fallstuff
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2009
- Messages
- 9,441
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
And that's what i just said, in post 11.
To explain the rest.
The BD border guards were told not to retaliate by their commanders, because they have a tradition of firing on Indian policemen, border guards and the Army without provocation, calling it retaliation. This tradition goes right bacck to 65 and before. It was because of this that the BDR, now the BGB, were persuaded not to allow this so-called retaliation, because with a force like a BDR, every minor incident would have escalated into a shooting war.
It still can, if we fail to understand the problem of adjudicating incidents along such a long and complex border.
A self serving opinion without any credible source.