What's new

Beijing won’t follow Washington’s footsteps in politics

Not a big deal. My Chinese coworkers regularly eat their self cooked foods made at home. Western cantine stuffs taste like prison foods.

:cheesy:

That's one valid point.

***

Singapore offers clues to China’s political system

By Ding Gang Source:Global Times Published: 2018/2/28

4b5c1f8f-a49b-4ea5-9745-fbb4b882987f.jpeg


Illustration: Liu Rui/GT


She was 67 years old, still working as a cleaner in a food court. He was 68 years old, still working as a taxi driver. The first time I made a visit to Singapore five years ago, I interviewed these two Singaporean Chinese. Their diligence was deeply touching and reminded me of the hard-working generation in 1980s' China.

In the interview, both complained a lot about inflation, expensive healthcare and low income, but they seemed satisfied with housing and public safety. Both of them had a three-bedroom apartment, thanks to Singapore's fair housing plan. Also, Singapore had the lowest crime rate in the world.

The housing scheme and public security were among the first things that struck China's former leader Deng Xiaoping when he visited the country 40 years ago, just before the Communist Party of China (CPC) decided to initiate the policy of reform and opening-up in late 1978. This visit steeled Deng's determination for China's development and raised his confidence in leading billions of Chinese to realize their dream in the generations to come.

It is easy to find books and written records about that historic visit, and among these the most important book is Deng Xiaoping and the Transformation of China by Harvard Professor Ezra F Vogel. According to the book, Deng was impressed with the order and the high living standard the city-state enjoyed.

After Deng's visit, from the articles about Singapore published by China's official newspaper, People's Daily, opening up to the outside world, attracting foreign investment, making the city greener, and providing public housing for every citizen became examples for China to follow.

In 2015, President Xi Jinping paid a state visit to Singapore and mentioned Deng's visit in his speech. He said, under the leadership of Lee Kwan Yew, Singapore succeeded in pursuing a development path suitable to its national conditions by combining Eastern values with an international vision. After seeing Singapore's economic achievements, Deng said that China needs to learn from Singapore.

The long-term stability, effectiveness and clean governance of the Singaporean government are the keys to the success of this Oriental country.

Although Lee Kwan Yew was a member of an ethnic Chinese family who was away from China for five generations, Chinese history left a significant impression on him, which primarily through the traditional imperial examination system influenced the way Singapore selected its officials and later formed Lee's elite governance philosophy. Both Deng and Lee believed a country should be led by competent people and a strong leader with a global view.

If one claims Singapore is always an example for China to emulate, it might sound exaggerating. You may list several reasons for which China cannot simply learn from Singapore. The tiny country is just a middle-sized city with only several million inhabitants compared to China's big cities. Its legal system is based on the British model, and most of its civil servants had received traditional British education when Singapore became independent in 1965.

However, you might find one of the most important similarities - the majority of people in both countries are Chinese and have same cultural roots.

In China's striving for modernization in the past 40 years, finding a way to keep the balance between economic development and social and political stability has always been crucial.

The CPC as the ruling party has been looking for a way to achieve the efficient use of capital and at the same time control its negative impact on the Party and the society.

The political system must be consistent with the cultural and social environment of the Eastern countries. That's why Chinese leaders always take Singapore's experience very seriously and send many middle-level officials to the country for training. Singapore's Chinese newspaper ZaoBao once reported that Xi had visited Singapore four times when he served in Fujian Province.

A detail of Deng's conversation with Lee deserves more attention.

"You're able to catch up with us, even better than Singapore, and there's no problem at all," Lee said. "We are only the descendants of illiterate, landless farmers in Fujian, Guangdong and other places, but many of you are the descendants of officials and scholars," Lee continued as Deng listened in silence. :partay:

The author is a senior editor with People's Daily, and currently a senior fellow with the Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies at Renmin University of China. dinggang@globaltimes.com.cn

***

I always held that developed/Confucius East Asia is an excellent learning/inspiration ground for Mainland China, from economics to public management and political discourse. China has already adopted many models from places like South Korea, Japan and Singapore. There is no reason (and in fact it would be foolish) to be blind to nearby systems that are perfectly working and, instead, trying to adopt rigid and increasingly inefficient/corrupt Western (US) model of governance.

This article is a nice testament to what I have come to argue on this forum.

@sinait , @Mista , @Chinese-Dragon , @Dungeness
 
.
That's one valid point.

***

Singapore offers clues to China’s political system

By Ding Gang Source:Global Times Published: 2018/2/28

4b5c1f8f-a49b-4ea5-9745-fbb4b882987f.jpeg


Illustration: Liu Rui/GT


She was 67 years old, still working as a cleaner in a food court. He was 68 years old, still working as a taxi driver. The first time I made a visit to Singapore five years ago, I interviewed these two Singaporean Chinese. Their diligence was deeply touching and reminded me of the hard-working generation in 1980s' China.

In the interview, both complained a lot about inflation, expensive healthcare and low income, but they seemed satisfied with housing and public safety. Both of them had a three-bedroom apartment, thanks to Singapore's fair housing plan. Also, Singapore had the lowest crime rate in the world.

The housing scheme and public security were among the first things that struck China's former leader Deng Xiaoping when he visited the country 40 years ago, just before the Communist Party of China (CPC) decided to initiate the policy of reform and opening-up in late 1978. This visit steeled Deng's determination for China's development and raised his confidence in leading billions of Chinese to realize their dream in the generations to come.

It is easy to find books and written records about that historic visit, and among these the most important book is Deng Xiaoping and the Transformation of China by Harvard Professor Ezra F Vogel. According to the book, Deng was impressed with the order and the high living standard the city-state enjoyed.

After Deng's visit, from the articles about Singapore published by China's official newspaper, People's Daily, opening up to the outside world, attracting foreign investment, making the city greener, and providing public housing for every citizen became examples for China to follow.

In 2015, President Xi Jinping paid a state visit to Singapore and mentioned Deng's visit in his speech. He said, under the leadership of Lee Kwan Yew, Singapore succeeded in pursuing a development path suitable to its national conditions by combining Eastern values with an international vision. After seeing Singapore's economic achievements, Deng said that China needs to learn from Singapore.

The long-term stability, effectiveness and clean governance of the Singaporean government are the keys to the success of this Oriental country.

Although Lee Kwan Yew was a member of an ethnic Chinese family who was away from China for five generations, Chinese history left a significant impression on him, which primarily through the traditional imperial examination system influenced the way Singapore selected its officials and later formed Lee's elite governance philosophy. Both Deng and Lee believed a country should be led by competent people and a strong leader with a global view.

If one claims Singapore is always an example for China to emulate, it might sound exaggerating. You may list several reasons for which China cannot simply learn from Singapore. The tiny country is just a middle-sized city with only several million inhabitants compared to China's big cities. Its legal system is based on the British model, and most of its civil servants had received traditional British education when Singapore became independent in 1965.

However, you might find one of the most important similarities - the majority of people in both countries are Chinese and have same cultural roots.

In China's striving for modernization in the past 40 years, finding a way to keep the balance between economic development and social and political stability has always been crucial.

The CPC as the ruling party has been looking for a way to achieve the efficient use of capital and at the same time control its negative impact on the Party and the society.

The political system must be consistent with the cultural and social environment of the Eastern countries. That's why Chinese leaders always take Singapore's experience very seriously and send many middle-level officials to the country for training. Singapore's Chinese newspaper ZaoBao once reported that Xi had visited Singapore four times when he served in Fujian Province.

A detail of Deng's conversation with Lee deserves more attention.

"You're able to catch up with us, even better than Singapore, and there's no problem at all," Lee said. "We are only the descendants of illiterate, landless farmers in Fujian, Guangdong and other places, but many of you are the descendants of officials and scholars," Lee continued as Deng listened in silence. :partay:

The author is a senior editor with People's Daily, and currently a senior fellow with the Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies at Renmin University of China. dinggang@globaltimes.com.cn

***

I always held that developed/Confucius East Asia is an excellent learning/inspiration ground for Mainland China, from economics to public management and political discourse. China has already adopted many models from places like South Korea, Japan and Singapore. There is no reason (and in fact it would be foolish) to be blind to nearby systems that are perfectly working and, instead, trying to adopt rigid and increasingly inefficient/corrupt Western (US) model of governance.

This article is a nice testament to what I have come to argue on this forum.

@sinait , @Mista , @Chinese-Dragon , @Dungeness

IMO the greatest lesson Singapore can give to other developing countries is the rule of law and the institutionalising of political power. This is the macro factor which underpines the long term development of a country. Greening, cleaning, urban planning, housing etc; these are just micro factors with specific purposes and limited influence on a country's trajectory in the long term.

Many other developing countries seek to emulate us but they analyse us only superficially. For example Duterte and the East Europeans think Singapore's economic success is all due to the strongmen Lee Kuan Yew. But LKY's greatest achievement is actually building the rule of law and the institutions for political power during his reign, and only after he stepped down he knew whether he have suceeded or not. He once said that his greatest satisfaction is to build up a meritocratic system which will endure beyond him.

I hope China can institutionalise the political system and instill the rule of law, and avoid the pitfalls of a Putin system.

I have posted this before:

李光耀模式最适合中国

郑永年不讳言,这种改变的背后当然存在意识形态的因素,但他认为,中共采取的一些做法还是作为工具的意义多一些。

不久前,郑永年在《联合早报》撰文指出,十九大以后中国政治的发展,可能是普京模式、蒋经国模式、李光耀模式,这三者之一。

他在接受本报专访时说,三者之中,他个人希望中国采取李光耀模式,并相信这依然是最适合中国的模式,李光耀模式的特点是开放的一党制,以内部多元主义来吸纳民主化的压力,并且将个人的权力转换为制度的权力。

反之,如果中国走普京模式,也可能导致台湾模式。郑永年解释说,普京模式是个人集权,制度权力很弱,这个结果“很危险”。因为中国民主化的基础已经存在,利益分化、中产阶层正在形成,“你这个时期集权可以,但以后呢?可能绷不住就会走向台湾模式。”

蒋经国模式是从威权走向多党制、政治多元,但看看台湾目前的形势,郑永年认为,是否要采取蒋经国模式,还需要重新思考。

在郑永年看,习近平“还是希望像李光耀模式”,中国明年要设立国家监察委、军队改革走的也都是制度化的模式。“如果是想像普京那样一会儿当总统一会儿当总理,那就完全是个人化的集权,那是不一样的。”

“新加坡是制度比较集权,不是个人比较集权;要集权,如果没有李光耀这样先从个人集权转换到制度集权,还是做不成的。”

http://www.zaobao.com.sg/news/china/story20170925-797821

Additional reads:

The Curse of Lee Kuan Yew
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/03/lee-kuan-yew-legacy-116317#.VRSMPOkfrIU

Lee Kuan Yew: The Father of Modern China?
https://thediplomat.com/2015/03/lee-kuan-yew-the-father-of-modern-china/

China Needs a Strong Leader Like Xi — but the Rule of Law Like Singapore
https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/7051580
 
.
IMO the greatest lesson Singapore can give to other developing countries is the rule of law and the institutionalising of political power. This is the macro factor which underpines the long term development of a country. Greening, cleaning, urban planning, housing etc; these are just micro factors with specific purposes and limited influence on a country's trajectory in the long term.

Definitely agree. Especially trust in the long term stability and predictability of a country's politics is very important for, especially, economy. This is perhaps one of the strengths of East Asian (Confucian) states. Beefing it up with a strong rule of law system, covering every aspect and walk of life without exemption would just lead to a better government and governance.

Rule of law is a target for China, as well, but, there is the question of developing status and scale (population and land), in the case of Mainland China. Hence, whatever reforms it makes, they are actually very systemic and consequential as well as challenging to manage.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom