 34% in the 2016 survey and in Quebec, it increased from 16% in 2013 to 32% in 2016."

Islam in Canada - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

You haven’t got a clue about Thailand sorry. The fact you are going to wiki says a great deal. Do also look at how started the decline in Buddhism in India, it wasn’t Muslims.
Canada fair enough, views can change.
Look at how many nations I put up in the link.

 

[masterchief_mirza]

I don't despise all muslims.

Thought of Non Believers being friendly with muslims must be terrifying to you, DAR AL HARB concept would be invalid....

I was quite clear. People like you make my skin crawl. That doesn't equate to "non-believers" as a group.

 

[KurtisBrian]

You haven’t got a clue about Thailand sorry.
Canada fair enough, views can change.
Look at how many nations I put up in the link.

exactly. Views can change.

 

[lightoftruth]

You and your idiotic friend @lightoftruth need to read what you drool over very carefully before posting...

"Five thousand years ago, when the peoples of Europe were hauling stones across the face of the continent and grubbing out a meager existence, Indians throughout what is now western and southern Pakistan and Punjab, and even farther to the East, were living in elaborately designed cities, with sturdy houses, broad, straight roads, public baths, and drainage systems that were hardly equaled until the Roman era three thousand years later.."

IVC is your chacha once again, even in your own posts. Modern India owes its very composition to the lands of ancient Pakistan.

You and your comprehension skills are disturbingly poor.
Read it again ,you might get what's written their.
Nobody I repeat nobody outside your books have heard of "ancient pakistan"

 

[Hassan Guy]

Numbers don't matter, Israelis are tiny they still kick every muslim neighbouring country.

Islam is growing in the most poor areas be in economically, technologically or anything.

By going like this It might grow in numbers but never in value addition or respect.

Its odd you say this when one of the largest and fastest growing muslim populations is in India.

 

[masterchief_mirza]

You and your comprehension skills are disturbingly poor.
Read it again ,you might get what's written their.
Nobody I repeat nobody outside your books have heard of "ancient pakistan"

The author refers to "Indians" in Pakistani territories.

Praytell, what "Indians" lived in Pakistani territories? Did they carry a NRC card with them?

"Indians" simply refers to the inhabitants of the subcontinent.

Ever heard of the West Indies? Or the Dutch East Indies? This may surprise you, but their inhabitants are also loosely referred to as West or East "Indians". "India" is used in an orientalist mannerism, referring to a geographic region, not the secular republic of India.

Your people decided to adopt the word "India" in 1947 for your nation by simple happenstance or opportunism even. You're no more "Indian" than the people of the IVC. Indeed, you're arguably less Indian, because you don't control the Indus Valley. "Ancient India" has no connection with the lands of the Ganges. Ancient India as referenced by the Greeks, Persians and colonial powers in their history books referred to the Indus Valley first and foremost. The Indus Valley was inhabited by those whose descendants live in Pakistan now. It's none of your concern.

 

[Mirzah]

Everyone in the world ......Atheists, Christians Jews, Hindus,Buddhists etc hate muslims ?

Ever thought why ?

Are all of them bigoted ? Or it is just a stupid generalisation to avoid the necessary introspection and keep continuing with the victim card.

why hindus hate musims? because we eat beef, armed separatist movement in Kashmir, hindu women marrying muslim men

 

[Baibars_1260]

okay wikipedia says the Thai Islamic insurgency is still ongoing. Just a lull in the fighting. Muslims still want to take and Buddhists don't want them to take. Plus, Buddhists have a VERY bad history with Islam. Wiki decline of Buddhism in the Indian subcontinent.

the chart you show does not include Canada. I only spoke of Canada (and Thailand).

"According to the surveys conducted by the Angus Reid Institute (ARI), 24% of the Canadians had a favorable opinion of Islam in 2013 which increased to 34% in the 2016 survey and in Quebec, it increased from 16% in 2013 to 32% in 2016."

Islam in Canada - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Are Muslims the only nasty ones?
Manipur in NE India is Hindu. Apart from Kashmir it is the only other province governed under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act. basically it is under martial law.

The Manipuris protest differently though ( Link , Viewer Discretion advised ) .

 

[Juggernaut_Flat_Plane_V8]

You and your idiotic friend @lightoftruth need to read what you drool over very carefully before posting...

"Five thousand years ago, when the peoples of Europe were hauling stones across the face of the continent and grubbing out a meager existence, Indians throughout what is now western and southern Pakistan and Punjab, and even farther to the East, were living in elaborately designed cities, with sturdy houses, broad, straight roads, public baths, and drainage systems that were hardly equaled until the Roman era three thousand years later.."

IVC is your chacha once again, even in your own posts. Modern India owes its very composition to the lands of ancient Pakistan.

Fixed that for you..Indians descend from people of Lothal,Dholavira,Rakhagarhi

Pakistanis descend from Mohenjodaro and Harappa

Stop claiming our heritage and in turn we will stop claiming yours...Deal?

 

[masterchief_mirza]

Fixed that for you..Indians descend from people of Lothal,Dholavira,Rakhagiri

Pakistanis descend from Mohenjodaro and Harappa

Stop claiming our heritage and in turn we will stop claiming yours...Deal?

Genetic descent is more complex than that and I won't go into details here.

I am referring to the erroneous alignment of the Secular Republic of India with the term "ancient India". It is sheer, unabashed and unadulterated coincidence, nothing more, that your nation state shares its name with the generic historical term used for an entire subcontinent. This does not give the secular republic of India sole authority or legacy rights over all matters "Indian". Contrarily, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and even Sri Lanka and Nepal are all also successor states to what you call "ancient India", they all occupy their respective positions in this regard.

India and Pakistan have the biggest bone of contention though, because India has shamelessly usurped Pakistan's heritage by unilaterally declaring itself the sole heir of subcontinental legacy. This is fallacious and rests solely on this notion described above that the word "India" automatically confers such authority. Pakistanis are also to blame because the need to dissociate ourselves from modern India has created this unwanted side-effect wherein we have often suppressed "ancient Indian" history simply because of its unfortunate nomenclatural circumstances.

If your country had been birthed correctly as "Gangadesh", we wouldn't have this problem - you would enjoy your bit and we would enjoy ours. This is very much why Jinnah originally objected to you lot using the word "India". He knew this dilemma would arise.

 

[masterchief_mirza]

Same issue with Greece and Northern Macedonia in their decades old spat. The nation variously referred to as FYROM or Northern Macedonia has finally relented and dissociated itself from laying false claim to Alexander of Macedon's heritage, which it was hitherto doing simply riding on the back of the fact that it has "Macedonia" in its name. In precisely the same way, the Secular Republic of India falsely claims anything connected with the Indus - Pakistan will resist this. Certainly, it's difficult because of the fossilisation of this erroneous alignment due to the word "India", nevertheless, we shall persevere.

India is a billion brainwashed and deluded people with editorial access to Wikipedia - it's a difficult fight, much harder than puny FYROM being put in its place by Alexander's true descendants. Nevertheless, we will overcome yours and Nehru's petulance.

 

[Juggernaut_Flat_Plane_V8]

Genetic descent is more complex than that and I won't go into details here.

I am referring to the erroneous alignment of the Secular Republic of India with the term "ancient India". It is sheer, unabashed and unadulterated coincidence, nothing more, that your nation state shares its name with the generic historical term used for an entire subcontinent. This does not give the secular republic of India sole authority or legacy rights over all matters "Indian". Contrarily, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and even Sri Lanka and Nepal are all also successor states to what you call "ancient India", they all occupy their respective positions in this regard.

India and Pakistan have the biggest bone of contention though, because India has shamelessly usurped Pakistan's heritage by unilaterally declaring itself the sole heir of subcontinental legacy. This is fallacious and rests solely on this notion described above that the word "India" automatically confers such authority. Pakistanis are also to blame because the need to dissociate ourselves from modern India has created this unwanted side-effect wherein we have often suppressed "ancient Indian" history simply because of its unfortunate nomenclatural circumstances.

If your country had been birthed correctly as "Gangadesh", we wouldn't have this problem - you would enjoy your bit and we would enjoy ours. This is very much why Jinnah originally objected to you lot using the word "India". He knew this dilemma would arise.

Stay on point .Just look at this map and see how much of IVC is in India..We have Usurped Nothing...We have protected the archaeological treasures on our side of the Border...Somethings of IVS are unique to India like the Sanauli Chariot

We have right to claim our part of IVC....you have right to claim your part as much aas you want

It is unfair for you to stop us from taking pride in the history of our territorry

Sanauli Chariot--------------------->sorry posted wrong pic








What do you expect us to do? stop researching IVC archaeology within our borders? Not maintain our own Archaeological Heritage?

Please be coherent while constructing a narrative about Pakistani nationalism OR Indus Nationalism ...Majority of Indians won't have problem with it...But they would certainly have problem if its incoherent and impinges on our history

 

[masterchief_mirza]

Stay on point .Just look at this map and see how much of IVC is in India..We have Usurped Nothing...We have protected the archaeological treasures on our side of the Border...Somethings of IVS are unique to India like the Sanauli Chariot

We have right to claim our part of IVC....you have right to claim your part as much aas you want

It is unfair for you to stop us from taking pride in the history of our territorry

Sanauli Chariot--------------------->sorry posted wrong pic








What do you expect us to do? stop researching IVC archaeology within our borders? Not maintain our own Archaeological Heritage?

Please be coherent while constructing a narrative about Pakistani nationalism OR Indus Nationalism ...Majority of Indians won't have problem with it...But they would certainly have problem if its incoherent and impinges on our history

I have been perfectly coherent. It is you who disregards the elephant in the room.

Your fundamental problem is that the IVC originated in Pakistan. Ours is an older nation than yours. Even the genetic tests on the Rakhigiri specimen confirm her origins in Pakistan. The major consequential bone of contention for you and other pseudo-secularists is that Hinduism's roots lie in Pakistan on the banks of the Indus, not in India on the Gangetic plains. You and I both know that this alone is the reason that Delhi MUST maintain its claim over Pakistani history. This is the true challenge for those of your ilk. Imagine the furore in temples across the land if history books taught "Hinduism's roots lie in ancient Pakistan". You people would cut your own livers out in rage, starting with the oh so adorable little "show-secularists".

Be proud of your parts of the IVC by all means, but dissociate yourselves from our parts ...if you think you can.