Nevsky
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2015
- Messages
- 478
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
In one of the most decisive battles of the last 300 years, the military mights of Europe shifted as one world power fell and another arose.
The siege of Poltava was not going well. It was June 17, 1709 and for six weeks an army under King Charles XII of Sweden had been besieging the fortress town near the Vorskla River in the Ukraine. Poltava was proving a tough nut to crack; its Russian garrison stubborn and courageous. The Swedes were veteran soldiers, accustomed to victory, and generally looked down on the Russians with ill-disguised contempt. Yet even Charles was forced to utter a few words of grudging praise when he said, “What! I believe the Russians are mad and will defend themselves in a regular way.”
The summer heat grew almost unbearable, a stifling oven that drained a man of energy and left him drenched with sweat. The soaring temperature encouraged bacteria growth, and wounds festered. Soon, many wounded Swedes died when injuries putrefied with gangrene. Powder supplies were low, too, and much of what the Swedes had was damp. Lack of powder made the Swedish bombardment of Poltava sluggish at best.
Czar Peter I of Russia, later known as Peter the Great, was marshaling a large army just across the river in an effort to relieve Poltava and force a showdown with Charles. A major battle was in the offing: All signs pointed to it. Nothing less than the future of Russia was about to be decided on the banks of the Vorskla, a tributary of the mighty Dnieper.
The battle of Poltava was a phase in what became known as the Great Northern War, a conflict that was destined to last a whole generation, from 1700 to 1721. The roots of the conflict went deep, and centered around the shores of the Baltic, not the rivers of the Ukraine. In the late-17th and early-18th centuries the Baltic and its surrounding waters were basically a Swedish lake, and its shores part of a mighty Swedish empire.
Peter the Great’s Modernization of the Russian State
In 1700 Sweden was at the height of its power. Strong kings, subtle diplomacy, hard-fought victories, and brilliant generalship had carved out a Scandinavian empire like no other. But the Swedish empire was like a magnificent tree with a splendid trunk, thick branches … and very shallow roots. Sweden had only a million and a half people, a tiny population base for a great power. Contemporary France had about 20,000,000 people, for example, and Great Britain some 5,000,000 souls.
The Swedish empire was intact—but the winds of adversity were rising, and might prove strong enough to topple the mighty “tree.” To maintain both its empire and its great-power status, Sweden needed to be constantly vigilant. In a time when absolute monarchy reigned supreme, the issue of war and peace was bound up in the personalities of each respective ruler. The two dominant players of the Great Northern War were Peter of Russia and Charles of Sweden.
A towering figure in Russian history, Peter was also physically imposing. An astonishing 6-foot-7-, Russia’s ruler could be coarse and brutal, and his rages could make his court cringe with terror. He was a powerful man, muscular and lean, and hard manual labor only increased his brute strength. Peter was also afflicted with a facial tic, which under stress could develop into a full-blown convulsion. The left side of his head would jerk violently, his face contorted into a grim mask, and his eyes would roll up until the whites showed.
Apparently Peter was suffering from a form of epilepsy, but his intelligence was unimpaired. To Peter, Russia was backward, medieval and surrounded by powerful neighbors that looked on her with contempt. The only way Russia could take its rightful place among nations was to modernize—and to modernize, Russia would have to look west.
Peter took a trip to western Europe, and upon returning home he set to work, issuing a series of decrees that transformed Russia forever. Western technology was introduced, the coinage reformed, and the western Julian calendar made standard. The Russian year 7206 was now 1698. Since outward appearance can reflect inner thought and character, Peter saw to it that Russians adopted western European dress. Also, and most important, beginnings were made toward the creation of a Russian army on the western model.
In Pursuit of a Russian Sea Port
The Czar knew geography also influences the course of nations. In an era when the sea was an important avenue of trade, Russia was landlocked and lacked a seaport. The Turkish Ottoman Empire controlled the Black Sea, and was too powerful for Peter to dislodge. But what about the Baltic? Or more specifically, the Gulf of Finland?
The Swedish provinces of Ingria and Karelia bordered the gulf to the east and northeast, Swedish Finland to the north. Karelia and Ingria had been a bone of contention between different powers for centuries, a shuttlecock that bounced back and forth as fortunes waxed and waned. But these provinces had generally been Russian until Sweden had seized them early in the 17th century. Peter resolved to get them back.
Since Russia was landlocked, much of its trade flowed through the Swedish-controlled Baltic ports of Riga, Reval and Narva. The Swedes allowed their rivals to use the ports, but exacted a heavy “pound of flesh” in exorbitant tolls and duties. If Peter could regain the “lost” territory, however, he would have a seaport, which would be a conduit of trade and western influence.
Others cast covetous eyes on the Swedish empire; Augustus the Strong, Elector of Saxony and King of Poland, was one of these. Sweden’s King Charles XI had recently died, and a 15-year-old Charles XII ascended the throne. Power politics knows no morality, and Augustus cynically suggested to Peter that Sweden’s Baltic territories could easily be wrested from the feeble grasp of a mere boy.
Peter was interested, but nothing more came of the matter. The tinder had been laid, however, and all that was needed was a few sparks to start the conflagration of war. The necessary spark was provided by John Patkul, a disaffected noble from the Swedish province of Livonia. Hoping for Livonian independence, or at least more autonomy for the nobility, Putkul persuaded Augustus to form an alliance with Frederick IV of Denmark and Peter of Russia. The object of this alliance was nothing less than the invasion of Sweden and the partition of its empire.
The Underestimated Charles XII
The Great Northern War began when Augustus invaded Swedish Livonia in February of 1700. There was no declaration of war, just open and unabashed aggression. Sweden’s position seemed hopeless; surrounded by enemies, the ship of state guided by an untried adolescent.
In truth, the young King of Sweden seemed a reckless boy, more interested in hunting and galloping wildly through the streets of Stockholm than in affairs of state. But there was more to Charles than met the eye. When he heard of the unprovoked invasion, the young king, now 18, took the news with a mature calm. “I have resolved never to begin an unjust war,” he told his council, “but also never to end a just war without overcoming an enemy.”
Charles proved to be a lion, not a cub, and a lion with very sharp teeth and claws. In spite of his youth, the Swedish king was one of history’s great battlefield commanders, a general of real genius who could inspire as well as lead. Over the course of the next seven years Charles XII defeated his enemies in a series of masterstrokes that amazed Europe and created a legend. He first defeated Denmark, a junior partner in the anti-Swedish coalition, then turned his attention to Russia.
Routing the Russians at Narva
In the fall of 1700, Peter was besieging Swedish-held Narva with a large army, and Charles moved east to confront the Czar. The Swedish army was a well-trained and professional force, led by talented commanders and a king of real genius. It was these factors that offset Swedish weakness in numbers. Estimates vary, but Charles was outnumbered 4 to 1, and some say 5 to 1. Some 8 to 10,000 Swedes were marching against 40,000 Russians. The Swedes marched through the howling fury of a snowstorm because, as Charles explained, “with the storm at our back, they will never see how few we are.”
The Battle of Narva was a great Swedish victory; the Russians were not merely defeated, they were utterly routed. In fairness to the Russians, most of Peter’s troops were raw recruits, in some respects an armed mob. Still, Charles’ victory was a triumph over the odds, and Narva was a battle that confirmed him as one of the era’s great soldiers.
The Height of the Swedish Empire
Poland and Augustus were Charles’ next target. By 1702 he had defeated the Saxons, Poles and Russians in a series of battles in which he was usually outnumbered. His legend grew, fueled by feats of incredible daring. For example, the king captured the great city of Cracow with little more than audacity and the weight of his growing reputation. The Swedish king rode up to the gates of the city with only three hundred cavalrymen, drew rein, and shouted, “Open the gates!” When the Cracow commander peered out, Charles hit him in the face with a riding crop. Swedish soldiers pushed through the gates, and Cracow fell without a blow—except for the one applied by the king’s riding crop.
More victories followed, and by 1706 Charles XII and his army found themselves in Saxony, deep in the heart of central Europe. Augustus had been dethroned as King of Poland and Stanislas, a man friendly to Sweden, put in his place. Charles was at the height of his power; Sweden’s military reputation stood at an all-time high, and European dignitaries came to the king’s lodgings at Altranstadt to pay court.
The Swedish Invasion of Russia
While Charles was preoccupied in Poland and Saxony, Peter had at least partly regained the initiative lost on the snowy fields of Narva. With the Swedish king far away—at least for the moment—Peter took a slice of Ingria that fronted the Gulf of Finland, an arm of the Baltic. When Peter came down to look at his newly acquired territory, his attention focused on the mouth of the Neva River, a sinuous stream that snakes its way past a series of marshes and forests and waterlogged islands before emptying into the Gulf of Finland.
The site was desolate, windswept and uninviting—and the last place to build a major city. Officially founded in 1703, St. Petersburg rose from these marshy bogs, Peter’s cherished “window on the west” that would be a conduit for western trade, ideas and technology. But Peter knew he still had Charles to contend with. The Czar sent out peace feelers to the victorious Swedish king, but they were rejected out of hand. For one thing, Peter refused to give up St. Petersburg, still technically Swedish territory, and for another Charles probably felt the Swedes would have no real peace until the Czar was not just defeated, but toppled from his throne.
And so it was that Charles XII decided to invade Russia. With the advantage of hindsight, Charles would have been well advised to treat with Peter. While Charles was busy elsewhere the Russians had occupied Livonia, Estonia and Ingria. The Czar offered to return these lands as part of an overall peace package but St. Petersburg, his toehold on the sea, refused to relinquish.
Charles XII: An Uncompromising King
In 1707 King Charles XII was a far different man from the callow youth who had gone to war in 1700. His face was pocked with smallpox scars—common enough in that era—and bronzed by the sun. Campaigning in all weathers had aged his skin, and crows’-feet gathered at the corners of his blue eyes. Charles did not wear the curled periwig that was the fashion of those days, so viewers could see that he was rapidly balding at the temples, an island of curls staying in the center of his forehead. Charles was tall, about 5’9″, and his height was accentuated by his black, hip-length cavalry boots. The king usually wore a blue Swedish uniform, and on campaign he would often not change his clothes for days at a time.
Charles was a soldier whose ascetic habits are reminiscent of the Knights Templars and other military orders that flourished in the Middle Ages. He led a spartan life, and avoided strong drink. It was as if he preferred the intoxication of battle to the intoxication of liquor. He also had no mistresses, unusual for the time, and was celibate his entire life. If he had a mistress, it was war; real women seemed to be an unnecessary distraction.
As a commander, Charles excelled in the offensive. He had an excellent eye for terrain, and had the ability to size up an enemy’s strength or weakness at a single glance. He was an excellent tactician, not afraid to break the rules if required. In the 18th century armies went into winter quarters, “hibernating” until spring brought better weather. The King of Sweden spurned such conventional wisdom, and actually conducted operations through snow and storm.
Charles wanted to punish his enemies for their aggression, and as the years passed this righteous anger hardened into near obsession. The king refused to compromise even when his victories might have given him a negotiated peace favorable to Sweden. The very qualities that made Charles an outstanding battlefield general did not transfer well on the political and diplomatic fronts. Audacity became rashness, confidence in himself a crippling inability to accept reality. These unfortunate tendencies were to bear bitter fruit at Poltava.
Charles might have marched to the Baltic, recapturing the provinces Peter had so lately seized. Once on the Baltic shores, the Swedes could be supplied and reinforced by sea. St. Petersburg might well be captured, and the Russian presence on the Baltic erased forever. But to the Swedish king these were half-measures. Narva had not destroyed Peter, so why should a Baltic campaign? No, Charles was going to invade Russia, topple Peter, and dictate a Swedish peace within the walls of the Kremlin.