What's new

Beijing to tap water from thousands of kilometers away

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
65,195
Reaction score
-55
Country
China
Location
China
Beijing to tap water from thousands of kilometers away
BY STIAN REKLEV

BEIJING Sun Oct 12, 2014 10:41pm BST
moor%20paper%20map.JPG

article-0-1435611C000005DC-389_964x688.jpg

(Reuters) - The water coming out of Beijing taps later this month may have traveled more than 1,400 kilometers, transported along a series of canals and pipelines that form part of the world's biggest water transfer project.

The $62 billion undertaking - dreamed up by former Communist Party leader Mao Zedong in the 1950s - is designed to supply China's parched and pollution-ridden north, home to more than 300 million people and countless water-intensive businesses.

For global companies that rely on Chinese factories and farms to supply clothing, food,electronics and a host of other products, it's crucial that China gets this right.

Some provinces in Northern China have less freshwater per person than the desert countries of the Middle East. Of the country's total, water-intensive industries such as clothing andelectronics manufacturing consume a quarter - a share the think-tank 2030 Water Resources Group expects to grow to a third by 2030.

"There is no doubt that cities (in) the rapidly growing powerhouses of regional economieswould be seriously compromised without additional water supplies," said Simon Spooner, a China water expert with consultancy Atkins Global.

The government could keep water flowing into industry by taking it away from agriculture, with crippling consequences for the latter. By transporting water from the south, the government can avoid having to make such a choice, Spooner said.

Reuters is hosting a global summit on climate change this week, interviewing executives across a variety of industries about changes they are making now to cope with effects such as dwindling resources and extreme weather.

Securing adequate water is among the biggest issues. Parts of Northeast China endured the worst drought in more than 60 years this summer, damaging crops and forcing factories to close down operations several days a week. The economic cost in one province amounted to 7.3 billion yuan ($1.19 billion), state-run Xinhua news agency cited local authorities as saying.



CHANGING WAYS

The first stage of China's south-to-north transfer brought water to the industry-heavy northeast, but it was barely useable when it reached Tianjin because it picked up pollutants and sediments while flowing north through polluted soil.

That has raised concerns about the latest phase - a decade in the making - bringing water to Beijing and surrounding regions via a different, less polluted route.

Some experts have also voiced concern that the project's extensive tapping of water from the Yangtze River and its tributaries may damage one of China's most important water ways.

At the same time there are fears that sending so much water north will harm the development of the regions from which the water is drawn.

Concerns have even been voiced at the high levels of the central government.

In February, Qiu Baoxing, the vice minister of housing and urban-rural development, said the water diversion project was unsustainable and that Beijing would be better off relying on desalination technology and saving rain water.

Some critics have said the project is yet another example of China trying to engineer its way out of a problem that could be largely solved through better policies, such as a tiered pricing system for water and better monitoring.

"The water that will be transferred is about the same as the water deficit, so it will offset some of the problems," Richard Hardiman, a water expert with the EU-China Environmental Governance Programme, told Reuters.

"But the fundamental conclusion is that better management is needed."

Beijing to tap water from thousands of kilometers away| Reuters
 
Mainland just care about water supply for Beijing resident, than the rest of people at the north.

Kinda selfish.
 
I absolutely disgree with such stupid water project, BeiJing trying to steal waters from other Chinese ppl areas, the project must change local weather & water balance.

Millions of Chinese ppl will pay for that due to only BeiJing city lack water.
 
It is estimated that around 96% of the mighty Yangtze river flows straight into the Pacific Ocean.

There is no lack of water, we just need to use it more efficiently. I fully support this project.
 
This project is good and will benefit China greatly. The leaders making the decision will be remembered for their contribution. The geography of China is the South is mountainous will the northern China proper is flat and dryer plains.

Plains are more productive in farming if you have water.

The water does not go just to Beijing but it solve the drought problem of Henan and Heibei.

南水北调工程向河南平顶山应急调水圆满结束-新华网

Right now, Northern China aquifer is drying up and with water from Han Shui, China agriculture will be far more sustainable.

华南多丘陵,农业不能大规模化。但华北地平但降雨量低。平原能够工业化种植,但若没有可靠水源,工业化农业则免谈。
 
Last edited:
I absolutely agree with such brilliant water project, It not only benefits Beijing, but also the North China as a whole, don't listen to those stupid anti China western propaganda, we know what' s best for us and the only thing they want to see is we fail, but we will never let them.
 
I absolutely agree with such brilliant water project, It not only benefits Beijing, but also the North China as a whole, don't listen to those stupid anti China western propaganda, we know what' s best for us and the only thing they want to see is we fail, but we will never let them.

Always do the opposite of what the West says。:D
 
The 3 gorge dam is still being fcuk by white man media. Li Peng is a scape-goat while the real decision of 3 gorge dam is Deng Xiaoping. In my opinion, Butcher Li Peng and Deng Xiaoping have done a great thing for China in building 3 gorge dam. China will benefit for thousand and thousands of years. First 3 gorge dam is less about power generation than flood prevention. Since 3 gorge dam was completed, Yangtze has never seen a serious flood. The 2010 head water of Yangtze is more serious than 1998, but Yangtze overflow a little
2010年长江流域大洪水_百度百科

Second, Chongqing is now becoming the world greatest inland port as Yangtze upper stream is more navigable. Huang Qifan even propose forgoing some power generation in favor of navigation.
黄奇帆:三峡水位不宜大起大落 应收窄落差

During dry seasons, 3 gorge dam release water, and that help agriculture and navigation.

Third some geologist speculate that 3 gorge dam and USSR Aral Sea diversion could have increase more rainfall in Xinjiang deserts.
 
The west can never be able to mobilize huge funds and resources to undertake those mind blowing projects and they are becoming blue with envy and pray for China's failure .
 
I absolutely disgree with such stupid water project, BeiJing trying to steal waters from other Chinese ppl areas, the project must change local weather & water balance.

Millions of Chinese ppl will pay for that due to only BeiJing city lack water.
Be careful what you say! Big brother is watching.....:ph34r: :lol:
 
I agree with the water diversion project but I'm just wondering how much of this water will be wasted on watering illegal golf courses?

Always do the opposite of what the West says。:D

That is the most important rule of thumb on planet earth.
 
Back
Top Bottom