What's new

BBC accepts that AIT is flawed

Morover North was always invaded since the time of Iranian and Greek invasion bringing new settlers in the North. Later came Kushans or Huns and many more.

Kushans became Gujjars and White Huns became Rajputs and Pashtuns

Three ethnic groups found today in Northern Indian/Pakistan.

Most Pakistanis are descended from such Invaders, and most North Indians. But Indian culture was in existence before these guys and they just adopted it.
 
Before the invasions began it is migrations that did small changes in the demography.

My point is if Indian shares similar genetics with some of the Europeans it may be because some of the common races like Greeks settling in India or both India and Europe.
 
Kushans became Gujjars and White Huns became Rajputs and Pashtuns

Three ethnic groups found today in Northern Indian/Pakistan.

Most Pakistanis are descended from such Invaders, and most North Indians. But Indian culture was in existence before these guys and they just adopted it.

But I heard Rajputs are descendents of Scythians, the Hun rule were driven out from the plains of the North into the mountains by king of Malwa and others while we found that many Rajput clans ruled over North for later centuries.
 
This is the real point

@Joe Shearer @Bang Galore


No.

That is NOT the real point.

The real point is that history should be done by historians, not by wise guys forming mutual admiration societies in Internet fora.

Most of the criticism of historical writing and historical analysis comes from utterly ignorant people who have no idea of what is being said by historians today, as distinct from someone might have said nearly a century ago. Such criticism is always based on ignorance, and is sometimes based on politically-infected thinking as well.

Anything else?

BTW, the quote is probably right; our views of the AIT have changed radically over the decades, but to some of us, it still remains the most credible account to say that Indo-European languages were not native, but were introduced from outside, from the regions where the other variants seem to have radiated out, wherever that is, and whatever the way in which these/this was introduced, through invasion (unlikely), through migration, followed by the formation of tribal groupings, through trade and commercial relations and consequent familiarisation of the language. or any other.

My point is if Indian shares similar genetics with some of the Europeans it may be because some of the common races like Greeks settling in India or both India and Europe.

The numbers of Greeks in India were miniscule, and they mainly settled in the cities of Bactria, Balkh and its neighbourhood. The number of Greeks in Greece were much larger, but there were large-scale exchanges of population there as well. The Bulgars and Avars were all over the place, in overwhelming number, during the collapse of the western Roman Empire, and the shrinking of the eastern Empire.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
But I heard Rajputs are descendents of Scythians, the Hun rule were driven out from the plains of the North into the mountains by king of Malwa and others while we found that many Rajput clans ruled over North for later centuries.

It is difficult to make accurate one-to-one identifications of the invaders of past ages and todays ethnicities. It is advisable to read whatever seems current and balanced, and cites both sides of the argument, and to hold one's own counsel.
 
Indians just won't accept that the White Race, is indeed, superior to them.
 
Why are you kids obsessed with being aryans? :undecided:
 
you accepted both white and yellow to be superior to you.. see where it has led you to.. :chilli:



nobody is, except op perhaps..


Yellows aren't superior to us, but yes, Whites are. Their race is the Chosen one
 
White men better than Indian men
The reason white men are the most desirable men in the world - Stormfront

It is a fact that white men are the most desirable men in the world. Recently a dating site called OKcupid did a survey about the preferences of their clients. They found out race mattered. A lot.
Out of everyone white men were the most likely to get messaged and least likely to return messages.
Black women were least likely to get messaged and most likely to return messages.
They also found out that white women have a clear preference for white men. Asian, Black, Indian, and Hispanic women also have a clear preference for white men.

I copied this information about OK cupid from Albert999 who copied it from whitechristiannational

Quote:
Originally Posted by whitechristiannational

"Question by Millie A: Why do women prefer white men?
A survey of over one million college students by OkCupid, an online dating site, showed that women in general preferred white men the most and black men the least. Women were three times as likely to respond to messages sent by white men vs black men. If you don’t believe me, see for yourself, link included below.
This is the opinion of 1,000,000 women.

Asian women
Most: White men
Least: Black men

Black women
Most: White men
Least: Black men

Hispanic women
Most: White men
Least: Indian men, Black men

Indian women
Most: White men
Least: Indian men, Asian men

White women
Most: White men
Least: Indian men, Asian men, Black men

It looks like White men are at the top, hispanic men are second, indians and asians third, and blacks come in last.

How Your Race Affects The Messages You Get « OkTrends
End Quote

Why do women love white men so much even over their own race? I looked to an Asian dating site for the reason they give.
Www.asianpromise.com/chinese_htm
I copied this response as their reason:

"Many educated Chinese women have been to the West or have had experience with Westerners in China . They are familiar with Western culture and like the culture very much. They like Western gentlemen who respect ladies and treat them well in public and at home, qualities which are not commonly seen in Chinese men within China. Being a “Big man” both in public and at home are still common in China .

They like the ability of Western men to put personality above age and appearance, as well as their more refined tastes in sex, which is not solely based on physical needs. Westerners accept, and enjoy, a Chinese woman’s children as well as the woman herself. All in all, Chinese women are pleased with the Western attitude towards love and marriage."

The Asian site also describes traits that western women have that Chinese women don't tend to have. Western women tend to be the equal of their male counterparts. They are more direct, outgoing and independent than Chinese women. Western women also put more value on the quality of their marriage than Chinese women.
There are more unique traits of white women and these traits have complemented white men as white men's unique traits have complemented white women's.
I think it is clear that white women place higher expectations on their men. A white mother will expect more from her son. She trains him to respect ladies and treat them with respect at work and in the home. This is further enforced by watching how his white father treats his mother. In short, all the qualities the Chinese woman and all other women fawn over in a white man is above all else, his white mind.

It has been said that cultures do not create distinct people, distinct people create cultures. We have a superior culture because of the white mind.That takes a WM and WW. Also more than that it is the mother that will mold her children to a greater degree than the father. A White woman's baby will be shaped by the White woman, the child's perspective will be that of the White mother because she is it's caregiver. My white son has the mind of his white father and mother, and the heart of his white mama. The result: the most desirable kind of man in the world; the white man.
 
so you were talking about preference of women to have white partner? lol.
It might make them more desirable, but not superior.
 
The numbers of Greeks in India were miniscule, and they mainly settled in the cities of Bactria, Balkh and its neighbourhood. The number of Greeks in Greece were much larger, but there were large-scale exchanges of population there as well. The Bulgars and Avars were all over the place, in overwhelming number, during the collapse of the western Roman Empire, and the shrinking of the eastern Empire.

Joe sir, have you heard of the Indo-Greek king Dimetrius his coins contains wearing elephant skulls as symbol of the conquest of parts of India. There were many Indo-Greek who ruled over Punjab.
 
It is difficult to make accurate one-to-one identifications of the invaders of past ages and todays ethnicities. It is advisable to read whatever seems current and balanced, and cites both sides of the argument, and to hold one's own counsel.

These new invaders were allowed to marry local women and constituted as new caste of Hindus. I don't think a single group could have origin from multiple invaders.
 
Back
Top Bottom