What's new

Benazir Bhutto, a kleptocrat in a Hermes scarf

fatman17

PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
32,563
Reaction score
98
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Benazir Bhutto, a kleptocrat in a Hermes scarf
By Jemima Khan
Last Updated: 12:01am BST 21/10/2007

She's back. Hurrah! She's a woman. She's brave. She's a moderate. She speaks good English. She's Oxford-educated, no less. And she's not bad looking either.

I admit I'm biased. I don't like Benazir Bhutto. She called me names during her election campaign in 1996 and it left a bitter taste. Petty personal grievances aside, I still find jubilant reports of her return to Pakistan depressing. Let's be clear about this before she's turned into a martyr.

This is no Aung San Suu Kyi, despite her repeated insistence that she's "fighting for democracy", or even more incredibly, "fighting for Pakistan's poor".

This is the woman who was twice dismissed on corruption charges. She went into self-imposed exile while investigations continued into millions she had allegedly stashed away into Swiss bank accounts ($1.5 billion by the reckoning of Musharraf's own "National Accountability Bureau").

She has only been able to return because Musharraf, that megalomaniac, knows that his future depends on the grassroots diehard supporters inherited from her father's party, the PPP.

As a result, Musharraf, who in his first months in power declared it his express intention to wipe out corruption, has dropped all charges against her and granted her immunity from prosecution. Forever.

Notably, he did not do the same for his other political rival, Nawaz Sharif, who was recently deported after attempting his own spectacular return to Pakistan.

But the difference is that Benazir is a pro at playing to the West. And that's what counts. She talks about women and extremism and the West applauds. And then conspires.

The Americans and the British are acutely aware that their strategy in the region is failing and that Musharraf's hold on power is ever more tenuous. They have pressed hard for Benazir and the General to cut a deal that would allow them to share power for the next five years in a "liberal forces government".

It's all totally bogus. Benazir may speak the language of liberalism and look good on Larry King's sofa, but both her terms in office were marked by incompetence, extra-judicial killings and brazen looting of the treasury, with the help of her husband — famously known in Pakistan as Mr 10 Per Cent.

In a country that tops the international corruption league, she was its most self-enriching leader.

Benazir has always cynically used her gender to manipulate: I loved her answer to David Frost when he asked her how many millions she had in her Swiss bank accounts. "David, I think that's a very sexist question."

A non sequitur (does loot have a gender?) but one that brought the uncomfortable line of questioning to a swift end.

Of all Pakistan's elected leaders she conspicuously did the least to help the cause of women. She never, for example, repealed the Hudood Ordinances, Pakistan's controversial laws that made no distinction between rape and adultery.

She preferred instead to kowtow to the mullahs in order to cling to power, forming an expedient alliance with Pakistan's Religious Coalition Party and leaving Pakistan's women as powerless as she found them.

The problem is that the West never seems to learn; playing favourites in a complicated nation's politics always backfires. Imposing Benazir on Pakistan is the opposite of democratic and doubtless will cause more chaos in an already unstable country.

Make no mistake, Benazir may look the part, but she's as ruthless and conniving as they come — a kleptocrat in a Hermes headscarf.
 
Jemima Khan?:disagree:

Does succeed in making Bhutto a villain though.
 
there dosnt seem to be anything untrue written about BB by JK.
 
there dosnt seem to be anything untrue written about BB by JK.

Yeah...I didn't check the facts though...I'm assuming they are correct.

However, I wonder if she is as greedy and dishonest as she is made out to be, why is she risking her life by coming back to Pakistan.
 
However, I wonder if she is as greedy and dishonest as she is made out to be, why is she risking her life by coming back to Pakistan.

Risking her life no mate you made the statement wrong it should be.
I wonder if she is as greedy and dishonest as she is made out to be, why is she risking innocent lives by coming back to Pakistan
it suits her batter.


Regards
Wilco
 
Risking her life no mate you made the statement wrong it should be.
I wonder if she is as greedy and dishonest as she is made out to be, why is she risking innocent lives by coming back to Pakistan
it suits her batter.


Regards
Wilco

I wonder...that bomb blast was quite close to her truck...she could have just as easily been killed.

Initially even I thought that why is she endangering the lives of others by traveling in the open. Then one realizes that being a politician, she must go on the campaign trail. There are no two ways about it. She had no choice but refuse ultra-tight security and mingle with the people if she hoped to win support.
Any other politician would have done the same thing.

However, one does question her intentions. If she has billion dollar bank account as Musharraf said, she should be enjoying her life in UK and not bother much about Pakistan.

Either she is so power hungry that she wants to risk everything to get it, or she really wants to make a difference to Pakistan, and again, would risk her life to do it.
 
I wonder...that bomb blast was quite close to her truck...she could have just as easily been killed.
Her truck was bomb proof & at the time of blast she was in the most secured section of the truck, so saying that she could had been killed, may not work.


Regards
Wilco
 
However, one does question her intentions. If she has billion dollar bank account as Musharraf said, she should be enjoying her life in UK and not bother much about Pakistan.

Power is a addiction. no amount of money in the world can be a subsitute. the world is replete with such examples.
 
I don't understand hatred for civilian leaders like Benazir in Pakistan they are not in power.
They can come to power only by democratic means and Public support which seems remote since all the governments machinery is in hands of Musharraf who did not even spare the Chief justice.
Chief justice however was incidentally re-insted back because of Public support.
 
I don't understand hatred for civilian leaders like Benazir in Pakistan they are not in power.

i will vote for a civilian leader who is not carrying such a burden of corruption. kindly read the post "crying for pakistan".
 
i will vote for a civilian leader who is not carrying such a burden of corruption. kindly read the post "crying for pakistan".

You just answered my question, People will not vote for her if charges of corruption are true. However we are seeing Musharraf making behind doors deals with her.

Why give her so much importance ?
Did'nt she manage tremedrous support for her in karachi before the Bomb blast tragedy ?
 
You just answered my question, People will not vote for her if charges of corruption are true. However we are seeing Musharraf making behind doors deals with her.

Why give her so much importance ?
Did'nt she manage tremedrous support for her in karachi before the Bomb blast tragedy ?

Whether one likes BB or not; I am certain that most of the corruption charges have some basis; PPP is a political force and have a strong vote bank spread over in nearly every province. Only other trans province party is PML. All other parties are regional parties.

Arranging a large procession is dependent upon good organization and doesnot necessarily translates into votes. PPP however, was the largest single party even in 2002 elections and PML(Q)could only form a govt with MQM support and after luring a few PPP MNA's.

It is therefore impossible to ignore BB. Besides if you want to have a liberal moderate govt, who else is there except PPP and MQM. That is why BB has been given so much importance.
 
Whether one likes BB or not; I am certain that most of the corruption charges have some basis; PPP is a political force and have a strong vote bank spread over in nearly every province. Only other trans province party is PML. All other parties are regional parties.

Arranging a large procession is dependent upon good organization and doesnot necessarily translates into votes. PPP however, was the largest single party even in 2002 elections and PML(Q)could only form a govt with MQM support and after luring a few PPP MNA's.

It is therefore impossible to ignore BB. Besides if you want to have a liberal moderate govt, who else is there except PPP and MQM. That is why BB has been given so much importance.

You just answered my another question. Benazir is a force to reckon with but its civilian and is of peoples support. Not all democratic leaders are ideal leaders.

Having few political parties is not of Benazir's making, if you see history civilian rule was never allowed to mature bu army.

But if you think without bias there needs to be some starting point again.
 
Back
Top Bottom