What's new

Best way to implement Sharia in Pakistan ???

Sharia deals with many topics addressed by secular law, including crime, politics, and economics, as well as personal matters such as sexual intercourse, hygiene, diet, prayer, everyday etiquette and fasting. Though interpretations of sharia vary between cultures, in its strictest and most historically coherent definition it is considered the infallible law of God—as opposed to the human interpretation of the laws (fiqh). Historically however, much of Sharia has been implemented in its strictest understanding.

There are two primary sources of sharia law: the precepts set forth in the Quranic verses (ayahs), and the example set by the Islamic prophet Muhammad in the Sunnah.[6] Where it has official status, sharia is interpreted by Islamic judges (qadis) with varying responsibilities for the religious leaders (imams). For questions not directly addressed in the primary sources, the application of sharia is extended through consensus of the religious scholars (ulama) thought to embody the consensus of the Muslim Community (ijma). Islamic jurisprudence will also sometimes incorporate analogies from the Quran and Sunnah through qiyas, though many scholars also prefer reasoning ('aql) to analogy.
...

The origin of sharia is the Qu'ran, and traditions gathered from the life of the Islamic Prophet Muhammad (born ca. 570 CE in Mecca).[43]

Sharia underwent fundamental development, beginning with the reigns of caliphs Abu Bakr (632–34) and Umar (634–44), during which time many questions were brought to the attention of Muhammad's closest comrades for consultation.[44] During the reign of Muawiya b. Abu Sufyan ibn Harb, ca. 662 CE, Islam undertook an urban transformation, raising questions not originally covered by Islamic law.[44] Since then, changes in Islamic society have played an ongoing role in developing sharia, which branches out into fiqh and Qanun respectively.

The formative period of fiqh stretches back to the time of the early Muslim communities. In this period, jurists were more concerned with pragmatic issues of authority and teaching than with theory.[45] Progress in theory happened with the coming of the early Muslim jurist Muhammad ibn Idris ash-Shafi'i (767–820), who laid down the basic principles of Islamic jurisprudence in his book Al-Risala. The book details the four roots of law (Quran, Sunnah, ijma, and qiyas) while specifying that the primary Islamic texts (the Quran and the hadith) be understood according to objective rules of interpretation derived from careful study of the Arabic language.[46]

A number of important legal concepts and institutions were developed by Islamic jurists during the classical period of Islam, known as the Islamic Golden Age, dated from the 7th to 13th centuries.[47][48][49][50]

Among some Muslims, tribal laws were adapted to conform to sharia "for they could not form part of the tribal law unless and until they were generally accepted as such."[51] Additionally, Noel James Coulson, Lecturer in Islamic law of the University of London, states that "to the tribe as a whole belonged the power to determine the standards by which its members should live. But here the tribe is conceived not merely as the group of its present representatives but as a historical entity embracing past, present, and future generations."[51] So, while "each and every law must be rooted in either the Quran or the Sunnah,"[52] without contradiction, tribal life brought about a sense of participation. Such participation was further reinforced by Muhammad who stated, "My community will never agree in error".[52]

The Umayyads initiated the office of appointing qadis, or Islamic judges. The jurisdiction of the qadi extended only to Muslims, while non-Muslim populations retained their own legal institutions.[53] The qadis were usually pious specialists in Islam. As these grew in number, they began to theorize and systemize Islamic jurisprudence.[54] The Abbasid made the institution of qadi independent from the government, but this separation wasn't always respected.[55]

Both the Umayyad caliph Umar II and the Abbasids had agreed that the caliph could not legislate contrary to the Quran or the sunnah. Imam Shafi'i declared: "a tradition from the Prophet must be accepted as soon as it become known...If there has been an action on the part of a caliph, and a tradition from the Prophet to the contrary becomes known later, that action must be discarded in favor of the tradition from the Prophet." Thus, under the Abbasids the main features of sharia were definitively established and sharia was recognized as the law of behavior for Muslims.[56]

During the 19th century, the history of Islamic law took a sharp turn due to new challenges the Muslim world faced: the West had risen to a global power and colonized a large part of the world, including Muslim territories. In the Western world, societies changed from the agricultural to the industrial stage, new social and political ideas emerged, and social models slowly shifted from hierarchical towards egalitarian. The Ottoman Empire and the rest of the Muslim world were in decline, and calls for reform became louder.

In Muslim countries, codified state law started replacing the role of scholarly legal opinion. Western countries sometimes inspired, sometimes pressured, and sometimes forced Muslim states to change their laws. Secularist movements pushed for laws deviating from the opinions of the Islamic legal scholars. Islamic legal scholarship remained the sole authority for guidance in matters of rituals, worship, and spirituality, while they lost authority to the state in other areas.[citation needed]

The Muslim community became divided into groups reacting differently to the change: secularists believe that the law of the state should be based on secular principles, not on Islamic legal doctrines; traditionalists believe that the law of the state should be based on the traditional legal schools;[57] reformers believe that new Islamic legal theories can produce modernized Islamic law[58] and lead to acceptable opinions in areas such as women's rights.[59] This division persists until the present day (Brown 1996, Hallaq 2001, Ramadan 2005, Aslan 2006, Safi 2003, Nenezich 2006).

There has been a growing religious revival in Islam, beginning in the eighteenth century and continuing today. This movement has expressed itself in various forms ranging from wars to efforts towards improving education.[60]

Sharia - Ask.com Encyclopedia

Qanun
Laws and regulations enacted by a government. Qanun were meant to be supplements to Islamic law in matters it left insufficiently regulated. Under the Ottoman sultans, qanun became an integral part of the legal system, especially in the administrative, fiscal, and penal domains. The sultan's prerogative to enforce customary practices deemed publicly beneficial was a main justification of qanun. In the modern era, qanun gradually became a generic name for all laws and regulations. Similar developments took place in other Muslim countries under such different names as dustur and nizam.

QANUN
Qanun (pl. qawanin) is a word that apparently entered into Arabic from Greek, although according to some reports it might have been borrowed from Persian or Latin or have meant the "way to something" or its measurement in old Arabic. The word, however, has come to have broad meanings including a particular musical instrument, known simply as al-qanun, tax assessments, state taxes and tariffs, registers and lists, land measurements, and also rules and regulations. In modern times, qanun generally refers to state law, although the word is often used to signify guiding rules, customs, and principles. In both premodern and modern times, qanun often referred to secular laws and administrative rules, as opposed to religious laws or shari˓a. The word was often used in the titles of books written as early as the tenth century. The titles of some of these books included: al-Qawanin al-shar˓iyya (The principles of shari˓a), Qawanin al-ahkam al-shar'iyya (The principles of Islamic law), Tashrih al-qanun (The explanation of the law), Qawanin al-siyasa (The rules of governance), Qanun al-sa˓ada (Rules of conduct and principles of happiness), Qanun al-adab (Rules of good character), Qanun al-balagha (Rules of eloquence), Qanun fi al-tibb (Avicenna's book on medicine), and Qawanin al-riyada (Principles of mathematics). …

Qanun - Encyclopedia of Islam and the Muslim World | Encyclopedia.com
 
Last edited:
Sharia deals with many topics addressed by secular law, including crime, politics, and economics, as well as personal matters such as sexual intercourse, hygiene, diet, prayer, everyday etiquette and fasting. Though interpretations of sharia vary between cultures,.

Come on bro

The best you could do is cut-n-paste, cut-n-paste, cut-n-paste, cut-n-paste, cut-n-paste, cut-n-paste. you get the point hopefully.

look! For personal matters such as sexual intercourse, hygiene, diet, prayer, everyday etiquette and fasting etc.

There is no issue. you do your way of sex, pee pee, prayer etc and let others do what they want to do.
you don't have to implement this part of Sharia at all.

Duh. It is implemented already!




The issue(s) come in when bunch of Mullahs and Ayatullahs go way out of their league in 2014, and start barking about crime, politics, and economics.

This part of Sharia is epic fail.

It is epic fail now
And it was epic fail for centuries upon centuries. Why? All of the Khalifa's were in reality ditto copy of kings of their time. OK some were benevolent kings and the others were utterly bad.


So this part of Sharia cannot be implemented.

Hope you get the point now.
 
A brief introduction to Islamic Law

Islamic law is a complete legal system. It is not limited to “religious” aspects. Under Islam, all human behaviour is in some manner religious. Therefore, there is always a moral and immoral way of acting. There are, in fact, five classifications:

Wajib : Actions obligatory on Believers

Matlub : Desirable or recommended (but not obligatory) actions

Mubah : Indifferent actions

Makruh : Objectionable, but not forbidden actions

Haram : Prohibited actions

Islamic law deals with obligations, property, family law, criminal law, administrative law, etc. The religion of Islam and the government are one.

There are three words that are used to mean “law” in the Islamic tradition: fiqh, which can be loosely translated as jurisprudence; qanun, which encompasses positive law rules that are set, such as state-made law; and shari’a, the generic term for Islamic law. Shari’a denotes Islamic law as a whole. It is meaning was extended to cover all issues which were considered vital to human existence, including what God has decreed for the people in terms of fasting, prayer, pilgrimage, marriage, contracts, succession and war. Shari’a is thus the all-encompassing notion of the Islamic tradition; it contains written sources, qawanin (plural of qanun), and interpretations of those sources. In principle, the shari’a recognizes only two written sources: the Qur’an, the divine Book revealed to the Prophet Muhammad in the early 7th century AD, and the sunna, the reported compilation of the conversations (hadith) and deeds of the Prophet collected after his death by his Companions. The Qur’an counts approximately five hundred verses that deal with law and thus acts as foundational “Code” of sorts. This basic foundation lies under a heavy field of legal texts that were written by jurists. This is fiqh, which also means knowledge, understanding and comprehension. It refers to the legal rulings of the Muslim scholars, based on their knowledge of the shari’a; and as such is the third source of rulings. The science of fiqh started in the late 7th century AD, when the Islamic state expanded and faced several issues that were not explicitly covered in the Qur’an and Sunnah. These writings are interpretive and, although not strictly authoritative, are fundamental to the development of the law.

THE JURIST IN ISLAM

The jurist is Islam, is both a legal and religious expert. Muslim jurists have been known by different titles. Fuqaha are the class of Muslim scholars who dealt in theoretical Islamic Law, or fiqh while a mufti gives legal responses (fatwa) to people’s questions. It is the mufti, or jurisconsult, that attracts attention.

In order to be qualified to interpret the sources of law, a jurist had to master many branches of knowledge. Deep knowledge of the Qur’an and the hadith are essential of course, as well as an understanding of the science of interpreting these sources. his learning would be done at the hands of another learned man, by following in his footsteps and by attending meetings at assemblies . Knowing the history of the law and the schools of law, their differences and legal precedents (“decisions” of other jurists in the past) is also part of the curriculum. Other disciplines such as logic, history, rhetoric and general knowledge as well as specialized areas like commerce or international relations might be important in deciding specific cases. Being proficient in commercial matters was expected. Indeed, most jurists were also merchants and tradesmen. Muslim jurists were scholars with specialized professional training, but their authority was very limited. There is no clergy or priesthood in Islam, and no central authority hands out final judgments. The source of a Muslim jurist’s authority comes only from their recognized knowledge, not from the government, and not from a central religious authority. Judges (Qadi) are appointed and have the backing and support of the states. But judges’ rulings, however, are not the foundation of Islamic law, but only its application to specific cases and often, one could go directly to a mufti to resolve an issue and avoid the appearance in front of a judge.

Islamic Law thus allowed affluent learned people to become legally authoritative. These men become authoritative if they could, by a discussion, internal to the community, agree or supplant the arguments of the other. The common pattern for jurist-made law is as follows: (1) law is not created primarily by legislation or by judges, (2) in their capacity as jurists, these individuals are largely independent of government, (3) their prestige, fundamental for their role, is independent of any job that they hold, indeed being a jurist was not a profession: they took no money for their services, (4) the materials on which they work are usually older, regarded as authoritative, but are insufficient and require a great deal of interpretation. Islamic law is religious; and religious law is a search for fundamental truth. But the shari’a is “of this world and the other”. In other words, it is both religious law as well as civil law. In modern times it has even extended to cover web-surfing and cellular phone usage.

The role of the Islamic jurist in the incorporation of “foreign” ideas to the shari’a can therefore be seen as primordial. It is the jurist that became the link between the customary interactions of the population and the written qawanin. By analogy and reasoning, the mufti rationalized behaviours to fit general principles of law. Unlike the judge, who deals with discreet matters, the jurist must account for dialectic reasoning when rendering opinions. This adds to the law an analytical thread giving regard to broad ideas and notions as well as “on the ground” policy concerns. Jurist-made law is thus a way to systemize popular behavioural interaction into broad notions of justice. The Volkgeist is thus “sublimated” from society and “synthesized” back to the people.

It is the unique structure of jurist dominated legal systems that allows them to be so malleable to outside influence. In addition, Islam is individualist and decentralized. This decentralization does not allow for a predominant figure to emerge or a unique set of ideas to dominate. It is because of the looseness of this structure, the liberalism of the institutions, that external influence is particularly strong on Islamic Law. In essence, any rule that makes sense will find at least some followers.

A brief introduction to Islamic Law | Jurizone

So where lies the difference with "secular" laws? in the form or in the essence?
 
Come on bro

The best you could do is cut-n-paste, cut-n-paste, cut-n-paste, cut-n-paste, cut-n-paste, cut-n-paste. you get the point hopefully.

look! For personal matters such as sexual intercourse, hygiene, diet, prayer, everyday etiquette and fasting etc.

There is no issue. you do your way of sex, pee pee, prayer etc and let others do what they want to do.
you don't have to implement this part of Sharia at all.

Duh. It is implemented already!




The issue(s) come in when bunch of Mullahs and Ayatullahs go way out of their league in 2014, and start barking about crime, politics, and economics.

This part of Sharia is epic fail.

It is epic fail now
And it was epic fail for centuries upon centuries. Why? All of the Khalifa's were in reality ditto copy of kings of their time. OK some were benevolent kings and the others were utterly bad.


So this part of Sharia cannot be implemented.

Hope you get the point now.

Those are hygiene guidelines to prevent diseases! they are all health oriented if you have not noticed it. Even in West they still promote condoms since personal hygiene is lacking,,, for instance
 
you spreading hate about the beautiful religion of Islam? just because the thread is boring.

Wow.

Didn't realize it was your mission.

Im spreading hate because this topic is retarded. And we need to loosen up on our religion if we ever want to be considered respectful. This doesnt mean badmouthing, this means let others do and just dont care.
 
Those are hygiene guidelines to prevent diseases! they are all health oriented if you have not noticed it. Even in West they still promote condoms since personal hygiene is lacking,,, for instance

hygine practices in the West (among educated class) have already far exceeded any values that Islamic societies have at this point.

The best any Islamic society can do is simply copy small portions of Western values.

you my bro is like trying to sell a donkey cart labeled as super racer.

Ain't gonna work (except with those who want to live in 8th cetury and want to show off their donkeys, carts and donkey brains).
 
hygine practices in the West (among educated class) have already far exceeded any values that Islamic societies have at this point.

The best any Islamic society can do is simply copy small portions of Western values.

you my bro is like trying to sell a donkey cart labeled as super racer.

Ain't gonna work (except with those who want to live in 8th cetury and want to show off their donkeys, carts and donkey brains).
And you know all Islamic societies!? Brother, be realistic, not biased, hygiene is hygiene be it in the 8th century or 21st one, it is just human.
You talk about the western educated class, where I point to the main Islam's idea for the masses. You mean than that the west have failed in general considering the hygiene of the masses,
Even those among western educated classes were not immune to AIDS or STD., or heart attacks or cancer...etc
 
And you know all Islamic societies!? Brother, be realistic, not biased, hygiene is hygiene be it in the 8th century or 21st one, it is just human.
You talk about the western educated class, where I point to the main Islam's idea for the masses. You mean than that the west have failed in general considering the hygiene of the masses,
Even those among western educated classes were not immune to AIDS or STD., or heart attacks or cancer...etc

This is now behs brai behs.

Western medicine, hygine, etc. is the best in the world.

If you can't accept this, then why bother.
 
This is now behs brai behs.

Western medicine, hygine, etc. is the best in the world.

If you can't accept this, then why bother.

Symposium international : Al-Qanun fi al-tibb of Ibn Sina

Ibn Sina achieved the first ever systematic survey of medicine in history, laid down in his “al-Qanun fi al-tibb” or “Canon medicinae”, as the Latin translation from the 12th century is called. This survey is based on the writings of Galen of Pergamon (died around AD 200), the most important ancient author of medical treatises besides Hippocrates. Galen had tried to create a didactic synthesis of the different medical schools in Greece, but failed to achieve a complete survey of Internal Medicine.
At the beginning of the “Qanun”, Ibn Sina defines medicine as the branch of science dealing with the composition and disposition of the human body, or, as he calls it, the perception of complexions. It is not restricted to theoretical observation; its practical part is curing and avoiding diseases. So Ibn Sina’s theory of medicine comprises theoretical knowledge – the afore-mentioned perception of complexions – and practical activity – the administration of cures in case of illness.
Health and illness respectively are based on four groups of conditions: 1. material conditions: the organs and fluids of the body; 2. external conditions: the quality of the air, nutrition, drink, climate etc.; 3. the so-called “shaping” conditions: the complexions themselves, consisting of a specified mixture of the four elements; 4. the so-called “useful” conditions: the “spirits of life”. Up to the 19th century the idea prevailed that organic functions necessarily have a spiritual component.
Therefore, the complexion of the human body is of central importance for health and illness. It results from the qualities of the four elements fire, air, water and earth: warmth, coldness, humidity and aridity respectively.
The ideal condition of the body is achieved by maintaining the qualities in a state of perfect balance and harmony. However, this ideal condition does not occur in reality. One part of the contrary pairs of warm/cold and humid/arid always dominates. Every people, every individual and every organ have their own complexion. The complexion also changes in the different stages of life. Getting old is understood to be a process of drying out, together with gradually losing strength. According to Ibn Sina the dynamics of dissolution eventually prevail, with humidity and warmth getting more and more reduced.
Dealing with the treatment of the four body fluids blood (sanguis), mucus (phlegma), yellow bile (colera) and black bile (melancolia), Ibn Sina does not only describe the functions of metabolism, he also takes a look at the causes of disease. He leaves the medieval conception of illness as a result of extreme domination of one of the body fluids far behind him, declaring that all body fluids are integral parts of the blood without any pathological quality. Only if a body fluid is not used in the process of metabolism for a certain time, a pathological quality can develop, for example by getting viscous, or rotten, or burnt. Ibn Sina specifies eight different pathological conditions of phlegma: raw, watery, and limy (causing irritations in the joints), salty, thin, acetic, piercing, and glassy. He deals with different conditions of yellow and black bile, too. By means of these sub-classifications, Ibn Sina achieved a much more refined diagnosis than the usual scheme of humoral pathology.
The body fluids can also be influenced by mental conditions and perceptions of the senses.
So Ibn Sina was one of the first to integrate psychological aspects in theoretical and practical medicine. For “Panel 1: Medical theory”, we are seeking contributions that address any of these issues.
2. History: Bridging cultures and time (For Panel 2: History)
Moderator: Prof. Dr. Ingrid Hehmeyer (Toronto, Canada)
Ibn Sina’s al-Qanun fi al-tibb is arguably the most significant encyclopedia on medicine in medieval Islamic times. The work is firmly rooted in the medical tradition of its time, and the author relied heavily on the medical authorities from the past. Translated into Latin as early as the 12th century, the Qanun became the most popular reference text in the medical schools of medieval Europe and continued to wield wide influence until the 16th century. For “Panel 1: History”, we encourage submissions that address the manuscript tradition and implications of the text in translation. We are particularly interested in papers that explore aspects of the transmission of medical knowledge and practice.
3. Cosmos, soul and body – Healing in the context of Ibn Sina’s philosophy
(Panel 3: Philosophy)
Moderator: Dr. Detlev Quintern (Istanbul, Turkey)
Ibn Sina embedded natural sciences and in particular medicine meta-theoretically. The Qanun fi al-tibb and Ibn Sina’s comprehension of healing in general, including his approach to psychological therapy, are inextricably entwined with his philosophy. Ibn Sina’s ontology and epistemology follow the immortal and incorruptible soul, which unfolds natural bodies, be it plant (reproductive soul), animal (sensitive soul) or human, self-reflecting and imaginative consciousness (intelligent soul) towards the unity of life. Thus, to be in harmony with the constructiveness of communicative unity, ways of healing have to overcome dualistic approaches, e.g. man/nature. As healthiness is not to be seen “beyond soul”, Ibn Sina’s approach towards the dimensions of healing is of significant actuality.
Ibn Sina’s philosophy has enjoyed a long tradition of reception and critical debate. With the early translations from the twelfth century onwards, his cosmology, ontology and epistemology found also their way into European scholastic and/or mystic schools. In this context the œuvre of Ibn Sina is exceptionally suited for bridging cultures and time, strengthening endeavors for peace. The panel welcomes papers focussing on Ibn Sina’s cosmology (of healing), ontology, and ethics as well as travelling epistemologies and invites for comparative studies considering that the phenemenology of life (A.-T. Tymieniecka) unveils philosophical congruities
4. Materia medica in al-Qanun fi al-tibb (Canon of Medicine) (Panel 4: Materia medica)
Moderator: Prof. Dr. K. Hüsnü Can Başer (Eskişehir, Turkey)
Book 2 and Book 5 of al-Qanun fi al-tibb describe over 700 simple drugs and compound medicines of plant, animal and mineral origin with their medicinal properties and instructions for their preparation. 1000 years ago, Ibn Sina gave examples of concepts like evidence based medicine, experimental medicine, clinical trials, efficacy tests, risk factor analysis, inductive logic (syndrome concept in diagnosis), dietary supplements, etc. “Panel 4: Materia medica” invites colleagues to submit their recent findings on research into Ibn Sina’s materia medica bridging knowledge through time.
5. Garden design in the historical Gülhane Park (Panel 5: Designing the Garden)
Moderator: Prof. Ayten Altintas (Istanbul, Turkey)
In spring 2013 a medicinal botanic garden, based on the materia medica of the Qanun fi al-tibb, will be planted in Istanbul’s Gülhane Park (Rosegarden). Linked to a long tradition which florished around the Ottoman palace (Topkapı Palace) for centuries, the Ibn Sina garden project aims to sensitise for current medicinal potentials of the materia medica described in the Qanun. Here the visitor will have the opportunity to learn more about the herbs, their medicinal properties and their effects on the human body. The garden will thus invite people to enjoy spending time while offering a sensual as well as a learning experience. The Ibn Sina medicinal botanic garden is to be seen as part of the long history of the Gülhane Park, initiating a rediscovery of the interplay of medicinal botany and leisure during the Ottoman period.
For “Panel 5: History and future of the the Gühane Park”, we encourage submissions that address the history of the Gülhane Park, Ottoman landscape and garden architecture, art and cultural history and leisure.
6. Potentials of the Qanun: Contemporary applications (Panel 6: Current applications)
Moderator: Dr. Amina Ather (Bangalore, India and Castrop-Rauxel, Germany)
Ibn Sina says: “The wellbeing of the whole person – emotionally, physically, spiritually and mentally – is necessary for the believer to participate fully in life, fulfilling his or her duty towards a better society.” His approach to healing is a universalistic one that considers body and mind as a unit. In South Asian countries, Ibn Sina’s medicine has been gradually transformed into herbal medicine, and today an increasing number of patients prefer herbal substances over chemical-synthetic products, especially in complementary and alternative medicine.
The World Health Organization (WHO) and other international organizations recognize the significance of herbal medicine for the treatment of both physical and mental illness, especially in developing countries.
What was involved in the transformation process of Ibn Sina medicine as described in his Al-Qanun fi al-tibb, into today’s practices of herbal medicine? How do these practices work, what are the links with Ibn Sina, and who are the practitioners? Who are the main groups of patients that respond well to herbal medicine? “Panel 6: Current applications” is inviting contributions that address these issues.

Symposium international : Al-Qanun fi al-tibb of Ibn Sina, Istanbul, 21 juin 2013 | Diwan

The Canon of Medicine (Arabic: القانون في الطب Al-Qanun fi al-Tibb "The Law of Medicine"; Persian: قانون پزشکی Qanun "Law"; Latin: Canon Medicinae "Canon of Medicine"; Chinese: 回回藥方 / 回回药方 Huíhui Yàofāng "Prescriptions of the Hui Nationality")[1][2] is a 14-volume medical encyclopedia compiled by Ibn Sīnā (Avicenna) and completed in 1025.[3] It presents a clear and organized summary of all the medical knowledge of the time.[4] Originally written in the Arabic language, the book was later translated into a number of other languages, including Persian, Latin, Chinese, Hebrew, German, French, and English.[5] The Canon is considered one of the most famous books in the history of medicine.[6]

Also known as the Qanun, which means "law" in both Arabic and Persian, the Canon of Medicine remained a medical authority up until the 18th century[7] and early 19th century.[8] It set the standards for medicine in Europe and the Islamic world, and is Avicenna's most renowned written work alongside The Book of Healing. Qanun was used at many medical schools—at University of Montpellier, France, as late as 1650.[9] Much of the book was also translated into Chinese as the Huihui Yaofang (Prescriptions of the Hui Nationality) by the Hui people in Yuan China.[10] The Canon also formed the basis of Unani medicine, a form of traditional medicine practiced in India. The principles of medicine described by the Canon ten centuries ago are still taught at UCLA and Yale University, among others, as part of the history of medicine.

George Sarton, the father of the history of science, wrote in the Introduction to the History of Science:

Contents

The Canon of Medicine
 
Last edited:
theres been so many threads about sharia, i realized its pointless to have such discussion on a forum like this. there's more appropriate places to gain knowledge of it.
 
The Holy Quran itself testifies to its "all encompassing" knowledge and guidance in the following verse:

"And We have sent down to you the Book as clarification for all things and as guidance and mercy and good tidings for the Muslims." [16:89]

The Shariah proponents have not been able to bring their proof from Holy Quran (that there is compulsion in religion) ... Whereas there are a lot of Quranic verses (some of which have been quoted in previous posts) which tell us clearly that there is no compulsion in religion and no one (including the prophet) has any right to force someone in religious matters . Quran does not order any worldly punishment for religious "offenses" (only the acts that are harmful to the community or the state are punishable by a state , as per Quran) and tells us that the people who do not follow religion are accountable to Allah only and it is for him (alone) to decide their fate , on the day of judgement .

The Shariah proponents have to rely on "other" sources to justify their claims .. But if one reads Quran , it becomes absolutely clear that deriving laws from "sources" other than Quran is strictly forbidden by Allah .. And when these sources (Hadith/history etc.) are scrutinized , One finds out that they are nothing but "conjecture" ,All Such "books were compiled on the orders of Kings , centuries after the revelation of Quran , to make lawful what had been made unlawful by the almighty ..

And Iqbal (Mufakkir e Pakistan) held similar views . We are talking about "implementing Shariah in Pakistan" .. So the views of "thinker of Pakistan" are not "irrelevant" . Quran is the only text whose authority is undisputed among all sects of Muslims . So any "Shariah" derived from sources other than Quran can only be a Sunni Shariah , Deoband Shariah , Wahhabi Shariah , Shiite Shariah etc. etc. but not an "Islamic Shariah" .. The Shariah derived from Quran is compatible with the modern world ... All other "Shariahs" are outdated , medieval codes of law which can not be implemented in the 21st century ..

You failed to see my point and I agree with most of your post so I see no point in carrying on a convo that is going nowhere.
 
Why not join the Taliban? They are also doing a revolution to install Shariah.
I don't think Taliban are imposing Shariah, because what they say and how they are saying dosen't seem to be Sharia, infact they themselves are not following it.
 
why don't you join the nato forces who are trying to implement the NWO secularism across the world.

Since when did shariah= taliban.

According to shariah taliban, isis etc are taking actions contradictory to islam and should be punsished.
problem ?
read my signature & you will get your answer


thats why i put millions i.e. pakistan

billions i.e. the rest of the world

there you go smarty pants
Indonesia, Bangladesh, turkey, Egypt, Afghanistan ,Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Indian Muslims don't want it, there goes 600 million from your billion now what eh' ? :azn:
 
Last edited:

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom