What's new

BGB-BSF celebrate Holi along border

No need to wonder, it will happen soon enough within our lifetimes. Then you can know for certain instead of wasting time wondering about it.

I am talking about present condition... when Indias per capita will reach 40000-45000 USD by that time US or Canada will reach more then 100K USD...

In terms of nominal I guess you are talking about what will happen after around 50 years if you remain alive up to that time....
 
.
This thread is not about Indian economy. Feel free to raise these questions in the Indian economy thread.

Also, we wish Bangladesh a good economy as well. Hope they can rise from poverty with us and we can co-operate along the way.
 
.
.
This thread is not about Indian economy. Feel free to raise these questions in the Indian economy thread.

Also, we wish Bangladesh a good economy as well. Hope they can rise from poverty with us and we can co-operate along the way.

Great .... India should more think of it self as it has 1/3 of the poor of the world... which is couple of times then the entire bangladeshi population... The way bangladesh has reduced unemployment in the last couple of years BD will reduce poverty also ... if everything goes well before India eliminate poverty...

Regarding cooperation ... there are no problem in it but only possible if India remain honest in this regard...
 
.
Great .... India should more think of it self as it has 1/3 of the poor of the world... which is couple of times then the entire bangladeshi population... The way bangladesh has reduced unemployment in the last couple of years BD will reduce poverty also ... if everything goes well before India eliminate poverty...

Regarding cooperation ... there are no problem in it but only possible if India remain honest in this regard...

Yes, we have a bigger challenge. The projections are that if we maintain the current growth rates, poverty will be in single digits by 2020 and very manageable with the resources available.

And yes, we need to be honest and so do you. I think India should go more than 3/4 of the way in creating good relations with Bangladesh. You need to cover the rest.
 
.
You are deluded and unable to look at reality.

You can go read the media reports of the time. Let me show one example.

The Sunday Times of London had reported, “It took only 12 days for the Indian Army to smash its way to Dacca, an achievement reminiscent of the German Blitzkrieg across France in 1940. The strategy was the same: speed, ferocity and flexibility”. The Army, of course, was not alone. The Indian Air Force, the Indian Navy and the Mukti Bahini helped to shape the victory.

If India really had so super duper army n it could win the war in 12 days why it took 10 months... when freedom fighters in this 10 month had almost achieved their goal...You can at best claim India provided assistance in the liberation war .... other then that it may take longer time instead of 9 month... but claiming such staff like it is India which has won the battle and other then India bangladesh would not get independence is utterly nonsense and disgusting ....
 
.
Yes, we have a bigger challenge. The projections are that if we maintain the current growth rates, poverty will be in single digits by 2020 and very manageable with the resources available.

And yes, we need to be honest and so do you. I think India should go more than 3/4 of th way in creating good relations with Bangladesh. You need to cover the rest.

Just look at the present trend... 100% co operation is from bangladesh but 0% from India other then some empty promise... just let me know what India has done for the development for bangladesh other then some empty promise...
 
.
If India really had so super duper army n it could win the war in 12 days why it took 10 months... when freedom fighters in this 10 month had almost achieved their goal...

It's called strategising dude, something you might not understand. We needed 10 months to train the millions of Bangladeshis who had illegally crossed into India. We also waited for winters to set in so as to limit war fronts in Kashmir. Winters also meant that Chinese govt. wouldn't be able to help the Pakistanis over land.

You strike your enemy when he's at his weekest. Probably like how General Tikka struck on the night of 25/26 March 1971.
 
.
If India really had so super duper army n it could win the war in 12 days why it took 10 months... when freedom fighters in this 10 month had almost achieved their goal...You can at best claim India provided assistance in the liberation war .... other then that it may take longer time instead of 9 month... but claiming such staff like it is India which has won the battle and other then India bangladesh would not get independence is utterly nonsense and disgusting ....

Indian army entered the war on 3 December 1971 and secured the surrender on 16 December.

Mukti fought bravely. They simply didn't have the resources needed to fight a regular army that was completely ruthless.

I am saying it was a "jot", an alliance. The role of India was critical but freedom was ultimately won because you fought for it and wanted it badly.

Now, if there had been no IA, the genocide would have gone on and you won't have had a Bangladesh.
 
.
It's called strategising dude, something you might not understand. We needed 10 months to train the millions of Bangladeshis who had illegally crossed into India. We also waited for winters to set in so as to limit war fronts in Kashmir. Winters also meant that Chinese govt. wouldn't be able to help the Pakistanis over land.

You strike your enemy when he's at his weekest. Probably like how General Tikka struck on the night of 25/26 March 1971.

Actually the PRC issue was nullified by going into the 20 years treaty with Soviet, I just wish his father was as smart as Indira was!
 
.
Just look at the present trend... 100% co operation is from bangladesh but 0% from India other then some empty promise... just let me know what India has done for the development for bangladesh other then some empty promise...

You say that there is no cooperation from India, yet the BSF decides to use non-lethal ammo on Bangladeshi illegal cross border immigrants, a luxury we don't even provide for our own population!!!
 
.
Just look at the present trend... 100% co operation is from bangladesh but 0% from India other then some empty promise... just let me know what India has done for the development for bangladesh other then some empty promise...

Indo Bangla relations have been bad for much of the time. Your politicians love to make anti India noises and even shelter ULFA leaders.

That makes things difficult. Also any Indian help is seen as a sellout in your country.

But hopefully things are getting better. I would want India to help you more and your leaders to not be as anti India for that to happen.

Several Indian investments are happening now, in telecom, automobile etc. Also in infrastructure projects.
 
. .
Sorry, my history is a bit week. Can you provide the details of this treaty?

Indira Gandhi launched a diplomatic offensive in the early autumn of 1971 touring Europe, and was successful in getting both the United Kingdom and France to break with the United States, and block any pro-Pakistan directives in the United Nations security council. Gandhi’s greatest coup was on 9 August when she signed a twenty-year treaty of friendship and co-operation with the Soviet Union, greatly shocking the United States, and decreasing the possibility that the People’s Republic of China would become involved in the conflict. China, an ally of Pakistan, had been providing moral support, but little military aid, and did not advance troops to its border with India.

Also relevant the extracts of Indira's speech to India League, London.

“I do not want to say that the refugee problem is a small one-9,000,000 people can never be small, no matter where they are-and certainly to have 9,000,000 extra people at a time when you can ill afford to look after your own people is not an easy task. But the problem of Bangla Desh is not merely the problem of the refugees in India. It is a far deeper problem and one which affects us in many ways. The refugees have highlighted the problem for us in India because they have posed not only a tremendous economic burden, they have created social problems, political problems and, above all, the question of the security, the stability and the integrity of India. We are equally concerned with the tragedy which is taking place outside of our country. Rarely has the world witnessed the sort of atrocities and barbarities which we hear described by the refugees who are daily pouring in.
People have asked me how long can India manage? Actually that date has long since been passed. I feel that I am sitting on the top of a volcano and I honestly do not know when it is going to erupt. So the question is not of how restrained we are today, but of what will happen across the border. We think this is the responsibility of the international community to see that a way out is found. Obviously, the best way, the most humane way, is to have a political settlement and that political settlement can only be with the elected leader of the people of Bangla Desh, and with the elected and accepted representatives of that country.”


Bangladesh Genocide Archive » Role of India
 
.
How did India's friendship treaty with Soviet Union affect China? Why didn't they provide any military support to Pakistan?
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom