What's new

Beheading the Blacksmith of Balkh: Iranian Americans scapegoated again

Juicer

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Nov 24, 2015
Messages
107
Reaction score
0
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Location
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
A radicalised, American-born Pakistani went to Saudi Arabia and married another Pakistani brainwashed with an extremist version of Wahhabism that is the Saudi state religion. The couple came to the US and shot up a Christmas office party killing 14 people.

Guess who is being chosen for punishment for this despicable crime? Iranian Americans, who have never shared that extremist ideology and who, as far as we know, have never had anything to do with this or any other act of terrorism anywhere in the world.

The passage by the United States House of Representatives of the Visa Waiver Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act, or HR 158, brings to mind a Persian story about a ruler who heard a blacksmith had committed a crime in the city of Balkh, now in northern Afghanistan. In his desire to appear swift in meting out justice he ordered the arrest and beheading of the culprit.

But, as Balkh was too far away, the ruler decreed that beheading any blacksmith would do. And yet his henchmen were unable to find such an artisan in nearby towns. All they found was a coppersmith in the city of Shushtar in western Iran. So, our zealous ruler called for the execution of the poor coppersmith of Shushtar lest the crime of the blacksmith of Balkh went unpunished.

The US House of Representatives just reenacted that story. If backed by the Senate and president, then the new law will bar Iranian-Americans from a 38-nation visa waiver programme that allows visits to signatory countries for up to 90 days without a visa.

Even if we grant that prudence in the cause of security justifies collective punishment, HR 158 does not punish either Pakistani or Saudis dual nationals. Instead Iranian Americans are to be punished – along with dual nationals from Iraq, Sudan and Syria, as well as anyone who has been to any of these four countries in the past five years.

Why? Two reasons. One: somebody had to be nailed. Two: nobody ever pays a political price for targeting Iranian Americans. This is despite the fact no Iranian national, let alone an Iranian American, has ever been proved to be involved in terrorism in the US or Europe – this should not be confused with the state- sponsored assassinations of dissidents by agents of the Islamic Republic that ended in the late 1990s.

So, why do Saudis receive a get-out-of-jail card every time they land on the terrorism square, as they often do? Because they have been the favourites of the American political elites and its ersatz aristocracy including the Bush and Trump dynasties.

Everyone knows that the never-never desert kingdom ruled by the house of Saud was heavily implicated in 9/11. Everyone knows the Saudis have for decades spread the virulent, hardcore ideology of Wahhabism that is now carried by the Taliban, al-Qaida, Isis, Boko Haram, and a dozen other terrorist franchises from Chechnya and Baluchistan to Chad. And yet, the Saudis appear untouchable.

The kabuki of passing HR 158 was an elaborate show that made the House of Representatives look busy without having the slightest effect on the security of US citizens. The legislation would restrict the travel of people who have nothing to do with terrorism but let the most likely suspects continue their movement without restrictions.

The HR 158 would affect people who have travelled directly between the US and Syria, missing the glaring fact that virtually nobody actually does this: Isis recruits usually go back and forth via Turkey. Why not introduce travel restrictions for people who go there? Because Turkey is a member of Nato and confronting them would be costly.

This is an old story. Iranians had nothing to do with 9/11 while the Saudis supplied 15 out of 19 hijackers of that bloody Tuesday.

But it was not the student visas of Saudi nationals but those of Iranians that were restricted after those attacks. It appears that we are perfect scapegoats again. Unable to find the blacksmith of Balkh, the House wants to chop off the head of the coppersmith of Shushtar.

The Tehran Bureau is an independent media organisation, hosted by the Guardian. Contact us @tehranbureau


Beheading the Blacksmith of Balkh: Iranian Americans scapegoated again | World news | The Guardian


side note : I couldn't colore "Saudi Arabia" words , and I tried it for several times !!! ... PDF editors is really pro KSA !!!
 
.
side note : I couldn't colore "Saudi Arabia" words , and I tried it for several times !!! ... PDF editors is really pro KSA !!!
Because its a link...

iWKad22.jpg
 
.
The passage by the United States House of Representatives of the Visa Waiver Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act, or HR 158, brings to mind a Persian story about a ruler who heard a blacksmith had committed a crime in the city of Balkh, now in northern Afghanistan. In his desire to appear swift in meting out justice he ordered the arrest and beheading of the culprit.

Clicked the link, cannot see anything about Iran. Bottomline, anyone travelling to ME will get questioned on way there and way back. Including American citizens.

Because its a link...

iWKad22.jpg

lol
 
. .
A radicalised, American-born Pakistani went to Saudi Arabia and married another Pakistani brainwashed with an extremist version of Wahhabism that is the Saudi state religion. The couple came to the US and shot up a Christmas office party killing 14 people.

Guess who is being chosen for punishment for this despicable crime? Iranian Americans, who have never shared that extremist ideology and who, as far as we know, have never had anything to do with this or any other act of terrorism anywhere in the world.

The passage by the United States House of Representatives of the Visa Waiver Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act, or HR 158, brings to mind a Persian story about a ruler who heard a blacksmith had committed a crime in the city of Balkh, now in northern Afghanistan. In his desire to appear swift in meting out justice he ordered the arrest and beheading of the culprit.

But, as Balkh was too far away, the ruler decreed that beheading any blacksmith would do. And yet his henchmen were unable to find such an artisan in nearby towns. All they found was a coppersmith in the city of Shushtar in western Iran. So, our zealous ruler called for the execution of the poor coppersmith of Shushtar lest the crime of the blacksmith of Balkh went unpunished.

The US House of Representatives just reenacted that story. If backed by the Senate and president, then the new law will bar Iranian-Americans from a 38-nation visa waiver programme that allows visits to signatory countries for up to 90 days without a visa.

Even if we grant that prudence in the cause of security justifies collective punishment, HR 158 does not punish either Pakistani or Saudis dual nationals. Instead Iranian Americans are to be punished – along with dual nationals from Iraq, Sudan and Syria, as well as anyone who has been to any of these four countries in the past five years.

Why? Two reasons. One: somebody had to be nailed. Two: nobody ever pays a political price for targeting Iranian Americans. This is despite the fact no Iranian national, let alone an Iranian American, has ever been proved to be involved in terrorism in the US or Europe – this should not be confused with the state- sponsored assassinations of dissidents by agents of the Islamic Republic that ended in the late 1990s.

So, why do Saudis receive a get-out-of-jail card every time they land on the terrorism square, as they often do? Because they have been the favourites of the American political elites and its ersatz aristocracy including the Bush and Trump dynasties.

Everyone knows that the never-never desert kingdom ruled by the house of Saud was heavily implicated in 9/11. Everyone knows the Saudis have for decades spread the virulent, hardcore ideology of Wahhabism that is now carried by the Taliban, al-Qaida, Isis, Boko Haram, and a dozen other terrorist franchises from Chechnya and Baluchistan to Chad. And yet, the Saudis appear untouchable.

The kabuki of passing HR 158 was an elaborate show that made the House of Representatives look busy without having the slightest effect on the security of US citizens. The legislation would restrict the travel of people who have nothing to do with terrorism but let the most likely suspects continue their movement without restrictions.

The HR 158 would affect people who have travelled directly between the US and Syria, missing the glaring fact that virtually nobody actually does this: Isis recruits usually go back and forth via Turkey. Why not introduce travel restrictions for people who go there? Because Turkey is a member of Nato and confronting them would be costly.

This is an old story. Iranians had nothing to do with 9/11 while the Saudis supplied 15 out of 19 hijackers of that bloody Tuesday.

But it was not the student visas of Saudi nationals but those of Iranians that were restricted after those attacks. It appears that we are perfect scapegoats again. Unable to find the blacksmith of Balkh, the House wants to chop off the head of the coppersmith of Shushtar.

The Tehran Bureau is an independent media organisation, hosted by the Guardian. Contact us @tehranbureau


Beheading the Blacksmith of Balkh: Iranian Americans scapegoated again | World news | The Guardian


side note : I couldn't colore "Saudi Arabia" words , and I tried it for several times !!! ... PDF editors is really pro KSA !!!
Did you know the Saudi representative to UN assigned as the head of human rights council of UN!!?
It is not funny... Like what a famous philosopher said once:

"It is jungle..and every rule in the jungle makes sense..becoz it is a jungle"

Scythian500
 
. . .
Relax.

Lots of Iranian professors are their in American varsities teaching science and stuff. Go ask them if they have ever been discriminated in any way.
 
.
Relax.

Lots of Iranian professors are their in American varsities teaching science and stuff. Go ask them if they have ever been discriminated in any way.
just to know yourself better, here is just one example:

Exclusive: Iranian Scientist Speaks of Ordeal in US Jail
13931029000856_PhotoI.jpg

TEHRAN (FNA)- Iran's internationally acclaimed Professor Mojtaba Atarodi, who was kept in US jails for more than 17 months on unfounded allegations, disclosed his catastrophic conditions and ordeal in the US in remarks on Monday.
The 54-year-old scientist is a microchip expert and associate professor at the prestigious Sharif University of Technology. He is the author or coauthor of dozens of scientific papers dealing with microchip technology.

The university professor was arrested upon arrival in the US on December 7, 2011 and was set free after 17 months of incarceration in April, 2013.

Speaking in an exclusive interview, Professor Atarodi explained that upon his arrival in the US and after stepping off the plane in Los Angeles he was detained and interrogated for more than two hours at the airport.

He complained that he had been arrested and imprisoned even before the US law enforcement or judicial bodies officially pressed charges against him.

He said he was next imprisoned in a US jail where he was mistreated and forced to take off all his clothes before he went unconscious, explaining that the US law enforcement and judicial bodies did not even mention his charges when taking him to prison.

"I answered all their questions during the interrogations although I knew that I had done nothing wrong. Of course, I was not in good conditions after a 14-hour flight to the US and I had undergone a heart surgery …," Professor Atarodi added.

He said the behavior of the interrogators disclosed to him that they had checked all his emails and intended to make him confess to some false charges by using the personal information that they had gathered through reading his mails.

"Of course, I rejected all the offenses that they were trying to make me confess and they were embarrassed after they failed in do so," the Iranian professor said.

He said he was under much pressure during the interrogations due to his heart problems, and added, "When I insisted to go home, they officially informed me that I was under arrest which deteriorated my health conditions."

The Iranian professor underlined that the prison conditions were more torturous than he had imagined.

"The doctors at the hospital did no let me go home although they knew my conditions and I was for two days in the hospital without being allowed to even call my brother who was in the US at the time," the professor added.

Atarodi, who suffers from a critical cardiac problems, said that he had traveled to the US to undergo a medical checkup by a cardiologist. He said two more reasons for his visit were meeting his former teacher, a well-known microchip professor, and attending an electrical technology conference in the US.

He further complained that the court had assigned a Zionist lawyer to defend him during the trial, adding that the lawyer had asked him to refuse going back to Iran and to stay in the US in a bid to see his problem resolved.

"And after I refused to do so, the lawyer told me that the US government wanted to exchange me with a US citizen named Amir Hekmat who was jailed in Iran," Professor Atarodi continued.

"I told them he (Amir Hekmat) is a spy, but I have done nothing wrong," Professor Atarodi said.

Atarodi said that he was charged with violating US exports laws by purchasing lab equipment for Iran's Sharif University, where he works and teaches.

The Iranian professor said that he has written a book on his ordeal in the US prisons which will be published soon.

The US court requested $480,000 to change Atarodi's arrest order to house arrest.

In 2012, an Iranian human rights NGO in a letter to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon asked for the world body's probe into the trial and the usurped rights of the Iranian nationals imprisoned in the US and Europe.

"We urge the UN to accelerate the judicial procedures in the cases of the Iranian nationals who are imprisoned in the West through its special attention, inspection and supervision and require the westerners to respect their (the Iranian inmates') rights," Yousef Pirzadeh, Head of the 'Campaign for Defending Iranian Expatriates' Rights', said in his letter which was submitted to Ban Ki-moon on the sidelines of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) summit in Tehran in August 2013.

Pirzadeh, a businessman, himself was jailed in Germany for 18 months under fabricated accusations of buying military equipment for the Islamic Republic. He has borne different physical and mental sufferings during his imprisonment which started in 2006.

The Iranian government has on many occasions deplored the US and European authorities for their mistreatment of innocent Iranian prisoners held in these countries' jails.

More than 60 Iranian nationals are being held in US prisons, 11 of them on political grounds and without any proof or evidence.
 
.
Iranian Professors in US varsities

which part of it you don't understand ?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom