Before Kathua attack, Pak objected to Indian cameras on the border

[Burhan Wani]

And then will go to unmarked graves.

Losses on both sides.
Our men go to unmarked graves and your straight to ganga and jamna.

 

[Goenitz]

What an imagination, targeting office going people. Which company has is office on the LOC in kashmir region, all we knew was LET and some other terrorists have camp in that region, is that what you call office?
.

the village has school, barabr shops, small scale industries, etc

I dont think so.
Because we started our fencing and countermeasures only after 2003 .And it did work after all.
A few years before thousands had died due to insurgency .Now it is reduced to below 50 that is even after ,,,,.

Point is musharraf completely stopped interference in kashmir and allowed fencing (ow workers would hv been killed.
Later on, givernments didn't support armed struggle in kashmir as per policy and army was engaged elsewhere. US needed Pak army n western border and assured Pak, with its Indian counter parts, that india will not destablise eastern border. As a result Pak reduced armed support to freedom fighters..

 

[Burhan Wani]

Good thing about education is that they can now see whats Pakistan stands for in the worlds eye

It is our war we don't care about anyone.

 

[Viny]

Losses on both sides.
Our men go to unmarked graves and your straight to ganga and jamna.

Atleast ours get what they deserve.
Yours one are left to rot, thankfuly we respect human lifes and give them there last right.

It is our war we don't care about anyone.

Good, so stop interfering in Kashmir.

 

[Burhan Wani]

Atleast ours get what they deserve.
Yours one are left to rot, thankfuly we respect human lifes and give them there last right.

A shameful moment for regional power struggling against youngsters.

 

[Goenitz]

Losses on both sides.
Our men go to unmarked graves and your straight to ganga and jamna.

jigar thanda ho... wasy try commenting with pause so you can argue well.
Point is if kashmirirs aren't willing to be a part of india tehn it is jst a matter of time india would lose it. The time of imperailsm has long gone when few hundered britishers ruled over millions indians. New weapons are so lethal and force multiplier that if kashmirirs were armed now, india by no means could possibly keep holding kashmir.

 

[SrNair]

the village has school, barabr shops, small scale industries, etc

Point is musharraf completely stopped interference in kashmir and allowed fencing (ow workers would hv been killed.
Later on, givernments didn't support armed struggle in kashmir as per policy and army was engaged elsewhere. US needed Pak army n western border and assured Pak, with its Indian counter parts, that india will not destablise eastern border. As a result Pak reduced armed support to freedom fighters..

And there is no use even if you started it again.Of Course Musharraf blocked all of those support after 2003 ceasefire agreement .But we used that interval with maximum efficiency and deployed all type of sensors including motion sensor ,IR and cameras .
Now your Army again started to support but no use .Only few can pass in to border and rest of them will died in process .
Those who managed to escape will swallow bullets of Special Forces lately.

Losses on both sides.
Our men go to unmarked graves and your straight to ganga and jamna.

But the things go to the unmarked graves is still larger than few heros that goes to the Indians heart .In near future only unmarked graves will increase but soldiers will be there with zero casualities.

 

[Burhan Wani]

jigar thanda ho... wasy try commenting with pause so you can argue well.
Point is if kashmirirs aren't willing to be a part of india tehn it is jst a matter of time india would lose it. The time of imperailsm has long gone when few hundered britishers ruled over millions indians. New weapons are so lethal and force multiplier that if kashmirirs were armed now, india by no means could possibly keep holding kashmir.

Kafir hei to shamsheer per kerte hei bharosa
Momin hei to betaigh bhi lerta hai sepahi.
We don't believe in new weapons.
Old chinese Ak47 with rotten UBGL are enough to ruin the sleeps of entire occupied forces.

 

[SrNair]

jigar thanda ho... wasy try commenting with pause so you can argue well.
Point is if kashmirirs aren't willing to be a part of india tehn it is jst a matter of time india would lose it. The time of imperailsm has long gone when few hundered britishers ruled over millions indians. New weapons are so lethal and force multiplier that if kashmirirs were armed now, india by no means could possibly keep holding kashmir.

Wrong .Kashmiri Pundits,Sikhs,Shias,Sunnis that loyal to us is still there .And they like us down there.Kashmir will be there with us .You cant do anything .If they attempted for something Balochistan is there according to our NSA.

 

[Goenitz]

.But we used that interval with maximum efficiency and deployed all type of sensors including motion sensor ,IR and cameras .
Now your Army again started to support but no use. .

If there is a will then there is a way. pak is not supporting at all 'armed' struggle of kashmiri at the moment. Anyway, if pak or china or another indian hostile forces want to go against you, there are so many fonts,not just kashmi (the last point is out of topic but shows pak is not indulged)

 

[Burhan Wani]

And there is no use even if you started it again.Of Course Musharraf blocked all of those support after 2003 ceasefire agreement .But we used that interval with maximum efficiency and deployed all type of sensors including motion sensor ,IR and cameras .
Now your Army again started to support but no use .Only few can pass in to border and rest of them will died in process .
Those who managed to escape will swallow bullets of Special Forces lately.



But the things go to the unmarked graves is still larger than few heros that goes to the Indians heart .In near future only unmarked graves will increase but soldiers will be there with zero casualities.

No man it is your dream.
It isn't video game it is war.
so losses on both sides.

 

[Viny]

A shameful moment for regional power struggling against youngsters.

Ya very shameful for a country who cannot give right direction to its youth.

 

[Burhan Wani]

Ya very shameful for a country who cannot give right direction to its youth.

Yea and send them directly to J&K valley.

 

[SrNair]

If there is a will then there is a way. pak is not supporting at all 'armed' struggle of kashmiri at the moment. Anyway, if pak or china or another indian hostile forces want to go against you, there are so many fonts,not just kashmi (the last point is out of topic but shows pak is not indulged)

And we also have a lots of fronts and options.
And dont drag Chinese in to here .They wont go for a war with us .
We wont waste our source for war with a nation that is still relying on aids.
We have a lots of other options . And we dont need to fire a single bullet for that.

 

[Goenitz]

Wrong .Kashmiri Pundits,Sikhs,Shias,Sunnis that loyal to us is still there .And they like us down there.Kashmir will be there with us .You cant do anything .If they attempted for something Balochistan is there according to our NSA.

You cannot do anything in balochistan. First, you need a host for destabalisation. many armed ''sardars" repented and now in jails. 2nd. you don't share border with taht. 3rd you need physicla presence to dismantle a part (an invasion). 4th God knows what would happen if you succeeded doing first 3 as it would turn sub continent to an nferno