Developereo
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2009
- Messages
- 14,093
- Reaction score
- 25
- Country
- Location
Back to topic, maybe?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cant save marathon runners..
Spends billions on Lasers
Welcome to USA
Yeah, Ottoman Empire "lost" its military superiority in 10th century......and conquered Constantinople in 15th century
Dumbf*ck ignorant of history : Early middle-ages is an era from 5th to 10th century...Islamic World remained dominant superpower of the globe even centuries after 'high-middleages' ..forget about early middle-ages thingy..Again..you need to take some history course....
Islamic world was the world leader only during the "islamic golden age" which spanned from middle of 8th century to 14th century..After 15th century,it gradually lost the technological superiority to europe..From 7th century to 18th century, Islamic World was the leader of world in science, wealth, technology, large cities, health, arts, literature, medicine etc over-all (China was ahead in some aspect..so were others..but I'm talking about "over-all"..just like today, China is the largest industrial producer..but yet, "over-all", West is ahead still)...By 16th century onwards, West started to rise, closing the gap...yet the number one spot remained to Islamic World. Kinda like now, from last two decades, China is rising, and even surpassing U.S in some fields, but number one spot remains to U.S...It was only after 18th century, specially in 19th-20th century, that West decisively took over...Even Western scholars admit this fact....Fcuk..even highly anti-Muslim middle-eastern history scholars, such as Daniel Pipes, write in their writings what I've written..Not to mention Bernard Lewis
What i meant was early modern age,which i corrected even before your posts..Please check the time of posts..
Islamic world was the world leader only during the "islamic golden age" which spanned from middle of 8th century to 14th century..After 15th century,it gradually lost the technological superiority to europe..
I too disagree with the claim that mangol invation finished off islamic golden age..Where i disagree with you is in the broad claim that islamic world was number1 till 18th century..Now I can bet my life that you have never taken any history class..or seriously studied any subject regarding this..
The classical, and wrong, view of Western biased scholars was "Oh...After mongol invasion, everything was finished"...This theory has been completely debunked by modern Scholarship. Read George Saliba for example...In his book, he looks at detailed manuscripts, food records, scientific production curves, GDP per capita records etc etc...In 16th century, Islamic World are right on top! As I said, it was DURING 16th century that west started rising and Islamic World wasn't keeping up...it took 2 centuries for Islamic World to lose its position of number 1 or global leader of humanity in science, technology, military, arts, culture, economy etc etc..
No it wasn't the number 1 global leader in 16th and 17th century..I can substantiate with references to comparative scientific achievements,number of higher educational institutions,military technology etc in those centuries.You can definitely see that islamic empires weren't number 1 super powers in 16th and 17th centuries,let alone remaining number1 till 18th century...Same applies to Islamic World of 16th to 18th century...though it was losing to Europe gradually, it was still "the number one" global leader of the planet...
Its funny you claim that Islam had lost its superiority in 14th century where-as the Ottoman Empire achieved its HEIGHT of superiority/power in mid 16th century...I don't even want to talk about the wealth of Mughals and other Islamic Empires in Persia, Afghanistan, Central Asia etc...
Unbelievable post!! Could you support these bad guys who target innocent civilians more openly than this? Your own religion in its true context forbids from targeting women, children and elderly SPECIFICALLY. And here you are....supporting open terrorism???
The US ALLOWS its people to conduct activities as they please to as it is a democratic society. We don't go down on our knees in front of these terrorists nor do we refuse people's democratic rights to them for any reason.
If these guys were denied entry or were canceled their naturalized US citizenship due to them being suspects a long time ago, somehow, I think your post would still be anti-US that the US doesn't like muslims living there, etc, etc and how they canceled "innocent muslims" citizenship. But that didn't happen.
Instead, these idiots killed innocent people and your post still is anti-US. So for people like this, nothing we can do that'll change your ways of thinking. You have a very close mind towards the US and that's just a reality. Sorry, can't help ya.
Very idiotic post...
Criticizing the American agencies who get paid for protecting their citizens is equal to supporting terrorism...
How daft can one be?
Somebody who was being watched by FBI for years including their internet activities,managed to pull of such a large scale terrorist act on such a heavily guarded and important event is shameful for American agencies,and if they are ill equipped to do their job,they should be given more equipment.That is more important than spending billions on a "Death star"
So how do you contemplate this and my previous posts as supporting terrorism? Mr Bigoted amreekan.
I too disagree with the claim that mangol invation finished off islamic golden age..Where i disagree with you is in the broad claim that islamic world was number1 till 18th century..
No it wasn't the number 1 global leader in 16th and 17th century..I can substantiate with references to comparative scientific achievements,number of higher educational institutions,military technology etc in those centuries.You can definitely see that islamic empires weren't number 1 super powers in 16th and 17th centuries,let alone remaining number1 till 18th century..
Very idiotic post...
Criticizing the American agencies who get paid for protecting their citizens is equal to supporting terrorism...
How daft can one be?
Somebody who was being watched by FBI for years including their internet activities,managed to pull of such a large scale terrorist act on such a heavily guarded and important event is shameful for American agencies,and if they are ill equipped to do their job,they should be given more equipment.That is more important than spending billions on a "Death star"
So how do you contemplate this and my previous posts as supporting terrorism? Mr Bigoted amreekan.